Particle Identification. Particle identification: an important task for nuclear and particle physics Usually it requires the combination of informations.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
CBM Calorimeter System CBM collaboration meeting, October 2008 I.Korolko(ITEP, Moscow)
Advertisements

Particle identification in ECAL Alexander Artamonov, Yuri Kharlov IHEP, Protvino CBM collaboration meeting
HARP Anselmo Cervera Villanueva University of Geneva (Switzerland) K2K Neutrino CH Meeting Neuchâtel, June 21-22, 2004.
PHYSTAT2007, CERN Geneva, June 2007 ALICE Statistical Wish-List I. Belikov, on behalf of the ALICE collaboration.
1 Progress report on Calorimeter design comparison simulations MICE detector phone conference Rikard Sandström.
Particle interactions and detectors
14 Sept 2004 D.Dedovich Tau041 Measurement of Tau hadronic branching ratios in DELPHI experiment at LEP Dima Dedovich (Dubna) DELPHI Collaboration E.Phys.J.
8. Statistical tests 8.1 Hypotheses K. Desch – Statistical methods of data analysis SS10 Frequent problem: Decision making based on statistical information.
30 March Global Mice Particle Identification Steve Kahn 30 March 2004 Mice Collaboration Meeting.
Mar 31, 2005Steve Kahn -- Ckov and Tof Detector Simulation 1 Ckov1, Ckov2, Tof2 MICE Pid Tele-Meeting Steve Kahn 31 March 2005.
PHYSTAT 05P. Catastini Bias-Free Estimation in Multicomponent Maximum Likelihood Fits with Component-Dependent Templates Pierluigi Catastini I.N.F.N. -
Particle Identification in the NA48 Experiment Using Neural Networks L. Litov University of Sofia.
Algorithms and Methods for Particle Identification with ALICE TOF Detector at Very High Particle Multiplicity TOF simulation group B.Zagreev ACAT2002,
Jun 27, 2005S. Kahn -- Ckov1 Simulation 1 Ckov1 Simulation and Performance Steve Kahn June 27, 2005 MICE Collaboration PID Meeting.
TOF (and Global) PID F. Pierella for the TOF-Offline Group INFN & Bologna University PPR Meeting, January 2003.
The Time-of-Flight system of the PAMELA experiment: in-flight performances. Rita Carbone INFN and University of Napoli RICAP ’07, Rome,
PPR meeting - January 23, 2003 Andrea Dainese 1 TPC tracking parameterization: a useful tool for simulation studies with large statistics Motivation Implementation.
A Reconstruction Algorithm for a RICH detector for CLAS12 Ahmed El Alaoui RICH Workchop, Jefferson Lab, newport News, VA November th 2011.
Medium heavy Λ hyper nuclear spectroscopic experiment by the (e,e’K + ) reaction Graduate school of science, Tohoku University Toshiyuki Gogami for HES-HKS.
GlueX Particle Identification Ryan Mitchell Indiana University Detector Review, October 2004.
Feb 10, 2005 S. Kahn -- Pid Detectors in G4MicePage 1 Pid Detector Implementation in G4Mice Steve Kahn Brookhaven National Lab 10 Feb 2005.
28 April 0 Yaxian Mao, Daicui Zhou, Yves Schutz In ALICE Physics Workgroup: High p T and photons ( for ALICE collaboration -- Wuhan)
D 0 Measurement in Cu+Cu Collisions at √s=200GeV at STAR using the Silicon Inner Tracker (SVT+SSD) Sarah LaPointe Wayne State University For the STAR Collaboration.
Physics Modern Lab1 Electromagnetic interactions Energy loss due to collisions –An important fact: electron mass = 511 keV /c2, proton mass = 940.
Summary of PHOS Internal Notes (part I) Rafael Diaz Valdes 10/25/20151.
Fast Simulation of TOF Response A.Galoyan, LPP, JINR, Dubna Used model.
Charmonium feasibility study F. Guber, E. Karpechev, A.Kurepin, A. Maevskaia Institute for Nuclear Research RAS, Moscow CBM collaboration meeting 11 February.
Experimental Particle Physics PHYS6011 Joel Goldstein, RAL 1.Introduction & Accelerators 2.Particle Interactions and Detectors (2/2) 3.Collider Experiments.
Track extrapolation to TOF with Kalman filter F. Pierella for the TOF-Offline Group INFN & Bologna University PPR Meeting, January 2003.
Experimental data by HADES PID method As an example let`s take deuterons and protons with p = 750 MeV/c. Their PDFs are gaussians with mean at β = p/(
Tracking, PID and primary vertex reconstruction in the ITS Elisabetta Crescio-INFN Torino.
Electron-hadron separation by Neural-network Yonsei university.
The ATLAS detector. High energy particle physics Typical detector layout Tracking chamber ElectroMagnetic calorimeter Hadronic calorimeter Muon chamber.
PANDA GSI 13. December 2006 PID TAG Georg Schepers PANDA Technical Assessment Group PID Status Report G. Schepers for the PID TAG GSI PID TAG.
Particle Identification at BESIII Kanglin He April 23, 2007, Amsterdam.
Particle Detectors for Colliders Robert S. Orr University of Toronto.
Some remarks on (mis)identification: separation of pions from electrons Answer the question of the feasibility of p_bar p  e + e - Answer the question.
1 QuickSim - brief introduction - Akiya Miyamoto KEK 22 June 2005 GLD meeting See also.
PID simulations Rikard Sandström University of Geneva MICE collaboration meeting RAL.
Nucleon Decay Search in the Detector on the Earth’s Surface. Background Estimation. J.Stepaniak Institute for Nuclear Studies Warsaw, Poland FLARE Workshop.
Study of high energy cosmic rays by different components of back scattered radiation generated in the lunar regolith N. N. Kalmykov 1, A. A. Konstantinov.
I.BelikovCHEP 2004, Interlaken, 30 Sep Bayesian Approach for Combined Particle Identification in ALICE Experiment at LHC. I.Belikov, P.Hristov, M.Ivanov,
Track reconstruction in high density environment I.Belikov, P.Hristov, M.Ivanov, T.Kuhr, K.Safarik CERN, Geneva, Switzerland.
ESTAR Upgrade Ming Shao USTC. eRHIC – the future of RHIC STAR Regional Meeting, Weihai, /24/2012.
Kalanand Mishra BaBar Coll. Meeting February, /8 Development of New Kaon Selectors Kalanand Mishra University of Cincinnati.
Various Rupak Mahapatra (for Angela, Joel, Mike & Jeff) Timing Cuts.
Calice Meeting Argonne Muon identification with the hadron calorimeter Nicola D’Ascenzo.
Christian Lippmann (ALICE TRD), DPG-Tagung Köln Position Resolution, Electron Identification and Transition Radiation Spectra with Prototypes.
Kalanand Mishra June 29, Branching Ratio Measurements of Decays D 0  π - π + π 0, D 0  K - K + π 0 Relative to D 0  K - π + π 0 Giampiero Mancinelli,
Particle identification by energy loss measurement in the NA61 (SHINE) experiment Magdalena Posiadala University of Warsaw.
V. Pozdnyakov Direct photon and photon-jet measurement capability of the ATLAS experiment at the LHC Valery Pozdnyakov (JINR, Dubna) on behalf of the HI.
Rita Carbone, RICAP 11, Roma 3 26/05/2011 Stand-alone low energy measurements of light nuclei from PAMELA Time-of-Flight system. Rita Carbone INFN Napoli.
Study of Cherenkov detectors for high momentum charged particle identification in ALICE experiment at LHC Guy Paic Instituto de Ciencias Nucleares UNAM.
Study of influence of particle identification and resonances excitation on correlation functions mesured by ALICE setup. 1. Influence of particle identification.
Reconstruction tools for the study of short-lived resonances in ALICE pp collisions at the LHC startup 1.The ALICE 2.Short-lived resonances.
Particle Identification of the ALICE TPC via dE/dx
14/06/2010 Stefano Spataro Status of LHE Tracking and Particle Identification Status of LHE Tracking and Particle Identification Stefano Spataro III Panda.
Performance Evaluation for Open Charm and Beauty Measurement at LHC ALICE PID capability from λ and K s 0 measurement at LHC ALICE 筑波大学数理物質科学研究科 Kengo.
Study of the electron identification algorithms in TRD Andrey Lebedev 1,3, Semen Lebedev 2,3, Gennady Ososkov 3 1 Frankfurt University, 2 Giessen University.
Yet another approach to the ToF-based PID at PANDA
for Particle Identification
Status Report Fenfen An
Experimental Particle Physics
Instituto de Ciencias Nucleares UNAM
Simulation study for Forward Calorimeter in LHC-ALICE experiment
Study of dE/dx Performance in TPC at CEPC
Plans for checking hadronic energy
High-pT Identified Charged Hadrons in √sNN = 200 GeV Au+Au Collisions
Experimental Particle Physics
Electron PID & trigger using EMCal
Presentation transcript:

Particle Identification

Particle identification: an important task for nuclear and particle physics Usually it requires the combination of informations from several detectors Example: a charged particle in a magnetic field Under suitable conditions, the radius R of the trajectory is related to the momentum and charge R =p/z The velocity  may be obtained from a time-of-flight measurement, since it is proportional to 1/  The energy loss E of a charged particle may be described by the Bethe-Block formula, where dE/dx is proportional to z 2 All these informations may be combined to identify low energy particles

At low energies there is need to identify and discriminate ● particles with different Z (protons, He, Li, light nuclei,…) ● different isotopes of the same Z (p/d/t, 3He/4He,…) This is usually accomplished by combined dE/E and TOF techniques

At high energies particles have all Z=1 and most of them have relativistic speed There is need to identify and discriminate ● electrons/muons/pions/kaons/protons ● electrons/photons/neutral pions This is usually accomplished by different techniques tuned to the different momentum ranges: dE/dx, TOF, Cherenkov, TRD,...

Particle identification techniques and detector geometries have to take into account the usual penetration capabilities of the different species.

Large experiments wish to detect and identify as much as possible all the particles produced in each event. To this aim, a combination of different detectors and tehniques is used, to have good reconstruction efficiency in a large momentum range (0.1 – few GeV/c). For instance, in ALICE, a combination of the information from ITS (silicon), TPC, TOF, TRD and RHIC detectors is used. When the track is identified in more than one detector, the combined information is taken into acount.

Particle identification in the silicon detectors The measurement of energy loss in thin silicon layers may be used for PID in the non-relativistic region.

Previous equation only gives the average value of the energy loss. However, the energy loss is a statistical process with fluctuations. Two cases: a)Thick absorbers (large number of collisions): Gaussian distribution b)Thin absorber (small number of collisions): extremely difficult to evaluate. Approximation: Landau distribution

Landau distribution Long tail in the high energy side, asymmetric distribution Most probable energy loss Mean energy loss

Simulation of dE/dx in keV and MIP units for pions of MeV/c in a silicon detector

The truncated mean approach: in a multi-layer detector, evaluate the mean excluding one or more values, especially the largest ones which may come from the high energy tail. ΔE1ΔE1 ΔE2ΔE2 ΔE3ΔE3 ΔE4ΔE4 ΔE5ΔE5 ΔE6ΔE6

ΔE-p plot for pions, kaons and protons in the ALICE ITS (6 layers). The truncated mean approach is used. How to identify such particles? Distribution of truncated mean energy loss in the ALICE ITS for pions, kaons and protons of 400 MeV/c

Separation between particle species is made, for each given momentum interval, by the PID probability for each type of particle. (PID probability) i = g i /Σg i g i = gaussian value for each species (centroid from Bethe-Bloch function, with a σ

The Bayesian approach The probability to be a particle of type i if a signal s is observed - w(i | s) – depends on the conditional probability - r(s | i) - to observe a signal s if a particle i crosses the detector and on the “a priori” probabilities C i (how often such particle species are detected). A priori probabilities may be estimated from simulations through event generators or from other detectors. W(i | s) = PID weights Identify the particle according to the largest PID weight (with some threshold?)

PID results Define PID Efficiency = N corr /N true PID Contamination = N incorr /(N incorr +N corr ) N corr = No. of correctly identified particles N incorr = No. of misidentified particles N true = True number of particles of that species

Momentum dependence of PID efficiency and contamination for pions, kaons and protons in the ALICE ITS.

Particle identification with TPC Again, the Bethe-Bloch function is used to describe the energy loss of particles as a function of their momentum, especially in the relativistic rise region.

The mean value (truncated mean) of the energy loss is gaussian, with a standard deviation determined by the detector properties. dE/dx distribution for various particles of p=0.5 GeV/c

The general way to quantify the separation power between particles A and B is to consider the difference in energy loss compared to standard deviation Typical examples of separation power as a function of momentum

Particle identification with TRD and RHIC Such detectors are used for TRD: Improve electron/pion separation by a large factor (pion rejection of 100 for large momenta) RHIC: Improve the overall PID at very large momenta (See specific lectures on the working principle of such devices)

TRD may contribute also to pion, kaon and proton PID

Particle identification with the TOF (Time-Of-Flight) The time-of-flight technique may be used to separate particles with intermediate momenta (a few GeV/c), depending on the time resolution. In ALICE, the TOF system is built with MRPC (Multigap- Resistive-Plate-Chambers), with a time resolution around 80 ps. In such conditions, a pion/kaon separation better than 3 σ is achieved up to 2.5 GeV/c, and kaon/proton up to 4 GeV/c.

The combined PID The method can be applied to combine PID information from several detectors Consider the whole detector of N different detectors: Vector of PID signals in N detectors If the PID measurements are uncorrelated over the different detectors,

The PID weights combined over the whole system of detectors will be -If a detector is not able to provide PID, its PID weights are set equal, and its contribution cancels out in the product -When several detectors may provide PID, they contribute together, improving the overall information

Items not covered in detail: Neutral particle identification: especially neutral pions and photons

Principal-Component- Analysis (PCA) of showers A shower in a calorimeter may be characterized by different parameters: Lateral dispersion, two ellipse axes, sphericity parameter, core energy, largest fraction of energy deposited in a single crystal, … Instead of working in a multidimensional space to find the cuts (which is not an easy task), the principal components may be obtained by diagonalization of the covariance matrix of the original parameters. The two most significant components (largest eigenvalues) allow to work in a 2-D space to find selection criteria.

Principal-Component-Analysis of showers in a photon detector

Neural-network approach Several applications exist for particle identification with neural network algorithms Just one example: π 0 / γ discrimination in ALICE Neural network structure: 3 Layers: 1 input (N nodes = features vector) 1 hidden (2 N + 1 nodes) 1 output (1 node: 0 or 1)

Training with 2 event samples: 1)Clusters with single photons 2) Clusters with overlapped photons (from π 0 decay) Typical results in ALICE with the PHOS (Photon Spectrometer) Probability of true photon identification Probability of misidentification of a π 0 as a photon