Y. Matsuo A), M. Hashimoto A), M. Ono A), S. Nagataki B), K. Kotake C), S. Yamada D), K. Yamashita E) Long Time Evolutionary Simulations in Supernova until.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
INAF The advanced evolutionary phases of the massive stars and their explosive yields Alessandro Chieffi Istituto Nazionale di AstroFisica (Istituto di.
Advertisements

arvard.edu/phot o/2007/m51/. Confronting Stellar Feedback Simulations with Observations of Hot Gas in Elliptical Galaxies Q. Daniel Wang,
Stellar Evolution. Evolution on the Main Sequence Zero-Age Main Sequence (ZAMS) MS evolution Development of an isothermal core: dT/dr = (3/4ac) (  r/T.
Thermal X-ray in SNR Patrick Slane Zhang Ningxiao.
Supernova Remnants Shell-type versus Crab-like Phases of shell-type SNR.
Acceleration of GCR in stellar winds and the GCR 22 Ne/ 20 Ne source ratio N. Prantzos (Institut d’Astrophysique de Paris)
Stellar Evolution Chapters 12 and 13. Topics Humble beginnings –cloud –core –pre-main-sequence star Fusion –main sequence star –brown dwarf Life on the.
The Deaths of Stars Chapter 13. The End of a Star’s Life When all the nuclear fuel in a star is used up, gravity will win over pressure and the star will.
Compact remnant mass function: dependence on the explosion mechanism and metallicity Reporter: Chen Wang 06/03/2014 Fryer et al. 2012, ApJ, 749, 91.
RX J alias Vela Jr. The Remnant of the Nearest Historical Supernova : Impacting on the Present Day Climate? Bernd Aschenbach Vaterstetten, Germany.
2009 July 8 Supernova Remants and Pulsar Wind Nebulae in the Chandra Era 1 Modeling the Dynamical and Radiative Evolution of a Pulsar Wind Nebula inside.
The evolution and collapse of BH forming stars Chris Fryer (LANL/UA)  Formation scenarios – If we form them, they will form BHs.  Stellar evolution:
From Progenitor to Afterlife Roger Chevalier SN 1987AHST/SINS.
Supernovae from Massive Stars: light curves and spectral evolution Bruno Leibundgut ESO.
October 10, 2002COSPAR Houston, TX1 X-Ray Spectral Morphologies of Young Supernova Remnants John P. Hughes Rutgers University  Cara Rakowski, Rutgers.
SN 1987A the excitement continues Bruno Leibundgut ESO.
Neutron Star Formation and the Supernova Engine Bounce Masses Mass at Explosion Fallback.
The Formation and Structure of Stars Chapter 9. Stellar Models The structure and evolution of a star is determined by the laws of: Hydrostatic equilibrium.
Stellar Structure Section 6: Introduction to Stellar Evolution Lecture 16 – Evolution of core after S-C instability Formation of red giant Evolution up.
NASA's Chandra Sees Brightest Supernova Ever N. Smith et al. 2007, astro-ph/ v2.
March 11-13, 2002 Astro-E2 SWG 1 John P. Hughes Rutgers University Some Possible Astro-E2 Studies of Supernova Remnants.
The Deaths of Stars Chapter 10. Mass Transfer in Binary Stars In a binary system, each star controls a finite region of space, bounded by the Roche Lobes.
Evolved Massive Stars. Wolf-Rayet Stars Classification WNL - weak H, strong He, NIII,IV WN2-9 - He, N III,IV,V earliest types have highest excitation.
Dejan Urošević Department of Astronomy, Faculty of Mathematics, University of Belgrade Shock Waves: II. HII Regions + Planetary Nebulae.
Stellar Winds and Mass Loss Brian Baptista. Summary Observations of mass loss Mass loss parameters for different types of stars Winds colliding with the.
Zhang Ningxiao.  Emission of Tycho from Radio to γ-ray.  The γ-ray is mainly accelerated from hadronic processes.
Fusion, Explosions, and the Search for Supernova Remnants Crystal Brogan (NRAO)
About the 8 keV plasma at the Galactic Center CEA, Saclay Belmont R. Tagger M. UCLA Muno M. Morris M. Cowley S. High Energy Phenomena in the Galactic Center.
Current understandings on dust formation in supernovae Takaya Nozawa (NAOJ, Division of theoretical astronomy) 2014/06/25 Main collaborators: Masaomi Tanaka.
Linear analysis of the standing accretion shock instability with non-spherical accretion flows Kazuya Takahashi with Yu Yamamoto, Shoichi Yamada (Waseda.
Rino Bandiera, Arcetri Obs., Firenze, ItalyA Basic Course on SNRs A Basic Course on Supernova Remnants Lecture #1 –How do they look and how are observed?
Cas A 超新星残骸中の ダストの進化と熱放射 野沢 貴也 東京大学数物連携宇宙研究機構(IPMU) 共同研究者 小笹 隆司 ( 北大 ), 冨永望 ( 国立天文台 ), 前田啓一 (IPMU), 梅田秀之 ( 東大 ), 野本憲一 (IPMU/ 東大 )
THE EXPANSION ASYMMETRY AND AGE OF THE CASSIOPEIA A SUPERNOVA REMNANT XinZhou
COS Observations of the Chemical Composition of SNR LMC N132D France et al. Ben Folsom and Sharlene Rubio.
Gas mixing and Star formation by shock waves and turbulence Claudio Melioli Elisabete M. de Gouveia Dal Pino (IAG-USP)
K S Cheng Department of Physics University of Hong Kong Collaborators: W.M. Suen (Wash. U) Lap-Ming Lin (CUHK) T.Harko & R. Tian (HKU)
Red Giant Phase to Remnant (Chapter 10). Student Learning Objective Describe or diagram the evolutionary phases from the beginning of stellar formation.
Feedback Observations and Simulations of Elliptical Galaxies –Daniel Wang, Shikui Tang, Yu Lu, Houjun Mo (UMASS) –Mordecai Mac-Low (AMNH) –Ryan Joung (Princeton)
Progenitor stars of supernovae Poonam Chandra Royal Military College of Canada.
Low-Mass Star Formation, Triggered by Supernova in Primordial Clouds Masahiro N. Machida (Chiba University) Kohji Tomisaka (NAOJ) Fumitaka Nakamura (Niigata.
Formation of Dust in Supernovae and Its Ejection into the ISM Takaya Nozawa (IPMU, Univ. of Tokyo) Collaborators; T. Kozasa (Hokkaido Univ.), N. Tominaga.
Neutron Star Kicks Chris Fryer Aimee Hungerford Frank Timmes  Observational Evidence and constraints on kicks  Theoretical kick mechanisms.
Magneto-hydrodynamic Simulations of Collapsars Shin-ichiro Fujimoto (Kumamoto National College of Technology), Collaborators: Kei Kotake(NAOJ), Sho-ichi.
NIRI Observations of Type Ia Supernovae Christopher L. Gerardy University of Texas, Austin Peter GarnavichNotre Dame Peter Hoeflich, UT Austin J. Craig.
Evolution of Newly Formed Dust in Population III Supernova Remnants and Its Impact on the Elemental Composition of Population II.5 Stars Takaya Nozawa.
「すざく」 による超新星残骸 RCW86 の観測 Suzaku Observations of Supernova Remnant RCW86 山口 弘悦 (理研) Hiroya Yamaguchi (RIKEN) ← Preliminary image of the Suzaku mapping observation.
Formation and evolution of dust in Type IIb SN: Application to Cas A Takaya Nozawa (IPMU, Univ. of Tokyo) Collaborators; T. Kozasa (Hokkaido Univ.), N.
The Deaths of Stars Please press “1” to test your transmitter.
Study on the growth and time-variability of fluctuations in super-sonic flows: toward more realistic investigations on SASI K. Takahashi & S. Yamada (Waseda.
Formation and evolution of dust in hydrogen-poor supernovae Takaya Nozawa (IPMU, Univ. of Tokyo) Collaborators; T. Kozasa (Hokkaido Univ.), N. Tominaga.
High energy Astrophysics Mat Page Mullard Space Science Lab, UCL 7. Supernova Remnants.
On The Fate of a WD Highly Accreting Solar Composition Material Irit Idan 1, Nir J. Shaviv 2 and Giora Shaviv 1 1 Dept. Of Physics Technion Haifa Israel.
Prof. dr. A. Achterberg, Astronomical Dept., IMAPP, Radboud Universiteit.
Matteo Cantiello Astronomical Institute Utrecht Binary star progenitors of long GRBs M. Cantiello, S.-C. Yoon, N. Langer, and M. Livio A&A 465, L29-L33.
Waseda univ. Yamada lab. D1 Chinami Kato
ALMA observations of Molecules in Supernova 1987A
The signature of a wind reverse shock in GRB’s Afterglows
SN 1987A: The Formation & Evolution of Dust in a Supernova Explosion
Vikram V Dwarkadas University of Chicago
Supernovae and Gamma-Ray Bursts
Observations: Cosmic rays
The Deaths of Stars.
Stellar Evolution Chapters 12 and 13.
PRE(Photospheric Radius Expansion) X-ray burst simulation with MESA(Modules for Experiments in Stellar Astrophysics) rd CHEA Workshop Gwangeon.
Supernova Nucleosynthesis and Extremely Metal-Poor Stars
Nucleosynthesis in jets from Collapsars
Stellar Evolution.
The X-ray information on the progenitors of Core-Collapse Supernovae
Formation and evolution of dust in hydrogen-poor supernovae
Presentation transcript:

Y. Matsuo A), M. Hashimoto A), M. Ono A), S. Nagataki B), K. Kotake C), S. Yamada D), K. Yamashita E) Long Time Evolutionary Simulations in Supernova until SNR phase Included the Uncertainties of CSMs A :Kyushu university B : RIKEN C : Fukuoka university D : Waseda university E : Yamanashi university MMCOCOS December 2 – 6, 2013

Cassiopeia A (Cas A) Hwang et al This indicates the mixing between Si- and Fe-rich matters during the expansion. Badences 2010

From the observations, … There is the emission line of Fe in Cas A. It is likely that Fe exist outside the Si. Nobody have simulated the evolution of the elements from the onset of SN explosion to SNR phase. So we try to simulate the SN shock expansion and trace the elements (in particular H,He,O,Si,Fe) from the onset of the explosion to SNR phase (330 yr). In this study, we investigate whether Fe collides with the reverse shock at which the fluid instability develops. Motivation

Progenitors 6 M  He core model (Hashimoto 1995) and 3.8 M  CO core model Circumstellar mediums (CSMs) We assumed that CSM consists of RSG wind and/or WR wind. We adopted the several wind parameters ( for details, please see my poster) Initial models Density profiles of the progenitor models Density profiles of the CSM models

Results In the case of 6M  He core models, Fe does not collide with the reverse shock in most CSM models. In the case of 3.8M  CO core models, Fe collides with the reverse shock in slow wind models. 6.0M  He core and slow wind (T WR = 4000 yr) 3.8M  CO core and slow wind (T WR = 4000 yr) Fe would be mixed because the fluid instability develops around the reverse shock region. Red: H, green:He, blue:O, pink:Si, aqua:Fe

Initial model Progenitor M  He core model (Hashimoto 1995) Circumstellar medium (CSM) --- RSG wind only SN explosion We input the thermal energy ( 4×10 51 erg) to simulate the SN ejecta. Perturbation: Resolution: 2000 (r) × 100 (θ) When the blast wave reaches near the outer boundary of the computational domain, we increase the domain by a factor of 1.1 to trace the shock until SNR phase. Numerical methods

Circumstellar Medium: only RSG wind Results X Fe

Elements distribution He O-rich Si-rich Fe-rich We can see the mixing between He and O. However, we cannot see the mixing between Si and Fe.

1D analysis forward shock reverse shock Time distribution of particle positions Red: H, green:He, blue:O, pink:Si, aqua:Fe Fe and Si would be mixed if I change the density distribution of CSM so that Fe-rich ejecta will collide with the reverse shock. In this model, He and O are mixed but Si and Fe ejecta are not mixed. O collides with reverse shock at which RTI develops, but Fe does not. We try other CSM models to investigate the possibility that Fe collides with the reverse shock.

Circumstellar medium models We assume that CSM consists of RSG wind and/or WR wind. We adopt the following parameters: Wind velocity (V RSG and V WR ) and duration time of WR wind (T WR ) Fast wind models V RSG = 20 km/s, V WR = 3.4 × 10 3 km/s, T WR = 0, 1000, 2000, 4000 yr Middle wind models V RSG = 10 km/s, V WR = 1.7 × 10 3 km/s, T WR = 0, 2000, 4000, 8000 yr Slow wind models V RSG = 5 km/s, V WR = 8.5 × 10 2 km/s, T WR = 0, 4000, 8000, yr We investigate whether Fe collides with the reverse shock under these CSM models.

The position of shocks and Fe RSG wind modelR FS (pc)R RS (pc) Slow RSG wind Middle RSG wind Fast RSG wind WR wind modelR FS (pc) R RS (pc) Slow wind model (T WR =4000yr) Slow wind model (T WR =8000yr) Slow wind model (T WR =16000yr) Middle wind model (T WR =2000yr) Middle wind model (T WR =4000yr) Middle wind model (T WR =8000yr) Fast wind model (T WR =1000yr) Fast wind model (T WR =2000yr) Fast wind model (T WR =4000yr) Fe ~ 1.2 pc

2D results of the slow wind model Slow wind model ( T WR = 8000 yr) RTI develops around the O-rich region. But Fe –rich matter are not mixed because … 1) the mixing time of Fe are not enough to mix 2) Fe are not mixed in the star before the shock pass through the stellar surface. The expansion velocity of Fe is too slow.

From the observations, Fe reaches at the reverse shock ( r = 1.6 pc ) 1.6 pc / 330 yr = 4740 km/s ~ 5000 km/s So, we need that the Fe-velocity is about 5000 km/s at least. Now, V Fe in our models is km/s at most. We need to increase the expansion velocity of Fe by a factor of ~ 1.5 at least. Fe need to be mixed up to the O-rich layers when the shock pass through the stellar surface. How do we need the expansion velocity of Fe ?

Fluid element velocity (slow RSG wind) The ejecta expand at constant velocity after the ejecta reach the stellar surface. Expansion velocities of … O ~ 4000 – 6000 km/s Si ~ 3500 – 4000 km/s Fe ~ 3000 – 3500 km/s Red: H, green:He, blue:O, pink:Si, aqua:Fe

From the observation, Fe reach at the reverse shock ( r = 1.6 pc ) 1.6 pc / 330 yr = 4740 km/s ~ 5000 km/s So, we need that the Fe-velocity is about 5000 km/s Now, V Fe in our models is km/s. We need to increase the expansion velocity of Fe by a factor of ~ 1.5 at least. Fe need to be mixed up to the O-rich layers when the shock pass through the stellar surface. How do we need the expansion velocity of Fe ?

We try to simulate the formation of SNR from onset of SN explosion and compare the results and the observation of Cas A. From the observation, Fe reaches at reverse shock and it is likely that Fe and SI mixed during the explosion. In all our models, Si and Fe are not mixed because the mixing between SI and Fe at SN explosion are not enough that Fe collides with the reverse shock. We find that expansion velocity of Fe need to be increased by a factor of ~ 1.5 at least and this problem is not solved if CSM distribution are changed. We should the estimate of growth rate of RTI to investigate the reason why Fe are not mixed in the star. So, we will try to mix Fe to O-shell artificially and investigate the possibilities that Fe would exist outside the Si. Summary

Our simulations have two parameters Duration time of Wolf-Rayet wind (T WR ) Wind velocity (V wind ) ( Progenitor star have H envelop or not ) Our simulations

Until blast wave pass through the stellar surface ( time scale ~ sec ) Rayleigh-Taylor instability (RTI) Richtmyer-Meshkov instability (RMI) Fluid instabilities during SN explosion Joggerst et al Hammer et al. 2010

Supernova remnant phase ( time scale ~ 1 – 1000 yr ) Rayleigh-Taylor instability (RTI) Instabilities develop in front of reverse shock. Fluid instabilities during SN explosion Veelen et al. 2009

After core bounce ( time scale ~ 1 sec ) Standing accretion shock instability (SASI) Neutrino driven convection However, these instabilities are not key process to mix between Fe and Si because the temperature in shocked matter is too high to synthesize the Fe. Fluid instabilities during SN explosion Henke et al Couch 2013