PCWA Study Plan Physical Habitat Characterization Study Plan –Geomorphology Study Plan –Riparian Habitat Mapping Study Plan –Aquatic Habitat Characterization.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Big Cypress/Caddo Watershed Geomorphic Classification
Advertisements

Middle Fork Project AQ 6 – Fish Passage Technical Study February 3, 2009.
Simone Bizzi In collaboration with: Dr Andrea Nardini Technical Director of CIRF (Italian Centre for River Restoration) Model and evaluate geomorphology.
Step 4: Complete PFC assessment §17 questions about attributes and processes §Reminder – PFC based on: l Water (hydrology), l Vegetation, and l Soil &
Step 1: Valley Segment Classification Our first step will be to assign environmental parameters to stream valley segments using a series of GIS tools developed.
GCSE Geography Enquiry
Clearwater River Habitat/Bioassessment
Geomorphic Impacts of Dam Removal Rollin H. Hotchkiss Director, Albrook Hydraulics Laboratory Washington State University, Pullman, WA
Natural Riparian Resources Vegetation Landscape/Soil Water.
Watershed System Physical Properties Stream flow (cfs) Stream Channel Pattern Substrate Chemical Properties pH Dissolved Oxygen Temperature Nutrients Turbidity.
Channel Repair of Montezuma Creek in Coronado National Memorial following Fire and Flood Damage Stephanie Yard, P.E. & Allen Haden, Aquatic Ecologist Natural.
Healthy Streams Through Bringing People Together
Lewis Creek Reach M19 Phase 1, Phase 2, and Phase 3.
FOR 272 Forested Watershed Management: Water and aquatic resources as the wave of the future for forest management.
ENSC 202 – 2004 Phase 1 Steps 2-5 Watershed Assessment (ENSC 202) Phase 1 – Steps 2-5 Extracted from Vermont ANR Stream Geomorphic Assessment Protocols.
Geomorphic Effects of Dams on Rivers Gordon Grant.
ENSC 202 – 2004 Phase 1 Steps 6-10 Watershed Assessment (ENSC 202) Phase 1 – Steps 6-10 Extracted from Vermont ANR Stream Geomorphic Assessment Protocols.
FOR 272 Forested Watershed Management: Water and aquatic resources as the wave of the future for forest management.
Overview of Exercise Module 1 – Geologic Setting Module 2 – Flow Regimes Module 3 – Downstream Effects.
Biological Objectives Tied to Physical Processes Dr. William Trush Scott McBain Arcata, CA.
IX. 1 See these resources: HDS6-01 (Section 9.3), HEC20-95 (Section 4.3 to 4.7), HDS1-78 (Section 11), TXDOT-02 (Section 4.4), FITD Class CD IX. Overview.
Greg Jennings, PhD, PE Professor, Biological & Agricultural Engineering North Carolina State University BAE 579: Stream Restoration Lesson.
3-in-1 Stream Restoration Using AutoCAD® Civil 3D®, Map 3D, and Autodesk® Storm and Sanitary Analysis Heather Nagel Application Engineer.
Ecology and environment, inc. International Specialists in the Environment The McKinstry Creek & Riparian Area NYSDOT Rt. 219 Mitigation Project Analysis.
Probabilistic Monitoring of Streams Below Small Impoundments in Tennessee Debbie Arnwine Water Pollution Control
Regional/National Sediment Yields: Application of Fundamental Fluvial Geomorphic Techniques for TMDLs National Sedimentation Laboratory Andrew Simon USDA-ARS.
Stream Ecology: River Structure and Hydrology Unit 1: Module 4, Lectures 1.
Hat Creek Restoration Project Hat Creek Restoration ProjectHatRAC PresentationOctober 29, 2013 Prepared by Geomorphic Assessment and Preliminary Plans.
Habitat Restoration Division Coastal Program Partner For Wildlife Program Schoolyard Habitats Chesapeake Bay Field Office U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
2012 Instream Flow Study Agency Meeting on 2012 Draft Study Descriptions January 24,
The flow or movement of water
Suggested Guidelines for Geomorphic aspects of Anadromous Salmonid Habitat Restoration proposals G. Mathias Kondolf.
Step 1: Assess Riparian Resource Function Using PFC §1d. Complete PFC assessment l 17 questions about attributes and processes l Reminder – PFC based on:
Natural Riparian Resources Water Landscape & SoilVegetation.
Channel Modification Washington Dept. Forestry, 2004, Channel Modification Techniques Katie Halvorson.
1c. Determine Reach Potential 1b. Review Existing Information & Delineate & Stratify Reaches 1a. Identify Assessment Area & Assemble ID Team 1d. Complete.
Assessing Riparian Function YOUR remarkable RIPARIAN.
Stream Processes and Habitat Ryan Johnson. Overview Watershed Processes – Factors and their effects on the watershed as a whole Stream Processes – Factors.
PNAMP Habitat Status and Trends Monitoring Management Question: Are the Primary Habitat Factors Limiting the Status of the Salmon and Steelhead Populations.
Claytor Lake Debris Study. Hydro Environmental Services of Kleinschmidt Associates  Shoreline Management Plans (SMP)  Aquatic & Terrestrial Habitat.
San Pedro Creek: A Longitudinal Profile Study Andrew Georgeades Anne Jurek Mary Snow.
Dry Creek Fish Habitat Enhancement Feasibility Study Current Conditions Summary.
National Consultation with TNMC 3 May 2005, Bangkok WUP-FIN Phase II – Bank erosion study.
Baird Claytor Hydroelectric Project Sedimentation Study.
Sensitivity analysis of hydraulic model to morphological changes and changes in flood inundation extent J.S. Wong 1, J. Freer 1, P.D. Bates 1, & D.A. Sear.
To main objectives: Build a seamless, routed stream network across WAM tiles Apply a process based, riparian zone delineation tool Riparian Processes.
October 28, 2015 Yuba River Development Project Slide 1 Licensee Response to Relicensing Participant Tunnel Closure Proposal Yuba County Water Agency Yuba.
Describe the features and characteristics of the Three Gorges Dam.
Aquatic GAP program in Kansas Keith Gido, Walter Dodds, Chris Guy, Jessica Kemp, and Bob Oakes Kansas State University The Gap Analysis Program
Christie Beeman, Andrew Collison, and Mike Liquori Philip Williams & Associates Options for Flow-Control Compliance.
Stream Classification. What factors affect stream morphology? Width Depth Slope Velocity Discharge Flow resistance Sediment size Sediment load Leopold.
Pacific Northwest Side-by-Side Aquatic Habitat Protocol Comparison Test Steve Lanigan, Brett Roper, John Buffington, Eric Archer, Scott Downie, Phil Kaufmann,
Middle Fork Project AQ 3 – Macroinvertebrate and Aquatic Mollusk Technical Study Report Overview May 5, 2008.
Fluvial Geomorphology Environmental Hydrology Lecture 20.
Natural Riparian Resources Water Landscape & SoilVegetation.
NHACC Annual Meeting 2014 New Approaches to Restoring NH’s Rivers Natural Channel Design and Dam Removal Peter J. Walker.
Reservoir and Flow Routing Model Transect Data Collection Water Resources Study Planning Meeting January 25, 2012 Prepared by 1.
Placer County Water Agency Middle Fork American River Project Plenary Meeting February 2, 2009 Handout #5.
Natural Riparian Resources Vegetation Landscape/Soil Water.
PFC Assessment. 1c. Determine Reach Potential 1b. Review Existing Information & Delineate & Stratify Reaches 1a. Identify Assessment Area & Assemble ID.
Teaching Geomorphology in the Field
Middle Fork Project Overview of 2008 Technical Study Plan Implementation April 21, 2008.
Fluvial Geomorphology
Water Testing Project for the North Fork River
Streams Hydrodynamics
Streams Hydrodynamics
Milltown Phase II Draft Restoration Plan
Iowa’s River Restoration Toolbox Level 1 / Base Training
Module # 17 Overview of Geomorphic Channel Design Practice
Kastanis- Existing Conditions
Presentation transcript:

PCWA Study Plan Physical Habitat Characterization Study Plan –Geomorphology Study Plan –Riparian Habitat Mapping Study Plan –Aquatic Habitat Characterization Study Plan Water Temperature Study Plan Hydrology Study Plan Cultural Studies

Geomorphology Study Classify and organize bypass reaches (river reaches downstream of Project dams and/or diversions) into distinct reaches based on stream morphology. Distinguish the relative responsiveness (i.e. “sensitivity”) of river reaches to alterations of flow and sediment regimes. Describe geomorphic conditions of river reaches immediately upstream of Project facilities to evaluate their suitability to serve as reference reaches in later study phases. Identify potential comparison streams (reference reaches) in the vicinity of the MFP if reaches immediately upstream of Project facilities are determined to be unsuitable as reference reaches. Provide the framework for organizing future survey efforts.

Helicopter Survey Sediment contributions from large-scale mass-wasting sites Depositional features at tributary confluences Fine sediment deposits Dominant bank materials Relative presence of large woody debris Potential floodplain locations

Ground Characterization Entrenchment ratio (floodprone width divided by the bankfull width; Wfp/Wbf) Width-to-depth ratio (bankfull width divided by the average bankfull depth; Wbf/Dbf) Sinuosity (ratio of stream distance to valley distance) Water surface slope Bed particle size

Riparian Habitat Mapping Identify the locations of riparian and meadow habitat along the streams and rivers upstream and downstream of the MFP dams and reservoirs, Qualitatively describe riparian and meadow habitats, Identify unregulated streams in the vicinity of the MFP that could serve as comparison reaches for subsequent studies, and Identify potential historical and existing activities that may have or are currently affecting the development of riparian habitat.

Aquatic Habitat Characterization Review existing reports, topographic maps, geological maps, hydrologic units and contributing watershed areas, and other available materials. Stratify and classify habitats in the study streams based on review of existing information, Rosgen Level I geomorphologic classifications, topographic maps, and aerial imagery. Evaluate habitats and strata in the field using helicopter reconnaissance for confirmation and a higher level of resolution. Incorporate Rosgen Level II information for finalization of strata. Select habitats in portions of major strata to be ground- truthed in consultation with resource agencies. Ground-truth habitats in representative lengths of major strata.

Hydrology Assemble the existing hydrologic data available in the Project vicinity into a comprehensive database. Select a preliminary water-year type classification for the watershed, in consultation with the resource agencies. Select the period of record for analysis of Project and unimpaired hydrology. Describe the Project and unimpaired hydrology through a series of hydrologic analyses. Determine if additional data are needed to support the upcoming relicensing. Provide a complete hydrologic data set and corresponding analyses to support the geomorphology, riparian and aquatic habitat, and water temperature studies described in this package.