Insider Guide to Peer Review for Applicants Dr. Valerie Durrant Acting Director CSR Division of Neuroscience, Development and Aging.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ing%20for%20Success.pdf Information from NIH: Louis V. De Paolo NICHD Roger G. Sorensen.
Advertisements

How a Study Section works
How to write a Research Grant? or How to get a grant rejected? Spencer Gibson Provincial Director, Research CancerCare Manitoba.
How your NIH grant application is evaluated and scored Larry Gerace, Ph.D. June 1, 2011.
How Your Application Is Reviewed Robert Elliott, Ph.D. Scientific Review Officer (SRO)
Session 5 Intellectual Merit and Broader Significance FISH 521.
Preparing a Grant Proposal: Some Basics
INSTITUTE OF BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES WRITING GRANT PROPOSALS Thursday, April 10, 2014 Randy Draper, Office of the Vice Chancellor for Research Room 125, IBS.
Grant Writing: Specific Aims and Study Design Zuo-Feng Zhang, MD, PhD EPIDEMIOLOGY
Top 10 Tips for Effective Grant Writing Karen Kidd, Canada Research Chair & Professor, Biology, University of New Brunswick, Saint John Presented at the.
Writing a Grant: Focus on Mentored Awards J. Randall Curtis, MD, MPH Professor of Medicine University of Washington, Seattle,
How Your Application Is Reviewed Vonda Smith, Ph.D. Scientific Review Officer (SRO)
The IGERT Program Preliminary Proposals June 2008 Carol Van Hartesveldt IGERT Program Director IGERT Program Director.
How to write a research proposal (I) Yu-sun Chang Ext 5131 March 23, 2011.
The Life Cycle of an NIH Grant Application Alicia Dombroski, Ph.D. Deputy Director Division of Extramural Activities NIDCR.
How to Improve your Grant Proposal Assessment, revisions, etc. Thomas S. Buchanan.
Formulating an important research question Susan Furth, MD, PhD Welch Center for Prevention, Epidemiology and Clinical Research
Effective proposal writing Session I. Potential funding sources Government agencies (e.g. European Union Framework Program, U.S. National Science Foundation,
Nancy L Desmond, Ph.D. Division of Neuroscience & Basic Behavioral Science Key Things to Know about Research Project Grants (R01)
THE NIH REVIEW PROCESS David Armstrong, Ph.D.
UAMS Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology
Pearls to get your grants funded Steven Kornblau.
NIH – CSR and ICs. The Academic Gerontocracy Response to the Crisis Early investigator status: first real grant application. K awards, R13s etc don’t.
Michael A. Sesma, Ph.D.; NIMH What Is A Strong Grant Application? What Is A Strong Grant Application? Simple steps to a successful grant application Michael.
A Roadmap to Success Writing an Effective Research Grant Proposal Bob Miller, PhD Regents Professor Oklahoma State University 2011 Bob Miller, PhD Regents.
Grant Research Basics. Asking the Question  Before you start, you must have both clearly stated research question and primary outcome measure.  What.
CSR Peer Review of NIH HIV/AIDS Grant Applications NIH Grantsmanship Workshop Diana Finzi, Ph.D. Chief, Pathogenesis and Basic Research Program Division.
Why Do Funded Research?. We want/need to understand our world.
Academic Research Enhancement Award (AREA) Program Erica Brown, PhD Director, NIH AREA Program National Institutes of Health 1.
The NIH Grant Review Process Hiram Gilbert, Ph.D. Dept. of Biochemistry, Baylor College of Medicine Xander Wehrens, M.D. Ph.D. Dept. of Molecular Physiology.
NIH Mentored Career Development Awards (K Series) Part 5 Thomas Mitchell, MPH Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics University of California San Francisco.
AHRQ 2011 Annual Conference: Insights from the AHRQ Peer Review Process Training Grant Review Perspective Denise G. Tate Ph.D., Professor, Chair HCRT Study.
Presubmission Proposal Reviews at the College of Nursing (CON) Nancy T. Artinian, PhD, RN, FAAN Associate Dean for Research and Professor.
"Writing Successful Grant Proposals: Lessons Learned” Don W. Morgan Department of Health and Human Performance Center for Physical Activity and Health.
NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH CHALLENGE GRANT APPLICATIONS Dan Hoyt Survey, Statistics, and Psychometrics(SSP) Core Facility March 11, 2009.
Components of a Successful AREA (R15) Grant Rebecca J. Sommer Bates College.
12/11/2009 Writing a NIH Grant Application Ellen Puré, PhD, Professor and Associate Vice President of Academic Affairs, Wistar Institute Mitchell Schnall.
Funding Caroline Wardle Senior Science Advisor, CISE Directorate National Science Foundation
Tips on Fellowship Writing A Reviewer’s Perspective Wendy Havran.
The Review Process o What happens to your proposal o Two Review Criteria.
National Institutes of Health AREA PROGRAM (R15) Thomas J. Wenzel Bates College, Lewiston, Maine.
Archived File The file below has been archived for historical reference purposes only. The content and links are no longer maintained and may be outdated.
1Mobile Computing Systems © 2001 Carnegie Mellon University Writing a Successful NSF Proposal November 4, 2003 Website: nsf.gov.
Changes is NIH Review Process and Grant Application Forms Shirley M. Moore Professor of Nursing and Associate Dean for Research Frances Payne Bolton School.
Key Elements in Applying for a Clinical Research Grant Niloofar Afari, PhD Associate Professor University of CA, San Diego Director of Clinical Affairs.
Insider’s Guide to NIH Peer Review for Reviewers Richard Kitsis, M.D. Former Chair CSR’s Myocardial Ischemia and Metabolism Study Section.
What Makes a Proposal Successful Dr. George B. Stefano The State University of New York College at Old Westbury October 6, 2008.
Ronald Margolis, Ph.D. National Institute of Diabetes, Digestive and Kidney Diseases Amanda Boyce, Ph.D. National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal.
How is a grant reviewed? Prepared by Professor Bob Bortolussi, Dalhousie University
Restructured NIH Applications One Year Later:
An Insider’s Look at a Study Section Meeting: Perspectives from CSR Monica Basco, Ph.D. Scientific Review Officer Coordinator, Early Career Reviewer Program.
 Where should the idea come from? ◦ The researcher !
ENHANCING PEER REVIEW: GUIDE FOR REVIEW OF RESTRUCTURED GRANT APPLICATIONS.
NIH Grant Application Writing Workshop Significance and Innovation S.P. Sugrue Feb
Pilot Grant Program EGAD Study OCCUPATIONAL & ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH.
Short and Sweet: Selling Your Science in 12 Pages ASBMR Grant Writing Workshop Friday, 15 October 2010 Toronto, ON Jane E. Aubin, Ph.D. Dept of Molecular.
Grantsmanship: The Art and Science of Getting Funded Ronald Margolis, Ph.D. Senior Advisor, Molecular Endocrinology National Institute of Diabetes and.
Down the Road to Funding: Getting That First NIH Grant Dr. Ann M. Schreihofer Department of Physiology Medical College of Georgia
Research Strategy: Approach Frank Sellke, MD Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery Brown Medical School Providence RI AATS Grant Course 2011.
NIH R03 Program Review Ning Jackie Zhang, MD, PhD, MPH College of Health and Public Affairs 04/17/2013.
Grant Writing for Success
NSF/NIH Review Processes University of Southern Mississippi
NSF/NIH Review Processes University of Southern Mississippi
$$ Money $$ (for research) Bob McMurray
Rick McGee, PhD and Bill Lowe, MD Faculty Affairs and NUCATS
Responding to Grant Reviews using a Matrix
8 Ways to Successfully Navigate NIH Peer Review and Get an R15 Grant
Dr. Lani (Chi Chi) Zimmerman, UNMC Dr. Bill Mahoney, IS&T
Dissecting the critical “Specific Aims” page of an NIH grant
Dissecting the critical “Specific Aims” page of an NIH grant MADISON HEDRICK, MA
Presentation transcript:

Insider Guide to Peer Review for Applicants Dr. Valerie Durrant Acting Director CSR Division of Neuroscience, Development and Aging

“I wish I knew then what I know now.” Collective wisdom from experts involved in the process Study section chairs Reviewers NIH staff

What You Need to Know about NIH Review Scientific review is independent from funding decisions Review panels are broad and interdisciplinary Review criteria for research applications: Significance, Investigator, Innovation, Approach, Environment = Overall Impact

Getting Started Do your homework −Talk to NIH program staff about ideas and mechanisms −Ask successful applicants at your institution to share their experiences −Review instructions, deadlines, and guidelines –Develop a one-page summary and discuss with: Experienced investigators at your institution/colleagues Program officers in the NIH institutes

Getting Started Develop your idea/project –Start with significance Current controversies or issues of importance to the field Bring something new to the table Broad enough to be of interest to general field –Keep it focused and feasible –Write about what you know

Getting Started You cannot disguise a weak idea with great grantsmanship… But bad grantsmanship can disguise a good idea.

Writing Your Application Sell your project –How will your study advance the field? −What do we currently know and what will we know at the end? Remember: Significance of your research question/application is not the same as significance of the research area.

Writing Your Application Know your audience: Reviewers –Broad range of scientific expertise and background −Experts in the field, but maybe not in exact area of your application

Writing Your Application Articulate each aim and how it advances the overall project Tell reviewers: –What you will do –Why it is important –How you will do it –How each piece contributes to the whole

Writing Your Application Provide enough detail to show feasibility –Rationale –Methods –Preliminary Data Address potential pitfalls and challenges in the approach

Writing Your Application Help reviewers do their work –Clearly organize your ideas and application –Be succinct –Provide brief summaries of critical elements (review criteria) –Keep it readable –Proofread, proofread, proofread!

Be Persistent Revise and resubmit Don’t panic if you are not funded or discussed –Carefully read critiques –Seek guidance from program directors

Insider’s Guide to Peer Review for Applicants

Want More Information?