Dynamic Signal Workshop January 14, 2016 APA Office Phoenix, Arizona 1.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Parker-Davis Project FES Contract Amendment January 16, 2004.
Advertisements

Arizona Corporation Commission 2008 Biennial Transmission Assessment Workshop I CATS-EHV 2007 Studies Ten Year Snapshot and N-1-1 Jose Silva Salt River.
Arizona Independent Redistricting Commission Analysis of Round Two of Public Hearings 11/29/11.
State of the Arizona Energy System Examining the current state of Arizona’s energy mix in the context of the Clean Power Plan.
Think-Pair-Share What are some limited natural resources that you use on a regular basis?: 1.
David H. Wiggs General Manager Los Angeles Department of Water and Power September 24, 2003.
U.S. Bureau of Reclamation Central Yavapai Highlands Water Resource Management Study [BOR Appraisal Study] Presented by: Ken Janecek January 28, 2009.
Status of Arizona Coordinated Resource Management Efforts.
U.S. Energy Information Administration Independent Statistics & Analysis Balancing Authority Related Proposals for EIA Surveys EIA Stakeholder.
 2005 Pinnacle West Capital Corporation Palo Verde Hub Participant Meeting May 27, 2005 Arizona Public Service Company Tom Glock – Manager Power Operations.
Special Open Meeting of the Arizona Corporation Commission Energy Workshop February 16, 2001 Arizona Public Service Company Cary B. Deise Director, Transmission.
Central Arizona Project Thomas W. McCann January 7, 2015.
Arizona Electric Power Cooperative, Inc.
2/16/2001ACC Energy Workshop – Summer Preparedness 2001 and SS-1 SRP Summer Preparedness 2001 and 2002 Presented to the Arizona Corporation.
Arizona Water Banking Authority December 3, 2014.
Water Use and Resources in Arizona – Part 1 Role Playing Project.
Transaction Privilege Tax Simplification 2015 Arizona Transaction Privilege Tax Simplified.
1 JPA Meeting Joint Planning Agreement Western Area Power Administration Desert Southwest Region July 13, 2005.
9/22/00 1 Jerry W. Smith. 9/22/00 2 Jerry W. Smith.
1.  Purpose  To present Staff’s Preliminary Findings on the 2012 Integrated Resource Plans of:  APS – Arizona Public Service Company  TEP – Tucson.
Helping Government Go Solar 1 Steven Eddy, AICP Government Relations August 21, 2014.
Arizona Water Banking Authority December 4, 2013.
Arizona Transmission System Overview November 18, 2014 Tribal Solar Working Group 1.
Enhancing Interruptible Rates Through MISO Demand Response: WIEG Annual Meeting June 19, 2008 Presented by: Kavita Maini, Principal KM Energy Consulting,
2006 BTA 8/5/ SSC-1 ACC BTA Requirements SRP’s Ten Year Plan Presentation Chuck Russell Salt River Project June 6, 2006 Phoenix, Arizona Arizona.
Solar Incentives for Arizona Public Service, Salt River Project, Tucson Electric Power.
Renewable Energy Investment Fund Lori Singleton, Director Emerging Customer Programs Solar, Sustainability & Telecom 5/1/20131National Tribal Forum.
Arizona Corporation Commission 2010 Biennial Transmission Assessment Workshop June 3 & 4, 2010 Brian K. Keel Manager, Transmission System Planning Salt.
© Copyright 2013, First Solar, Inc. Moapa Southern Paiute and Aiya Solar Projects.
Arizona Topographic Map The topography of Arizona. What would influence you if you were trying to escape back to Germany? What factors would influence.
Lori Singleton Manager, Sustainability Initiatives and Technologies September 15, 2010 SRP’s Sustainability Initiatives and Programs.
Arizona Power Authority Transmission Workshop August 7, 2015 APA Offices/On-line Webinar.
NORTHWEST POWER POOL Reliability Update – Summer 2010 April 2010 Jerry D. Rust.
Virtual Tour March PHOENIX ACTIVE MANAGEMENT AREA ~~ Virtual Tour ~~ arizona department of water resources – phoenix ama Physical SettingPhysical.
Avista’s Flexibility Overview James Gall Senior Power Supply Analyst Contact:
2009 SOUTHEAST ARIZONA TRANSMISSION SYSTEM STUDY REPORT 6 th BTA Workshop Carnegie Library, Phoenix, AZ By TEP on behalf of SATS Participants June 3-4,
Highlights of AESC 2011 Report Vermont Presentation August 22, | ©2011 Synapse Energy Economics Inc. All rights reserved.
WestConnect Activities Charles Reinhold WestConnect Project Manager 2008 ACC BTA Workshop Phoenix, AZ May 22, 2008.
Western Wind and Solar Integration Study Debbie Lew National Renewable Energy Laboratory SWAT/CCPG Meeting Aug 22, 2007.
1 Crisis Management / Emergency Management Overview.
1 Welcome to Load Participation Orientation Elev MenWomen Phones Info Presentation and other Load Participation information will be posted at:
Demand Response: Keeping the Power Flowing in Southwest Connecticut Presented by: Henry Yoshimura Manager, Demand Response ISO New England September 30,
California Energy Commission Staff Paper - April 12,20071 Estimating the Generation Resource Mix of Electricity Imports to California – Energy Commission.
Chandler Gilbert – Estrella Mountain – GateWay – Glendale – Mesa – Paradise Valley – Phoenix – Rio Salado – Scottsdale – South Mountain 21 st Century Maricopa.
Debbie Lew (NREL) TEPPC MWG Feb 6, 2008 Western Wind and Solar Integration Study and Virtual Control Area Study.
Western Area Power Administration Summer Status Arizona Corporation Commission Special Open Meeting May 17, 2000.
Arizona Water Banking Authority December 19, 2012.
Arizona Corporation Commission Energy Workshop February 16, 2001.
Montana Energy Summit April 22, 2008 Ancillary Service – Regulating Reserves.
03/22/07 ACC Open MeetingSummer Preparedness SRP Summer Preparedness 2007 Mike Hummel Manager – Supply & Trading and Gary Harper Manager - System.
Arizona Corporation Commission Power Plant & Transmission Siting Summary ACC Staff Presentation October 30,
The Big Picture Cover Arizona April 15, Gains In Coverage Nationally Q1 2014Q3 2014Q Number gained coverage since baseline (Q Q3 2013)
 Group 1 – Cochise, Pima, Santa Cruz, Greenlee, Graham  Group 2 – Coconino, Apache, Navajo County & Nation & Hopi Tribes  Group 3 – Mohave, Yavapai.
ACC Summer Preparedness Hearing Tucson Electric Power & UNS Electric March 22, 2007 Ed Beck Superintendent Transmission & Distribution Planning.
1 Demand Response A 28 Year History of Demand Response Programs for the Electric Cooperatives of Arkansas by Forest Kessinger Manager, Rates and Forecasting.
12/15/ SS-1 Arizona Corporation Commission Special Open Meeting Gary Harper Manager, System Operations July 23, 2004 Phoenix, Arizona.
1 CATS HV Status Report Presented to the 2008 BTA Workshop May 22, 2008.
CAP Trail Master Plan: Pinal County Segment CAP Trail Draft Master Plan Presentation to Pinal County Board of Supervisors November 4, 2015.
Overview of the Grid Randy Manion, Western Area Power Admin. EPA Clean Power Plan Workshops Farmington, NM, December 7 and 8, 2015 Tuba City, AZ, December.
Arizona Extreme Contingency Analysis 2009 & th BTA Presentation Jonathan Stahlhut, Ph.D. Transmission Planning Engineer, APS May 22-23, 2008.
An Economist’s Law of the River Lesli Kirsch-Burke Economist, Boulder Canyon Operations Office Lower Colorado Regional Office April 8, 2016.
APA Customer Bubble Charts Work in Progress Updated January 25, 2016 (a.m.) (Contact: John Underhill ) 1.
Ed Gerak, Executive Director
2017 AZ Water Association Leadership Retreat July 28 – 29, 2017 Tucson, Arizona Member Services.
Status of Arizona Coordinated Resource Management Efforts
Pseudo-tie business procedure
Town Council Strategic Planning Session
How the Missouri River is Operated - WAPA’s Role - Mid-West Electric Consumer Association Annual Meeting December 11, 2018 | Denver, CO Lori L. Frisk VP,
Yuma County Water Agriculture Water Coalition
Pseudo-tie business procedure
Presentation transcript:

Dynamic Signal Workshop January 14, 2016 APA Office Phoenix, Arizona 1

What is a Dynamic Signal? 2

Dynamic Signal Unilateral Signal This form of dynamic scheduling is used to replace static or manual scheduling for load and generating resources, typically base loaded generation such as Four Corners, Navajo, and Palo Verde. Bi-lateral Signal Dynamic Scheduling (Bi-directional) occurs when two Control Areas’ AGC are electronically linked, allowing them to request and acknowledge desired schedule changes and the ability to cause or change the level of energy flow between them, when 1)The AGC calls for a change in the level of its remote generation or a portion of the receiving Control Area's Area Control Error (ACE) is allocated to its remote generation. ACE is defined as the instantaneous difference between actual and scheduled interchange, taking into account the effects of frequency bias. Examples are the mid-Columbia hydro plants and Hoover Dam. 2)A Control Area is providing regulation service to another Control Area or non-Control Area entity. Car Cruise Control 3

Western Area Power Administration Hoover Dynamic Signal Mead 230kV bus SRP AEPCOAPS TEP APA Customer Loads Zero to Maximum WAPA 4

SVERI Resources and Loads (Southwest Variable Energy Resource Initiative) ( 5

Option 1 (Agree to Value-Extend 10 years) Pending an agreed upon price for the dynamic signal, renew the current SRP contract (the agreement would automatically extend for 10 years). This may require an RFP to establish a current market value for the dynamic signal. Assume that the CAWCD arrangement would be renewed for ten years. 6

Option 2 (Issue RFP to Establish Value-SRP Renewal) Put out an RFP to establish a potential value for the dynamic signal at various levels (suggest 25%, 50%, 75%, 100% of the maximum available capacity). Use these values to discuss with SRP the renewal of the Scheduling Entity/Dynamic Signal agreement. 7

Option 3 (Issue RFP-Dynamic Signal to Highest Bid) Put out an RFP to establish a potential value for the dynamic signal at various levels (suggest 25%, 50%, 75%, 100% of the maximum available capacity). Select the entity or entities offering the highest value for the dynamic signal and providing Scheduling Entity services. 8

Option 4 (Extend SRP/CAWCD for 2 Years) Due to vast and extensive changes forecast for the electric industry, delay a long term commitment and simply extend the contract with SRP for two years subject to successful renegotiation of the SRP payment to APA for the dynamic signal ($5.4M today). This may require an RFP to establish a current market value for the dynamic signal. Assume that the CAWCD arrangement would be extended for two years. 9

Option 5 (Allocate Signal to APA Customers) Allocate the dynamic signal to APA customers and those entities able to establish a dynamic signal with WAPA. This could involve one or more customers and the dynamic signal between entities may be limited to Balancing Authorities (APS, SRP, TEP, AEPCO, and WAPA). 10

Working Examples of Option 5 11

Salt River Project Scheduling Entity Balancing Authority 64,248kw Total 59,234kw A 4,014kw D1 1,000kw D2 Town of Gilbert 1,000kw D2 San Tan ID 520kw A City of Chandler 676kw D1 Fort McDowell 338kw D1 SRPMIC 3,000kw D1 SRP 38,782kw A Customer Point of Delivery Queen Creek ID 1,770kw A Chandler Heights 930kw A ED6 Pinal 8,358kw A Ocotillo WCD 2,115kw A Roosevelt WCD 6,759kw A Mead 230kV Hoover Dam Post-2017 WAPA Dynamic Signal 0 to 64MW Point of Delivery Transmission Reservation

AEPCO/CAWCD Sub-metered under WAPA Scheduling Entity 174,973kw Total 161,600kw CAWCD 3,024kw A 3,161kw B 7,188kw D kw D2 Graham County Elec 312kw D1 1000kw D2 Sulfur Springs VEC 2731kw D1 1000kw D2 Mohave Electric Co. 1145kw D1 1000kw D2 TRICO Elec Coop 3000kw D1 1000kw D2 Avra Water Co-op 100kw D2 Duncan Valley Elect 700kw D2 City of Safford 2101kw B City of Sierra Vista 204kw D2 Town of Thatcher 1060kw B Mead 230kV Hoover Dam CAWCD 161,600kw B Avra I&DD 630kw A St David ID Sulfur Spr 81kw A Silverbell I&DD 710kw A Franklin Irr District Duncan Vly 303kw A Gila Vly ID Graham Cy 910kw A Mohave Valley I&DD 390kw A Post-2017 Customer Point of Delivery WAPA Dynamic Signal 0 to 175MW Point of Delivery Transmission Reservation

Arizona Public Service Balancing Authority 82,971kw Total 49,509kw A 22,450kw B 7,405kw D1 3,607kw D2 Hyder Valley Irrig District 100kw A Maricopa Co. Mun. WCD 8838kw A Roosevelt ID 3219kw A McMullen Valley 3,800kw A 5342kw B Tonopah Irrigation District 1549kw A Aguila Irrig District 2449kw A 3878kw B Customer Point of Delivery Harquahala Valley Power 2490kw A Buckeye Water Cons District 2979kw A ED7 Maricopa 10498kw A ED-8 Maricopa 13,387kw A 10917kw B Markham Irrig and WCD 100kw A Mead 230kV Hoover Dam Silvercreek Irrig Dist 100kw A City of Avondale 547kw D2 City of Buckeye 670kw D2 City of Flagstaff 201kw D1 172kw D2 City of Glendale 426kw D1 City of Globe 115kw D1 113kw D2 City of Payson 119kw D1 173kw D2 City of Peoria 691kw D1 City of Phoenix 3000kw D1 City of Sedona 111kw D2 City of Scottsdale 2366kw D1 City of Tempe 241kw D1 Town of Wickenburg 2313kw B City of Williams 825kw D2 Northern AZ IDPP 246kw D1 Post-2017 ED-3 Pinal (ED-1) 15896kw A Point of Delivery WAPA Dynamic Signal 0 to 83MW Transmission Reservation

Tucson Electric Power Balancing Authority 8,069kw Total 6,439kw A 1,427kw D1 203kw D2 Cortaro Marana ID 6439kw A Customer Point of Delivery Town of Oro Valley 203kw D2 City of Tucson Water Dep. 1248kw D1 Metro Domestic Water ID 179kw D1 Mead 230kV Hoover Dam Post-2017 WAPA Dynamic Signal 0 to 8MW Point of Delivery Transmission Reservation

Western Area Power Administration Balancing Authority 69,952kw Total 56,667kw A 2,649kw B 9,901kw D1 735kw D2 Town of Oro Valley 203kw D2 Hohokam Irrigation & Drainage 100kw A Town of Fredonia 100kw D2 Ak-Chin Indian Comm 102kw B City of Mesa 1497kw B ED kw A Customer Point of Delivery Wellton Mohawk 2910kw A ED4 Pinal 19445kw A ED-5 Pinal 14767kw A Page Utility 1050kw B Mead 230kV Hoover Dam Kaibab Band of Paiute 124kw D1 Hualapai Indian Tri 381kw D1 100kw D2 Gila River Indian Com 3,000kw D1 Aha Macav Indian Comm 332kw D2 Tohono O’odham 2,709kw D1 Pascua Yaqui Tribe 437kw D1 Navajo Tribal Util. 3000kw D1 Tonto Apache Tribe 250kw D1 Post-2017 Point of Delivery WAPA Dynamic Signal 0 to 70MW Transmission Reservation

Need to Establish Criteria to Assign the Scheduling Entity Role to One or More Parties (Should this tie to the dynamic signal allocation?) 17

Pricing Example Reflecting the Value of Hoover Dam’s Dynamic Signal 18

APA 400,000kw x 12 months= $4,800,000 SRP 64MW AEPCO 175MW APS 83MW TEP 8MW APA Customers (Pro-rata $4,800,000) Value of Dynamic Signal Pay $1.00/kW/Month Credit $1.00/kW/Month 19 WAPA 70MW