Duality in Left-Right Symmetric Seesaw Mechanism Michele Frigerio Service de Physique Théorique, CEA/Saclay Rencontres de Physique des Particules March.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
TeV scale Universal seesaw, vacuum stability and Heavy Higgs at the LHC Yongchao Zhang ( 张永超 ) Center for High-Energy Physics, Peking University w/ Rabi.
Advertisements

March 2005 Theme Group 2 Neutrino Mass and Grand Unification R. N. Mohapatra University of Maryland LAUNCH, 2007 Heidelberg.
Morimitsu TANIMOTO Niigata University, Japan Prediction of U e3 and cosθ 23 from Discrete symmetry XXXXth RENCONTRES DE MORIOND March 6, La Thuile,
Gennaro Corcella 1, Simonetta Gentile 2 1. Laboratori Nazionali di Frascati, INFN 2. Università di Roma, La Sapienza, INFN Phenomenology of new neutral.
Fermion Masses and Unification Steve King University of Southampton.
TeV scale see-saws from higher than d=5 effective operators Neutrino masses and Lepton flavor violation at the LHC Würzburg, Germany November 25, 2009.
Joe Sato (Saitama University ) Collaborators Satoru Kaneko,Takashi Shimomura, Masato Yamanaka,Oscar Vives Physical review D 78, (2008) arXiv:1002.????
The classically conformal B-L extended standard model Yuta Orikasa Satoshi Iso(KEK,SOKENDAI) Nobuchika Okada(University of Alabama) Phys.Lett.B676(2009)81.
Neutrinoless double beta decay and Lepton Flavor Violation Or, in other words, how the study of LFV can help us to decide what mechanism is responsible.
How to Evade a NO-GO Theorem in Flavor Symmetries Yoshio Koide (Osaka University) International Workshop on Grand Unified Theories: Current Status and.
Neutrino Mass Seesaw at the Weak Scale, the Baryon Asymmetry, and the LHC Z. Chacko University of Maryland, College Park S. Blanchet, R.N. Mohapatra.
Higgs Boson Mass In Gauge-Mediated Supersymmetry Breaking Abdelhamid Albaid In collaboration with Prof. K. S. Babu Spring 2012 Physics Seminar Wichita.
Higgs Quadruplet for Type III Seesaw and Implications for → e and −e Conversion Ren Bo Coauther : Koji Tsumura, Xiao - Gang He arXiv:
May 25, 2004Kakizaki, Mitsuru1 Flavor structure in supersymmetric models Kakizaki, Mitsuru (ICRR, University of Tokyo) May 25, 2004 We proposed a new alignment.
Oct. 25, 2004Mitsuru Kakizaki1 Flavor structure in supersymmetric models Mitsuru Kakizaki (ICRR, University of Tokyo) Oct. 25, Ochanomizu University.
Non-Standard Neutrino Interactions Enrique Fernández-Martínez MPI für Physik Munich.
March 2005 Theme Group 2 Do Neutrons Oscillate ? Do Neutrons Oscillate ? R. N. Mohapatra University of Maryland Beijing Colloqium, June, 2007.
Richard Howl The Minimal Exceptional Supersymmetric Standard Model University of Southampton UK BSM 2007.
March 2005 Theme Group 2 Perspectives on Grand Unification in View of Neutrino Mass R. N. Mohapatra University of Maryland.
Fermion Masses and Unification Steve King University of Southampton.
The Top Quark and Precision Measurements S. Dawson BNL April, 2005 M.-C. Chen, S. Dawson, and T. Krupovnikas, in preparation M.-C. Chen and S. Dawson,
Fermion Masses and Unification Lecture I Fermion Masses and Mixings Lecture II Unification Lecture III Family Symmetry and Unification Lecture IV SU(3),
Fermion Masses and Unification Steve King University of Southampton.
March 2005 Theme Group 2 PROBING B-L UNIFICATION via N-N-bar Oscillation, Proton and Rare Lepton Decays PROBING B-L UNIFICATION via N-N-bar Oscillation,
Pasquale Di Bari (Max Planck, Munich) COSMO 06, Tahoe Lake, September 25-29, 2006 Flavor effects in leptogenesis Reference paper: S. Blanchet, PDB hep/ph.
Aug 29-31, 2005M. Jezabek1 Generation of Quark and Lepton Masses in the Standard Model International WE Heraeus Summer School on Flavour Physics and CP.
Neutrino Mass and Grand Unification of Flavor R. N. Mohapatra Goranfest, June 2010 Split.
 Collaboration with Prof. Sin Kyu Kang and Prof. We-Fu Chang arXiv: [hep-ph] submitted to JHEP.
Fermion Masses and Unification Steve King University of Southampton.
Minimal SO(10)×A4 SUSY GUT ABDELHAMID ALBAID In Collaboration with K. S. BABU Oklahoma State University.
2. Two Higgs Doublets Model
Takehiro Nabeshima University of Toyama ILC physics general meeting 9 jun Phenomenology at a linear collider in a radiative seesaw model from TeV.
Wednesday, Apr. 23, 2003PHYS 5326, Spring 2003 Jae Yu 1 PHYS 5326 – Lecture #24 Wednesday, Apr. 23, 2003 Dr. Jae Yu Issues with SM picture Introduction.
Shaving Type-I Seesaw Mechanism with Occam's Razor
Lepton flavour and neutrino mass aspects of the Ma-model Alexander Merle Max-Planck-Institute for Nuclear Physics Heidelberg, Germany Based on: Adulpravitchai,
Let us allow now the second heavy RH neutrino to be close to the lightest one,. How does the overall picture change? There are two crucial points to understand:
ILC Physics a theorist’s perspective Koji TSUMURA (Kyoto from Dec 1 st ) Toku-sui annual workshop 2013 KEK, Dec , 2013.
March 2005 Theme Group 2 PROBING B-L UNIFICATION via N-N-bar Oscillation PROBING B-L UNIFICATION via N-N-bar Oscillation R. N. Mohapatra University of.
1 Supersymmetry Yasuhiro Okada (KEK) January 14, 2005, at KEK.
Family Symmetry Solution to the SUSY Flavour and CP Problems Plan of talk: I.Family Symmetry II.Solving SUSY Flavour and CP Problems Work with and Michal.
Seesaw 25 Paris, 10-11/06/04 P. Binétruy, APC, Paris.
A. Yu. Smirnov International Centre for Theoretical Physics, Trieste, Italy Institute for Nuclear Research, RAS, Moscow, Russia NO-VE 2006: ``Ultimate.
March 2005 Theme Group 2 What can N-N-bar Oscillation teach us about physics Beyond the standard model ? R. N. Mohapatra University of Maryland NANO workshop,
X ± -Gauge Boson Production in Simplest Higgs Matthew Bishara University of Rochester Meeting of Division of Particles and Fields August 11, 2011  Simplest.
Neutrino mass and DM direct detection Daijiro Suematsu (Kanazawa Univ.) Erice Sept., 2013 Based on the collaboration with S.Kashiwase PRD86 (2012)
Zhi-zhong Xing 【 IHEP, Beijing 】 Naturalness & Testability of Seesaw Models at the LHC Workshop on Neutrino Oscillations in Venice, April 15-18, 2008 LHC.
Neutrino mass models at the TeV scale, naturally BENE 2012 ICTP Trieste Sept , 2012 Walter Winter Universität Würzburg TexPoint fonts used in EMF:
Geometric -Mass Hierarchy & Leptogenesis Zhi-zhong Xing (IHEP, Beijing)  A Conjecture + An Ansatz  Seesaw + Leptogenesis  -Mixing + Baryogenesis Z.Z.X.,
1 Prospect after discoveries of Higgs/SUSY Yasuhiro Okada (KEK) “Discoveries of Higgs and Supersymmetry to Pioneer Particle Physics in the 21 st Century”
Parity Symmetry at High- Energy: How High? Xiangdong Ji U of Maryland In collaboration with Zhang Yue An Haipeng R.N. Mohapatra.
Probing the new physics heavy bosons at LHC In collaboration with Shou-Shan Bao, Xue Gong, Shi-Yuan Li, Zong-Guo Si and Yu-Feng Zhou Hong-Lei Li
Supersymmetric B-L Extended Standard Model with Right-Handed Neutrino Dark Matter Nobuchika Okada Miami Fort Lauderdale, Dec , 2010 University.
SUSY GUT Predictions for Neutrino Oscillation Mu-Chun Chen Brookhaven National Laboratory DUSEL Workshop, January 4-7, 2005 University of Colorado at Boulder.
Diquark Higgs production at LHC Nobuchika Okada Theory Division, High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (KEK) In collaboration with Rabindra Nath.
Introduction to Flavor Physics in and beyond the Standard Model Enrico Lunghi References: The BaBar physics book,
M. Frank, K. H., S.K. Rai (arXiv: ) Phys.Rev.D77:015006, 2008 D. Demir, M. Frank, K. H., S.K. Rai, I.Turan ( arXiv: ) Phys.Rev.D78:035013,
Hunting for Hierarchies in PSL 2 (7) MICHAEL JAY PEREZ PHENOMENOLOGY 2015 MAY 5, 2015 ARXIV : /
THE CONNECTION BETWEEN NEUTRINO EXPERIMENTS AND LEPTOGENESIS Alicia Broncano Berrocal MPI.
1-2 Mass Degeneration in the Leptonic Sector Hiroyuki ISHIDA (Tohoku University) Collaboration with : Takeshi ARAKI (MISC) Ref ; T. Araki and H.I. arXiv.
Carla Biggio Universidad Autónoma de Madrid Neutrino masses and new TeV scale HEP 2007, Manchester, England, 19-25/07/07 Based on: Antusch, CB,
Grand Unification and Neutrino Masses
Leptogenesis beyond the limit of hierarchical heavy neutrino masses
A New Family Symmetry: Discrete Quaternion Group
Classically conformal B-L extended Standard Model
TeV-Scale Leptogenesis and the LHC
MINIMAL SO(10) SPLITS SUPERSYMMETRY*
The MESSM The Minimal Exceptional Supersymmetric Standard Model
New aspects of leptogenesis
Searching for New Physics in muon lepton flavor violating processes
Lepton Flavor Violation
Presentation transcript:

Duality in Left-Right Symmetric Seesaw Mechanism Michele Frigerio Service de Physique Théorique, CEA/Saclay Rencontres de Physique des Particules March 3, Institut Henri Poincaré Evgeny Kh. Akhmedov in collaboration with Evgeny Kh. Akhmedov Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, (2006) [hep-ph/ ] & in preparation

Neutrino mass in Left-Right models Left-Right gauge symmetry: SU(2) L x SU(2) R x U(1) B-L  SU(2) L x U(1) Y extensions: SU 422, SO(10), … Pati, Salam, Mohapatra, Senjanovic, Georgi, Fritzsch, Minkowski Leptons: L = ( L l L ) T L c = ( R c l R c ) T Mass matrix in ( L, R c ) basis: Yukawa couplings: VEVs: - v R = breaks SU 221 into SU 21 - v = breaks SU 21 into U(1) em - v L =  v 2 /v R is induced by EW breaking

Seesaw in Left-Right models Effective mass matrix of light neutrinos: f determines heavy masses and mixing f directly contributes to light masses Seesaw mechanisms: - v << v R (Type I seesaw) - v L << v (Type II seesaw) Minkowski, Gell-Mann, Ramond, Slansky, Yanagida, Glashow, Mohapatra, Senjanovic Magg, Wetterich, Lazarides, Shafi, Mohapatra, Senjanovic, Schecter, Valle Type I and II contributions are strictly intertwined.

A very well motivated framework Seesaw explains (i) smallness of mass;(ii) baryogenesis via leptogenesis Left-Right models (i) incorporate naturally RH neutrinos; (ii) explain maximal parity violation Several completely realistic models (for unification, fermion masses, p-decay, …) do not contain sources of mass other than type I and II seesaw (fermion triplets, double seesaw, radiative mechanisms, extra dimensions, …) Supersymmetry can be easily incorporated. If only (B - L)-even Higgs bosons acquire VEVs, then R-parity is automatically unbroken. Let us take the LR seesaw formula seriously!

LR seesaw: the parameter space v 2 = (174 GeV) 2 (EWSB) 0  v L  GeV(  ≈ - 2 v L 2 / v 2 ) TeV  v R  M Pl (no RH weak currents) 0  (m ) ij  eV : partially known from oscillations data 0  y ij  1 : in general unknown Yukawa couplings, but -Minimal SUSY LR: y = tan  y e -Minimal SO(10): y = y u -Seesaw + mSUGRA:y ij << 1 to suppress, e.g.,    0  f ij  1 : completely unknown Yukawa couplings Bottom-up approach: what is the structure of the matrix f ? To what extent we can reconstruct the seesaw heavy sector ?

Seesaw duality Non-linear matrix equation in f  Multiple solutions Different structures of f are viable physical options One generation: f 2 - (m /v L ) f - v 2 y 2 /(v L v R ) = 0  f = f ± Three generations: f = f 1±, …, f 4± 4 pairs of dual f structures reproduce the same m Duality: f solution if and only if f is ^

Ambiguity on the seesaw type Suppose type II dominates: Suppose type I dominates: LR-symmetry  y = y T  duality holds  f II + f I = m f II is a solution if and only if f I is! If in a model f = f II, there is always another model where f = f I (with the same values for v L,R, m, y)

A realistic numerical example Tribimaximal mixing: tan 2  23 = 1 tan 2  12 = 0.5 tan 2  13 = 0 No CP violation v L v R = v 2 (natural when scalar potential couplings are of order 1) Neglect CKM-like rotations (both charged lepton and neutrino Yukawa couplings diagonal in the same basis) y 1 = y 2 = y 3 = 1 (inter-generation hierarchy slightly weaker than for charged fermions) Eigenvalues: -0.1, 0.2, 0.9 Normal hierarchy with  m 2 sol /  m 2 atm = EX EX TH There are 4 dual pairs of f structures such that:

Features of the solutions

One seesaw type dominance in m 12, m 22, m 23 : type II in the case of f 4, type I in the dual. Mixed seesaw in m 11, m 13, m 33. Consider a given pair of dual solutions: Seesaw Duality: f 4 structure has dominant  -block; large (but non-maximal) 2-3 mixing Dual structure is hierarchical, with dominant 33-entry; small 2-3 mixing

Perspectives Identification of flavor symmetries in the structures of f. Radiative stability of the LR seesaw formula: –Running below the LR-symmetry breaking scale Baryogenesis via Leptogenesis: lepton asymmetry from the decays of R or  L –The matrix f determines masses and mixing of R ’s as well as couplings of  L to leptons –Each solution for f leads to different asymmetry More options for model-building –Different forms of f available to accommodate  mass –Extra symmetries of the model as selection criterion

Summary Neutrino mass in Left-Right symmetric models Analysis of the LR symmetric seesaw formula –8 structures of f reproduce the same m and y –Duality among solutions: f  (m  / v L - f) –Criteria to identify the dominant seesaw type –General analytic method to solve for f Spin-off both in phenomenology and theory E. Kh. Akhmedov, M.Frigerio & E. Kh. Akhmedov, PRL 96, (2006) [hep-ph/ ] and in preparation