Astrium ‘Robotics and Autonomy’ Test facilities - hardware and software verification - for 28 Feb 2012 Harwell meeting. Tony Jorden Elie Allouis.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
PowerPoint ® Presentation Chapter 14 Homeland Security Homeland Security Building Layout Specific CBR Attack Prevention Recommendations Securing Outdoor-
Advertisements

SOFTWARE TESTING. Software Testing Principles Types of software tests Test planning Test Development Test Execution and Reporting Test tools and Methods.
SOUTHEASTCON I KARMA ECE IEEE SoutheastCon Hardware Competition Must build an autonomous robot that can –Start at rest at the Starting Station.
Work Breakdown Structures. Purpose The WBS shows different levels within the product hierarchy. For Government program managers levels 1-3 are of prime.
VI. Descent and Terminal Guidance for Pinpoint Landing and Hazard Avoidance Session Chair: Dr. Sam W. Thurman.
Integrated Sensing Systems for Asteroid Missions Asteroid Initiative Idea Synthesis Workshop Sept 30, 2013 Rich Dissly and Kevin Miller Ball Aerospace.
Laura Jones Swati Mohan 11/21/14. ◦ Different class of ACS hardware and software  Limited mass, power, processing ◦ Different dynamical regime  Testbeds.
1 Software Testing and Quality Assurance Lecture 15 - Planning for Testing (Chapter 3, A Practical Guide to Testing Object- Oriented Software)
Autonomous Landing Hazard Avoidance Technology (ALHAT) Page 1 March 2008 Go for Lunar Landing Real-Time Imaging Technology for the Return to the Moon Dr.
Blue Bear Systems Research Soar Agents for Unmanned Air & Ground Vehicles Dr Phill Smith 24 th Soar Workshop 9 th – 11 th June 2004 Building 32, Twinwoods.
Simultaneous Localization and Map Building System for Prototype Mars Rover CECS 398 Capstone Design I October 24, 2001.
Navigation Systems for Lunar Landing Ian J. Gravseth Ball Aerospace and Technologies Corp. March 5 th, 2007 Ian J. Gravseth Ball Aerospace and Technologies.
INTEGRATED PROGRAMME IN AERONAUTICAL ENGINEERING Coordinated Control, Integrated Control and Condition Monitoring in Uninhabited Air-Vehicles Ian Postlethwaite,
Remote manipulations / diagnostics in radioactive areas and handling of radioactive material Workshop, Geneva, Switzerland 6 th May 2013 THE REPLACEMENT.
Automated Inspection Using Machine Vision
Zereik E., Biggio A., Merlo A. and Casalino G. EUCASS 2011 – 4-8 July, St. Petersburg, Russia.
Autonomous Robot Localisation, Path Planning, Navigation, and Obstacle Avoidance The Problem: –Robot needs to know where it is? where it’s going? is there.
Dr. Jennifer Rochlis. Overview Build a technology testbed for future rover concepts Develop and demonstrate operations and mission concepts.
All rights reserved © Altec ExoMars 2018 Rover Operations Control Centre Available Tools for planning and Data Processing I. Musso.
Autonomous Surface Navigation Platform Michael Baxter Angel Berrocal Brandon Groff.
Coverage Efficiency in Autonomous Robots With Emphasis on Simultaneous Localization and Mapping Mo Lu Computer Systems Lab Final Version.
COE4OI5 Engineering Design. Copyright S. Shirani 2 Course Outline Design process, design of digital hardware Programmable logic technology Altera’s UP2.
SCIENCE Team © 2006 Denis Thibault Designing Your Martian Landscape.
Protecting the Public, Astronauts and Pilots, the NASA Workforce, and High-Value Equipment and Property Mission Success Starts With Safety Believe it or.
To come up with a practicum project that full filled the 411 requirements Create a fun project that would get kids interested in science and engineering.
LUNAR ROVER Concept proposal meeting Dr. Ashish Dutta Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur Kanpur, INDIA ( *** for private circulation only)
Adaptive Autonomous Robot Teams for Situational Awareness Gaurav S. Sukhatme, Maja J. Mataric, Andrew Howard, Ashley Tews Robotics Research Laboratory.
Project Proposal: Student: Rowan Pivetta Supervisor: Dr Nasser Asgari.
All rights reserved © Altec ExoMars 2018 Rover Operations Control Centre Planned Organization of ROCC Operations I. Musso.
Copyright © 2012 Boeing. All rights reserved. Effective Verification and Validation Testing Steve Holt Boeing Commercial Airplanes August 2013.
Dept of Materials Engineering l Use of a Virtual Laboratory to plan, execute and analyse Neutron Strain Scanning experiments. John A James 1, Javier R.
IV&V T ESTING S TRATEGIES FOR I NDEPENDENT V ERIFICATION OF NASA M ISSION S OFTWARE I MPLEMENTATION 3 rd Annual Workshop on Independent Validation and.
March 2004 At A Glance NASA’s GSFC GMSEC architecture provides a scalable, extensible ground and flight system approach for future missions. Benefits Simplifies.
SE&I Pre-Proposal Meeting GSFC - JPL Systems Engineering Management Colleen McGraw.
Intelligent Systems Software Assurance Symposium 2004 Bojan Cukic & Yan Liu, Robyn Lutz & Stacy Nelson, Chris Rouff, Johann Schumann, Margaret Smith July.
Accelerated Long Range Traverse (ALERT) Paul Springer Michael Mossey.
Aeronautics & Astronautics Autonomous Flight Systems Laboratory All slides and material copyright of University of Washington Autonomous Flight Systems.
Solar Probe Plus A NASA Mission to Touch the Sun March 2015 Instrument Suite Name Presenter's Name.
June 28, 2000 Architecture Review 1 Examples: Implementing Common Solutions within CLARAty.
ESA Harwell Robotics & Autonomy Facility Study Workshop Autonomous Software Verification Presented By: Rick Blake.
SRR and PDR Charter & Review Team Linda Pacini (GSFC) Review Chair.
SAS_05_Contingency_Lutz_Tal1 Contingency Software in Autonomous Systems Robyn Lutz, JPL/Caltech & ISU Doron Tal, USRA at NASA Ames Ann Patterson-Hine,
Robotics and Autonomy Test Facility - Hardware Verification needs Elie Allouis HRAF Workshop – 28/02/2012.
©Roke Manor Research Ltd 2011 Part of the Chemring Group 1 Startiger SEEKER Workshop Estelle Tidey – Roke Manor Research 26 th February 2011.
1 Integrated Modeling Stephen Merkowitz. 2 May 13, 2003 Integrated Modeling LISA has intricate interactions between subsystems that require an integrated.
Radiation Protection Considerations for the CDR Helmut Vincke DGS-RP.
SwCDR (Peer) Review 1 UCB MAVEN Particles and Fields Flight Software Critical Design Review Peter R. Harvey.
[Date] Dr. Yang Gao Robotics & Autonomy Test Facilities: In Support Micro Space Vehicle Research.
Coverage Efficiency in Autonomous Robots With Emphasis on Simultaneous Localization and Mapping Mo Lu Computer Systems Lab
Embedded System Design and Development Introduction to Embedded System.
Scarab Autonomous Traverse Carnegie Mellon December 2007 David Wettergreen.
Standards Certification Education & Training Publishing Conferences & Exhibits Communication necessary to achieve LowE valve sealing compliance Presented.
FASTER SPACE EU CONFERENCE February /06/2016 In FASTER, a European consortium of six partners from five member states develops and demonstrates.
IEEE South East Conference 2016 MID-SEMESTER PRESENTATION.
JSTAR Independent Test Capability (ITC) Core Flight System (CFS) Utilization October 26, 2015 Justin R Morris NASA IV&V Program.
A Multi-Touch Display for Robotic Team Control
PRODUCT VERIFICATION Adapted from the NASA Systems Engineering Handbook for CSULB EE 400D by Alia Bonetti.
Digital Light Sources First introduced in 2001.
Overview Modern chip designs have multiple IP components with different process, voltage, temperature sensitivities Optimizing mix to different customer.
Intelligent Systems Software Assurance Symposium 2004
Identifying Tools of the Rover
Ethylene Furnace High Temperature Cameras
Introduction to Software Testing
NASA Robotic Mining Competition
HHS Child Welfare National IT Managers' Meeting
Integration and Test Organization Chart
PSS verification and validation
PSS0 Configuration Management,
Mission job descriptions
Jeff Dutton/NASA COR August 26, 2019
Presentation transcript:

Astrium ‘Robotics and Autonomy’ Test facilities - hardware and software verification - for 28 Feb 2012 Harwell meeting. Tony Jorden Elie Allouis.

Outline (1) Mars Yard  Current Mars Yard  Photos/ Layout /Slope Bins  Soil Simulants & Health & Safety  Localisation System  Future Mars Yard  Specification (2) Autonomy and software testing  Overview of testing- as applied to ExoMars rover (autonomous navigation vehicle)  Comparison of small-scale and large-scale testing

Current Astrium Mars Yard (2009) - as used for ExoMars rover vehicle testing

Layout : As Built Team Building !  Terrain Area = 11m by 11m  EGSE Area = 11m by ~5m

Photos

Slope Bins  Internal test area  Humidity control- for dry soil.  Allows controlled illumination  Aluminium slope bins used to create slopes up to 20 degrees  Two slope bins :  5m wide x 3m deep – used primarily for cross-slope trials  3m wide x 5m deep – used primarily for up/down-slope trials

Soil Simulants  Three soil types are used in the current Mars Yard  Slope bins: Sand representative of Engineering Soil 2 (ES2)  Flat area: Sand representative of Engineering Soil 3 (ES3)  Remaining area: Temporary material (red sand & rocks)  Health & Safety  Main risk is airborne sand  Minimal risk in current Mars Yard due to composition / particle size:  Silica-based sand is not flammable, therefore cannot cause a dust explosion  However, if sand becomes contaminated, risk of fire / explosion increases – in particular blasted sand should be avoided  Finest sand in the Mars Yard (Engineering Soil 2) has less than 0.2% of particles with grain sizes < 63 microns  Dusts with particle sizes below 63 microns may cause irritation to the nose and throat but dusts need to be 10 microns or less to be respirable and cause respiratory irritation

Localisation System  The Mars Yard Localisation System  54 markers (known as fiducials)  Installed in the ceiling  “i-Position” measurement system (Inition Ltd)  Pattern scanned using a theodolite and loaded into rover computers  Camera on the rover compares what it sees with this pattern  Outputs position and attitude data to a very high degree of accuracy  Used as a ‘ground truth’ for localisation sources on the rover

Extended Mars Yard

Specification  Key points from specification:  Mars Yard  Dimensions of 30m x 14m  No obstacles in terrain area (except Rocks)  Lighting: representative spectrum, minimum light intensity at ground level (lower than Mars) and uniform.  Dedicated loading area (with access ramps to terrain)  Ventilation system for terrain areas  Radiative heaters for terrain areas …soil must be dry- hence the need for an indoor test area  Extension of localisation system  Representative terrain – reference soils (& rocks /slopes) - commercial sand but similar colour & density… - emphasis is on integrated tests, including vision.  Separate area for perception tests  Control Room  “Office” environment  Rover control system (GNC, PSS, DHS etc)  Visibility across complete Terrain

Astrium Test facilities for software/autonomy testing - as used for ExoMars rover vehicle testing (eg navigation/GNC) and smaller-scale robotics instrumentation

Autonomous Systems – Key Elements  The end result is a system (eg. Rover) autonomously performing its function in the mission environment (eg. Martian surface)  A number of key elements (building blocks) are needed to develop and validate such a system Flight Software Numerical Models Hardware Breadboards Eg. Mars yard Flight Hardware Environment Mission Elements Development and Testing Elements Autonomy Algorithms

GNC Simulator Example of test case Rover start location Rover target Path planned by rover while traversing terrain 5m Areas classified as obstacles by rover White: Unsafe Dark grey: “Do not plan a path into” Areas classified as safe by rover Green: Low cost Red: High cost

ExoMars GNC development and validation Benches GNC software specification documents Development Sim GNC equipment & environment models FVB GNC flight software Prototype GNC algorithms Bread board rovers Prototype GNC algorithms GNC equipment & environment models NSVF Complete flight software All equipment & environment models ETB Complete flight software Env models Algorithm & model developmentFormal verification and validation Coding of GNC software V&V of models [Verification & Validation] EM/EQM H/W FVB= Functional Validation Bench NSVF= Numerical Software Validation Facility ETB=Electrical test Bench EM= Eng. Model EQM= Engineering Qualification Model e.g. Rover Dynamics Model Hardware model Used for operations also

Mars Yard test facility

Testing robotic equipment- small-scale Off-line development & test of control software and simulations Test bench- includes hardware in-the-loop Adaptable user-defined control and monitoring options LiRA Robotic arm – typical robotic payload

Large-scale and small-scale comparison  Overall process is the same  Numerical simulation facilities (for faster execution, repeatability…)  Test bench with hardware (may be multiple elements) in the loop  Hardware models must be designed to suit the scope of the testing.  Environment needs to be correct (e.g. terrain, lighting…)  For smaller scale systems some elements may be merged or omitted  E.g. rover simulation may include PANGU visual environment model, but not needed for robotic arm testing.  Still need to develop and test software independent of hardware initially (including simulations).  Still need to verify with appropriate hardware models and facilities

Summary of ExoMars facilities Astrium, under the ESA ExoMars project, has developed critical technologies using:  A Mars yard which allows for different soils and visual test conditions  Rover breadboards representative of the 2011 ExoMars flight design  Numerical simulators modelling the Martian environment, the Rover dynamics on the Martian surface, the sensors and actuators, etc.  The ExoMars GNC algorithms running on the Rover breadboards and on the numerical simulators  Several tools for the development and validation of the Rover autonomy  The integrated autonomy system has demonstrated its TRL 6  The next level (TRL 7) is the demonstration already on the Mars surface