Getting the most from HDR Candidature Milestone Reviews Paul Gorry, Director HDR, SEH. 1.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Rob Briner Organizational Psychology Birkbeck
Advertisements

Preparing for Confirmation of Candidature
Queensland University of Technology CRICOS No J Research Students Centre CRICOS No 00213J Surviving Confirmation Semester 2 Gardens Point.
RESEARCH STUDENTS CENTRE Stage II and Your Literature Review Monday 15 August 2011.
Deakin University CRICOS Provider Code: 00113B PREPARING FOR CONFIRMATION OF CANDIDATURE 2014 School of Exercise & Nutrition Sciences.
Graduate Research Degree Orientation 2013 Decision Making and Governance.
Research Supervisor Training Programme Obligations of the Supervisor.
CHANGE MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE CRITICAL CONCERNS FOR SUPERVISION AND ELEMENTS OF INTEREST FOR MAKERERE UNIVERSITY Prof Buyinza Mukadasi Director, DRGT - Mak.
PhD PROPOSAL AND SUPERVISORY AGREEMENT FORM
1 Supervision, Monitoring and Assessment: An Introduction Andrzej Krasniewski Conference of Rectors of Academic Schools in Poland & Faculty of Electronics.
GCSE Crossover Coursework Pre1914 texts: Shakespeare and the Prose Study.
Graduate Research School
Honors College CE/T Third Reader Role. Overview  Description of Third Reader Role  Day of Defense  Responsibilities to the student defending  Responsibilities.
IRSHAD Fourth Objective Dubai Islamic Bank – Performance Management Systems.
Writing an original research paper Part one: Important considerations
Reviewing and Critiquing Research
Recent Changes to HDR Policy and Procedures Felicity Roddick Associate Dean Research and Innovation.
SET approach to HDR Irena Cosic Dean R&I SET. Slide 2 SET PORTFOLIO Higher Degree by Research Environment *Graduates will have: Commitment and the capacity.
Introduction to Postgraduate Candidature in the College of Science, Engineering and Technology Professor Felicity Roddick Associate Dean (Research and.
Introduction to Postgraduate Candidature in the College of Science, Engineering and Technology Professor Felicity Roddick Associate Dean (Research and.
Thesis Examination PRE-THESIS SUBMISSION CHECK LIST Professor Judith Bessant (Chair – Research Training Sub-Committee) Prepared from notes presented at.
Confirmation of Candidature Writing the research proposal Helen Thursby.
By Saurabh Sardesai October 2014.
Research Project or Thesis Proposal MT, MA and PhD
How do I manage my work as well as possible? Know who is responsible for what Three key parties: 1.The student (you) 2.Your supervisor 3.Your unit/UCC.
Chapter 9. Intro  What is Project Management?  Project Manager  Project Failures & Successes Managing Projects  PMBOK  SDLC Core Process 1 – Project.
Research Degrees School of Psychology and Psychiatry Introduction and Overview Professor Max King Pro Vice-Chancellor (Research & Research Training) Monash.
Research Ethics A guide to principles and procedures
Estelle M. Phillips and Derek S. Pugh Summarized by Chaky (2012) 1.
Internal Auditing and Outsourcing
The Learning Agreement, Intellectual Property Rights and Project Approval Professor Dianne Ford Director of PhD Studies, Faculty of Medical Sciences.
Monash University Graduate Research Program in Literary and Cultural Studies Induction.
 NSF Merit Review Criteria Intellectual Merit Broader Impacts  Additional Considerations Integration of Research & Education Integrating Diversity into.
Services the Dean of Graduate Studies Presents at UNE Omdosheaa 5th Conference: Conflict Resolution in Universities 4 December 2006 Professor Kay Harman.
Strong Schools, Strong Communities Strategic Plan Implementation Process and Roles Saint Paul Public Schools has designed the following process and roles.
Getting the most from HDR milestones Assoc Prof Suellen Murray DSC HDR Director 11 March 2015.
Graduate Research School (GRS) Nicky Solomon Dean Graduate Research School THINK.CHANGE.DO.
GRADUATE STUDIES: STUDENTS’ OBLIGATIONS AND EXPECTATIONS By Dr. Michael Wainaina Associate Dean, Graduate School.
What Expectations Does the University have of Supervisors? Professor Rod Devenish, Academic Director, MIGR.
Edmonton Public Schools Sustainability Review & School Closure Process johnstonresearch.
Research Project Grant (RPG) Retreat K-Series March 2012 Bioengineering Classroom.
Introduction Candidature Milestones College Performance Reports Felicity Roddick Associate Dean Research and Innovation College of Science Engineering.
Unit 5 – eProject – Project Organisation Procedures Set up and use procedures for storing and protecting project information, tracking and monitoring progress.
Confirmation of Candidature Progress Reports
1 Internal Audit. 2 Definition Is an independent activity established by management to examine and evaluate the organization’s risk management processes.
SEVESO II transposition and implementation – possible approaches and lessons learned from MS/NMS SEVESO II transposition and implementation – possible.
 NSF Merit Review Criteria Intellectual Merit Broader Impacts  Additional Considerations Integration of Research & Education Broadening Participation.
Project Kick-off Meeting Presented By: > > > > Office of the Chief Information Officer.
Safety Management System Implementation Michael Niels Thorsen Moscow 15 September 2005.
Policy and Procedures Ian S Burnett Student Research Culture Session – 29 April 2009.
ACTION RESEARCH By Toni McConnell Rachel Milliken Sarah Montefiore Biljana Milovanovic.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency Development of the Basis Document for Periodic Safety Review for Research Reactors William Kennedy Research Reactor.
Managing Your Supervisor Professor Joe Luca Dean, Graduate Research School.
Research Proposal Writing Resource Person : Furqan-ul-haq Siddiqui Lecture on; Wednesday, May 13, 2015 Quetta Campus.
Critiquing Quantitative Research.  A critical appraisal is careful evaluation of all aspects of a research study in order to assess the merits, limitations,
Welcome. Contents: 1.Organization’s Policies & Procedure 2.Internal Controls 3.Manager’s Financial Role 4.Procurement Process 5.Monthly Financial Report.
Change Management A process for process change by Cory R. Peters Exelon PowerLabs.
Introduction Candidature Milestones College Performance Reports
PhD Program Requirements
MSc in Social Research Methods
Overview Thesis Project Galenic Pharmacy & Biopharmacy A9 R6
Annual Assessment of Progress 2017/18 Briefing for Research Students Research Student Registry Mar/Apr 2018.
The Learning Agreement, Intellectual Property Rights and Project Approval Professor Dianne Ford Director of PhD Studies, Faculty of Medical Sciences.
”How to be a good PhD supervisor ?”
Research funding application process
Managing the Supervisory relationship and Support
Assessment and completion
Dissertation / Research project
Role of Evaluation coordination group and Capacity Building Projects in Lithuania Vilija Šemetienė Head of Economic Analysis and Evaluation Division.
Presentation transcript:

Getting the most from HDR Candidature Milestone Reviews Paul Gorry, Director HDR, SEH. 1

2 Overall objectives. -proactively identify and resolve issues as they occur -monitor and manage performance, and scheduling of timelines -maximize impact of studies -manage inevitable ups and downs of HDR candidature -facilitate “seamless” transition through different stages of candidature -continued awareness of our duty of care as supervisors -ensure a high quality research training environment -maximize positive experience for the HDR candidate

3 Confirmation of Candidature -Is there a clear hypothesis and rationale? -Does the candidate have a solid grasp of the literature? -Does the candidate need to expand his/her knowledge base? -Are ethics approvals in place, if required? -Is the research plan sound and feasible? Can improvements be suggested? -Are methodologies clearly indicated and understood? -Has adequate progress been made? -Has the candidate completed research methods?

4 -Is there a well developed understanding of the research area? -How well does the candidate understand the broader literature? -How well is the candidate communicating their presentation? -Is the candidate on schedule? -What hurdles are hindering progress? How can these be overcome? Does the research plan need amending? -Is there a clear timeline to completion? -Is the candidate interpreting data properly? -How is the supervisor-candidate relationship tracking? Is the candidate getting sufficient supervisor attention? Is the candidate part of a vibrant research culture? -Can potential papers be mapped out? -Has the candidate (and supervisors) discussed submitting a review article? Mid Candidature Review

5 Completion seminar -Is there a well developed thesis draft? -Has the candidate developed considerable expertise, and evidence of original research development (for PhD’s)? -How effectively does the candidate communicate his/her research? -Does the body of work represent a substantial and original contribution to Knowledge? -What publications have resulted, and are more to follow? -Have 2 examiners been identified, and has the RPOE form been completed and lodged?