Student Growth Percentiles For Classroom Teachers and Contributing Professionals 1 October 22, 2014.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
AchieveNJ: Teacher Evaluation Scoring Guide
Advertisements

Completing the Classroom Teacher and Non-Classroom Teacher Evaluations for Presented by: The Office of Talent Development Employee Evaluations.
Principal & Assistant Principal
Simpson County Schools Accountability Results, Fall of 2013 Franklin-Simpson High School 97 th Percentile* DISTINGUISHED *percentile rank based on 2012.
+ Utah Comprehensive Accountability System (UCAS) 1 Hal Sanderson, Ph.D. Research and Assessment August 21,
Kentucky’s School Report Card and Spreadsheets
Overview of Next-Generation Learners Part 2 (Growth) Ken Draut, Associate Commissioner Office of Assessment and Accountability Kentucky Department of Education.
PROPOSED MULTIPLE MEASURES FOR TEACHER EFFECTIVENESS
Student Growth Percentiles For Classroom Teachers and Contributing Professionals KDE:OAA:3/28/2014:kd:rls 1.
ASSESSMENT and ACCOUNTABILITY UPDATE Create by KAAC Modified by Kenna Williams.
State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness.
Student Growth Percentile (SGP) Model
99th Percentile 1st Percentile 50th Percentile What Do Percentiles Mean? Percentiles express the percentage of students that fall below a certain score.
DAC Back-to-School Training Overview Presented By: Jennifer Stafford 1 OAA:DSR:js:07/22/2015.
STATE ACCOUNTABILITY OVERVIEW Back To School| August 19-22, 2013 Dean Munn Education Specialist Region 15 ESC.
1 Measuring growth in student performance on MCAS: The growth model.
Kentucky’s New Assessment and Accountability Model June 2011.
Student Impact Rating Teacher Professional Growth and Effectiveness System Daviess County Public Schools.
Strategic Planning Update Kentucky Board of Education January 31, 2012.
How Can Teacher Evaluation Be Connected to Student Achievement?
SB : The Great Teachers and Leaders Act State-wide definition of “effective” teacher and principal in Colorado Academic growth, using multiple measures.
1 New York State Growth Model for Educator Evaluation 2011–12 July 2012 PRESENTATION as of 7/9/12.
Hull Public Schools MCAS Presentation Kathleen I. Tyrell, Ed.D., Superintendent of Schools October 7, 2013 mko.
Update on Virginia’s Growth Measure Deborah L. Jonas, Ph.D. Executive Director for Research and Strategic Planning Virginia Department of Education July-August.
School Performance Framework Sponsored by The Colorado Department of Education Summer 2010 Version 1.3.
1 Watertown Public Schools Assessment Reports 2010 Ann Koufman-Frederick and Administrative Council School Committee Meetings Oct, Nov, Dec, 2010 Part.
New York State Scores 2011—2012 School Year. Growth Ratings and Score Ranges Growth RatingDescriptionGrowth Score Range (2011–12) Highly EffectiveWell.
Collecting data & information Talking with teachers, administrators, service providers Progress Monitoring Consolidated Planning /Use of Data Alternative.
Denise Bailey Education Academic Program Manager Diverse Learners Branch Kentucky Department of Education.
Student Achievement Dashboard Training. Objectives ●PWBAT understand the purpose for using the dashboard to analyze student achievement ●PWBAT understand.
Student Growth Percentiles Basics Fall Outcomes Share information on the role of Category 1 assessments in evaluations Outline steps for districts.
Median Student Growth Percentile For Classroom Teachers and Contributing Professionals 1 ONGL-12/15/14.
1 New York State Growth Model for Educator Evaluation 2011–12 July 2012 PRESENTATION as of 7/9/12.
Melrose High School 2014 MCAS Presentation October 6, 2014.
Barren County Schools CERTIFIED EVALUATION PLAN
Assessing Learners with Special Needs: An Applied Approach, 6e © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. Chapter 5: Introduction to Norm- Referenced.
ASSESSMENT and ACCOUNTABILITY UPDATE Kentucky Association for Assessment Coordinators Ken Draut, Associate Commissioner Rhonda L.. Sims, Director Office.
Sonoraville Elementary Parent Meeting February 3, 2015.
Standard VI Teachers Contribute to the Academic Success of Students.
Kentucky’s New Assessment and Accountability System What to Expect for the First Release of Data.
Kentucky Department of Education, Office of Assessment and Accountability, July 2012 Questions: or
Measuring Turnaround Success October 29 th, 2015 Jeanette P. Cornier, Ph.D.
Rhonda Sims, Associate Commissioner Jennifer Stafford, Director Office of Assessment and Accountability Monthly DAC Webcast February 11, 2016 KDE:OAA:DSR:
Kentucky Department of Education, Office of Assessment and Accountability, July 2012 Questions: or
PROGRAM REVIEWS GETTING STARTED. THE PURPOSE OF THE PROGRAM REVIEW PROCESS To provide for careful and systematic analysis of current programs.
Erlanger-Elsmere Independent Schools Assessment Results.
Accountability Overview Presented by Jennifer Stafford Office of Assessment and Accountability Division of Support & Research KDE:OAA:DSR:pp: 12/11/2015.
Gallatin County High School Accountability & Assessment Data.
Assessment and Accountability Update Longbranch Elementary School September 27,
PRINCIPAL STATE GROWTH SCORES / Principal Performance/Visit= 50 Student Performance=50.
Standard VI Teachers Contribute to the Academic Success of Students.
1 New York State Growth Model for Educator Evaluation June 2012 PRESENTATION as of 6/14/12.
Consolidated District and School Improvement Plans
2015 Assessment and Accountability Update Scott Trimble Workshop October 20, Rhonda Sims, Associate Commissioner Jennifer Stafford, Director Kentucky.
Richard Woods, Georgia’s School Superintendent “Educating Georgia’s Future” gadoe.org Overview of the Georgia Student Growth Model 1.
Assessment & Accountability Session 3: Content and School Scores.
Kentucky State Personnel Development Grant/CCR for Student Participating in the Alternate Assessment.
1 Testing Various Models in Support of Improving API Scores.
Bennett County School District
District Accountability Report
South Dakota’s Growth Model
Kansas Elementary and Secondary Education Act Advisory Council (ESEA)
AchieveNJ: Teacher Evaluation Scoring Guide
Milton Public Schools 2013 Accountability Status
Specifications Used for School Identification Under ESSA in
Kentucky’s New Assessment and Accountability System
College/Career Ready for All
November 09, 2012 Suzanne M. Wright Joe Prather
OVERVIEW OF THE 2019 STATE ACCOUNTABILITY SYSTEM
Impact of EL Students and TELPAS Performance on State Accountability
Presentation transcript:

Student Growth Percentiles For Classroom Teachers and Contributing Professionals 1 October 22, 2014

2

 Next Generation Instructional Programs and Support Program Reviews o Arts/Humanities o Practical Living/Career Studies o Writing o Primary/World Languages  Next Generation Learner Achievement Gap Growth (SGP) College/Career Readiness Graduation Rate Unbridled Learning: Next-Generation Accountability Model  Next Generation Professionals Teachers and Leaders 2

CLASSROOMGRADE BELOW 40 SGP AT 40 or HIGHER SGP Smith - Math 5617 Smith - Reading Rodriguez - Math 4917 Rodriguez - Reading 4226 Total Number of Scores 2476 Percentage for State Accountability 24%76% State Accountability Use of SGP Elementary Accountability Calculation: 76% (students at 40 or higher SGP) X 40% Weight = 30.4 Points Earned for Growth Component of Unbridled Learning 4

 Next Generation Instructional Programs and Support Program Reviews o Arts/Humanities o Practical Living/Career Studies o Writing o Primary/World Languages  Next Generation Learner Achievement Gap Growth College/Career Readiness Graduation Rate Unbridled Learning: Next-Generation Accountability Model  Next Generation Professionals Teachers and Leaders 2

Student Growth Two types of Student Growth will factor into a teacher’s overall Student Growth Rating: 1.Local Student Growth Goals (all teachers) 2.State Student Growth Percentiles (approximately 20% of teachers)  NO Goal is written by a teacher for this data point 6

Teacher Student Growth Percentile Median Student Growth Percentiles are used Up to three years of data are combined A minimum number of 10 students are required to receive SGP (100 Days) Attribution is determined at the local level It is a lagging indicator (will not be available until the next fall) (11-12;12-13) 7

Student Growth Percentile (SGP) Model SGP measures change in an individual student’s performance over time. ◦ How much did John improve in mathematics from grade 4 to grade 5 can be answered by showing:  How John improved from grade 4 to 5 compared to his academic peers. 8

Student Growth Percentile: Key Points Focuses on the relative standing of a student from year to year compared to the student’s academic peers. ◦ The academic peers are students who perform very similarly to the student on the test. The student is only compared to students who start at the same place. ◦ In year two, the question is: Did the student outpace his peer group? 9

Student Growth Percentile Key Points The rate of change is expressed as a percentile. ◦ How much did John improve in mathematics from grade 4 to grade 5, relative to his academic peers? ◦ If John improved more than 65 percent of his academic peers, then his student growth percentile would be

Student Growth Percentile (SGP) Requirements Must have two test scores from two different years for each student. Tests must be in same subject. ◦ In Kentucky only Reading and Mathematics are tested each year from grades

Student Growth Percentiles Available for teachers of students in grades 4-8 who take K-PREP in Reading and/or Math Available for both classroom teachers and contributing professionals Not available for Grade 11 (PLAN-ACT) for teacher effectiveness because there may be more than one teacher impacting that student’s growth 12

Student Growth Percentile Kentucky Classroom Mrs. Smith Grade 5 13

Mrs. Smith—Grade 5 Classroom Beginning of Year Incoming Mathematics Scale Scores Grade Grade 4 14

210 Academic Peer Group (Statewide) Students Scoring at 210 on Grade 4 Mathematics Mrs. Smith’s Grade 5 Student 15

Academic Peer Group (Statewide) Grade 5 Mathematics Scale Scores for Grade 4 “210” Group 210 Grade Grade Grade 5 Grade 4 … 16

Rank Ordered Grade 4 Mathematics “210” Academic Peer Group Based on Grade 5 Mathematics Score 210 Grade Grade Grade 5 Grade 4 Student is at the 70 th Percentile 17

Grade 4 Mathematics Score is 210. Grade 5 Mathematics Score is 215. The student outpaces 70% of the statewide Academic Peer Group. The student’s SGP is 70. Mrs. Smith’s Grade 5 Student Student Summary 18

Mrs. Smith—Grade 5 Classroom SGP for Each Student Based on Grade 5 Mathematics Test 70 SGP SGP

Theoretical Premise: When students with “like” scores are placed in an academic peer group and then compared one year later, we assume teacher and school actions happened between the two tests to cause a student to stay even with or out- perform the academic peer group. The actions may include instruction, curriculum, on-going assessments, etc. 20

Mrs. Smith—Grade 5 Classroom SGP for Each Student Based on 2014 Grade 5 MATHEMATICS Test 70 SGP SGP Mrs. Smith’s Median Math SGP=46 The median SGP is the middle number in the teacher’s list of student SGP scores; or the average of the two middle numbers in the case of an even number of students.

Mrs. Smith—Grade 5 Classroom SGP for Each Student Based on 2014 Grade 5 READING Test 70 SGP SGP Mrs. Smith’s Median Reading SGP=52

Mrs. Smith—Grade 5 Classroom SGP for All Students in Reading Classes 70 SGP SGP SGP Median SGP for Mrs. Smith = (51+49)/2= 50

Student Growth Rating Teachers will receive one of 3 ratings on their overall student growth: Low, Expected, or High. For research purposes median student growth percentiles were calculated for all teachers statewide. Using the distribution of median student growth percentiles, cutoffs were created to indicate Low, Expected, and High Student Growth. 24

Rationale for Ratings Expected Student Growth should constitute approximately 2/3 of teachers. Cut scores for Low, Expected and High were determined using the distribution of median SGPs for teachers. 25

Distribution of Teachers’ SGPs 26 67% of all Teachers 18% of all Teachers 15% of all Teachers ExpectedLowHigh

Student Growth Percentile Ratings Growth RatingMedian SGP% of Population LowLess than 3018% MediumBetween 30 and 6567% HighAbove 6515% 27

What was Mrs. Smith’s Reading Rating? Mrs. Smith had a median SGP of 50 for her Reading Students; therefore, she would have a state student growth rating of Expected. Up to 3 years of Data Scores can be used. 28

What was Mrs. Smith’s Math Rating? 29 Mrs. Smith had a median SGP of 46 for her Math Students; therefore, she would have a state student growth rating of Expected. Up to 3 years of Data and Math/Reading Scores can be used.

Contributing Professionals and SGP Median Teachers set up for a course/section as a contributing teacher in Infinite Campus. All students are assigned to each teacher/ contributing professional of record in the same manner as the primary teacher. Contributing professionals may have students in- accurately attributed because of the way positions are designated for LEAD reports. Reviewing data locally with your principals to create correct attribution is important. KDE:OAA:3/28/2014:kd:rls 30

31

32

Don’t forget best practice with data sets Data that contains unique student/teacher identifiers should be kept secure You are obtaining data from a secure system, so continue to ensure that it is kept secure Consider who will have access to the data and reports and how this information will be stored securely 33

Accessing the Results in CIITS KDE:OAA:3/28/2014:kd:rls 34

KDE:OAA:3/28/2014:kd:rls 35

KDE:OAA:3/28/2014:kd:rls 36

KDE:OAA:3/28/2014:kd:rls 37

Questions to Consider for SG%? How will you address the SG% Median in your CEP? How will you help teachers understand the reports and (more importantly) implications for teaching and learning? 38

Special Education and Student Growth Goal Setting Two types of Student Growth will factor into a teacher’s overall Student Growth Rating:  Local Student Growth Goal (all teachers)  State Student Growth Percentiles (approximately 20% of teachers) 39

Student Growth Goals Student Growth Goals All teachers are required to write one Local Student Growth Goal for one group of students to be entered in CIITS. The SGG process accounts for growth for all students, including students with disabilities.

How can you support a Special Education teacher, an EL Teacher, and other alternate setting teachers in setting Student Growth Goals? Using the documents provided (available on the KDE Student Growth page) 1. Develop key points/guidance for your group’s given role/situation. 2. Be prepared to share your ideas with the group. 41 ACTIVITY

Key Points to Remember Special Education teachers should first consider their role/position and the type of support they give to students. Special Education teachers should focus on ELA or Math enduring learnings whenever possible. 42