Resident Engineer Panel Discussion Jack Stone, P.E. District 2 Engineer, Casper Chad Aagard, P.E. District 2 Engineer, Casper Pete Hallsten, P.E. District.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Project Development Process (PDP) Structures. PDP – Three Project Levels Major Project ~ 14 Steps Major Project ~ 14 Steps Minor Project ~ 10 Steps Minor.
Advertisements

Constructability Review
Construction Contracting
Roles & Responsibilities in Construction Management
DISTRICT FIVE CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION UPDATE TRAINING Submission of Working Schedule Specification SP A.
NMDOT 2013 Specifications- Section 100 Presented by: Rod Billingsley Billingsley Engineering, P.C. Las Vegas, NM.
CON 4003 CVE 4073/5073 The Estimating Process Prof. Ralph V. Locurcio, PE.
Construction Cost Estimating Class #2: Bidding Process Prof. Ralph V. Locurcio, PE.
Contract Law 2014 NCHCA Education Series- January 23, 2014 Presented by Geoffrey Cantello, City of Ottawa and Ron Price, Rasmussen Starr Ruddy LLP.
Managing and Negotiating Change Orders Presented by Daniel Williams, P.E. May 1, 2008.
Time for a new standard - AS General Conditions of Contract
Reviewing & Analyzing Schedule
Lecture(3) Instructor : Dr. Abed Al-Majed Nassar
2014 CONSTRUCTION ESTIMATES Estimates Estimates 3 Point of the illustration? Document your assumptions.
Office of Traffic, Safety and Technology Module 6 Specifications and Special Provisions Traffic Control Plan Development Course.
Copyright © 2009 T.L. Martin & Associates Inc. Chapter 3 Requirements of a realistic CPM schedule.
Construction: Legal Issues. Legal Issues In the Bidding Process Timing of various activities has legal implications. During the bidding process: –A bid.
Nabil dmaidi1 Bid Submission Documents A LATE BID IS NO BID.
IDM Chapter 104 Utility Coordination Joe Gundersen Senior Utility Engineer, INDOT August 21, 2014.
Amin Salari, CCM, PMP, LEED AP – Lundgren Management
Dan Frasier, PE, CCP Successful Turnover of New and Renovation Construction Projects Successful Turnover of New and Renovation Construction.
Kenneth D. Fenton P.S. Clark County Engineer’s Office.
HIGHWAY/UTILITY PROGRAM OVERVIEW ROADWAY CONFERENCE APRIL 20, 2009.
CVE 4070 Construction Engineering Test-2 & Review Prof. Ralph V. Locurcio, PE.
NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Superstructure and Bridge Replacements in Region 9 Design-Build Project (PIN , D900020) Broome, Delaware,
Risk Assignment in The Delivery of a Project  RISK! –Construction projects have lot of it –Contractors manage it –Owners pay for it.
CHAPTER#08 MANAGEMENT OF TECHNICAL PROPOSALS AND SPECIFICATIONS Lecture No. 08 Course: Engineering Management 19 april 2013 MED DEPARTMENT, U.E.T TAXILA.
NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Superstructure and Bridge Replacements in Regions 2 & 9 Design-Build Project (PIN , D900022) Herkimer,
CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTS PRIME CONTRACTS Format and Major Components CHAPTER - 4.
CVE 4070 Construction Engineering Course Review & Critique Prof. Ralph V. Locurcio, PE.
Conditions of the Contract ACT Objective To provide an overview of the Conditions of the Contract, their purpose, content, and relationship to.
Project Schedules The Cabinets New Categories of Scheduling.
CONTRACT MANAGEMENT DISPUTE RESOLUTION AND COURSE CORRECTION AJAY RAGHAVAN Counsel Training Workshop, Bhopal, February 2009.
CE 366 PROJECT MANAGEMENT AND ECONOMICS Robert G. Batson, Ph.D., P.E. Professor of Construction Engineering The University of Alabama
Basis of Estimates Part 1 Introduction Melissa Hollis Engineering Systems Support State Specifications and Estimates Office June 2012.
Project Procurement Management
Project Scoping. Project Scoping – learning objective Who should complete the Project Initiation Package (PIP)? How is PDP Path used in scoping? Task.
Contract Specifications Written Set of standards and procedures informing the contractors or remediation professionals of materials & operation necessary.
Resident Engineer Panel Discussion Jack Stone, P.E. District 2 Engineer, Casper Chad Aagard, P.E. District 2 Engineer, Casper Pete Hallsten, P.E. District.
CVE 4070 Construction Engineering Course Review Prof. Ralph V. Locurcio, PE.
Stacy Hagenbucher.  Process Improvements  Clarification  Trends  Finals Tracking  Trends  Why Missing Dates  Additional Resource  Issues on sites.
 Section Where you go if you disagree on either three elements entitlement, impacts or costs  Begins with the contractors notice 5 working days.
DISTRICT CONSTRUCTION ENGINEER PANEL DISCUSSION Contract Management: Claim Avoidance and Handling Keith Compton, P.E. District 5 Construction Engineer.
CLAIMS MANAGEMENT. PRESENTATION OUTLINE INTRODUCTION TYPICAL CLAIMS AGAINST OWNER TYPICAL CLAIMS AGAINST CONTRACTOR CRITICAL PATH METHODS UTILIZATION.
What is “Constructability”?
Contract Management: Claim Avoidance and Handling District Engineer Panel Discussion Lowell Fleenor, P.E. District 2 Engineer, Casper John Eddins, P.E.
CE 366 PROJECT MANAGEMENT AND ECONOMICS Robert G. Batson, Ph.D., P.E. Professor of Construction Engineering The University of Alabama
CVE 4070 Construction Engineering HW #6 review Test-2 & Review Prof. Ralph V. Locurcio, PE.
Collaboration of Entitlement and Cost Efforts in Claims Analysis Rubino & McGeehin Consulting Group June 27, 2005.
April 29, 2014 WELCOME!. Tips & Tricks Interface & View.
Conaway Conference March 15-16, 2016 “A Bridge from Concept to Construction” A Contractor’s Perspective.
Engineering a Good Project Drew Seaman. Engineering: the work of designing and creating large structures (such as roads and bridges) or new products or.
CHANGE ORDER/CLAIMS MANAGEMENT MODULE 9. Change Order Management.
SCHEDULE MANAGEMENT MODULE 8. Required by Specification City/Caltrans Level 1 schedule – simple Less than $1 million, less than 100 working days Advanced.
Chapter 8 Specifications & Special Provisions
Reconstruction site Investigation, Planning, Scheduling, Estimating and Design Eng. Fahmi Tarazi.
Document control MODULE 4.
Construction Oversight
CONTRACT DOCUMENTS & CONSTRUCTION
Chapter 8 Specifications & Special Provisions
Traffic Control Plan Development Course
Sponsored by the RMS Center
Engineering Project Tendering.
A Paradigm for Utility Coordination
Value Engineering In Design
Conventional Facilities
2006 Central Region Post Mortem Review
Directed Change Constructive Change
Txdot field inspection
Presentation transcript:

Resident Engineer Panel Discussion Jack Stone, P.E. District 2 Engineer, Casper Chad Aagard, P.E. District 2 Engineer, Casper Pete Hallsten, P.E. District 3 Engineer, Pinedale

 Preliminary Claim Avoidance ◦ Plans and Specification Development ◦ Pre-bid ◦ Review Bid Tabulations ◦ Review Construction Schedules  Claim Avoidance During Construction ◦ Pre-104

 Plans and Specification Development ◦ Plans and Specs - Clear and Concise  Are the plans and specs complete  Review the project as a complete package (not always possible)  Manna From Heaven  Will the Contractor have the same information we have?  Soils Profile, Borrow Drill Logs, etc.  Is the work to be performed clearly described  Details vs. Standard Plans  Standard Plans References  e.g., traffic control signing at interchanges  Special Provisions vs. Supplementary Specs vs. Standard Specs  Have a clear understanding of document hierarchy and which form of the spec is appropriate.  Read and understand Specials and Specs (HDPE Pipe)  Are specials and/or specs consistent with plans and summaries/quantities?

 Plans and Specification Development ◦ Plans and Specs - Clear and Concise  Are the appropriate payment mechanisms in place  Are the correct bid items and method of measurement being used (CY vs TON)  Incidental Work .5.2 – Reference Sections for Direct Payment  e.g., Pipe replacements and removal of existing pipe  Minimize risk  Are we placing unnecessary responsibility/risk on the contractor? ◦ Ambiguity  Are there conflicting specs, notes, etc.  Is the intent clear.

 Plans and Specification Development ◦ Summaries and Quantity Checks  Are the summaries clear?  Are quantities accurate. (Splices)  Take the time to perform quantity checks  Start Early  Have corrections made to the plans  Late changes can be made ◦ Constructability and Contract Time  Review the project as a complete package  How would you build it – Develop a rudimentary construction sequence  Identify restrictions or other stumbling blocks that could effect time  Is there sufficient contract time  Are there seasonal or weather limitations that could extend contract time  Chip seals, landscaping planting times

 Plans and Specification Development ◦ Construction Requirements  Restrictions – Environmental, Wildlife, Local Holidays or Events, etc.  Coordination Clauses – Utilities, landowners, etc.  Windows, Partial Completion Dates  Are they necessary? – Are they achievable? (Bonus for nothing?)  Liquidated Damages & Incentives  Are they aligned with project intent?  Are amounts appropriate?  What is the desired result?  Creating scheduling conflicts  Sequence of Work  Is a specific sequence necessary  Typically removes flexibility  K.I.S.S. -

 Pre-Bid ◦ Plan Job Showing  Create notes to ensure uniformity and accurate representation of the contract documents.  Stick to the contract documents  Do not speculate or offer opinions  Preserve the bidding process  Ensure each bidder has the same information  Know the documents that are available to the bidders ◦ Take note of what prospective bidders are saying/asking  May lead to an error or lack of clarity in the contract documents.  Evaluate issues to determine course of action  Have an addendum issued if necessary

 Review Bid Tabulations ◦ Compare line item unit costs for all bidders  Unusually high (or low) units costs can be a red flag  Investigate those unit costs that seem out of line  Review Construction Schedules ◦ Watch for accelerated schedules ◦ Do durations seem reasonable ◦ Get updated schedules as work progresses per  Compare schedules and evaluate changes to the time line - critical path, durations, etc.

 Pre-104 ◦ Listen and Observe - Early Recognition  Listen! – Contractors will often tip you off when there is a potential problem – sometimes before it becomes a problem  Observe the contractors operations and take note of work activities they are struggling with.  Be proactive – initiate conversation with the contractor ◦ Know your Contractor