MGSC/2009/06 Eurostat Strategy for Developing Light Peer Reviews (LPR) for Candidate Countries and Adapted Global Assessments (AGA) for Potential Candidates.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Yalta Seminar on Global Assessments, 2009 Eurostat and Global Assessments: Context, Approaches, Tools 3.1.
Advertisements

Safeguarding trust in Irish Official Statistics A Code of Practice for the Irish Statistical System Pádraig Dalton Director General Central Statistics.
Orientation to the Accreditation Internal Evaluation (Self-Study) Flex Activity March 1, 2012 Lassen Community College.
Capacity building activities of the OIE STDF WORKSHOP on Capacity Building Tools Geneva, 31 March 2008 Dr Sarah Kahn Director, International Trade Department.
Atlanta Public Schools Project Management Framework Proposed to the Atlanta Board of Education to Complete AdvancED/SACS “Required Actions” January 24,
Marina Signore Head of Service “Audit for Quality Istat Assessing Quality through Auditing and Self-Assessment Signore M., Carbini R., D’Orazio M., Brancato.
Joanna Fiedler Enlargement and Neighbouring Countries Unit DG Environment European Commission REReP → RENA Vision of the European Commission PEIP Regional.
EUROPEAN COMMISSION DG Employment, Social Affairs and Equal Opportunities Luca PIROZZI Social Protection and Inclusion Policies PROGRESS Community Programme.
Eurostat’s Technical Co-operation in the SPECA Region Mariana Kotzeva, Eurostat Adviser Hors Classe 7 th SPECA Project Working Group on Statistics, Issyk-Kul,
Organization of the peer review process of stress tests in the European context “stress tests of NPP Dukovany and NPP Temelín - evaluation of safety and.
Developing a programme for the implementation of the 2008 SNA and supporting statistics OECD Working Party on National Accounts October 2011, Paris,
Developing a programme for the implementation of the 2008 SNA and supporting statistics Seminar on Developing a programme for the implementation of the.
Country Experience with the 2008 Assessment Round Turkey Meeting of the Policy Group on Statistical Cooperation October 2008 Metin EROL Foreign Relations.
23 March 2012, Luxembourg MGSC STATISTICS LITHUANIA PROCEDURE FOR MONITORING THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE PEER REVIEW Audronė Miškinienė Head.
Bosna i Hercegovina Agencija za statistiku Bosne i Hercegovine Bosnia and Herzegovina Agency for Statistics of Bosnia and Herzegovina Donor coordination.
Status and role of International Department (Slovak experience) MGSC Meeting Luxembourg 23 – 24 March 2012 SOSR.
Global Assessment of National Statistical Systems: Global Assessment of National Statistical Systems: A tool for planning and monitoring capacity building.
23 March 2012 Adapted global assessments and light peer reviews.
Eurostat New round of peer reviews in the enlargement countries 1 Policy Group on Statistical Cooperation October 2015, Herceg Novi, Montenegro.
The Joint ECE-Eurostat programme on the new recommendations for the 2010 round of Population and Housing Censuses in the ECE region Joint ECE-Eurostat.
1 Role of HEREs in the Erasmus+ programme HERE meeting Alger
Statistical Cooperation with ENP-South Twelfth meeting of the Management Group on Statistical Cooperation March 2010 Luxembourg Agenda item 6.1.
United Nations Economic Commission for Europe Statistical Division WHAT MAKES AN EFFECTIVE AND EFFICIENT STATISTICAL SYSTEM Lidia Bratanova, Statistical.
Global Assessments and Integrated Economic Statistics Global Assessments and Integrated Economic Statistics from products towards processes United Nations.
Progress Report on Quality Issues SIPUS – Strengthening of Internationalisation Policies at Universities in Serbia February 18, 2015 Belgrade, Serbia.
M O N T E N E G R O Negotiating Team for the Accession of Montenegro to the European Union Working Group for Chapter 32 – Financial Control Bilateral screening:
ISO 9001 Quality Management System implementation experience in the Agency on Statistics of the Republic of Kazakhstan (ASRK) Zhasser Jarkinbayev, ASRK.
Developing National Capability for Integrated Border Management (IBM) in Lebanon Project Funded by the European Union Implemented by the International.
1 Recent developments in quality matters in the ESS High level seminar for Eastern Europe, Caucasus and Central Asia countries Claudia Junker, Eurostat,
1 Recent developments in quality related matters in the ESS High level seminar for Eastern Europe, Caucasus and Central Asia countries Claudia Junker,
1 Strategy for Statistical Cooperation in the ENP-East Region High Level Seminar June 2012, Tbilisi, Georgia Session No. 7 Jolanta Szczerbinska,
Strategy of Statistics in Georgia
Assessing a national PIC system
National Statistical Committee of the Kyrgyz Republic
Twinning – a Tool to Develop Education and Evaluation Systems
10-13 September 2013, Ankara, Turkey
PARIS21 - League of Arab States
United Nations Economic Commission for Europe
New round of assessments in the enlargement and EECCA countries
UNECE Technical Cooperation Activities
Update on the assessments carried out in the enlargement and ENP countries MGSC meeting March 2015 Point 4.1 of the Agenda Ferenc Gálik Unit A3.
Statistical Cooperation with ENP-East
Management Group on Statistical Cooperation March 2015
Policy Group on Statistical Cooperation October 2014, Antalya
4th RDG meeting Luxembourg
Agenda item 5b Main challenges and priorities for future work Implementation of the 2008 SNA in the EECCA, SEE and Mongolia Presentation by UNECE Workshop.
Strategy for statistical cooperation with the enlargement countries 2014 – 2020 MGSC March 2014 Point 3.1 of the Agenda Ferenc Gálik.
9. Quality and Experimental data
Education and Training Statistics Working Group – June 2014
The Amended ESS Statistical Law - Regulation (EC) 223/2009
Mandates for Unit A6 "Statistical cooperation" (Doc MGSC/2013/16)
Assessment of Quality in Statistics GLOBAL ASSESSMENTS, PEER REVIEWS AND SECTOR REVIEWS IN THE ENLARGEMENT AND ENP COUNTRIES Mirela Kadic, Project Manager.
Management Group on Statistical Cooperation March 2013, Luxembourg
Peer review in the Republic of Macedonia
ETS WG, 31 January-2 February 2005
Management Group on Statistical Cooperation March 2014, Luxembourg
Palestinian Central Bureau of Statistics
16th Meeting of the MGSC March 2014
Marleen De Smedt Geoffrey Thomas Cynthia Tavares
Policy Group on Statistical Cooperation October 2014, Antalya
Sixth SPECA Project Working Group Meeting Geneva, 16 June 2011
Policy Group on Statistical Cooperation October 2013, Skopje
Statistical cooperation
Internal control quality assessment
"Experience with the peer reviews, successes and things to change for next reviews" Delina Ibrahimaj, Albania.
The experiences of Statistical Office of the Republic of Serbia with the screening for Chapter 18 - Statistics PGSC, Kruševo October 2018.
Strategy for Statistical Cooperation in the ENP-East Region
Adapted global assessments and light peer reviews
Task Force Peer reviews and quality Eurostat
cooperation in statistics Proposal for the organizational structure
Presentation transcript:

MGSC/2009/06 Eurostat Strategy for Developing Light Peer Reviews (LPR) for Candidate Countries and Adapted Global Assessments (AGA) for Potential Candidates and ENP-East Countries

E.4MGSC/2009/06 The goal is to develop a strategy of organising peer reviews - similar to those developed for the ESS members but adapted to the specific situations of candidate, potential candidate, and ENP countries.

E.4MGSC/2009/06 Questions to be considered by delegates What is country experience with current review frameworks? How the two proposed approaches (LPR and AGA) can be evaluated regarding –elements covered by the assessment approach? –potential benefits and risks for the reviewed countries?

E.4MGSC/2009/06 Current review frameworks ESS peer reviews (ESS-PR) Traditional global assessment Eurostat annual assessments Institutional coverage National statistical institute National statistical system Topics covered Only horizontal topics (legislation, human resources, IT, governance) Horizontal topics, statistical infrastructure (classifications, etc.) and some sector statistics Horizontal topics, statistical infrastructure and sector statistics; securing regular data delivery is a key element Self-assessment questionnaires Formal part of the process Are not systematically used SMIS+ self-assessments Main purposesBenchmarking against other members of the ESS and identification of best practices Strategic orientation and re-design of statistical system. Basis for master plans and multi-annual work programs. Planning of assistance by donors. Monitoring progress towards EU standards for annual reports. SAp and succession negotiations. Evaluation, planning and coordination of assistance.

E.4MGSC/2009/06 Light Peer Reviews vs. Adapted Global Assessments Light peer reviews (LPRs) –intended for countries with advanced statistical systems that are about to join the EU (candidate countries) –precursors for standard ESS peer reviews Adapted global assessments (AGAs) –adapted to the needs of countries with European perspective or with a stated intention to align their statistical systems to that of the EU

E.4MGSC/2009/06 Light Peer Reviews –Candidate and potential candidate countries –One LPR country mission –Before the LPR mission self-assessment (questionnaire based on the ESS-PR version) specific training on LPR provided to the reviewed countries –Reviewers 2 ESS peers 1-2 observers from group of reviewed countries 1 Eurostat representative –Report to include recommendations for improvement actions covering all principles of the European Code of Practice with a view to future assistance needs; will not include rankings

E.4MGSC/2009/06 Adapted Global Assessments (1) –Mainly for ENP-East, as well as potential candidate countries –Details adapted to the circumstances of the reviewed country and relevant EU policy network regarding scope of elements of traditional global assessment degree of assessment of statistical areas against international standards and/or EU acquis –Sections on legislation, national statistical system, national statistical institute, and statistical domains –Repeated every 4-5 years

E.4MGSC/2009/06 Adapted Global Assessments (2) –Before the AGA mission(s) self-assessment (SMIS+ and/or questionnaire based on the ESS-PR version) specific training on AGA provided to the reviewed countries –Reviewers 2 ESS peers 2 observers from the group of reviewed countries 2 Eurostat representatives –Report to include recommendations for improvement actions with a view to future assistance needs; will not include rankings

E.4MGSC/2009/06 Tentative timetable March 2009MGSC to advise on key elements of the approaches to be taken June 2009CES Plenary meeting in Geneva to discuss key aspects of the approaches June/July 2009EFTA seminar for ENP-East countries on adapted global assessments July 2009Frameworks drafted (draft guidelines and questionnaires) October 2009PGSC to discuss and possibly approve approaches November 2009Training event for countries on how to prepare for such reviews December 2009First LPR conducted in volunteer test country February 2010First AGA conducted in volunteer test country March 2010MGSC consulted on results from the tests April/May- September AGAs and 2-3 LPRs carried out on the basis of the 2010 round of compliance monitoring with SMIS+ October 2010Reporting of results to the PGSC After October 2010Regular conduct of LPRs and AGAs (3 to 5 per year)

E.4MGSC/2009/06 Example: Global Assessment of the National Statistical System of Armenia (1) Currently an ongoing process: –Initiated Autumn 2008 by National Statistical Service of Republic of Armenia –Two missions First mission: 4.5 working days, end-January 2009 Second mission: 2.5 working days, end-March 2009 –Assessment report to be concluded – Spring/Summer 2009 Assessor team: –3 Eurostat representatives –1 ESS peer (EFTA) –3 UNECE representatives

E.4MGSC/2009/06 Example: Global Assessment of the National Statistical System of Armenia (2) Before the assessment missions –Self-assessment included both SMIS+ and adapted self- assessment questionnaire derived from ESS-PR version –No specific training in the country on the overall assessment process –Substantial documentation, including translation of relevant information, requested from the National Statistical Service Assessment missions –Assessor team split in two parallel-working groups –Large number of external producers and users met Assessment report –Equal focus on institutional aspects and statistical domains

E.4MGSC/2009/06 Thank You!