CFN 201 High School Principals’ Meeting Thursday, September 27, 2012 12:00 – 3:45 p.m.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Introducing Instructional Expectations
Advertisements

Practice Profiles Guidance for West Virginia Schools and Districts April 2012.
NYC DOE – Office of Teacher Effectiveness A
Creating Coherence Work Session: Part 1 Copyright © 2013 American Institutes for Research. All rights reserved. Connecting Teacher Evaluation and Support.
Activity: Introducing Staff to Danielson’s Framework for Teaching
PD Plan on the Danielson Framework ADSUP 731 Kelli McDaniel May, 2013
Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation Project Preparing and Applying Formative Multiple Measures of Performance Conducting High-Quality Self-Assessments.
Professional Growth= Teacher Growth
Differentiated Supervision
Teacher Evaluation Ashley Greene 10/29/13.
NYC Teacher Effectiveness A Preview of the NYC Teacher Effectiveness Framework for Created by The Center for the Professional Education of Teachers,
Resources to Support Teachers NAME LOCATION DATE.
Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation Project Connecting the Common Core State Standards and TPEP 1.
Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation Project Preparing and Applying Formative Multiple Measures of Performance Goal Setting in Educator Evaluation.
Student Learning Objectives The SLO Process Student Learning Objectives Training Series Module 3 of 3.
Our Leadership Journey Cynthia Cuellar Astrid Fossum Janis Freckman Connie Laughlin.
Principals’ Conference CFN 204 Diane Foley, Network Leader Mary Barton, SATIF October 12,
AiZ and FT&LQ project Teachers working collaboratively in teams (PLTs, Triads) Teachers developing a shared understanding of effective teaching (PoLT,
Student Learning Objectives: Setting Goals for Student Growth Countywide Professional Development Day Thursday, April 25, 2013 This presentation contains.
Instructional leadership: The role of promoting teaching and learning EMASA Conference 2011 Presentation Mathakga Botha Wits school of Education.
Supporting Teacher Development Using Danielson’s Framework Goals of our session: Explore core beliefs informing the Citywide Instructional Expectations.
Citywide Instructional Expectations, Teacher Teams and the QR—Implications for Mary Barton SATIF CFN 204 May 17, 2013.
Assistant Principal Meeting August 28, :00am to 12:00pm.
ExCEL Academic Liaison Meeting Elementary- January 8, 2015 Middle/High School – January 15, 2015.
CFN 609 Principals’ Summer Institute Citywide Instructional Expectations Teacher Development Schools will select competencies relevant.
ISLLC Standard #2 Implementation
Monitoring through Walk-Throughs Participants are expected to purpose the book: The Three-Minute Classroom Walk-Through: Changing School Supervisory.
Compass: Module 2 Compass Requirements: Teachers’ Overall Evaluation Rating Student Growth Student Learning Targets (SLTs) Value-added Score (VAM) where.
FRAMEWORK FOR TEACHING (FFT) SUMMER INSTITUTE CONVERSATIONS TO ENHANCE PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE DR. MICHAEL BROOKS JUNE 18, 2012.
Using the Nine Characteristics to Test Assumptions in School Improvement G. Sue Shannon OSPI Senior Researcher WERA/OSPI Assessment Conference December.
Name Workshop Facilitator Instructional Leadership: Creating Demand.
The Danielson Framework Emmanuel Andre Owings Mills High School Fall 2013.
Using Teacher Evaluation as a Tool for Professional Growth and School Improvement Redmond School District
1 Introducing Danielson’s Framework for Teaching NYCDOE | November
Assistant Principal Meeting September 18, :00am to 1:00pm Presenters: Anna Arrigo & Marygrace DiForte.
Session Materials  Wiki
Envisioning Success: Setting the Stage July 24, 2012 Diane Foley, Network Leader Mary Barton, SATIF.
WELCOME WASHINGTON STATE FELLOWS! September 22, 2015 Jessica Vavrus, Assistant Superintendent of Teaching and Learning, OSPI Cindy Duncan, Assistant Superintendent.
Resources to Support Teachers NAME LOCATION DATE.
 Development of a model evaluation instrument based on professional performance standards (Danielson Framework for Teaching)  Develop multiple measures.
BY COURTNEY N. SPEER TECHNOLOGY AS A TOOL SPRING Professional Growth & Self- Reflection.
PGES: The Final 10% i21: Navigating the 21 st Century Highway to Top Ten.
Boot Camp 2014 The 4 Cs in the Common Core. Marta Stirling School Library Coordinator, East River Joan Upell School Library Coordinator, West River.
NYC DOE – Office of Teacher Effectiveness B. Examining the Framework
INSTRUCTIONAL LEADERSHIP Supporting Common Assessments (Time for Common Assessments) © AZ Board of Regents, All rights reserved, 2012.
NYC DOE – Office of Teacher Effectiveness F. Prioritize Areas for Feedback 1.
ISLLC Standard #3 Planning for School – wide Behavior Management
Instructional Leadership Planning with Indicators of Quality Instruction.
Citywide Expectations for
FOUR DOMAINS Domain 4: Domain 1: Professional Planning & Responsibilities Preparation Domain 3: Domain 2: Instruction Classroom Environment.
ISLLC Standard #6 ISLLC Standard #6 Implementing Educational Policy Name Workshop Facilitator.
CFN 609 Principals’ Meeting December 6, 2012 Providing Effective Feedback Domain 1: Planning and Preparation Component 1e: Designing Coherent Instruction.
Goal Setting in Educator Evaluation Sept. 11 th,
Instructional Leadership: Applying Concern & Use Name Workshop Facilitator.
Instructional Leadership: Monitoring Insights, Patterns, & Trends.
Teacher Evaluation University of New England - EDU 704 Dr. William Doughty Submitted By: Teri Gaston.
DANIELSON MODEL SAI 2016 Mentor Meeting. Danielson Model  Framework with rubrics  Define specific types of behaviors expected to be observed  A common.
Quality Review Updates for Presented by Mary Barton, SATIF CFN 204 Assistant Principals’ Conference September 2, 2011.
Presented by Mary Barton SATIF CFN 204 Principals’ Conference September 16, 2011.
The Literacy and Numeracy Secretariat Le Secrétariat de la littératie et de la numératie October – octobre 2007 The School Effectiveness Framework A Collegial.
Mid-year Professional Conversations 1. JESA Preparation Process 2 Learn—Engage with the content as a participant and surface questions/hot spots. Internalize—Identify.
Using the CLASS tool to Improve Instructional Practices in Early Childhood Tracie Dow and Felicia Owo.
Welcome TDEC Professional Learning December 22,
Implementing the Professional Growth Process Session 3 Observing Teaching and Professional Conversations American International School-Riyadh Saturday,
Instructional Leadership Supporting Common Assessments.
Outcomes By the end of our sessions, participants will have…  an understanding of how VAL-ED is used as a data point in developing professional development.
Framework For Teaching (FFT)
An Introduction to Teacher Evaluation
Gary Carlin, CFN 603 September, 2012
Project Outcomes (separate handout)
Presentation transcript:

CFN 201 High School Principals’ Meeting Thursday, September 27, :00 – 3:45 p.m.

Agenda Welcome Introduction and Overview Activity 1: Competencies and Language of The Danielson’s Framework Activity 2: From low inference data to feedback Identifying Next Steps Academic Policy 2.0 Planning for the January Regents PPR Goals

Supporting Implementation of the CIE: School Instructional Leads Principals will identify a set of Instructional Leads (1 – 8 per school) to support school-wide instructional initiatives. Instructional Leads will work with school leadership and the Network Team to: - Analyze teacher and student work for quality and Common Core alignment - Lead or participate in school-wide inquiry cycles - Implement professional learning experiences that are informed by the learning needs of teachers/students - Help develop and lead peer-mediated activities anchored by Danielson’s Framework for Teaching to build a shared understanding of what constitutes effective teaching

Goals for Today Commence work with the CIE Review and analyze the language of Danielson’s Framework (DF) Categorize data by DF competency Prioritize data for feedback purposes Determine where data falls on the DF continuum Consider what constitutes high leverage feedback

Intended Outcomes By the end of our session today, we will have: ◦ Looked carefully at DF Competencies ◦ Analyzed the distinctions across the DF continuum ◦ Coded data as per DF competency ◦ Determined priority competency for feedback ◦ Identified where data of priority competency falls on the DF continuum ◦ Considered feedback to move teachers to the next level as per the DF continuum

CIE & Danielson’s Framework 1. Teacher development focuses on supporting all students to meet the Common Core standards. a. Schools will strengthen the common language and understanding of what quality teaching looks like by deepening the school community’s comprehension of Charlotte Danielson’s Framework for Teaching.

CIE Focus Competencies 1e: Designing coherent instruction 3b: Using questioning and discussion techniques 3d: Using assessment in instruction Additional TEP Competencies: ◦ 2b: Establishing a culture for learning ◦ 2d: Managing student behavior ◦ 3c: Engaging students in learning ◦ 4e: Growing and developing professionally

Activity 1: DF Competencies Part 1: Identifying Domain & Competency ◦ In your triad, take out your DF level of performance squares ◦ Read the squares together ◦ Determine which Domain/Competency they represent ◦ Align squares across the continuum showing the levels of performance [I - D - E - HE] ◦ You may not have all 4 levels for each competency!

Activity 1, cont’d Part 2: Identify distinguishing language for each level of performance ◦ Highlight/underline the words/phrases in each square that distinguish one level of performance from another ◦ With your triad, discuss your understanding of this language and what it means

Activity 1, cont’d Part 3: Articulating teacher/student actions that fall along the continuum ◦ Read through each DF Competency, paying particular attention to critical attributes ◦ Discuss what each level of performance looks like, sounds like, feels like ◦ Write 2-3 examples you would see/hear in a classroom that match each level of performance

Activity 1: Whole Group Share What did you notice about the distinguishing language? What distinguishes D from E? What distinguished E from HE? What a-ha insights did you and your triad members have while doing Activity 1?

CIE: Supporting Teacher Growth School leaders will conduct frequent formative classroom observations and provide teachers with formative feedback and professional development to support improved practice in identified competencies and across a common framework.

Activity 2: Using DF Competencies with Classroom Data Part 1: ‘Code’ the data ◦ In your triad, read each line of the classroom observation transcript, and ‘code it’ using the 7 DF Competencies (1e, 2b, 2d, 3b, 3c, 3d, 4e) ◦ Write your coding (1e. 2b, 2d, 3b, 3c, 3d, 4e) in the column labeled ‘Competency’

Activity 2, cont’d Part 2: Identifying a priority Competency as a high leverage area ◦ Review the transcript coding ◦ What Competencies are have been identified? ◦ Which Competency is most critical for this teacher at this time?

Activity 2, cont’d Part 3: Where does your ‘priority’ area fall on the continuum? ◦ Look at the transcript coded items one by one alongside the DF competency continuum ◦ Identify where the data falls on the DF competency continuum: I-D-E-HE

Activity 2, cont’d Part 4: Consider what to provide feedback on and how to articulate next steps ◦ Which area is highest in terms of leverage for this teacher at the present time? ◦ What specific actions could this teacher take to move/shift practice? ◦ What would the next steps be and how would they fall on the continuum? ◦ Provide an example

Activity 2: Whole Group Share What are you taking away from doing this activity? ◦ A-ha moments? ◦ Insights? ◦ Next Steps?

Reflecting on the morning Please take the next 5-10 minutes to respond to the 4-square reflection sheet Please provide your name so that we can tailor support (box 4) to your needs Thank you for your feedback!