Slide 1 February 21, 2006 Oakdale Irrigation District Water Resources Plan A Community Plan. A Successful Future. Water Supply Reliability Oakdale Irrigation.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
MORE WATER Phase I Reconnaissance Report C. Mel Lytle, Ph.D. Water Resource Coordinator San Joaquin County Public Works Board of Directors Update February.
Advertisements

Challenges in Finding and Connecting New Water Sources J. Tupling, P.Eng. June 22, 2009.
May 18, 2005 Oakdale Irrigation District Water Resources Plan.
Calista AVCP Regional Energy Plan. Preliminary Planning and Stakeholder Involvement Resource Inventory and Data Analysis Develop and Review Draft Energy.
David Purkey, SEI Rob Lempert, RAND
Sustainable Regional Water Resource Management By: Tucson Regional Water Coalition and Southern Arizona Leadership Council.
THE EXPANDING ROLE of RECYCLED WATER The Need, Benefits and Cost Effectiveness Make Recycled Water an Increasingly Valued Resource Harry Ehrlich, SDA Principal.
Slide 1 Oakdale Irrigation District Water Resources Plan.
Colorado River Basin Water Supply and Demand Study December 10, 2010.
History of Water Reuse in Texas
Responses to the New Normal Creative Partnerships for Innovative Water Solutions Colorado Water Workshop – July 17, 2013.
Water for Texas 2012 State Water Plan. Water Planning: Legislative Response to Drought  Late 1950s Drought of Record – 1957: Creation of TWDB – $200.
Department of Water Resources Role in Water Transfers Jerry Johns, DWR
1 Water Planning & Stewardship Committee Item #6b Summary Subject: Review of Long-Term Delta Actions & Water Supply Planning Implications Purpose:To open.
SUSTAINABLE OPERATION OF THE YAQUI RESERVOIR SYSTEM.
Slide 1 November 2005 Oakdale Irrigation District Water Resources Plan A Community Plan. A Successful Future. Phase 1 Recommendations Oakdale Irrigation.
National Cohesive Wildland Fire Strategy 1. What is the Cohesive Strategy? A national, collaborative approach to addressing wildland fire across all lands.
Task 3 Institutional Incentives for Efficient Water Use.
Hood River County Monthly Meeting Presentation Toni E Turner, M.S., P.E., Project Manager and Technical Lead.
Slide 1 Infrastructure Plan − Existing System Assessment Oakdale Irrigation District July 5, 2005.
Overview of the Colorado River Basin Water Supply and Demand Study Urban Water Institute 19 th Annual Water Policy Conference August 22-24, 2012 San Diego.
Southern Delivery System NSPE-Colorado State Meeting February 19, 2010.
SWRCB Periodic Review Topic #8  Part A – Concerns with 1999 SWRCB EIR analysis.  Part B – Concerns with San Joaquin River Base-flow Construct.  Part.
Colorado River Basin Water Supply and Demand Study Next Steps: Agriculture Conservation, Productivity, and Transfers Workgroup Urban Water Institute Conference.
Columbia River Water Management Program (CRWMP) Review of Year One Upper Crab Creek Planning Unit Meeting April 17, 2007.
Water Supply Planning Initiative State Water Commission November 22, 2004.
2010 Yakima Basin Science & Management Conference Yakima River Basin Study June 16, 2010 Joel Hubble, Technical Projects Biologist Columbia-Cascades Area.
Regional Grant Funding Coordination for Implementation of Watershed Management Plans Project Clean Water Summit July 15, 2004 David W. Gibson SDRWQCB
Colorado River Sustainability, Drought Response & Central Arizona Project Urban Water Institute August 27, 2015.
ESPA Comprehensive Aquifer Management Plan Public Meetings December 2, 4, Idaho Water Resource Board Jonathan Bartsch--CDR Associates.
Monterey Peninsula Water Management District 1 Confirm Scope of Work and Description for MPWMD ASR Project Item 13 April 18, 2005 Regular Meeting Staff.
Slide 1 April 18, 2006 Oakdale Irrigation District Water Resources Plan A Community Plan. A Successful Future. Financial Model and Discussion of Preferred.
An Interregional Water Solution with Conjunctive Use of Groundwater Haskell L. Simon President, Coastal Plains Groundwater Conservation District Vice President,
Short and Long Range Water Supply Planning and Aquifer Performance Test (APT)
Withlacoochee Regional Water Supply Authority Water Supply Plan Update - Progress Report #3 May 15 – June 18.
Sustainable Regional Water Resource Management By: Tucson Regional Water Coalition and Southern Arizona Leadership Council SUMBER:
Preparing Water Managers for Drought and Climate Change in the Southwest Katharine Jacobs Executive Director Arizona Water Institute USGS Congressional.
Connecticut Department of Energy and Environmental Protection.
Chapter 3 Strategic Information Systems Planning.
Slide 1 Infrastructure Plan − Improve Service Projects Oakdale Irrigation District August 17, 2005.
Central Valley Project Cost Allocation Study -- Irrigation and Municipal & Industrial (M&I) Benefits Public Meeting August 9, 2013.
Withlacoochee Regional Water Supply Authority Withlacoochee Master Regional Water Supply Planning and Implementation Program (WMRWSPIP) Technical Review.
1 Status of AC Input from Last Meeting. 2 Overview  Input received on Strategic Planning Elements (Mission, Vision, Guiding Principles) & the 7 Key Content.
Upper San Joaquin River Basin Storage Investigation ACWA Regions 9 and 10 Carlsbad Water Summit U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Reclamation State.
November 17, 2015 Charting the Future of Water Reuse for the City of Raleigh Sheryl D. Smith, P.E. – CDM Smith Eileen M. Navarrete, P.E., PMP – City of.
Is the Mid-Atlantic Region Water Rich? Presentation to 5 th Mid-Atlantic Regional Planning Roundtable November 7, 2008 Joseph Hoffman, Executive Director.
Oakdale Irrigation District Agricultural Water Management Plan Briefing on 2015 Update January 5, /5/2016 OID AWMP Update Briefing.
City of San Diego’s Recycled Water Study Item W15a October 10, 2012 Presentation to the California Coastal Commission.
Water Supply Planning in Hampton Roads: Options for an Uncertain Future The State of Virginia’s Water Resources October 28, 2015 Whitney S. Katchmark,
California Water Plan Update Advisory Committee Meeting January 20, 2005.
Slide 1 Oakdale Irrigation District Water Resources Plan “What We’ve Learned” October 2005.
Municipal Water District of Orange County OC Water Reliability Study INTERIM REPORT Review Interim Phase 1 Results December 8, 2015 Orange County Business.
Slide 1 March 7, 2006 Oakdale Irrigation District Water Resources Plan A Community Plan. A Successful Future. Discussion of Annexation/Expansion Issues.
1 EASTERN MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT 2016 Legislative Priorities and Strategy, and Policy Principles Jolene Walsh, Senior Director of Public.
Strategies for Colorado River Water Management Jaci Gould Deputy Regional Director Lower Colorado Region.
Hydrology and Water Resources Engineering ( ) Government Engineering College Rajkot Civil Engineering Department Faculty Guide: Prof V.G.Yadav DROUGHT.
Alan Matheson State Planning Coordinator November 19, 2013 Preparing for an Uncertain Future: Developing a Utah Water Strategy Alan Matheson Executive.
2016 Water Inventory and Analysis Report Highlights on Land Use, Water Supply, and Water Budgets Christina Buck, PhD Water Resources Scientist Board of.
Metropolitan North Georgia Water Planning District DRAFT Water Resource Management Plan Review
2017 Llano Estacado Regional Water Plan Planning Group Meeting
Water Resources Plan 2040 Update
SGMA – A Farmer’s Perspective
Allocation of Ogallala Groundwater Supplies
Policy Principles for the Allocation of Recycled Water
NRCS Agricultural Water Management Activities in the Southeast US
Future Water Supply Evaluation
City of Sunrise Wastewater Reuse Program
Status after Second Year of Work Implementing the Recommendations of the Santa Cruz Water Supply Advisory Committee Joint Meeting Santa Cruz City Council.
California Water Commission
Claude “Bud” Lewis Desalination Plant
Presentation transcript:

Slide 1 February 21, 2006 Oakdale Irrigation District Water Resources Plan A Community Plan. A Successful Future. Water Supply Reliability Oakdale Irrigation District Water Resources Plan A Community Plan. A Successful Future. Water Supply Reliability

2 The Water Resources Plan Goals Technical Analyses Institutional Activities Public Involvement Provide long-term protection to OID’s water rights. Address federal, state, and local water challenges. Rebuild/modernize an out-of-date system to meet changing customer needs. Develop affordable ways to finance improvements. Involve the public in the planning process.

3 The Project Team will need Board Input Throughout the PEIR Preparation Technical Analyses Institutional Activities Public Involvement Numerous issues from Phase 1 need continued Board input. Some items specifically relate to PEIR activities Other items, while not strictly tied to PEIR, need continued Board discussion

4 Schedule of Board Involvement Water Supply Reliability and prelude to Transfer/Annexation issues (Informational Presentation)

5 What is Water Supply Reliability and Why is it Important? w “Reliability” can mean different things to different people, for example: – To all users of Stanislaus River Supplies – Reliability of Stan. River supply to OID – Reliability of OID supplies to an OID customer w Typically expressed as a % w Reliability drives OID’s ability to annex new lands and/or transfer water.

6 Oakdale ID Water Supply (2004 Usage) Stanislaus Pre-1914 Water – 257 TAF (93%) Stanislaus Post Water – 1.3 TAF (>1%) Groundwater – 4.4 TAF (2%) Drainwater Reuse 13.5 TAF (5%)

7 Stanislaus River Supplies to OID are Reliable – But not 100% Reliable w New Melones Reservoir constructed w 1988 Agreement and Stipulation with Reclamation – OID and SSJID share the first 600 TAF of inflow w If inflow < 600 TAF, Districts share curtailments based on a formula (600 – Inflow divided by 3) w “Conserved water” up to 200 TAF but first spilled

8 Computer Models are Used to Simulate Operations and Runoff

9 Oakdale ID Receives its Full Allocation in 61 out of 77 Years TA F

TA F – 300 TAF – 300 TAF TAF

Statistics Help Summarize Stan R. Reliability–Independent of Acres Irrigated

Overlaying Current Customer Demand Tells More of the Story %10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100% The expected range of OID Stanislaus River demand not including current water transfer obligations is 262 to 299 TAF.

Overlaying Current Customer Demand Tells More of the Story %10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100% Without transfers, OID would need to augment Stanislaus River supply with additional sources under average ET conditions 9% of the time. The expected range of OID Stanislaus River demand not including current water transfer obligations is 262 to 299 TAF.

Overlaying Current Customer Demand Tells More of the Story %10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100% Without transfers, OID would need to augment Stanislaus River supply with additional sources under average ET conditions 9% of the time. Without transfers, OID would need to augment Stanislaus River supplies under maximum ET conditions 21% of the time. The expected range of OID Stanislaus River demand not including current water transfer obligations is 262 to 299 TAF.

%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100% TAF The expected range of OID Stanislaus River demand including minimum water transfer obligations is 292 to 329 TAF. Overlaying all Current OID Demand for Stan. R. Water Tells the Whole Story

%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100% TAF With minimum transfer obligations and average ET conditions, OID would need to augment Stanislaus supplies 19% of the time. The expected range of OID Stanislaus River demand including minimum water transfer obligations is 292 to 329 TAF. Overlaying all Current OID Demand for Stan. R. Water Tells the Whole Story

%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100% TAF With minimum transfer obligations and average ET conditions, OID would need to augment Stanislaus supplies 19% of the time. The expected range of OID Stanislaus River demand including minimum water transfer obligations is 292 to 329 TAF. With minimum transfer obligations and maximum ET conditions, OID would need to augment their Stanislaus River supplies with other sources in every year. Overlaying all Current OID Demand for Stan. R. Water Tells the Whole Story

TAF %10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100% The expected range of OID Stanislaus River demand including minimum water transfer obligations is 312 to 349 TAF. What if OID Annexed 5,000 Acres Today (under current policies)?

19 Conclusions (Current Land Use and Minimum Transfer Obligations) w In a maximum crop demand conditions, OID would need to augment its surface water supplies – Additional GW Pumping ($$ impact) – Reduced deliveries (modified rotations) w With average demand, OID would need to augment its surface water supplies 19% of the time

20 The Water Resources Plan Recommends Improving Current Level of Reliability w Developed conservative plan to meet worst case needs. w “Worst case” is defined as a maximum water demand condition occurring simultaneous to an extreme (5% chance of occurrence) Stanislaus River Curtailment w Strategy dependent on upcoming OID policy decisions regarding drought response, annexation, and water transfers

21 Implementing the WRP Improves Existing Customer Reliability w From an in-District grower perspective, assuming the following: – Max ET (299 TAF) – 30 TAF minimum transfer obligation – No annexations – 15 TAF of emergency pumping capability – Reduced rotations resulting in 10-14TAF in delivery curtailments w Customer reliability is 79% Current Customer Reliability

22 Implementing the WRP Improves Existing Customer Reliability w From an in-District growers perspective, same assumptions, plus: – 5000 acres of annexations (current policies) w Maximum demand could be as high as 360 TAF ( ). w With current facilities, this demand exceeds OID’s supplies Current Customer Reliability

23 Implementing the WRP Improves Existing Customer Reliability w From an in-District growers perspective, assuming the following: – 2025 Demands (233 – 265 TAF) – 50 TAF Minimum transfer obligation – Over 4,000 acres of annexations – 20 TAF of emergency pumping capability and increased drainwater reuse – Reduced rotations resulting in 10-14TAF in delivery curtailments w Customer reliability is 95 to 99% Future Customer Reliability with WRP

24 OID Can’t Improve Stanislaus River Reliability, Just Customer Reliability w Customer Reliability is also affected by board policies, facilities (gw and reuse), and land use w The WRP is structured to be implemented over time w Reliability improves steadily over the course of implementation w Additional water transfers and annexations need to be carefully phased – Availability of water supply – Financing of the WRP

25 Schedule of Board Involvement CEQA Scoping Meeting

26 Schedule of Board Involvement Expansion of Service Issues (Informational Presentation) and development of Annexation Policy Guiding Principles (Board Action)

27 Schedule of Board Involvement Water Resources Planning Committee Discussion of Annexation Policy Guiding Principles

28 Schedule of Board Involvement Annexation Policy Guiding Principles Board (Board Action) and Drought Response Plan (Informational Presentation)

29 Schedule of Board Involvement 1)Water Transfer Discussion to include Extension of Existing Contracts, and Potential New Recipients. 2)Confirmation of “Preferred Alternative”. 3)Infrastructure Projects and Details (Informational Presentations)

30 Implementing Best Apparent Alternative Will Benefit OID’s Customers and the Community w Protect OID’s water rights. w Enhance customer service for all users. w Rebuild, modernize, and expand system infrastructure. w Protect the future water supply needs of the cities of Oakdale and Riverbank. w Keep water rates affordable through a balanced effort of water transfers and service to “new” customers within OID’s Sphere of Influence. w Substantially increase water supply reliability and meet OID service in a worst-case drought.

Slide 31 February 21, 2006 Oakdale Irrigation District Water Resources Plan A Community Plan. A Successful Future. Water Supply Reliability Oakdale Irrigation District Water Resources Plan A Community Plan. A Successful Future. Water Supply Reliability