National Aeronautics and Space Administration www.nasa.gov/sls Space Launch System Phase I Safety Review Preparation for GT #2 Topic: Phase I Safety Review.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Welcome to the Open Court Business Plan Executive Summary Template!
Advertisements

TITLE OF PROJECT PROPOSAL NUMBER Principal Investigator PI’s Organization ESTCP Selection Meeting DATE.
Secondary Payloads Overview
[Insert Project Name] Detailed Design Review (DDR) [Insert Date of DDR] Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services eXpedited Life Cycle (XLC)
TITLE OF PROJECT PROPOSAL NUMBER Principal Investigator PI’s Organization ESTCP Selection Meeting DATE.
1 Resumes Cover Letters Preparing for an Interview.
USING NASA QUALITY STANDARDS NASA Academy of Aerospace (AAQ) Quality Mini-Workshop Ken Crane Quality Engineering Technical Discipline Team Lead NASA SAFETY.
DoD Information Technology Security Certification and Accreditation Process (DITSCAP) Phase III – Validation Thomas Howard Chris Pierce.
Fundamentals of Engineering for Honors - Team Project P. 1 Spring Quarter 2003 Engineering H193 Project Notebook & Brainstorming Sketches Week 1 Day 2.
1 SOFTWARE PRODUCTION. 2 DEVELOPMENT Product Creation Means: Methods & Heuristics Measure of Success: Quality f(Fitness of Use) MANAGEMENT Efficient &
1 08 January 2015 Stephen Horan Cube Quest Kick-off: Communications Rules PI for Avionics Space Technology Mission Directorate.
System Safety & Mission Assurance (SS&MA) for Sub-Class D Missions Steve Jara NASA Ames System Safety & Mission Assurance Division.
TS16949 requirements Subjects –Audit planning –Recertification audit requirements –Auditing Remote supporting functions.
LSU 10/09/2007System Design1 Project Management Unit #2.
LSU 01/18/2005Project Life Cycle1 The Project Life Cycle Project Management Unit, Lecture 2.
HACCP Training Guide
LSU 07/07/2004Communication1 Communication & Documentation Project Management Unit – Lecture 8.
Software Project Management
IHE Supply white paper Process for cross-domain case capture and analysis.
The Organizational Plan (Details of Your Business) 2-2.
Current Safety Status Phase III Flight Safety Review 12 Jan 2009.
Imperial Ship Management AB “2.0”
Certification and Accreditation CS Phase-1: Definition Atif Sultanuddin Raja Chawat Raja Chawat.
1 Chapter 5 Project management. 2 Project management : Is Organizing, planning and scheduling software projects.
Continuing analysis and surveillance system (CASS)
Lecture 7 Risk Analysis CSCI – 3350 Software Engineering II Fall 2014 Bill Pine.
INFO 424 Team Project Practicum Week 2 - Launch report, Project tracking, Review report Glenn Booker Notes largely from Prof. Hislop.
IT 499 Bachelor Capstone Week 4. Adgenda Administrative Review UNIT Four UNIT Five Project UNIT Six Preview Project Status Summary.
THE PROJECT LIFE CYCLE PROJECT MANAGEMENT LIFE CYCLE LSU 01/18/2005 PROJECT LIFE CYCLE 1.
Application – Identifying, Listing Equipment, and Documentation
Rules for Supporting Part 803 and Part 806 Decision Making Page 1 Establishing Rules for: Medical Device Reports (803) & Correction and Removal Reports.
IFS310: Module 7 Business Requirements Statement Interpersonal Skills and Communications.
PROJECT TITLE Project Leader: Team: Executive Project Sponsor (As Required): Date: Month/Day/Year 16/25/2015 V2.
IT 499 Bachelor Capstone Week 3. Adgenda Administrative Review UNIT two UNIT threeProject UNIT four Preview Project Status Summary.
Critical Design Review (CDR)
Project & Risk Management
Design Report – Fall Semester. Title Page List name of project and team number List date List team members, advisor, sponsor Team logos.
Solar Probe Plus A NASA Mission to Touch the Sun March 2015 Instrument Suite Name Presenter's Name.
Judges Score Card Overview Mark Turner NASA Ames Research Center.
RLV Reliability Analysis Guidelines Terry Hardy AST-300/Systems Engineering and Training Division October 26, 2004.
Preliminary Design Review (PDR) Advanced Energy Vehicle.
SRR and PDR Charter & Review Team Linda Pacini (GSFC) Review Chair.
Alpha Magnetic Spectrometer NASA / DOE National Aeronautics and Space Administration AMS-02 ROAD TO COFR Mike Fohey July 15, 2004.
Technical Report Outline Title Page Frontispiece Abstract Table of Contents List of Figures/ List of Tables.
SwCDR (Peer) Review 1 UCB MAVEN Particles and Fields Flight Software Critical Design Review Peter R. Harvey.
Failure Modes and Effects Analysis (FMEA)
Requirement Elicitation Review – Class 8 Functional Requirements Nonfunctional Requirements Software Requirements document Requirements Validation and.
Failure Modes, Effects and Criticality Analysis
Creating Your Business Plan 1. 2 Grading Criteria 300 pts!
Academic Writing Fatima AlShaikh. A duty that you are assigned to perform or a task that is assigned or undertaken. For example: Research papers (most.
Page No. 1 ISS_CM_019 (Rev 09/2011) Pre-decisional, For Internal Use Only Payload Safety Review Panel (PSRP) Process Updates/Status International Space.
Session 22 & 23 Dr. Dan C. Surber, ESEP
Planetary Lander PDR Team Name
ACCIDENT/INCIDENT REPORT
Architecture Concept Documents
FMEA.
DEFINITIONS.
Conducting the performance appraisal
Development Test Overview
0.0 Instrument Suite Name Presenter’s name
Outcome TFCS-11// February Washington DC
Air Carrier Continuing Analysis and Surveillance System (CASS)
Conducting the performance appraisal
Outcome TFCS-11// February Washington DC
JSA Quality Assessment Tool Guidelines for Assessors
This presentation document has been prepared by Vault Intelligence Limited (“Vault") and is intended for off line demonstration, presentation and educational.
Reporting 25 April 2018.
PSS verification and validation
Project Management Unit #2
ESHAC #8 Safety Readiness Review Thomas Hansson, ESH
Presentation transcript:

National Aeronautics and Space Administration Space Launch System Phase I Safety Review Preparation for GT #2 Topic: Phase I Safety Review Preparation for GT #2 Date: 10/21/2015 Org: Scott Spearing / FP30 Cube Quest Town Hall Meeting #2

Agenda Safety Ground Rules Safety Review Process Overview Safety Data Package Development Safety Presentation Questions? 2

Safety Ground Rules 3 Definition for a Hazard: Any affect by or from the secondary payload which could cause harm or risk the successful operation or mission of the Space Launch System (SLS) vehicle, primary payload (Orion), or the ground crew. The Secondary Payload Deployment System’s prime directives (in order of importance): 1)Do no harm to the vehicle 2)Do not affect the process/schedule of the vehicle 3)Deploy payloads at the end of SLS operations 4)Aid in the success of the secondary payload missions We are guests on the initial flight of a new vehicle, which has the ability to leave LEO.

Safety Status/Process 4 Phase 0 - Introduce payload concepts to the PSRP - Preliminary identification of possible hazards - Gain insight from PSRP as to payload concept & hazards Process flow is from SLSP EM-1 Secondary Payload Safety Review Process (SLS-PLAN-217) Phase I - Present preliminary payload design to PSRP - Identify possible system design hazards & potential hazard mitigations - Receive PSRP comments/suggestions & direction to advance to Phase II Phase II - Present mature payload design to PSRP - Identify methods of verification to assure hazard is eliminated or controlled - Identify any modifications/alterations to previous design or Phase I agreement - Receive PSRP comments/suggestions & direction to advance to Phase III Phase III - Present verification results (i.e. analysis, test reports, inspections, etc.) to PSRP - Identify any modifications/alterations to previous design or Phase II agreement - Receive PSRP comments & recommendation for flight to SLS Presentation RequiredSafety Data Package w/Hazard Report Required

Safety Data Package 5 Safety Data Package is composed of: 1)Basic Introduction Fill in blue highlighted wording w/payload specific information 2)Mission Overview Fill in blue highlighted wording w/payload specific information Brief paragraph of mission details only 3)SLS Payload Accommodations Fill in blue highlighted wording w/payload specific information 4)Payload Hardware Overview This section w/#7 (see below) that the payload developer needs to put as much detailed information, concerning their hardware, into the document. Areas with in a cubesat design that could be a hazard (i.e. batteries, pressure vessels, liquid propellants, energy storage devices, etc.) need to have additional info added. 5)Ground Processing Fill in blue highlighted wording w/payload specific information 6)On-Orbit Operations Fill in blue highlighted wording w/payload specific information 7)Safety Assessment This section needs to be filled out w/any possible hazard you think you have, whether it is identified in the outline or something you may have a concern about. Also need to discuss how that hazard could be eliminated/mitigated/controlled.

Hazard Report 6 Current hazard report hazards fall into either a “short form” or a “long form”. Short Forms – Capture the more common type of hazards that most payloads could experience. For Phase I the following blocks need to be filled out: Block A – Leave blank, to be filled in by NASA safety Block B – enter “Phase I” Block C – enter date you plan to submit hazard report Block D – enter your cubesat name Block F – Indicate Mission Phase the hazard could occur Block H – Indicate which hazard control in Block G you plan to employ Block I – is used for Phase II & III to identify how you plan to verify you have the proper hazard control in place (i.e. inspection, analysis, testing, etc.) and where you will list the reports confirming you completed the verification. Any data you wish to add to support your filling out of the hazard report can be added as appendixes (i.e. materials lists, grounding schematic, etc.) For GT#2 the info in Block I is not needed. But if you decide to add info in that block for future use it will not be held against you.

Hazard Report cont. 7 Long Form – Capture the unique hazard which your payload might have that was not in the short form (i.e. batteries, liquid propellant, etc.). Header - fill out payload name and mark HR IDENTIFIER as “TBD” Line 1 – briefly describe the hazard & the condition it could occur Line 1a – identify “Phase I” Line 1b – enter date you plan to submit hazard report Line 1c – enter “Payload Name, Cube Quest” Line 1d – list payload safety engineer (person who filled out the form) Line 2 – describe the hazard and its effect to the vehicle or ground crew Line 3 – create a title for the cause and mark the *severity & **likelihood Line 4 – list what, if anything, you are using to control the hazard beyond the confines of your payload (i.e. dispenser for containment, etc.) Line 5 – mark the cause(s) as “new (Phase I)” Line 6 – add any other info for this hazard that you think would aid in clarification of the other lines. *Severity This index quantifies the worst case accident or undesired event resulting from this cause. Severity levels are I (Catastrophic), II (Critical), and III (Marginal). Hazard Reports with Severity Level of III (Marginal) shall not be brought forth to the Safety Review Panel. **Likelihood The likelihood (probability of occurrence) of this hazard cause manifesting itself after controls have been implemented. Likelihood levels are A, B, C (Remote), and D (Improbable), with A being the most probable.

Safety Presentation 8 Phase I presentation is a summation of the safety data package and review of the hazard report forms (short & long). Basic info needed is: Payload objectives – 1 page Concept of Operations (w/emphasis on hand KSC thru 15 sec. after deployment) – 1 page Overall cubesat configuration description (i.e. top level description, block diagrams, etc.) – 1 to 3 pages Description of each system (diagrams, components identified, operations, etc.) – 6 to 10 pages Detailed hardware descriptions concerned w/possible hazards – x pages (as needed) Overall payload schedule – 1 page Summary of identified hazards (standard & unique) – 2 to 3 pages Review each hazard report page (short & long) – x pages Back-ups Approach to meet IDRD safety requirements tables – x pages Any additional info you might need to have for your presentation – x pages

Project Schedule 9

Town Hall - Safety 10 Questions ?

Back – Up Charts 11

Verification/CoFR Plan 12

Short Form Example 13 EXAMPLE

Long Form Example 14 UNIQUE HAZARD CONTROL REPORT FORMAT Payload Name SLS EM-1 Secondary Payload HR IDENTIFIER 1. HAZARD TITLE: Enter a brief description of the hazard in terms of hazard initiator, action or consequence. a.Review Level:Phase I, II, or III b.Revision Date:Date c.Scope:Payload, Payload Carrier d.Hazard Report Focal:Name, Phone Number _____________________________________________________________________________________________ 2. HAZARD CONDITION DESCRIPTION: The hazard description should define the risk situation including the unsafe act or conditions and its effect on SLS or personnel. _____________________________________________________________________________________________ 3. CAUSE SUMMARY: CAUSE 1:Cause Title 1 SEVERITY:LIKELIHOOD: CAUSE 2:Cause Title 2 SEVERITY:LIKELIHOOD: _____________________________________________________________________________________________ 4. INTERFACES: What does the Payload interface with? Does it rely on other hardware for controls? _____________________________________________________________________________________________ 5. STATUS OF OPEN WORK: CAUSE 1:Closed or Open (Phase II); Closed or Closed to SVTL (Phase III) CAUSE 2:Closed or Open (Phase II); Closed or Closed to SVTL (Phase III) _____________________________________________________________________________________________ 6. REMARKS: Entries here should include any information relating to the hazard but not fully covered in any other item field. EXAMPLE