HLT Kalman Filter Implementation of a Kalman Filter in the ALICE High Level Trigger. Thomas Vik, UiO.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Photons and Jets from the first year of ALICE A

Advertisements

High Level Trigger (HLT) for ALICE Bergen Frankfurt Heidelberg Oslo.

From Quark to Jet: A Beautiful Journey Lecture 1 1 iCSC2014, Tyler Dorland, DESY From Quark to Jet: A Beautiful Journey Lecture 1 Beauty Physics, Tracking,

 Trigger for Run 8 Rates, Yields, Backgrounds… Debasish Das Pibero Djawotho Manuel Calderon de la Barca Analysis Meeting BNL October 16, 2007.

Combined tracking based on MIP. Proposal Marian Ivanov.

HLT - data compression vs event rejection. Assumptions Need for an online rudimentary event reconstruction for monitoring Detector readout rate (i.e.

High Level Trigger – Applications Open Charm physics Quarkonium spectroscopy Dielectrons Dimuons Jets.

B triggering Fabrizio Palla INFN Pisa Consorzio CMS Italia Firenze 7 Sept

Level-3 trigger for ALICE Bergen Frankfurt Heidelberg Oslo.

Data rate reduction in ALICE. Data volume and event rate TPC detector data volume = 300 Mbyte/event data rate = 200 Hz front-end electronics DAQ – event.

1 Vertex fitting Zeus student seminar May 9, 2003 Erik Maddox NIKHEF/UvA.

Algorithms and Methods for Particle Identification with ALICE TOF Detector at Very High Particle Multiplicity TOF simulation group B.Zagreev ACAT2002,

Topological D-meson Reconstruction with STAR Using the Silicon Vertex Tracker (SVT) Sarah LaPointe Wayne State University SVT review, BNL, July 7 th /8.

High Level Trigger of Muon Spectrometer Indranil Das Saha Institute of Nuclear Physics.

HLT Collaboration (28-Jun-15) 1 High Level Trigger L0 L1 L2 HLT Dieter Roehrich UiB Trigger Accept/reject events Select Select regions of interest within.

ALICE HLT High Speed Tracking and Vertexing Real-Time 2010 Conference Lisboa, May 25, 2010 Sergey Gorbunov 1,2 1 Frankfurt Institute for Advanced Studies,

Cynthia HadjidakisTerzo Convegno sulla Fisica di ALICE Detection of photons and electrons in EMCAL Photons, Electrons and  0 at large p T Identification.

1 The Study of D and B Meson Semi- leptonic Decay Contributions to the Non-photonic Electrons Xiaoyan Lin CCNU, China/UCLA for the STAR Collaboration 22.

PPR meeting - January 23, 2003 Andrea Dainese 1 TPC tracking parameterization: a useful tool for simulation studies with large statistics Motivation Implementation.

Framework for track reconstruction and it’s implementation for the CMS tracker A.Khanov,T.Todorov,P.Vanlaer.

JSPS Research Fellow / University of Tsukuba T. Horaguchi Oct for HAWAII /10/15HAWAII

CBM Collaboration Meeting 1 Simulation Status V. Friese.

The High-Level Trigger of the ALICE Experiment Heinz Tilsner Kirchhoff-Institut für Physik Universität Heidelberg International Europhysics Conference.

Tracking at LHCb Introduction: Tracking Performance at LHCb Kalman Filter Technique Speed Optimization Status & Plans.

D 0 Measurement in Cu+Cu Collisions at √s=200GeV at STAR using the Silicon Inner Tracker (SVT+SSD) Sarah LaPointe Wayne State University For the STAR Collaboration.

Real data reconstruction A. De Caro (University and INFN of Salerno) CERN Building 29, December 9th, 2009ALICE TOF General meeting.

Matching between charged tracks and electromagnetic calorimeter (EMCAL) clusters in ALICE Alberto Pulvirenti University & INFN Catania ACAT 2007 Conference.

Charmonium feasibility study F. Guber, E. Karpechev, A.Kurepin, A. Maevskaia Institute for Nuclear Research RAS, Moscow CBM collaboration meeting 11 February.

PPR meeting Marcello Lunardon 1 Semi-electronic beauty detection: status and perspectives THE COLLABORATION Rosario Turrisi and Marcello Lunardon.

TOF, Status of the Code F. Pierella, Bologna University and INFN TOF Offline Group ALICE Offline Week, June 2002.

Off-line and Detector Database Kopenhagen TPC meeting A.Sandoval.

Status of Reconstruction in CBM

Track extrapolation to TOF with Kalman filter F. Pierella for the TOF-Offline Group INFN & Bologna University PPR Meeting, January 2003.

Tracking, PID and primary vertex reconstruction in the ITS Elisabetta Crescio-INFN Torino.

Tracking in High Density Environment

Normal text - click to edit HLT tracking in TPC Off-line week Gaute Øvrebekk.

V0 analytical selection Marian Ivanov, Alexander Kalweit.

“Vertexig and tracking ” Entirely based on works and results by: S. Rossegger, R. Shahoyan, A. Mastroserio, C. Terrevoli Outline: Comparison Fast simulation.

HLT/AliRoot integration C.Cheshkov, P.Hristov 2/06/2005 ALICE Offline Week.

Status of global tracking and plans for Run2 (for TPC related tasks see Marian’s presentation) 1 R.Shahoyan, 19/03/14.

CBM Simulation Walter F.J. Müller, GSI CBM Simulation Week, May 10-14, 2004 Tasks and Concepts.

Global Tracking for CBM Andrey Lebedev 1,2 Ivan Kisel 1 Gennady Ososkov 2 1 GSI Helmholtzzentrum für Schwerionenforschung GmbH, Darmstadt, Germany 2 Laboratory.

8 April 2000Karel Safarik: Tracking in ALICE1 Tracking in ALICE  OUTLOOK: Requirements History Tracking methods Track finding Tracking efficiency Momentum.

The Use of Trigger and DAQ in High Energy Physics Experiments Lecture 3: The (near) future O. Villalobos Baillie School of Physics and Astronomy The University.

Track reconstruction in high density environment I.Belikov, P.Hristov, M.Ivanov, T.Kuhr, K.Safarik CERN, Geneva, Switzerland.

STAR J/  Trigger in dA Manuel Calderon for the Heavy-Flavor Group Trigger Workshop at BNL October 21, 2002.

STAR Analysis Meeting, BNL – oct 2002 Alexandre A. P. Suaide Wayne State University Slide 1 EMC update Status of EMC analysis –Calibration –Transverse.

FPGA Co-processor for the ALICE High Level Trigger Gaute Grastveit University of Bergen Norway H.Helstrup 1, J.Lien 1, V.Lindenstruth 2, C.Loizides 5,

Upgrade Letter of Intent High Level Trigger Thorsten Kollegger ALICE | Offline Week |

Development of the parallel TPC tracking Marian Ivanov CERN.

PWG3 Analysis: status, experience, requests Andrea Dainese on behalf of PWG3 ALICE Offline Week, CERN, Andrea Dainese 1.

Outline Motivation The STAR/EMC detector Analysis procedure Results Final remarks.

CWG7 (reconstruction) R.Shahoyan, 12/06/ Case of single row Rolling Shutter  N rows of sensor read out sequentially, single row is read in time.

1 Reconstruction tasks R.Shahoyan, 25/06/ Including TRD into track fit (JIRA PWGPP-1))  JIRA PWGPP-2: Code is in the release, need to switch setting.

Workshop ALICE Upgrade Overview Thorsten Kollegger for the ALICE Collaboration ALICE | Workshop |

Data Analysis Practice looking for Φ(1020) Nuclear Physics Ⅲ Kyung-Eon,Choi.

AliRoot survey: Reconstruction P.Hristov 11/06/2013.

Track Reconstruction in MUCH and TRD Andrey Lebedev 1,2 Gennady Ososkov 2 1 Gesellschaft für Schwerionenforschung, Darmstadt, Germany 2 Laboratory of Information.

INFN - PadovaBeauty Measurements in pp with the Central Detector 1 Beauty Measurements in p-p with the Central Detector F. Antinori, C. Bombonati, A. Dainese,

ALICE Offline Week – 22 Oct Visualization of embedding Matevz Tadel, CERN Adam Kisiel, Ohio State University.

Status of Hough Transform TPC Tracker

New TRD (&TOF) tracking algorithm

A Kalman Filter for HADES

Christoph Blume Offline Week, July, 2008

Measurement of track length and time-of-flight hypothesis

ALICE – First paper.

Commissioning of the ALICE HLT, TPC and PHOS systems

Reconstruction status

Track Reconstruction Algorithms for the ALICE High-Level Trigger

Presentation transcript:

HLT Kalman Filter Implementation of a Kalman Filter in the ALICE High Level Trigger. Thomas Vik, UiO

The ALICE detector

Data rates ● Event rates -Central Pb-Pb: < 200 Hz -Min. bias pp: < 1000 Hz ● Event size (zero suppressed) -PbPb: ~75Mbyte -pp: ~2.5Mbyte ● Data rates -PbPb: < 15 Gbyte/sec -pp: ~2.5 Gbyte/sec ● Forseen DAQ bandwidth ~1.2 GByte/sec

What is the Kalman Filter ● Iterative data processing algorithm. ● Advantages as a tracker: -Track finding and fitting simultanously -No large matrices needs to be inverted. Number of computations increases linearly with the number of measurements. Therefore fast in situations with multiple scattering and many measurements. -Estimated track parameters follow closely the physical track.

Why do HLT need Kalman Filter ● Merge tracks from the different ALICE sub- detectors. ● Get good estimates of track parameters. ● Reduce amount of fake tracks from the HLT tracker.

Kalman in the TPC ● Track parameters: (y, z, D, tan, C) ● Three steps: -Make seeds: initialize track parameters. -Propagate to next padrow. Look for clusters in window around predicted position. -Update with hit which gives minimum 2.

Track following

Kalman in the HLT ● Calculate seeds from track parameters of the HLT fast tracker. ● Use clusters already assigned to tracks. ● Only needs to propagate tracks according to track model, and update parameters with already found clusters. ● Gives a fast global tracker.

Status ● Timing: - HLT tracker: setup ~50 ms/sector tracking ~70 ms/sector -HLT Kalman Filter: load tracks ~1000 ms tracking ~1000 ms

Example: heavy charm decay ● TRD triggers on possible dielectron candidates. ● Large background pions misidentified as electrons electron from conversions. ● Merge with TPC tracks, add TPC dE/dx PID remove pions misidentified as electrons. ● Merge with ITS tracks, impact parameter cut. ● Background reduction by factor 10.

Conclusion ● Merge tracks from the different sub- detectors. ● Need HLT tracking for ITS and TRD. ● Only implemented for the TPC, however some debugging is still needed. Must reproduce offline results.