How a Project Becomes a Project Michelle Ellias DOT SW Region Programming Engineer DNR/DOT Meeting December 4, 2012.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
County of Fairfax, Virginia Department of Transportation 1 Transportation Funding and Improving Roadway Services Delivery Transportation Advisory Commission.
Advertisements

County of Fairfax, Virginia Alternatives for Improving Roadway Services in Fairfax County Board Transportation Committee Meeting March 1, 2011 Department.
County of Fairfax, Virginia Department of Transportation Review and Discussion of Draft Scope of Work for Study of Issues Associated with Increasing Transportation.
State Aid Programs An Introduction to: Local Bridge Replacement Program Local Road Improvement.
Bob Vasek Cooperative Agreements Engineer Mn/DOT Metro State Aid Overview and Planning and Programming Tom Leibli Cooperative Agreements Project Manager.
State Aid Programs Legislative Issues - Bonding Local Bridge Replacement Program Local Road Improvement Township Sign Replacement Program.
Joint PDT/CAC Meeting June 16, 2010 Citizens Advisory Committee Project Development Team OR 62 Corridor Project Date: Wednesday, June 16 th 2010 Time:
Oregon 62: I-5 to Dutton Rd. (Medford) Oregon 62: I-5 to Dutton Rd. (Medford) for Jackson County Planning Commission May 9, 2013.
Oregon 62: I-5 to Dutton Rd. (Medford) for Jackson County Planning Commission May 9, 2013.
Paula J. Trigg, County Engineer Public Works and Transportation Committee April 2, 2014 OVERVIEW | SOURCE OF PROJECTS PROPOSED HIGHWAY IMPROVEMENT.
Wisconsin Transportation Finance and Policy Commission Freight Rail Day 2012 October 26, 2012.
Impacting Local Government Updating Functional Classification Using GIS September 12, 2013 Bentonville, Arkansas.
Local Highway Technical Assistance Council Joint Senate and House Transportation Committees January
PUBLIC WORKS OPERATIONS: TRANSPORTATION Steve Hansen, PE Director of Public Works – Liberty, MO APWA PW Institute April 8, 2014.
Local Programs Update July 24, 2014 Jennifer B. DeBruhl Director, Local Assistance Division.
Lassen County 2011 Supervisorial Reapportionment Public Hearing Lassen County Courthouse – Photo courtesy of Couso Technology & Design.
South Side Red River Bridge Corridor Study Phase III Preliminary Geotechnical Study Phase IV New Alignment Alternatives Evaluation.
From KY 89 at the northern city limits of McKee to the recently improved section of US 421 just north of the Jackson-Rockcastle County line. Six-Year Highway.
US 1 CORRIDOR STUDY AND PROJECT PRIORITIZATION PROCESS Augusta, GA November 29, 2012 Jeff Carroll CDM Smith Georgia Association of MPOs Annual Conference.
WTBA/ WisDOT Contractor /Engineer Conference January 21 and 22, 2009 Local Government Involvement on WisDOT Projects Craig J. Treadway, P.E., NE Region.
State Highway 6 Corridor Access Plan. SH 6 Project Description Project Initiated and funded by –City of Houston –Missouri City –City of Sugar Land –Harris.
Functional Classification CE 453 Lecture 3. Objectives Summarize general highway design process Identify different roadway classification systems Identify.
Functional Classification Maranda Obray, Transportation Planner Idaho Transportation Department.
COLORADO PERSPECTIVE Cathy Shull Board of Directors Ports-to-Plains Alliance.
Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) Value Engineering Program Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) Value Engineering Program VDOT 6/14/2012.
SECTION 3. Centerline and Edge Line Final Rule DECEMBER 1999.
Congressional District Projects New CD-3 SMART 160 Trail: — This trail will be a multiple use trail and will offer access to a network of current and proposed.
Fiscal Years Outlook Preliminary Six-Year Financial Plan and Six-Year Improvement Plan Strategy John W. Lawson, Chief Financial Officer Reta.
NDACo Legislative Wrap-up Funding for Non-Oil Producing County Highways and Bridges Jason Benson Cass County Engineer.
American Recovery and Reinvestment Act The Stimulus Package.
Transportation Planning Organization(TPO) City Council Workshop November 12, 2013.
The Regional Forum for Transportation Planning. Southwestern Pennsylvania 10 Counties >7,000 square miles 2.66 million citizens 548 municipalities 132.
Joint Urban Roadway Standards Workshop April 27, 2006.
VIRGINIA’S IMPLEMENTATION of the FINAL RULE on WORK ZONE SAFETY and MOBILITY Virginia Department of Transportation’s Instructional and Informational Memorandum-LD-241.
Water Supply Planning Initiative State Water Commission November 22, 2004.
Getting the Green Light on Transportation Initiatives Drafting Successful Ballot Measures Center for Transportation Excellence Conference June 12, 2007.
TRENDS AND HIGHWAY CLASSIFICATIONS Spring Examples of highway design problems
2006 Annual Report on the Status of the Implementation of Proposition 400 Management Committee 9/6/06.
SR 997 / KROME AVENUE Florida Department of Transportation April 27th, 2006 South Miami-Dade Watershed Study Advisory Committee.
1 A CASE STUDY: Organization and Workforce for Operations at Maryland State Highway Administration Glenn McLaughlin, Deputy Director Office of CHART and.
Highway Functional Classification Chapter 16 Dr. TALEB M. AL-ROUSAN.
1 Senate Transportation & Housing Committee December 13, 2005 Orange County Transportation Authority.
Overview of the DOTD Highway Project Selection Process.
Interstate 95 Corridor Improvement Program June 20, 2012.
Introduction Session 01 Matakuliah: S0753 – Teknik Jalan Raya Tahun: 2009.
3000 Connecticut Avenue, N.W., Suite 208 Washington, DC
Tom Norton, Executive Director Colorado Department of Transportation American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials September 9, 2003.
Transportation Investment Act of 2010 AASHTO/MTAP Conference December 6-9, 2010 Savannah, Georgia Steve Kish, Transit Program Manager Georgia Department.
Review of Principal Arterial Routes on the National Highway System For MAP-21 Reta R. Busher Chief of Planning and Programming October 17, 2012.
Local Funding Options What is, or could be, within the power of the County. WISCONSIN COUNTY ASSOCIATION 77 TH ANNUAL CONFERENCE LA CROSSE
Regional Transportation Issues Infrastructure Maintenance New Facilities Air Quality Pollution Congestion Freeway System Surface Streets Income.
Welcome March 20th 2009 Roads 101 GCMPC Presentation By Derek Bradshaw.
Julie Skallman State Aid Division Director & State Aid Engineer.
Mike Wendt & Cara Abts WisDOT Regional Traffic March 10, 2015.
Why Plan? Unprecedented pressure for growth and change To identify development and preservation areas over next 20 years To recommend types of land uses.
US 25 Corbin to London Citizens Advisory Committee Meeting December 2011.
County of Fairfax, Virginia Department of Transportation Fairfax County Parkway Corridor Study Board of Supervisors Transportation Committee December 1,
ITS Architecture Development in a Regional Planning Context Central Ohio Case Study Erika Witzke Principal Engineer Mid-Ohio Regional Planning Commission.
COUNTY ROAD 517 Improvements from State Highway 172 to Howe Drive DECEMBER 16, 2015 At Tribal Multipurpose Facility.
Waupaca County Highway 5 Year Plan We build and maintain a quality transportation system for the safety and prosperity of current and future.
Geometric Design: General Concept CE331 Transportation Engineering.
© 2014 HDR, Inc., all rights reserved. North Country Access Improvements Stakeholder Advisory Committee Meeting No. 6 October 6, 2015.
MED SR 18 Corridor Project MED PID October 13, 2015.
1 520 Tolling Implementation Committee Cascadia Center for Regional Development Beyond Oil Conference Thursday, September 4, 2008 Richard Ford, Commissioner.
CR184 (Quintette Road) Bridge #480045
Six Year Improvement Program Public Hearings
Environmental Assessment PUC Application Process
EAST MESABI JOINT WATER SYSTEM A JOINT VENTURE BETWEEN THE CITy OF AURORA & TOWN OF WHITE REQUEST A $8.6 million request for State Funding in 2018 for.
Sarah Tracy, P.E., PTOE Assistant Traffic Engineer
MPO Board Presentation
Presentation transcript:

How a Project Becomes a Project Michelle Ellias DOT SW Region Programming Engineer DNR/DOT Meeting December 4, 2012

DOT Planning & Programming

Planning & Programming  What’s the difference?  Planning—corridor and majors studies, long range planning, jurisdictional transfers, bike/ped coordination  Programming—manage allocated budget, 6-10 year window, projects in design/construction

Southwest Region  Area: 12,466 square miles  Counties: 16  Towns: 322  Villages: 144  Cities: 58  Population: 1,204,163  Bridges: 4,205  Roadway miles: 25,516

6-year program meetings Provide the public and officials opportunity to:  review current projects in program and provide comments  identify needs and express concerns or suggestions regarding potential (future) highway projects

Majors Program Major Highway Project (Sec , Wis. Stats.)  Total Cost more than $30 million, and one of the following:  Constructing a New Highway for 2.5 miles or more  Adding lanes for 5 miles or more  Converting expressway to freeway for 10 miles or more  The Department may not construct contiguous projects within 6 years, which when combined would meet the Major Project definition

Majors Program Transportation Projects Commission (Sec , Wis. Stats.)  Governor – serves as chairperson  5 Senators – 3 from the majority party and 2 from the minority party  5 Representatives – 3 from the majority party and 2 from the minority party  3 citizen members  Secretary of Transportation – serves as non-voting member

Majors Program Transportation Projects Commission PLANNING (STUDY) PHASE  Gives approval to WisDOT’s recommendations for studying potential major highway projects through the final EIS/EA stage DESIGN (PROJECT) PHASE  Reviews projects having gone through the final EIS/EA stage  Has the authority to conduct public hearings on potential major highway projects  Submits its recommendations for approval/disapproval to the governor, the legislature and joint committee on finance The governor and legislature enact legislation to list (enumerate) major highway projects in s (3), Wis. Stats.

Backbone System  The Backbone System connects major economic areas of the state

3R System  “3R”: resurface, recondition, reconstruct  The 3R System consists of existing (non-Backbone System) state highways  Does not include county or town roadways

3R Functional Roadway Classifications  Backbone Connector Routes (US 14 - La Crosse to Madison; US 12; STH 26)  Arterials Principal (US 18 – Prairie du Chien to Madison; STH 11/81) Minor (STH 133 – Cassville to Potosi; STH 33 – Portage to Fox Lake)  Collectors  Major & Minor (STH 89 -Waterloo to Columbus; STH 188 – STH 60 to CTH V, south of Merrimac)

Priority order for 3R corridors 1) Structurally deficient Bridges & Culverts 2) Connector Backbone Routes 3) Other Principal Arterials 4) Any other roadway over 5,000 ADT 5) All other STH in any size municipality 6) Minor Arterials 7) All other Collectors

Review Deficiencies  Safety  Pavement & Structure Data  Mobility

Input/Information Gathering  State/County/Local Officials  Operations Staff  Citizens

Roadway Classification New Projects Traffic & Maintenance Public County & Local Officials Legislators Crash History Mobility Need Pavement Data Structure Data

New Project set up  Establish project ID, write CDR (concept definition report)  Distribute CDR to internal parties/outside agencies/FHWA  Schedule and hold scoping meeting to better define concept of work before turning project over to project development staff