Office of Institutional Research CAMPUS CLIMATE SURVEY FALL, 2006.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

 Researchers must be  Open  Friendly  Non-judgemental  Questions must be  Ordered correctly  Designed for reliability and validity.

Advertisements

INSTITUTIONAL RESEARCH OFFICE Non-Returning Student Survey.

Survey conducted for Team New England by the Center for Survey Research and Analysis at the University of Connecticut Business Perceptions of New England.

© 2009 Richard Day Research, Inc. Purdue University Calumet Campus Climate Survey Results Richard Day, Ph.D. Richard Day Research November 27, 2009.

LIST QUESTIONS – COMPARISONS BETWEEN MODES AND WAVES Making Connections is a study of ten disadvantaged US urban communities, funded by the Annie E. Casey.

Results of the Faculty Survey on Internationalization at Villanova: A Preliminary Report Prepared for the International Leadership Committee Prepared by.

University of Louisville Employee Satisfaction Survey Presented by Dey Systems, Inc.

© 2006 SHRM SHRM Weekly Online Survey: March 21, 2006 Ethics - Held Accountable to Ethics Standards Sample comprised of 458 randomly selected HR professionals.

City of Victoria Presentation of Results - January 11, Business Survey.

The Marketing Survey Chapter 29.2.

4 Conducting Marketing Research 1. What is Marketing Research? Marketing research is the systematic design, collection, analysis, and reporting of data.

Voice Project Survey Report (c) Voice Project Pty Ltd & Access Macquarie Ltd – Overview Of Results Page 1 Guidelines For Interpretation Of Results.

DEVELOPING A QUESTIONNAIRE FOR USE IN OUTCOMES ASSESSMENT

Accreditation Climate Survey MC GAP May 1, Overview  Administered Fall 2012 via  Directly linked to the Accreditation Standards  Modeled.

Powered by Cuesta College Campus Climate Survey Results Wednesday, January 21, 2015.

Academic Advising Implementation Team PROGRESS REPORT April 29, 2009.

The Future of Technology 2003 IEEE Fellows Technology Survey Prepared for IEEE Spectrum By The Response Center December 2002.

Educating SLU Students toward Personal & Social Responsibility Findings from the Personal and Social Responsibility Institutional Inventory (PSRII) Presentation.

UNIVERSITY OF IDAHO 2008 STAFF SURVEY 1073 Respondents Executive Summary Institutional Research and Assessment Jane Baillargeon, Assistant Director 1073.

Institution Research Update John Porter AIRPO June 20, 2006.

Employee Satisfaction Survey Report 2006 OIRA. Introduction  Administered in November 2006 to all AUB employees, academic and non-academic.  Purpose.

U NIVERSITY OF M INNESOTA Measuring Student Perspectives on University Experiences.

The Economic Impact of a University on its Community and State: Examining Trends Four Years Later Presented by: Allison M. Ohme Institutional Research.

Public Relations in College Athletics An Examination of Athletic Directors’ Perceptions of the Role of Public Relations in a College Athletic Department.

Student Engagement at the Research University (SERU) at UW: Student Life Student Life Assessment Meeting 02 October 2014 Debbie McGhee.

Effect of Staff Attitudes on Quality in Clinical Microbiology Services Ms. Julie Sims Laboratory Technical specialist Strengthening of Medical Laboratories.

Accreditation Employee Survey. Positive Responses Top Five in Order from Greatest.

European Immigration Classism: Attitudes toward “Good” and “Bad” Immigrants Dr. Rueyling Tzeng Research Fellow Institute of European and American Studies.

2013 Administration & Resource Management (AR) Division Climate Survey Results 21 January 2014.

CLIMATE SURVEY REPORT 2014 OFFICE OF INSTITUTIONAL RESEARCH AND PLANNING Welcome.

David Torres Dean, Institutional Research Riverside Community College District.

BASIC STATISTICS WE MOST OFTEN USE Student Affairs Assessment Council Portland State University June 2012.

University Of North Alabama Alumni Marketing Survey Results

2 Enter your Paper Title Here. Enter your Name Here. Enter Your Paper Title Here. Enter Your Name Here. ANALYSIS OF THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN JOB SATISFACTION.

SECCP Salaried Employees Compensation and Classification Program June, 2005.

1 National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) 2013 Tiffany Franks Assistant Director, Office of Planning & Analysis October 25, 2013.

QUESTIONNAIRE DESIGN: GENERAL PRINCIPLES

To market or not to market that is the question. Are Minnesota performing arts organizations creating marketing plans? Kerry DePalma University of St.

NCAA Division I Institutional Performance Program 2015 NCAA Regional Rules Seminar Supplement.

Great Colleges to Work For Survey: 2013 Results

St. Thomas University ALUMNI SURVEY Executive Summary Undergraduate and Graduate alumni in university database from 2001 to 1991 were mailed a copy of.

HERI FACULTY SURVEY Surveys mailed through campus mail to all Full-Time faculty during the Spring 2005 semester A follow-up second mailing for non- respondents.

Citizens’ Survey Presentation of Results for Total Sample February 25, 2003 Prepared By: 831 E. Morehead Street, Suite 150 Charlotte, North Carolina

Guilford County Schools Parent and Community Surveys Presentation January 24, 2015 Prepared By Nancy Burnap, Ph.D Research Strategies, Inc. Presented By.

Online Course Evaluations Is there a perfect time? Presenters: Cassandra Jones, Ph.D., Director of Assessment Michael Anuszkiewicz, Research Associate.

ID Checking Study 2010 Conducted for Anheuser-Busch, Inc. February 5, 2010.

Back to the Basics: Determining the Importance of Basic Writing Skills in the Workplace MBC Final Project Presentation Camille Verzal May 20, 2003.

Physics Education Research The University of Edinburgh Attitudes and Beliefs about Physics from a UK Academics’ Perspectives Robyn Donnelly 1, Cait MacPhee.

2005 Design Outsourcing Study. Design Outsourcing Study 2  Web survey:  Fieldwork dates  December 15 th - December 31 st, 2005  303 usable responses.

Florida’s Educator Outcome Survey 2005 Prepared by Anna Vaccaro, Marketing Research Analyst Ulrich Research Service.

Question Everything.  Questionnaire should be: ◦ Valid – Questions should measure what was meant to be measured ◦ Reliable – Should give you the same.

Comparing Senior And Sophomore Knowledge and Confidence Concerning Academic Advising Anecdotal evidence suggested that a discrepancy existed between what.

Instrumental Behaviors Following Test Administration and Interpretation: Exploration Validity of the Strong Interest Inventory Presented by: Ana AriasAlheli.

University as Entrepreneur Results of Surveys of ASU Faculty, Students and Staff Spring 2007 Surveys conducted by the Institute for Social Science Research.

Results of 2004 Freshman Survey in regards to significant differences between STU and Peer Groupings.

SFCC Adjunct Faculty Survey Spring  Survey open from 1/16/14 – 2/1/14  Survey link sent to SFCC address of every person who had an adjunct.

Quantitative Data Collection Techniques In contrast to qualitative data quantitative data are numerical. Counted, calculated tallied and rated. Also ratings.

Fall 2003 Survey: Employer Perceptions of UNA Graduates Office of Research, Planning, and Institutional Effectiveness April 2004.

4-1 Marketing Research Defined Systematic design, collection, analysis, and reporting of data and findings relevant to a specific marketing situation facing.

© 2015© 2016 Results and Analysis 2016 School Climate Survey: Jenkins Elementary School.

AAPA Research – 2318 Mill Road, Suite 1300, Alexandria VA, AAPA Member Satisfaction 2014 Results.

UKZN Employee Engagement Survey – 2013 Overall Report 1.

National Survey of Student Engagement Executive Snapshot 2007.

1 Taking the pulse of the reader of the ABA Section of Real Property  Trust & Estate Law’s Probate & Property.

Pagosa Springs Area Tourism Consumer Satisfaction and Demographic Information Study Jenalle Beaman, Candace Corrales, and Kayla Wright.

Community Survey Report

Saint Joseph’s college of maine

CAMPUS CLIMATE SURVEY SPRING 2009

School Climate Survey 2008.

2018 UNC System Employee Engagement Survey Results

Presentation transcript:

Office of Institutional Research CAMPUS CLIMATE SURVEY FALL, 2006

Methodology Survey using online/ technology mailed to faculty/staff distributions lists of the University & Law School during October of the Fall, 2006 semester. Follow-up sent approximately 10 days later. One hundred eighty five scoreable surveys returned, resulting in a response rate of approx. of 54%. Analysis of respondent characteristics indicate sample was representative of all full-time employees at STU. Results presented for total sample and additionally by employee type.

The Survey Instrument

Demographics of respondents

What Is Your Position at St. Thomas University?

What Is Your Gender?

RESULTS FALL, 2006

The first series of questions requested respondents to indicate their opinion in terms of level of agreement on a four point scale with a list of positively written statements about their job and STU. The scales were: 4 = Agree Strongly 3 = Agree Somewhat 2 = Disagree Somewhat 1= Disagree Strongly

The second series of questions requested respondents to provide their attribution of quality on a five point scale with various attributes of STU. The scales were: 5 =Excellent 4 = Good 3 = Average 2 = Fair 1= Poor

COMPARISON OF RESULTS SPRING 2002 TO FALL 2006

In order to facilitate the comparison of results from Spring 2002 administration of the survey the four categories from Part I were collapsed into two categories; Agree ( Strongly Agree & Agree ), Disagree ( Strongly Disagree & Disagree ).

In order to facilitate the comparison of results from Spring 2002 administration of the survey the five categories from Part II were collapsed into two categories; Positive (Excellent & Good), Negative (Fair & Poor). ‘Average’ attributions were not included in the analyses.