Neutron EDM Monte Carlo Simulation Uniform E+B fields Riccardo Schmid B. Plaster, B. Filippone Chicago June 6, 2007 EDM Collaboration Meeting.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

The magnetic field uniformity and gradient of the B0 coils inside the lower cryostat for the nEDM experiment. S.Balascuta , dr. Ricardo Alarcon ASU Dr.

Advertisements

Magnetic Field Finite-Element Calculations for the Upper Cryostat S. Balascuta, R. Alarcon Arizona State University B. Plaster, B. Filippone, R. Schmid.

Erdem Oz* USC E-164X,E167 Collaboration Plasma Dark Current in Self-Ionized Plasma Wake Field Accelerators

Measuring Fluid Velocity and Temperature in DSMC Alejandro L. Garcia Lawrence Berkeley National Lab. & San Jose State University Collaborators: J. Bell,

Magnetic shielding calculations and also Petr Volegov Andrei Matlashov Michelle Espy LANL, P-21, SQUID team Igor Savukov.

Shuichi Noguchi, KEK6-th ILC School, November Shuichi Noguchi, KEK6-th ILC School, November RF Basics; Contents  Maxwell’s Equation  Plane.

Electric field calculation for the neutron EDM SNS experiment. Septimiu Balascuta Ricardo Alarcon ASU, 02/07/2008.

PRECIPITATION OF HIGH-ENERGY PROTONS AND HYDROGEN ATOMS INTO THE UPPER ATMOSPHERES OF MARS AND VENUS Valery I. Shematovich Institute of Astronomy, Russian.

Numerical investigations of a cylindrical Hall thruster K. Matyash, R. Schneider, O. Kalentev Greifswald University, Greifswald, D-17487, Germany Y. Raitses,

U N C L A S S I F I E D Operated by the Los Alamos National Security, LLC for the DOE/NNSA IMPACT Project Drag coefficients of Low Earth Orbit satellites.

Approaches to Data Acquisition The LCA depends upon data acquisition Qualitative vs. Quantitative –While some quantitative analysis is appropriate, inappropriate.

Inferring Axon Diameter Sizes using Monte Carlo Simulations of Magnetic Resonance Oscillating Gradient Spin Echo Sequences ME Mercredi 1, TJ Vincent 2,3,

Adnan Khan Lahore University of Management Sciences Peter Kramer Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute.

Analysis of instrumental effects in HIBP equilibrium potential profile measurements on the MST-RFP Xiaolin Zhang Plasma Dynamics Lab, Rensselaer Polytechnic.

Frictional Cooling MC Collaboration Meeting June 11-12/2003 Raphael Galea.

Physics of fusion power Lecture 14: Collisions / Transport.

DSMC simulations of Rb gas flow A. Petrenko, G. Plyushchev AWAKE PEB CERN Direct Simulation Monte Carlo method (developed by G. A. Bird in the.

Ideal solutions and excess functions

International Workshop on Energy Conversion and Information Processing Devices, Nice, France 1/16 Monte Carlo phonon transport at nanoscales Karl Joulain,

22/5/2006 EMBIO Meeting 1 EMBIO Meeting Vienna, 2006 Heidelberg Group IWR, Computational Molecular Biophysics, University of Heidelberg Kei Moritsugu MD.

Status of the Polarized 3He Target

Physics of fusion power

Simulation of streamer propagation using a PIC-MCC code. Application to Sprite discharges. Olivier Chanrion and Torsten Neubert Danish National Space Center.

Mote Carlo Method for Uncertainty The objective is to introduce a simple (almost trivial) example so that you can Perform.

1 Theoretical Physics Experimental Physics Equipment, Observation Gambling: Cards, Dice Fast PCs Random- number generators Monte- Carlo methods Experimental.

Number of Blocks per Pole Diego Arbelaez. Option – Number of Blocks per Pole Required magnetic field tolerance of ~10 -4 For a single gap this can be.

Molecular Dynamics Simulation Solid-Liquid Phase Diagram of Argon ZCE 111 Computational Physics Semester Project by Gan Sik Hong (105513) Hwang Hsien Shiung.

Effect of Magnetic Helicity on Non-Helical Turbulent Dynamos N. KLEEORIN and I. ROGACHEVSKII Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer Sheva, ISRAEL.

President UniversityErwin SitompulThermal Physics 5/1 Lecture 5 Thermal Physics Dr.-Ing. Erwin Sitompul President University

Kinetic Monte Carlo Triangular lattice. Diffusion Thermodynamic factor Self Diffusion Coefficient.

Motivation Polarized 3 He gas target Solenoid design and test 3 He feasibility test Summary and outlook Johannes Gutenberg-Universit ä t Mainz Institut.

Periodic Boundary Conditions in Comsol

Electromagnetic Induction AP Physics Chapter 21. Electromagnetic Induction 21.1 Induced EMF.

Beam Polarimetry Matthew Musgrave NPDGamma Collaboration Meeting Oak Ridge National Laboratory Oct. 15, 2010.

Monte Carlo Process Risk Analysis for Water Resources Planning and Management Institute for Water Resources 2008.

INFSO-RI Enabling Grids for E-sciencE Workflows in Fusion applications José Luis Vázquez-Poletti Universidad.

Optimization of Field Error Tolerances for Triplet Quadrupoles of the HL-LHC Lattice V3.01 Option 4444 Yuri Nosochkov Y. Cai, M-H. Wang (SLAC) S. Fartoukh,

Dressed Spin Simulations Steven Clayton University of Illinois nEDM Collaboration Meeting at Arizona State University, February 8, 2008 Contents 1.Goals.

Numerical Ginzburg-Landau studies of J c in 2D and 3D polycrystalline superconductors G.J.Carty and D P Hampshire Superconductivity Group, Department of.

حرارة وديناميكا حرارية

#1 “New” ILL EDM Experiment Systematic Comment on “An Improved Experimental Limit on the Electric-Dipole Moment of the Neutron,” C.A. Baker, et al. [1]

Bouncing Balls Alex Jing Wei Huang. Goals of this Project Analyze the ball collision rates under different conditions (parameters). – Different container.

Transport in potentials random in space and time: From Anderson localization to super-ballistic motion Yevgeny Krivolapov, Michael Wilkinson, SF Liad Levy,

A.G., Tsukuba, 16 July New advances in numerical simulations of theta-vacuum systems V. Azcoiti, V. LalienaZaragoza U. G. Di CarloINFN-Gran Sasso.

Javier Junquera Importance sampling Monte Carlo. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2002 ISBN Bibliography.

Gas pressure and the ideal gas law Assume specular collisions* *Bold assumption – but more general calculation gives same result. Change in momentum:

Cos θ Coil and Magnetic Shielding Progress B. Filippone and B. Plaster Caltech December 3, 2004.

Arthur Straube PATTERNS IN CHAOTICALLY MIXING FLUID FLOWS Department of Physics, University of Potsdam, Germany COLLABORATION: A. Pikovsky, M. Abel URL:

1 B-field Uniformity Issues Two Basic Problems Depolarization of n and 3 He due to field gradients –Discussed in Pre-Proposal (2002) –Provided specification.

Estimates of Intra-Beam Scattering in ABS M. Stancari, S. Atutov, L. Barion, M. Capiluppi, M. Contalbrigo, G. Ciullo, P.F. Dalpiaz, F.Giordano, P. Lenisa,

Derek F. Jackson Kimball. Collaboration Dmitry Budker, Arne Wickenbrock, John Blanchard, Samer Afach, Nathan Leefer, Lykourgas Bougas, Dionysis Antypas.

Melanie Martin University of Winnipeg

CHAPTER 10 – Gases Lecture 1 – KMT, Graham’s & Dalton’s Law

UCN transport and NN experiments

SNS Injection Fields and Coils

Monte Carlo methods 10/20/11.

Radar Micro-Doppler Analysis and Rotation Parameter Estimation for Rigid Targets with Complicated Micro-Motions Peng Lei, Jun Wang, Jinping Sun Beijing.

THE METHOD OF LINES ANALYSIS OF ASYMMETRIC OPTICAL WAVEGUIDES Ary Syahriar.

Diffusion of Gas Particles

Professor S K Dubey,VSM Amity School of Business

Intermittency and clustering in a system of self-driven particles

The NPDGamma Experiment at the SNS FnPB

Analysis of Optical Beam Propagation Through Turbulence

Gas pressure and the ideal gas law

Two-dimensional Lattice Boltzmann Simulation of Liquid Water Transport

Lattice Boltzmann Simulation of Water Transport in Gas Diffusion Layers of PEMFCs with Different Inlet Conditions Seung Hun Lee1, Jin Hyun Nam2,*, Hyung.

Laser Assisted Charge transfer in He++ + H Collisions

Status report on CATA-01/POLA-01 coincidence measurements

Arielle Little EPS 109, Fall 2009

Presentation transcript:

Neutron EDM Monte Carlo Simulation Uniform E+B fields Riccardo Schmid B. Plaster, B. Filippone Chicago June 6, 2007 EDM Collaboration Meeting

EDM Measurement Cell 50cm 7.6cm 10.2cm x z y B 0 = 10mGauss E 0 = 50kV/cm Neutrons are confined to moving inside a rectangular box and reflecting on its boundaries. An E field is applied parallel to the magnetic field. The E and B fields in these simulations are uniform in space. Simulation coded such that wall collisions can be diffuse or specular

Depolarization (T1) A moving neutron experiences an apparent magnetic field of the form: Effective B field changes as velocity changes due to wall bounces Spin relaxation due to bouncing: Neutron spin starts out parallel to B field ( ) and precesses about the effective B field. After some time spin depolarization occurs and Interested in the mean depolarization as a function of time

T 1 from effect for diffusive wall collisions [following Gamblin & Carver, Phys. Rev. A 138, 946 (1965)]  SI!! After each collision spin is “kicked” away from B Total by an angle

Between collisions the spin also precesses about Thus deviation of the spin following a collision is After n collisions (assumed random) the spin has “wandered” by And T 1 is the time to achieve See Gamblin and Carver

Thus Evaluating the averages: Leading to Where is the average time between collisions and 100% diffusive reflections

t (s) N.B.: (this fig.) v = 2.5 m/s B0 = 10mGauss E0 = 300kV/cm (Exponential behavior more evident) Fit to: Depolarization with time of parallel component of spin. The parameter T1 is calculated from the fit. run129 T1 = ( ±.0006)x10^4 s Estimated T1 = 3.83x10^4s

T1 Velocity Dependence B0 = 10mGauss E0 = 50kV/cm

T1 E field Dependence v = 2.5 m/s B0 = 10mGauss

T1 B field Dependence v = 2.5 m/s E0 = 50kV/cm T1 depends on the square of the B field and a constant term that originates from the term:

Conclusion and Future Two independent Monte Carlo Simulations agree on the depolarization times. Different methods used: Brad Plaster’s numerical (Runge-Kutta) approach Riccardo Schmid’s analytic solution approach ~30% agreement with Brad Filippone’s kinetic theory estimate of the depolarization time. Simulation of E and B field inhomogeneities and the effect on depolarization times. Geometric phase simulations for EDM coils