Pinal County Air Quality June 6, 2007 PM 10 Exceptional Event.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
AREP GAW Section 14 – Daily Air Quality Forecast Operations 1 Overview of Course Course Content: Background –Introduction and Overview of Course –What.
Advertisements

Children's Environmental Health Air Quality Flag Program.
Template Review of Northeast Texas 2012 Ozone Season Presentation to the NETAC Policy and Technical Committees June 13, 2013 Sue Kemball-Cook, Wilson Santamaria.
Examples of 1-Hour NO 2 and SO 2 Modeling William O’Sullivan Director, Division of Air Quality NJDEP June 14, 2011.
Challenges and Issues with Reporting the AQI for PM 2.5 on a Real-time Basis David Conroy, EPA New England Anne McWilliams, EPA New England January 30,
Met Briefing, Temperatures over us near 184K. Convection to south of us is approaching, will give significant rain into tomorrow morning. Coldest.
Measurement and spatial distribution of ozone in the Rocky Mountain National Park, Colorado. Geoff Henshaw, Aeroqual Ltd, Auckland, New Zealand. John Faust.
OZONE Monitoring Network 2015 Annual AQ Monitoring Meeting MAINE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION Protecting Maine’s Air, Land and Water Tom Downs,
Presentation to the Air Quality Forum – August 9, 2005 Clark County PM 10 Saturation Study Robert A. Baxter, CCM T & B Systems, Inc.
Adam N. Pasch 1, Ashley R. Russell 1, Leo Tidd 2, Douglas S. Eisinger 1, Daniel M. Alrick 1, Hilary R. Hafner 1, and Song Bai 1 1 Sonoma Technology, Inc.,
Exceptional Events: Lessons Learned Eric C. Massey, Director Air Quality Division Arizona Department of Environmental Quality Phoenix, AZ July 5, 2011Credit:
Missouri Air Quality Issues Stephen Hall Air Quality Analysis Section Air Pollution Control Program Air Quality Applied Sciences Team (AQAST) 9 th Semi-Annual.
OTAG Air Quality Analysis Workgroup Volume I: EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Dave Guinnup and Bob Collom, Workgroup co-chair “Telling the ozone story with data”
Presenting Evidence to Justify Data Exclusion as an Exceptional Event Ideas based on how EPA has recently documented events to support regulatory decisions.
Clark County PM 10 Saturation Study Robert A. Baxter, CCM T&B Systems Clark County Air Quality Forum – 03/14/06.
1 Communicating air quality trade-offs. Module 6. Communicating Air Quality to the Public in the Mid-Atlantic United States by K.G. Paterson, Ph.D., P.E.
2009 Ozone Season Summary and Air Quality Trends Jen Desimone and Sunil Kumar MWAQC Meeting, COG September 23, 2009.
11 Exceptional Event Case Studies Clark County, Nevada WESTAR-EPA Meeting San Francisco, CA February 25, 2009.
MODELS3 – IMPROVE – PM/FRM: Comparison of Time-Averaged Concentrations R. B. Husar S. R. Falke 1 and B. S. Schichtel 2 Center for Air Pollution Impact.
2014 Dissolved Oxygen Assessment CHRP Meeting December 17, 2014 Heather Stoffel.
Overview What we’ll cover: Key questions Next steps
Technical Support for Exceptional Event Analysis for Volcano Impacts on PM2.5 in Hawaii using the Exceptional Event Decision Support System (EE DSS)EE.
NWS Web Briefing March 1, 2010 National Weather Service Miami/South Florida Forecast Office.
Use of Photochemical Grid Modeling to Quantify Ozone Impacts from Fires in Support of Exceptional Event Demonstrations STI-5704 Kenneth Craig, Daniel Alrick,
Team 1 Meteorologists Hilary Minor & Matt Sanders.
Science Investigation Discussion of Results to Date & Future Work Red Deer Particulate Matter Information Session Maxwell Mazur
Pinal County Air Quality September 11, 2008 PM 10 Natural/Exceptional Event.
Latvian Environmental, Geology and Meteorology agency Future development scenarios for traffic system and air pollution in Riga city Iveta Steinberga La.
Imperial County PM 10 SIP: Update Imperial County APCD SIP Workgroup Meeting September 24, 2008.
An Evaluation of the Influence of the Morning Residual Layer on Afternoon Ozone Concentrations in Houston Using Ozonesonde Data.
1 Communicating air quality trade-offs. Module 6. Communicating Air Quality to the Public in the Mid-Atlantic United States.
Ozone Transport that Impacts on Tribal Land: Case Study Stan Belone Salt River Pima-Maricopa Indian Community.
A N EW H AMPSHIRE G ROUND -L EVEL O ZONE P OLLUTION F ORECASTING T OOL U SING M ETEOROLOGICAL C RITERIA Northeast Regional Operational Workshop Presenter:
Pinal County Air Quality October 27, 2008 PM 10 Exceptional/Natural Event.
Support by Inter-RPO WG - NESCAUM Performed by CAPITA & Sonoma Technology, Inc F ast A erosol S ensing T ools for N atural E vent T racking FASTNET Project.
Arizona 2011 Exceptional Events WESTAR Fall 2011 Business Meeting Tempe, Arizona Air Assessment Section Air Quality Division Arizona Department of Environmental.
1 Agricultural Programs for Controlling Particulate Matter Pollution Ira Domsky, Deputy Director Air Quality Division presented to Western State Air Resources.
Exceptional Events: A California Perspective Karen Magliano, Chief Air Quality Data Branch Planning and Technical Support Division.
Pinal County Air Quality April 3, 2009 PM 10 Natural/Exceptional Event.
Exceptional Air Pollution Events: Exceedances due to Natural/Non-recurring Events R. B. Husar, Washington U.; R.L Poirot, Vermont Dep. Env. Cons.; N. Frank,
Aerosol Pattern over Southern North America Tropospheric Aerosols: Science and Decisions in an International Community A NARSTO Technical Symposium on.
Response to the Bohnecamp memo Rudy Husar Kari Hoijarvi, Washington University, St. EE Detection – Which monitors.
Pinal County Air Quality July 23, 2007 PM 10 Exceptional Event.
Natural PM Events: Dust and Smoke Background and Rationale Smoke from C. American Forest Fires PM10 over the Eastern U.S. during the smoke event The Asian.
Pinal County Air Quality August 30, 2007 PM 10 Exceptional Event.
Pinal County Air Quality October 29, 2007 PM 10 Exceptional Event.
Pinal County Air Quality November 15, 2007 PM 10 Exceptional Event.
ENVIRONMENTAL PROGRAMS Copyright © 2007 Exceptional Events and Data Collection in the Vicinity of the West 43 rd Avenue Monitor MAG Regional Council April.
Implementation of Exceptional and Natural Events Policies and Rules in Arizona Ira Domsky, Deputy Director February 25, 2009.
Imperial County 2013 State Implementation Plan for the Hour PM2.5 Moderate Non-attainment Area December 2, 20141, 2014.
Emission and Air Quality Trends Review
Department of Environmental Quality
High Wind Blowing Dust April 29, 2011 Exceptional Event
Daily Screening for Wildfire Impacts on Ozone using a Photochemical Model A Proposal to the Texas Near-Nonattainment Areas Greg Yarwood
WESTAR Recommendations Exceptional Events EPA response
Ozone Exceedances and Elevated PM2.5 Connecticut June 11, 2015
Possible PM2.5 AQI Categories for Panama
A Novel Approach for Identifying Dust Storms with Hourly Surface Air Monitors in the Western United States Barry Baker1,2 and Daniel Tong1,2 1National.
Emission and Air Quality Trends Review
PM10 Concentration (μg/m3) Comparison of PM Design Values and PM10 Concentrations for the Same Day for Exceedances of the Proposed PM
DUST FORECAST OVER PART OF WEST AFRICA
Tropical Storm Tracking
Emission and Air Quality Trends Review
Pinal County Air Quality Control
Leroy Williams GRIC DEQ Air Program
Four seasons T T P 2012.
Emission and Air Quality Trends Review
State/Federal Technical Work Collaborative Group Conference call
Colleen McKaughan, EPA Region 9 December 14, 2005
wildfire season aq data summaries
Presentation transcript:

Pinal County Air Quality June 6, 2007 PM 10 Exceptional Event

June 6, 2007 Strong winds associated with a front helped transport dust from areas outside of the county. Max winds reached 28 mph which caused four PCAQCD monitors to exceed the 24-hr PM 10 NAAQS. Site24-hr PM 10 Conc. (ug/m 3 ) PCH Combs Stanfield Maricopa * June 6, 2007 also flagged by ADEQ as an exceptional event.

Pinal County Started an AQI forecasting program around June 1, Typically, the “Today” AQI is a carry forward forecast from the previous day since the PM 10 TEOM data isn’t provided throughout the day. The AQI forecasting effort is rather new and we err on the conservatively high side of the forecast, therefore the 6/5/07 PM 10 exceedance didn’t verify. However The 6/6/07 AQI forecast did verify. The daily AQI forecast is on the web at

5 a.m. local time

6 a.m. local time

7 a.m. local time

8 a.m. local time

9 a.m. local time

10 a.m. local time

11 a.m. local time

Noon local time

1 p.m. local time

2 p.m. local time

3 p.m. local time

4 p.m. local time

5 p.m. local time

6 p.m. local time

6/6/07 “But for” Test PCH had the following 24-hr PM 10 concentrations before/after the 6/6/07 event –6/5/07 – ug/m 3 –6/7/07 – 98.7 ug/m 3 Combs –6/5/07 – ug/m 3 –6/7/07 – ug/m 3 Stanfield –6/5/07 – ug/m 3 –6/7/07 – ug/m 3 Maricopa –6/5/07 – ug/m 3 –6/7/07 – ug/m 3 NOTE: The winds may have not been As strong as other previously noted Exceedance days. However the seasonal PM 10 “background” at this time of year is significantly higher and therefore Doesn’t take much wind to exceed the PM 10 NAAQS. As a Result had it not been (i.e. “but for”) for this atypical* frontal passage (i.e. exceptional) these monitors would NOT have exceeded the PM 10 NAAQS. *Source: Only frontal passage for June No frontal Passages for June 2006 as a comparison.