CONGRESSIONAL ETHICS. Relevant Constitutional Provisions Relevant Constitutional Provisions ---each chamber judges “qualifications” of its own members.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ETHICS WORKSHOP MAY 4, 2010 BROWARD COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS.
Advertisements

The Legislative Branch
AP Essay Review & Strategy
 starter activity In on 8 August 1974 Richard Nixon resigned as US president. What did money have to do with his choice to resign? 
15 Interest Groups Television host Stephen Colbert and members of Colbert Nation celebrate the creation of a Super PAC for the 2012 election cycle.
Interest Groups in Action. Activities of Interest Groups Interest groups attempt to influence policy by supplying public officials with things they want.
Wilson 11C. » Single most important work ˃Too many issues for legislators +Power words +Facts and data ˃Truth? +Accountability +Relationships.
Transparency Developments in the U.S. Congress Daniel Schuman, Policy
The West Virginia Ethics Act Chapter 6B of Code. Basic principle is that public officers and employees are not to use their public position for their.
INVITING MEMBERS OF CONGRESS TO PERFORMANCES & EVENTS: A Guide to Gift Rules Performing Arts Alliance The Coalition of Performing Arts Advocates.
Chapter 7 Congress. Constitutional Powers All powers given to Congress can be found in Article I, Section 8 –Lay and collect taxes –Borrow money –Regulate.
# 34 Lobbyists. Part 2 Objectives Describe the ways interest groups are funded. Discuss the impact of PACs, super Pacs and lobbying on policy making.
6.3 Representing the People Civics and Economics.
Warm-up: What does this cartoon suggest about lobbying?
Making Michigan a Leader in Government Ethics 1 Attorney General Mike Cox Representative Paul Opsommer Senator Bruce Patterson.
An Introduction to Science Policy (Week 6) Astronomy 408/508 (and var. cross-listed identifiers) Dr. Kevin B. Marvel Visiting Faculty And Executive Officer,
Interest Groups.  An interest group is an organized group that tries to influence public policy.  Interest groups provide an avenue for citizen participation.
Lobbying and the Legislative Process CLOSEUP.ORG Developed by the Close Up Foundation and the Bryce Harlow Foundation.
And examples of misconduct.  Article 1 Section 5 Clause 2  “Each House may determine the Rules of its Proceedings, punish its Members for disorderly.
 Presidential Primaries  Part private, part public money Federal matching funds for all individuals’ donations of $250 or less (incentive to raise money.
The Legislative Branch Of the United States Government.
Canada’s Lobbying Act Joe Wild Assistant Secretary to the Cabinet for Machinery of Government Privy Council Office Government of Canada.
Elections and Campaigns Campaign and Election Reform.
Unit II Election Process.  FEC – Federal Election Commission  BCRA – Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act  Buckley vs. Valeo  Citizens United vs. FEC 
April 1, 2010 Lobbying: The Scarlet “L” or Democracy in Action?
Discussion of Ethics & Campaign Finance Reform Packet Presented by Thomas B. Drage, Jr., County Attorney, and Dana Crosby, Assistant County Attorney June.
The Legislative Branch Article I Congress. House of Representatives  Term: 2 years  Qualifications 25 years old 7 years as a U.S. citizen Resident of.
Special Interest Groups;
Article I (Simplified) Unit III Section 1. Congress  Section 1. Congress  The power to make laws is given to a Congress made up of two chambers (bicameral):
Chapter 11: Powers of Congress Section 4
MONEY IN POLITICS Review & Update LWV Money in Politics Review and Update “This political system is awash in money... The effect of all this, unfortunately,
1 Restrictions on the Use of Federal Assistance Funds for Lobbying Federal Assistance Law Division U.S. Department of Commerce JAOM FMC May 2007.
What is a congressional hearing
United States Government
Campaign Finance. INTEREST GROUPS Criticisms: 1.Interest groups push their own agenda, which is not always in the best interest of most Americans. 2.
Congress: Getting elected  “Members of Congress are single-minded seekers of reelection.” - David Mayhew.
Lobbying in the United States GR Congress Moscow, Russia November 17, 2011 Wright Andrews Partner, Andrews & Andrews, PLLC Principal, CapCity Advocates.
Congress Chapter 6 Notes. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES SENATE Size- Number of representatives Term- how long they are elected Powers of the leaders Types.
Political Parties, Interest Groups, PACs, 527s. Political Parties 2 party system – Republican – Democrat Bipartisan Third Parties – Types – Why they fail?
Congress Day to Day. Leadership In both Houses, there are floor leaders The party with the most members is known as the majority party The party with.
The Legislative Branch Article I – Congress.
 Appropriations- Federal expenditures are controlled here.  Budget- Oversight of government spending.  Rules- Debate rules, bill sequence, and rules.
Development of Congressional Powers Chapter 6. Constitutional Powers Sec. 1.
The Organization of Congress Congressional Membership.
Pluralism & Elitism Pluralism: A theory which suggests that political power in a society does not rest simply with the electorate, nor with the governing.
Congressional Powers and Legislative Work
The House of Representatives
The Legislative Branch
Interest Groups and Lobbyists
WEST VIRGINIA ETHICS ACT Chapter 6B of WV State Code April 18, 2017
The Legislative Branch
The Legislative Branch
House & senate qualifications Ch 6 – goal 2
Interest Groups Chapter 16.
Reforming Congress.
The Legislative Branch
Interest Groups and the Political Process Post-Citizens United
The Legislative Branch
Watergate.
Chapter 11: Powers of Congress Section 4
The Legislative Branch Article I of the Constitution
Strategies of Interest Groups
Jeopardy! Begin.
The Legislative Branch
The Legislative Branch
The Legislative Branch
The Legislative Branch
The Legislative Branch
The Legislative Branch
Reforming Congress?.
Presentation transcript:

CONGRESSIONAL ETHICS

Relevant Constitutional Provisions Relevant Constitutional Provisions ---each chamber judges “qualifications” of its own members ---each chamber judges “qualifications” of its own members ---each chamber makes own rules, punishes for “disorderly” behavior, and (with 2/3 vote) expels ---each chamber makes own rules, punishes for “disorderly” behavior, and (with 2/3 vote) expels ---members are “privileged from arrest” in performance of official duties; “shall not be questioned in any other Place” for things they say in floor debate ---members are “privileged from arrest” in performance of official duties; “shall not be questioned in any other Place” for things they say in floor debate

CONGRESSIONAL ETHICS 1958 Ethics Code: positive principles 1958 Ethics Code: positive principles Big 1960s scandals Big 1960s scandals ---Adam Clayton Powell (violations, exclusion, Supreme Court case) ---Adam Clayton Powell (violations, exclusion, Supreme Court case) ---Thomas Dodd mixing campaign and personal funds ---Thomas Dodd mixing campaign and personal funds ---Bobby Baker (staffer) influence- peddling ---Bobby Baker (staffer) influence- peddling

CONGRESSIONAL ETHICS Why the Increased Attention to Ethics in 1960s- 1970s Why the Increased Attention to Ethics in 1960s- 1970s --Watergate and Vietnam --Watergate and Vietnam --emergence of “goo goo” groups like Common Cause --emergence of “goo goo” groups like Common Cause --With more power, bigger staff, and bigger budgets, Congress was a bigger target --With more power, bigger staff, and bigger budgets, Congress was a bigger target --During times of increased partisanship, both parties found that they could use ethics charges as hammer to “bash” the other party --During times of increased partisanship, both parties found that they could use ethics charges as hammer to “bash” the other party

Congressional Ethics Creation of House and Senate Ethics Committees Creation of House and Senate Ethics Committees 1968 Ethics Code: restrictions on gifts, honoraria, personal use of campaign funds, “ghost” employees 1968 Ethics Code: restrictions on gifts, honoraria, personal use of campaign funds, “ghost” employees BIG SCANDALS OF 1970s/1980s BIG SCANDALS OF 1970s/1980s 1.) Koreagate 1.) Koreagate 2.) “Abscam” – FBI Sting Operation, resulted in one expulsion and five forced resignations 2.) “Abscam” – FBI Sting Operation, resulted in one expulsion and five forced resignations 3.) Keating Five – related to bigger scandal about inadequate Federal regulation of savings and loan industry 3.) Keating Five – related to bigger scandal about inadequate Federal regulation of savings and loan industry 4.) Sex scandals: Wilbur Mills, Wayne Hays and his secretary/mistress, page scandals, Packwood 4.) Sex scandals: Wilbur Mills, Wayne Hays and his secretary/mistress, page scandals, Packwood

Congressional Ethics Commonly used penalties for recent ethics violations Commonly used penalties for recent ethics violations 1.) Expulsion (2/3 vote) 1.) Expulsion (2/3 vote) 2.) Censure 2.) Censure 3.) Reprimand 3.) Reprimand 4.) Senate innovations: denounce, rebuke, condemn 4.) Senate innovations: denounce, rebuke, condemn

Congressional Ethics JIM WRIGHT SCANDAL (book sales in lieu of honoraria) led to 1989 reforms: JIM WRIGHT SCANDAL (book sales in lieu of honoraria) led to 1989 reforms: ---ban on honoraria (charitable donations still OK) ---ban on keeping leftover campaign funds for personal use ---ban on honoraria (charitable donations still OK) ---ban on keeping leftover campaign funds for personal use ---one-year moratorium on leaving Congress or Congressional staff jobs to go work for a lobbyist ---one-year moratorium on leaving Congress or Congressional staff jobs to go work for a lobbyist

CONGRESSIONAL ETHICS 1995 REFORMS (Republican majority ) 1995 REFORMS (Republican majority ) new 1.) Complete ban on gifts from non-relatives, worth more than $50 new 1.) Complete ban on gifts from non-relatives, worth more than $50 2.) Lobby Disclosure Act of ) Lobby Disclosure Act of broadens definition of “lobbyist” (no longer just hired guns), requiring hundreds more lobbyists to register & state their intentions --broadens definition of “lobbyist” (no longer just hired guns), requiring hundreds more lobbyists to register & state their intentions --includes research and writing as part of lobbying --includes research and writing as part of lobbying --increased fines for failing to file disclosure reports --increased fines for failing to file disclosure reports --forbids nonprofit groups that receive federal funds from lobbying --forbids nonprofit groups that receive federal funds from lobbying Still, there’s not much regulation of “grassroots lobbying” and coalitional lobbying where it’s unclear who’s working with whom

CONGRESSIONAL ETHICS PROPOSED 2006 REFORMS ENDORSED BY “COMMON CAUSE” (weaker versions currenlty being considered in House and Senate) PROPOSED 2006 REFORMS ENDORSED BY “COMMON CAUSE” (weaker versions currenlty being considered in House and Senate) 1.) No privately funded travel 1.) No privately funded travel 2.) Extend from one to two years the ban on post- Congressional employment as lobbyists 2.) Extend from one to two years the ban on post- Congressional employment as lobbyists 3.) Force members and staff to disclose when they’re negotiating with future employers 3.) Force members and staff to disclose when they’re negotiating with future employers 4.) Make lobbying information available online in real- time 4.) Make lobbying information available online in real- time 5.) Limit role of lobbyists in campaign fundraising 5.) Limit role of lobbyists in campaign fundraising