Monopoly Pros –Easier to effect social policy (universal service for example) –Economies of scale and scope Cons –Lack of incentive for innovation –Inefficiencies.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Gender Perspectives in Introduction to Tariffs Gender Module #5 ITU Workshops on Sustainability in Telecommunication Through Gender & Social Equality.
Advertisements

CH 25 Review Monopolies.
Chapter 12: Oligopoly and Monopolistic Competition
1 Price squeeze tests in electronic communications: ARCEPs experience Competition Law and Electronic Communications Brussels, June 19, 2008.
Market Structures Review
Regulation of the Unconditioned Local Loop Service (ULLS) Presentation to ACMA International Training program 2006 Michael Eady Communications Group Compliance.
Monopolistic Competition
STATE OF ISRAEL MINISTRY OF COMMUNICATIONS Fixed-Mobile Convergence Regulatory Point of View Daniel Rosenne Director General, Ministry of Communications,
Part 7 Monopoly Many markets are dominated by a single seller with market power The economic model of “pure monopoly” deals with an idealized case of a.
Historical Perspective of Regulations under TRAI Act 1997 and Future Trends K.Sridhara Member (T), TC.
Number of players The number of players at wholesale level is very limited (more then 97% of sources /production + import/ in one /incumbent/ hand) New.
Market Structures and Current Changes
Chapter 11: Monopoly. Monopoly market single seller for a product with no close substitutes barriers to entry.
LIBERALISATION AND (DE)REGULATION OF SLOVENIAN TELECOMMUNICATIONS MARKETS Nevenka Hrovatin Damir Cibic Matej Švigelj Berlin, September 2004.
A framework for analyzing strategies of Internet Service Providers Authors: Erik Wiersta, Gabriele Kulenkampff and Hans Schaffers Article #: 15 Presented.
Iמשרד התקשורת Israel Ministry of Communications Internet (over-the-top) services and challenges to regulation Adi Cahan-Gonen Senior Professional Advisor.
COMPETITION LAW & POLICY, ECONOMIC GROWTH & DEVELOPMENT: AUSTRALIA & INDONESIA A Brief Discussion Rafaelita M. Aldaba, PIDS 15 November 2011 Bali, Indonesia.
Introduction to Telecom Reform and Liberalization Policy and Regulatory Tools Stefaan G. Verhulst, Markle Foundation August 2003.
Finishing Up Monopolies: Natural Monopolies.  natural monopoly ◦ one firm can produce a desired output at a lower cost than two or more firms—cost 
Monopoly Chapter 7 Copyright © 2011 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All Rights Reserved.McGraw-Hill/Irwin.
Explorations in Economics
International Telecommunication Union Committed to Connecting the World The World in 2009: ICT Facts and Figures Jaroslaw K. PONDER Strategy and Policy.
12/09/2015 NGN Broadband Access: TIA Broadband Drivers, Principles, and VoIP Contact: David Thompson, TIA Dan Bart, TIA SOURCE:TIA, TITLE:NGN Broadband.
(c) 2003 Charles G. Gray1 Telecommunications Regulation: Domestic and International MSIS 5600 Structural Models in International Telecommunications Charles.
An introduction to infrastructure services. Presentation outline  key characteristic of infrastructure industries economies of scale and/or scope  GATS.
Carriers Carriers carry traffic for a fee Must have rights of way to lay wire Given some monopoly protection Regulated but being deregulated.
Evaluating Monopoly Comparison with Perfect Competition.
Network Economics “We know how to route packets, what we don’t know how to do is route dollars.” -- David C. Clark IS250 Spring 2010
Regulatory Trends: New Enabling Environment International Telecommunication Union Workshop on ‘Future of Voice’ Geneva January 15-16, 2007 Gary Madden.
An International Perspective on Australia’s NBN Catherine Middleton Ryerson University Toronto, Canada.
23 April 2009 African Economic Outlook 2008/2009 UNECA A review of the ICT sector 2008/09 David Ogong, Director, Competition and Corporate Affairs Uganda.
Telecommunications and Trade in Services Peter Cowhey Dean Graduate School of International Relations and Pacific Studies University of California, San.
LIBERALISATION AND (DE)REGULATION OF SLOVENIAN TELECOMMUNICATIONS MARKETS Presented by Matej Švigelj Montpellier, November 2004.
1 Investment incentives in an environment of dwindling voice revenues* Harald Gruber Presentation for Conference “The Future of Voice” Geneva January.
PHOENIX CENTER 2002 U.S. TELECOMS SYMPOSIUM Personal Remarks of Lawrence J. Spiwak President © 2002 Phoenix Center and Lawrence J. Spiwak 20 November 2002.
Infrastructure for eInclusion – Regulation and Policy Initiatives Marianne Røgeberg Ministry of Transport and Communication Norway.
Liberalization of Telecommunications in Europe Pál Belényesi 27 October 2006 Verona.
Challenges facing ISPs in Africa: a view from an African ISP William Stucke AfrISPA ZAnet Internet Services.
Copyright © 2006 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved.13-1 Natural Monopolies And Regulation.
Monopoly This firm is now the ultimate market power in the galaxy.
P 1 confidential/proprietaryp 1p 1 confidential/proprietary Leap Wireless International, Inc. October 2009.
PowerPoint Slides prepared by: Andreea CHIRITESCU Eastern Illinois University Monopolistic Competition 1 © 2012 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved.
Local Loop Unbundling PRESENTATION TO THE PORTFOLIO COMMITTEE 6 th JUNE 2007.
WiMAX - The new Wireless Standard TELE 480 Mike Davison 11 Oct 2006.
1 Highlights of the OECD’s Communications Outlook 2007: Focus on Mexico Dimitri Ypsilanti Directorate for Science, Technology and Industry, OECD.
Internet Policy Day 3 - Workshop Session No. 5 The impact of telecomms regulation Prepared for CTO by Link Centre, Witwatersrand University, South Africa.
David Loomis.  To mimic a competitive market outcome even when the underlying market is not competitive  “other goals” ◦ Fair and just rates ◦ Specific.
1 Bandwidth for All Judith Mariscal Mexico City, September 5 th Acorn Redecom Conference 09.
How can Liberalization maximize the Benefits from the Telecommunications Sector to the Caribbean Lisa Agard VP Legal Regulatory and Carrier Services TSTT.
Ross Kelso Doctoral candidate, QUT 26 September 2006 Access to Next Generation Broadband 2006 Communications.
Providing Seamless Connectivity in E-commerce
The Regulation of Network Industries Simon Wilkie. Caltech Lecture for May 7, 2004.
ECON 201 WEEK 7 Finishing Up Monopolies: Natural Monopolies.
Evaluating Monopoly Comparison with Perfect Competition.
What’s So Bad About Monopolies? & What Can We Do About It?
Telecom Regulatory Environment Indian Case Payal Malik.
MARKET STRUCTURES. What you write: Market classification based off of: number and size of firms type of product type of competition What you need to know:
Workshop for West-African Telecommunication Regulators Abuja (Nigeria), September 21-22, 2000.
Presentation on Monopoly Market By
ENUM/Convergence Workshop
Comparison of Market Structures
Monopolies and Anti-Trust Regulation
Spectrum Management in a Converged Ecosystem Velamah Cathapermal-Nair
CTIA – The Wireless Association™ May 18, 2005
Chapter 11: Monopoly.
Monopoly.
The industry's results – Q3 2016
Mr. Cleveland Thomas Vice Chairman Working Party 2/3 Study Group 3 ITU-T.
Competition in the Telecommunications Industry
Game Theory & Natural Monopolies
Presentation transcript:

Monopoly Pros –Easier to effect social policy (universal service for example) –Economies of scale and scope Cons –Lack of incentive for innovation –Inefficiencies in pricing –Averaging of rates and services—often leading to bypass

Competition Pros –Pricing efficiencies –Encouragement of innovation –Customer orientation Cons –Possible degradation of service –Possibility of un-served areas –Potential for excess capacity

Market Structures Monopoly Duopoly Oligopoly Total competition

Market segmentation Terminal equipment International long distance Domestic long distance Basic local services Leased lines Wireless Value-added services or networks (data for example)—now termed “broadband” AND WHAT DO WE DO WITH NEW SERVICES LIKE VoIP?

Is there a need to draw regulatory boundaries? By service? –Local versus long distance By provider? –Duopoly provision By industry segment? –Cable versus telephony; wireline versus wireless Not at all?

Why regulation? In a monopoly structure: control the actions of the monopolist In a totally competitive structure: probably not necessary??? In an imperfectly competitive structure: control dominant carriers, etc.

Purpose of regulation Economic: encourage efficient use of important resource Social policy: fair and equitable access to services Industrial policy: building of infrastructure; global trading position

Regulatory Approaches Type approval (CPE) Certification or licensing: market entry and exit Resale: encourage use of excess capacity Interconnection: control of connection and the terms of interconnection Spectrum allocation: wireless

What to regulate? Price Quality of service Conduct Standards Interconnection Social policy attainment

QoS Regulation or monitoring Canada, UK and Australia—remedies required; Portugal fines Monitoring in most other OECD countries –Emphasis on providing comparative information for users

Pricing trends Reduction in distance and time sensitivity –Scandinavian countries and Belgium for example now charge same rate for local and domestic long distance calls –New Zealand call capped at $2 once exceeds 20 minutes; Bell Canada allows unlimited calls within Canada for $17 per month Bundling of services

More pricing trends Rebalancing—local rates increase as long distance rates decrease Metered local service in virtually all countries except US, NZ, Australia, Canada In OECD, fixed voice rates stable or a bit higher from

Broadband In OECD from –Prices declined by average 2% per year (DSL) and 5% per year (cable) –Speeds increased 15%--20%

Wireless Tends to be calling party pays (CPP) –Has led to issue of termination charges Roaming has been an issue In OECD , mobile rates have declined 6% for low usage and over 20% for medium and high usage