Goldstone Radar Support for LCROSS Evaluation of Impact Sites Martin Slade October 16, 2006 National Aeronautics and Space Administration Jet Propulsion.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
THESIS – the Terrestrial and Habitable-zone Exoplanet Spectroscopy Infrared Spacecraft a concept for a joint NASA/ESA exoplanet characterization mission.
Advertisements

ECCO-2 and NASA Satellite Missions Lee-Lueng Fu Jet Propulsion Laboratory January 22-23, ECCO-2 Meeting.
On Estimation of Soil Moisture & Snow Properties with SAR Jiancheng Shi Institute for Computational Earth System Science University of California, Santa.
Jet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology The NASA/JPL Airborne Synthetic Aperture Radar System (AIRSAR) Yunling Lou Jet Propulsion.
In-situ Radar for Asteroid Characterization and Altimetry
New modules of the software package “PHOTOMOD Radar” September 2010, Gaeta, Italy X th International Scientific and Technical Conference From Imagery to.
The Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter NASA’s Next First Step To The Moon Noah E. Petro NASA Goddard Space Flight Center May 12 th, 2009.
MEPAG National Aeronautics and Space Administration Jet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology Pasadena, California Presentation to MEPAG.
The Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter (LRO) is the first mission in NASA's Vision for Space Exploration, a plan to return to the moon and then to travel to.
LRO/LEND LEND 1 LCROSS Site Selection Workshop October 16 th 2006 Lunar Exploration Neutron Detector Evaluation of Potential LCROSS Impact Sites Igor Mitrofanov.
School of Earth and Space Exploration Existing Lunar Datasets M. S. Robinson School of Earth and Space Exploration Arizona State University.
Malapert Mountain as a Lunar Outpost Paul Lowman Planetary Geodynamics Lab Title Slide.
Lunar Geology Traverse Kimberly Albarico ASTE 527 Monday December 15, 2008.
National Aeronautics and Space Administration Jet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology Pasadena, California Observing System Simulation.
National Aeronautics and Space Administration Lunar Mapping and Modeling Project Summary and Status Go for Lunar Landing Conference Tempe,
Autonomous Landing Hazard Avoidance Technology (ALHAT) Page 1 March 2008 Go for Lunar Landing Real-Time Imaging Technology for the Return to the Moon Dr.
Lunar Observations of Changes in the Earth’s Albedo (LOCEA) Alexander Ruzmaikin Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology in collaboration.
Navigation Systems for Lunar Landing Ian J. Gravseth Ball Aerospace and Technologies Corp. March 5 th, 2007 Ian J. Gravseth Ball Aerospace and Technologies.
Flying, Hopping and Perching Microbots for Extreme Environment Exploration Deployed Using CubeSats Jekan Thanga 1, Jim Bell 1 Space and Terrestrial Robotic.
Digital Elevation Models And Relief Models 1DEM. Part 1: The Underlying Elevation Data 2DEM.
Mysteries of Earth and Mars Mars Facts and Exploration.
Hyperspectral Satellite Imaging Planning a Mission Victor Gardner University of Maryland 2007 AIAA Region 1 Mid-Atlantic Student Conference National Institute.
Spaceborne Weather Radar
200 pt 300 pt 400 pt 500 pt 100 pt 200 pt 300 pt 400 pt 500 pt 100 pt 200pt 300 pt 400 pt 500 pt 100 pt 200 pt 300 pt 400 pt 500 pt 100 pt Topography Types.
Why look for water? Humans exploring the Moon will need water: –Option 1: Carry it there. –Option 2: Use water that may be there already! Carrying water.
Mars Exploration Directorate National Aeronautics and Space Administration Jet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology Pasadena, California.
Intelligent Robotics Group NASA Ames Research Center Intelligent Robotics Group NASA Ames Research Center Planning for the Mapping and Exploration of Human.
Aerial Photographs and Remote Sensing Aerial Photographs For years geographers have used aerial photographs to study the Earth’s surface. In many ways.
Mapping Forest Canopy Height with MISR We previously demonstrated a capability to obtain physically meaningful canopy structural parameters using data.
Tools in ArcGIS Not only is there an immense toolbox,
Polar Topographic Knowledge Prior to LCROSS Impact David E. Smith 1, Maria T. Zuber 2 1 NASA/Goddard Space Flight Center 2 Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
GTOPO30 Global 30-arc-second (1-km) elevation model - “Best available” global DEM - Initial release: March Widely used for climate modeling, land.
Retrieving High Precision River Stage and Slope from Space E. Rodriguez, D. Moller Jet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology.
National Aeronautics and Space Administration Mark Swain THESIS – the Terrestrial and Habitable-zone Exoplanet Spectroscopy Infrared Spacecraft characterizing.
Mapping Ocean Surface Topography With a Synthetic-Aperture Interferometry Radar: A Global Hydrosphere Mapper Lee-Lueng Fu Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena,
Track 1. Track 2 TRACK LIST 1.An introduction to synthetic aperture radar 2.Mini-RF on LRO 3.The moon as seen by radar 4.The search for ice 5.Conclusions.
SWOT Near Nadir Ka-band SAR Interferometry: SWOT Airborne Experiment Xiaoqing Wu, JPL, California Institute of Technology, USA Scott Hensley, JPL, California.
USGS DIGITAL TERRAIN MODELS AND MOSAICS FOR LMMP M. R. Rosiek, E. M. Lee, E. T. Howington-Kraus, R. L. Fergason, L. A. Weller, D. M. Galuszka, B. L. Redding,
Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter Camera (LROC) Mark Robinson, PI Arizona State University School of Earth and Space Exploration Resource Mapping Surface Operations.
Planetary InSAR Summary Presented by Pete Mouginis-Mark
Dr. Richard R. Vondrak Director, Robotic Lunar Exploration Program Science Mission Directorate NASA Headquarters September 2004 NASA Robotic Lunar Exploration.
Yuki D. Takahashi University of California, Berkeley 2002 / 9
How does InSAR work? Gareth Funning University of California, Riverside.
Centre Spatial de Liège Institut Montefiore
LRO SRR LRO Mission Overview.
EPITHERMAL FLUX DEPRESION AND PSR IN SHOEMAKER CRATER V.V.Shevchenko 1, I.G.Mitrofanov 2, E.A.Kozlova 1, A.A. Shangaraev 1, and the LEND Science Team 1.
SHOEMAKER CRATER – GOING WHERE WE CAN “SEE” Carlton Allen NASA JSC.
LuNet Integrated Network Architecture for Sustained Human and Robotic Exploration Gary Noreen Telecommunications Architect Communications Architecture.
National Aeronautics and Space Administration Jet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology Pasadena, California Evaluation of the SMAP.
SATELLITE ORBITS The monitoring capabilities of the sensor are, to a large extent, governed by the parameters of the satellite orbit. Different types of.
NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center LRO SRR LRO Mission Level 1 Requirements.
Hab Placement and Landing Site. Pic 1, Ref 4 Picture 1 The red circle indicates the approximate location of the hab. The blue box shows an approximate.
Scarab Autonomous Traverse Carnegie Mellon December 2007 David Wettergreen.
A Concept for Spaceborne Imaging of the Base of Terrestrial Ice Sheets and Icy Bodies in the Solar System Ken Jezek, Byrd Polar Research Center E. Rodriguez,
Workshop on Science Associated with the Lunar Exploration Architecture - Earth Science Subcommittee Theme: A Lunar-Based Earth Observatory Science Observations.
Mission: Moon!. What is it like on the Moon? Length of Day Atmosphere Temperature Water Radiation Gravity Landscape.
Ice At the Moon - How the Moon Mineralogy Mapper on Chandrayaan-1 Will Help Noah E. Petro NASA Goddard Space Flight Center March 4 th, 2009.

Digital Elevation Models And Relief Models
Congratulations! You have chosen to climb Mount
(2) Norut, Tromsø, Norway Improved measurement of sea surface velocity from synthetic aperture radar Morten Wergeland Hansen.
Analysis Ready Data ..
Environmental data Landscape genomics
Mapping Earth Science.
Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter Camera
Lunar reflectance model based on SELENE/SP data
Saturn Ring Results from the Cassini Composite Infrared Spectrometer
Soil Moisture Active Passive (SMAP) Satellite
Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter (LRO)
Nuts and Bolts of FCC FM Allocations
Presentation transcript:

Goldstone Radar Support for LCROSS Evaluation of Impact Sites Martin Slade October 16, 2006 National Aeronautics and Space Administration Jet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology Pasadena, California

National Aeronautics and Space Administration Jet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology Pasadena, California 10/16/2006 Goldstone Radar Support for LCROSS Impact Site Evaluations 2 National Aeronautics and Space Administration Jet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology Pasadena, California Outline The Goldstone Solar System Radar (GSSR) GSSR Imaging and Topography Past GSSR Measurements of the Lunar Poles Completed Measurements of the Lunar Poles Future Options Possible in Support of LCROSS Summary

National Aeronautics and Space Administration Jet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology Pasadena, California 10/16/2006 Goldstone Radar Support for LCROSS Impact Site Evaluations 3 National Aeronautics and Space Administration Jet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology Pasadena, California The Goldstone Solar System Radar (GSSR) A unique NASA facility for high- resolution ranging and imaging of planetary and small-body targets –One transmitting, multiple receiving antennas for interferometry –500 kW X-band transmitter –Very sensitive maser receiver Provides a wide variety of information –Simultaneous, co-registered radar image and topography - even in Lunar unlit areas –Surface characteristics, structure and composition –Orbits, rotations, spin axis Leverages DSN assets for radar Mission support and radar science –Deep Space Network (DSN) primary function is communication and nav for space missions beyond low Earth orbit

National Aeronautics and Space Administration Jet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology Pasadena, California 10/16/2006 Goldstone Radar Support for LCROSS Impact Site Evaluations 4 National Aeronautics and Space Administration Jet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology Pasadena, California Past GSSR Observations of Lunar Poles 1997 GSSR observations provided the highest resolution topographic maps and images to date of the permanently shadowed regions at the lunar poles –Pixel size 150 m x 150 m –Height resolution 50 m –Datum: km sphere –Used by Lunar Prospector in planning impact into Shoemaker Crater (Images: Margot et al., Science, volume 284, 1999)

National Aeronautics and Space Administration Jet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology Pasadena, California 10/16/2006 Goldstone Radar Support for LCROSS Impact Site Evaluations 5 National Aeronautics and Space Administration Jet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology Pasadena, California Radar “Backscatter” Image vs. Optical Image Radar resolution 150 m; Clementine resolution variable - average ~200 m Radar image provides details in areas without solar illumination Radar simultaneously provides co-registered topography and imagery (Image: Margot et al., Science, vol. 284, 1999 ) Ref.:

National Aeronautics and Space Administration Jet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology Pasadena, California 10/16/2006 Goldstone Radar Support for LCROSS Impact Site Evaluations 6 National Aeronautics and Space Administration Jet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology Pasadena, California Permanently Shadowed Regions of Lunar South Pole Craters of note are Shoemaker, Faustini, de Gerlache, Shackleton,and an unnamed crater at ~(0,-87.5) (Image: Margot et al., Science, vol. 284, 1999)

National Aeronautics and Space Administration Jet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology Pasadena, California 10/16/2006 Goldstone Radar Support for LCROSS Impact Site Evaluations 7 National Aeronautics and Space Administration Jet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology Pasadena, California Radar “Backscatter” Image of Lunar South Pole at 150-meters/pixel Large “old” craters with a good radar view of a substantial fraction of their floors are marked.

National Aeronautics and Space Administration Jet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology Pasadena, California 10/16/2006 Goldstone Radar Support for LCROSS Impact Site Evaluations 8 National Aeronautics and Space Administration Jet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology Pasadena, California Goldstone Radar Data Acquisition on Sept. 13 for Lunar South Pole New radar swath just obtained on Sept.13; Processing underway ~20-meter resolution pixels topography + heights & ~20-meter resolution radar backscatter maps expected to be delivered in a few months

National Aeronautics and Space Administration Jet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology Pasadena, California 10/16/2006 Goldstone Radar Support for LCROSS Impact Site Evaluations 9 National Aeronautics and Space Administration Jet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology Pasadena, California Additions and Enhacements Possible in time to benefit LCROSS Additional 19-m resolution radar images/topography –More swaths can be obtained reliably and at low cost –Reduction to topography/radar backscatter images at modest  cost –Image any area of interest on lunar Nearside -landing site(s) early planning –Crater wall steepness and rms terrain roughness -- rover accessibility 4.5-m resolution could be extended to lunar polar measurements –Currently demonstrated on asteroids and lunar subradar point –Requires development of enhanced transmitter modulation for poles –4x in resolution - may enable detection ~20-m LCROSS impact crater Enhancement to 1-3 m resolution is under consideration –Requires development of broader bandwidth transmitter klystrons –Human-scale measurement of local surface roughness and slopes –Detailed characterization of landing sites and surface excursion planning –Near-grazing incidence angles limits Earth-based polar coverage, but still worthwhile for Malapert Mountain Earth relay site and many other sites

National Aeronautics and Space Administration Jet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology Pasadena, California 10/16/2006 Goldstone Radar Support for LCROSS Impact Site Evaluations 10 National Aeronautics and Space Administration Jet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology Pasadena, California Summary 1997 ground-based radar from the DSN site at Goldstone, CA, has produced the highest resolution topography and imaging to date of the lunar poles (150-m pixels, 50-m height resolution) Post-1997 enhancements to this facility provide ~ 19-m spatial and topographic resolution of the lunar surface –Ongoing processing of measurement of the south polar region Future options with benefit to the lunar exploration program –Measure other areas of interest anywhere on lunar Nearside –Extend new 4.5-m capability to image lunar polar and other regions –Develop 1-m capability to characterize surface at human-scale

National Aeronautics and Space Administration Jet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology Pasadena, California 10/16/2006 Goldstone Radar Support for LCROSS Impact Site Evaluations 11 National Aeronautics and Space Administration Jet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology Pasadena, California Backup material

National Aeronautics and Space Administration Jet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology Pasadena, California 10/16/2006 Goldstone Radar Support for LCROSS Impact Site Evaluations 12 National Aeronautics and Space Administration Jet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology Pasadena, California Tycho Crater: A Comparison of Radar DEM With Clementine LIDAR Dots are Clementine LIDAR measurements Continuous curve is Radar topography along the Clementine “ground” track Radar image of Tycho crater (greyscale) and Radar Digital Elevation Map (DEM) [color]

National Aeronautics and Space Administration Jet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology Pasadena, California 10/16/2006 Goldstone Radar Support for LCROSS Impact Site Evaluations 13 National Aeronautics and Space Administration Jet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology Pasadena, California South Polar Illumination-Bussey et al., 1999 High-light-time peaks will be better defined by higher resolution topography

National Aeronautics and Space Administration Jet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology Pasadena, California 10/16/2006 Goldstone Radar Support for LCROSS Impact Site Evaluations 14 National Aeronautics and Space Administration Jet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology Pasadena, California Overview of Processing Unwrap phase (remove 360º ambiguities) Image 1 Topography Image 2 (Source: A. Heim, Processing of SAR Data, Springer, 2004.)

National Aeronautics and Space Administration Jet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology Pasadena, California 10/16/2006 Goldstone Radar Support for LCROSS Impact Site Evaluations 15 National Aeronautics and Space Administration Jet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology Pasadena, California Complete Goldstone Radar Coverage in 1997 for Lunar South Pole (1738 km datum) 1997 Radar South Pole mosaics giving coverage inclusive of Clementine LIDAR altimetry. Grid has 5 degree latitude increments (30 km/degree). [J.-L. Margot Cornell Ph.D. thesis] Without topography including LIDAR altimetry, absolute topography might be difficult. 300 km 1200 km 300 km

National Aeronautics and Space Administration Jet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology Pasadena, California 10/16/2006 Goldstone Radar Support for LCROSS Impact Site Evaluations 16 National Aeronautics and Space Administration Jet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology Pasadena, California Goldstone Radar Swaths needed to reproduce 1997 South Pole coverage Since the resolution has decreased from 150 meters/pixel to ~20 meters per pixel, each swath requires about 10 times longer integration time, even with +10 dB SNR.