Around midnight on August 16, 1996, following a day spent together drinking alcohol and smoking marijuana, 18 year old Daryl Atkins and his accomplice,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
By: Nicholas DeJarnette
Advertisements

Courts and the Quest for Justice. In Theory: Courtroom Ideals  Courts have extensive powers in our criminal justice system.  The courts legitimacy is.
Aileen Wuornos By: Lauren Carter.
HOLT, RINEHART AND WINSTON A MERICAN GOVERNMENT HOLT 1 The U.S. Legal System Section 1: U.S. Law Section 2: The Criminal Justice System Section 3: Corrections.
 Amendment VI  In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district.
BY: CHASTITY REYNOLDS ATKINS V. VIRGINIA (2002) 536 U.S. 304.
Daryl Atkins. In a landmark 6–3 ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court barred the execution of mentally retarded people, ruling that it constituted "cruel and.
16.2- Criminal Cases.
By Bianca Kue Atkins v. Virginia. Background June 20 th 2002 Daryl Renard Atkins  Convicted of abduction, armed robbery, and capital murder  Forensic.
Ford V. Wainwright (1986) By:Harschel Reyes & Michelle Singh.
Daryl Atkin. The pieces of the appellant Daryl Renard Atkins found guilty of kidnapping, armed robbery and murder and was sentenced to death in Virginia.
The Scottish Court System
Daniel Moody PD. 3 3/25/10 Miranda VS. Arizona 1966.
Criminal and Civil Court
Clear & Cole, American Corrections, 8 th Chapter 20 The Death Penalty.
Mr. Noel Ciyanna Clark December 4, 2014 ATKINS V. VIRGINIA.
Criminal Appeal Routes !
Capital Punishment McCleskey v. Kemp 481 U.S. 279.
Judicial Review Day. Agenda Self assessment quiz Study Guide Review Game.
THE DEATH PENALTY AT THE FEDERAL LEVEL. 37 Separate Death Penalty Systems in the United States Each of 35 states has a death penalty system The federal.
Chapter 16 Lesson 2 Civil and Criminal Law. Crime and Punishment crime  A crime is any act that harms people or society and that breaks a criminal law.
DARYL RENARD ATKINS.  York County, Virginia  Scheduled Execution Date: Atkins was found mentally competent by a Virginia jury on Friday 5 August, 2005.
Objective Review. The US Court of Appeals Cases are decided by a panel of how many judges? 33.
Chapter 28.2 “The Judicial Branch of Texas”. The Judicial Branch is made up of courts and judges throughout the state.
Part II Vocabulary: Legal System & Violent Crimes Chapter 1: Law & Science.
Juvenile Justice.
Daryl Atkins Atkins v. Virginia Atkins v. Virginia, 536 U.S. 304 (2002), is a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States ruled 6-3 that executing.
Daryl Renard Atkins York County, Virginia Scheduled Execution Date: Atkins was found mentally competent by a Virginia jury on Friday 5 August, A.
Loren Gallimore. Background Daryl Renard Atkins, the plaintiff, went against the defendant, the state of Virginia, as he was convicted of abduction, robbery,
A play by Reginald Rose. Be ready to share the following questions with the class. Are you one who is quick to jump to conclusions or do you like to hear.
Eligible for Execution: The Daryl Atkins Story
Unit 4 Notes. Judges act in three major roles: 1. Adjudicator – must assume a neutral stance between the prosecution and the defense. Must apply the law.
Atkins v. Virginia (2002) Chandler Vaughan. Case Outline Supreme Court Title: Atkins v. Virginia, 536 U.S. 304 (2002) Plaintiff: The Commonwealth of Virginia.
Around midnight on August 16, 1996, following a day spent together drinking alcohol and smoking marijuana, 18 year old Daryl Atkins and his accomplice,
The Death Penalty in Delaware: An Empirical Study John Blume, Ted Eisenberg, Valerie Hans & Sheri Johnson Cornell Death Penalty Project, Cornell Law School.
Capital Procedure/ Severe Mental Disability An Act to Amend the Capital Trial, Sentencing, and Post-Conviction Procedures for persons with Severe Mental.
1. Explain retribution to deter crime At one time the primary reason for punishing a criminal was RETRIBUTION. This is the idea behind the saying “an.
Twelve Angry Men By: Reginald Rose. Discussion What is a jury? How is it chosen? What responsibility does an individual have to accept jury duty? How.
The Judicial Process. What types of cases are considered “criminal cases?” What types of cases are considered “criminal cases?” What types of cases are.
The Constitution explicitly permits capital punishment – if you may not be “deprived of life, liberty or property without due process of law,” then you.
Atkins v. Virginia, 536 U.S. 304 (2002), is a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States ruled 6-3 that executing the mentally retarded violates.
The Participants. Beyond a Reasonable Doubt Crown must prove case beyond a reasonable doubt: a reasonable person would have no choice but to conclude.
Georgia’s. SS8CG4 – The student will analyze the role of the judicial branch in GA state government. SS8CG6 – The student will explain how the Georgia.
The Criminal Justice System
THE PENAL SYSTEM AN OVERVIEW. Why do we have a penal system? Incapacitation: remove dangerous people from society so they don’t harm the rest of us. Deterrence:
1.REMAND: when a case is sent back to a lower court for retrial 2.Criminal Case: a law has been broken 3.Civil Case: a disagreement between two parties.
Atkins v. Virginia Peter Diddy Period 6 Constitutional Law.
The Fourth Amendment COURT CASES. What does the Fourth Amendment say? The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects,
This guide simplifies the arrest-to-sentence process in New York County.
THE ADULT JUSTICE SYSTEM. ADULT JUSTICE SYSTEM  Characterized as Civil or Criminal  Criminal laws are characterized as felonies or misdemeanors  For.
Judicial Branch CH 13 CRCT Prep Books.  Laws are made in society to keep order.  Conflicts over these laws may be over… 1. Rights and duties of citizens,
Georgia’s SS8CG4 and SS8CG6. SS8CG4 – The student will analyze the role of the judicial branch in GA state government. SS8CG6 – The student will explain.
The Courts. The Criminal Justice System has three major components: Police Courts Corrections Each plays an important role in the system and all three.
THE JUDICIAL BRANCH COURTS, JUDGES, AND THE LAW. MAIN ROLE Conflict Resolution! With every law, comes potential conflict Role of judicial system is to.
Criminal Prosecution Process May 5, Arrest Police officers arrest suspects when in their professional judgment they believe that a crime has been.
Darly Atkins (1990). The case involved Daryl Renard Atkins, who was convicted of capital murder and sentenced to death for abducting, robbing, and killing.
The Criminal Justice System Chapter 12. Elements of the Criminal Justice System  Criminal Justice Law  Texas criminal justice system: The system of.
Criminal Prosecution Process
Chapter 20 The Death Penalty.
Miranda v. Arizona.
Civics & Economics – Goals 5 & 6 Criminal Cases
VIII. DEATH PENALTY CONSIDERATIONS
Atkins v. Virginia 班級:四英一B 姓名:王心怡 學號:4000Z027.
Criminal Prosecution Process
Court Case Proceedings
The Criminal Trial Process
Procedures for a CRIMINAL case
Path to Prison Gallery Walk (APIATS)
Criminal Court Cases Chapter 16, Section 2.
Presentation transcript:

Around midnight on August 16, 1996, following a day spent together drinking alcohol and smoking marijuana, 18 year old Daryl Atkins and his accomplice, William Jones, walked to a nearby convenience store where they abducted Eric Nesbitt, an airman from nearby Langley Air Force Base. Unsatisfied with the $60 they found in his wallet, Atkins and Jones drove Nesbitt in his own vehicle to a nearby ATM and forced him to withdraw a further $200. In spite of Nesbitt's pleas, the two abductors then drove him to an isolated location, where he was shot eight times, killing him. Footage of Atkins and Jones in the vehicle with Nesbitt were captured on the ATM's CCTV camera, which was of the two men with Nesbitt in the middle and leaning across Jones to withdraw money, and further forensic evidence implicating the two were found in Nesbitt's abandoned vehicle. The two suspects were quickly tracked down and arrested. In custody, each man claimed that the other had pulled the trigger. Atkins' version of the events, however, was found to contain a number of inconsistencies. Doubts concerning Atkins's testimony were strengthened when a cell-mate claimed that Atkins had confessed to him that he had shot Nesbitt. A deal of life imprisonment was negotiated with Jones in return for his full testimony against Atkins. The jury decided that Jones' version of events was the more coherent and credible, and convicted Atkins of capital murder. During the penalty phase of the trial, the defense presented Atkins's school records and the results of an IQ test carried out by clinical psychologist Dr. Evan Nelson confirmed that he had an IQ of 59. On this basis they proposed that he was "mildly mentally retarded". Atkins was nevertheless sentenced to death. On appeal, the Supreme Court of Virginia affirmed the conviction but reversed the sentence after finding that an improper sentencing verdict form had been used. At retrial, the prosecution proved two aggravating factors under Virginia law—that Atkins posed a risk of "future dangerousness" based on a string of previous violent convictions, and that the offense was committed in a vile manner. The state's witness, Dr. Stanton Samenow, countered the defense's arguments that Atkins was mentally retarded, by stating that Atkins's vocabulary, general knowledge and behavior suggested that he possessed at least average intelligence. As a result, Atkins's death sentence was upheld. The Virginia Supreme Court subsequently affirmed the sentence based on a prior Supreme Court decision, Penry v. Lynaugh, 492 U.S. 302 (1989). Justice Cynthia D. Kinser authored the five-member majority. Justices Leroy Rountree Hassell, Sr. and Lawrence L. Koontz, Jr. each authored dissenting opinions and joined in each other's dissent. 參考資料: Air Force BaseATMCCTVcapital murderIQclinical psychologistmentally retarded sentenced to deathSupreme Court of VirginiaDr. Stanton SamenowPenry v. LynaughCynthia D. KinserLeroy Rountree Hassell, Sr.Lawrence L. Koontz, Jr.