Expert witness A person who is a specialist in a subject, often technical, who may present his/her expert opinion without having been a witness to any.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Chapter 4: Enforcing the Law 4 How Can Disputes Be Resolved Privately?
Advertisements

The Court System.
The Process of Litigation. What is the first stage in a civil lawsuit ?  Service of Process (the summons)
Criminal Cases Chapter 16 Section 2.
List three (3) types of law. Write your name on the sheet and hand in.
Capital Punishment Punishment: The deliberate and authorized causing of pain or harm to someone thought to have broken a rule, code, law etc. Punishment:
© 2015 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved Law A body of regulations that govern society and that people are obligated to observe Sources.
The Court System.  Judge: decide all legal issues in a lawsuit. If no jury, the judge’s job also includes determining the facts of the case.  Plaintiff.
THE JUDICIAL SYSTEM Chapter 18. The Judicial System  Articles of Confederation did not set up a national judicial system  Major weakness of the Articles.
Chapter 14: The Criminal Justice Process
The Judicial Branch. Court Systems & Jurisdictions.
Pre-Trial Procedure.
Objective 1.02 Understand Court Systems and Trial Procedures
Criminal Justice Process: Proceedings Before Trial
Pharmacy 151 Introduction to Pharmacy Law US Legal System.
The American Justice System Essential Questions: What are the steps of the criminal justice system? What do police do? What are the pre-trial steps of.
U.S. District Courts and U.S. Courts of Appeals
Section 2.2.
Chapter 15: Criminal Justice Process ~ Sentencing & Corrections Objective: The student should be able to list the various options to sentencing & identify.
Intro to Law Criminal Process: Sentencing. Sentencing Options Suspended Sentence – given, but does not have be served at that time, but may have to serve.
LAW 12 MUNDY 2008 Process and Objectives of Sentencing.
AJ 50 – Introduction to Administration of Justice
© 2011 South-Western | Cengage Learning GOALS LESSON 1.1 LAW, JUSTICE, AND ETHICS Recognize the difference between law and justice Apply ethics to personal.
How Federal Courts Are Organized
Article III of the U.S. Constitution The Judicial Branch.
 Judge  Prosecutor  Defense Attorney 2 Copyright Texas Education Agency (TEA)
2 Copyright and Terms of Service Copyright © Texas Education Agency, These materials are copyrighted © and trademarked ™ as the property of the.
Section 2.2.
Mr. Valanzano Business Law. Dispute Resolution Litigate – ________________________________________________ In some cases, people decided too quickly to.
1. 2 There is only one good kind of legal dispute -- The one that is prevented!
Chapter 3. Purpose: Solving legal disputes and upholding legal rights.
THE JUDICIAL SYSTEM Chapter 18. The Judicial System  Two types of cases:  Criminal Law: Government charges an individual with violating one or more.
Chapter 4 Business Law. Number 1 ◦ Is Ed bound by a third party decision? Number 2 ◦ Should Walter pay the money? ◦ Should Olivia sue, even though she.
The Judicial Branch.
Chapter 4 Sentencing and punishment. In this chapter, you will look at the purposes and process of sentencing and the different factors affecting a sentencing.
The Judicial Branch Chapter 10.
Legal Issues Unit 1 Review. Jurisprudence The study of law and legal philosophy.
Courts, Crime and Controversy
Sentencing and Corrections. Once Found Guilty, a defendant will be sentenced by a jury or judge.
Punishment and sentencing By: Jessie Graber The goals of modern sentencing  General Deterrence- a crime control policy that depends on the fear of criminal.
Criminal Justice Process:
Capital Punishment Punishment by execution of someone officially judged to have committed a serious or capital crime Punishment by execution of someone.
The Judicial Branch Unit 5. Court Systems & Jurisdictions.
 The United States has an adversarial court system. › This means that two opposing sides must argue their cases before a judge in order to find the truth.
THE PENAL SYSTEM AN OVERVIEW. Why do we have a penal system? Incapacitation: remove dangerous people from society so they don’t harm the rest of us. Deterrence:
Constitutional Criminal Procedure
1 Chapter 5: The Court System. 2 Trial Courts Trial courts listen to testimony, consider evidence, and decide the facts in disputes. There are 2 parties.
The Criminal Justice System. Arrest Procedure The Arrest: To arrest a person the police must have probable cause. (reason to believe that criminal activity.
THE COURT SYSTEMS Chapter 18. The Dual Court System ■In the United States there are two types of court systems under which every court in the nation can.
Unit Question What is fair legal procedure for people accused of crimes?
FEDERAL COURT SYSTEM: Jurisdiction, Jurisdiction, Jurisdiction! Vocab: Original Jurisdiction Appellate Jurisdiction Ruling Opinion Precedent Litigants.
The Court System Chapter 5. Courts  Trial Courts- two parties Plaintiff- in civil trial is the person bringing the legal action Prosecutor- in criminal.
THE JUDICIAL BRANCH COURTS, JUDGES, AND THE LAW. MAIN ROLE Conflict Resolution! With every law, comes potential conflict Role of judicial system is to.
Article III: The Judicial Branch Chapters: 11,12
Chapter 5: The Court System
Jury System.
American Court Structure
C10: Punishment and Sentencing
How Federal Courts Are Organized
The Court System Street Law.
Criminal Court Cases Chapter 16, Section 2.
The Federal Court System & the Judicial Branch
Process and Objectives of Sentencing
How Federal Courts Are Organized
The Structure of Canada’s Courts
How Federal Courts Are Organized
Sentencing.
Chapter 5: The Court System
The Lower Courts District Courts The lowest level of federal system
Section 2.2.
Presentation transcript:

Expert witness A person who is a specialist in a subject, often technical, who may present his/her expert opinion without having been a witness to any occurrence relating to the lawsuit or criminal case. It is an exception to the rule against giving an opinion in trial, provided that the expert is qualified by evidence of his/her expertise, training and special knowledge. If the expertise is challenged, the attorney for the party calling the "expert" must make a showing of the necessary background through questions in court, and the trial judge has discretion to qualify the witness or rule he/she is not an expert, or is an expert on limited subjects. Experts are usually paid handsomely for their services and may be asked by the opposition the amount they are receiving for their work on the case. In most jurisdictions, both sides must exchange the names and addresses of proposed experts to allow pre-trial depositions.

Appellate Jurisdiction Appellate jurisdiction is the power of a court to review decisions and change outcomes of decisions of lower courts. Most appellate jurisdiction is legislatively created, and may consist of appeals by leave of the appellate court or by right. Depending on the type of case and the decision below, appellate review primarily consists of: an entirely new hearing (a non trial de novo); a hearing where the appellate court gives deference to factual findings of the lower court; or review of particular legal rulings made by the lower court (an appeal on the record).

US Court of Appeals Districts

Change of Venue A change of venue is the legal term for moving a trial to a new location. In high-profile matters, a change of venue may occur to move a jury trial away from a location where a fair and impartial jury may not be possible due to widespread publicity about a crime and its defendant(s) to another community in order to obtain jurors who can be more objective in their duties. This change may be to different towns, and across the other sides of states or, in some extremely high-profile federal cases, to other states.legal termtrialjury trialimpartial jurypublicitydefendantjurorsfederal

Juror Any person who actually serves on a jury. Lists of potential jurors are chosen from various sources such as registered voters, automobile registration or telephone directories. The names are drawn by lot (more often by computer random selection) and requested to appear for possible service. Before a trial begins the names of jurors are assigned to a trial court, and a further selection process is made. Acceptable excuses from service are determined by state law or by the judge before or during the final selection process. If chosen, a juror receives a small amount of pay per day of service and payment for automobile mileage from home to court. A member of a grand jury is called a grand juror

Jury Pool

Subpoena A subpoena /səˈpiːnə/ (also subpœna) is a writ issued by a government agency, most often a court, to compel testimony by a witness or production of evidence under a penalty for failure. There are two common types of subpoena:/səˈpiːnə/writ 1.subpoena ad testificandum orders a person to testify before the ordering authority or face punishment. The subpoena can also request the testimony to be given by phone or in person.subpoena ad testificandum 2.subpoena duces tecum orders a person or organization to bring physical evidence before the ordering authority or face punishment. This is often used for requests to mail copies of documents to the requesting party or directly to court.subpoena duces tecum

Rehabilitation Rehabilitation is the re-integration into society of a convicted person and the main objective of modern penal policy, to counter habitual offending, also known as criminal recidivism. [1][2]convicted personpenal policyhabitual offendingrecidivism [1][2] Alternatives to imprisonment also exist, such as community service, probation orders, and others entailing guidance and aftercare towards the offender.community service probation

What are some rehab programs? 1. GED 2. Work skills 3. Drug programs 4. Personal skills (anger management, social skills)

Work Skills

Incapacitation Incapacitation in the context of sentencing philosophy is the effect of a sentence in positively preventing (rather than merely deterring) future offending.sentencing philosophydeterring Imprisonment incapacitates the prisoner by physically removing them from the society against which they are deemed to have offended. Long term imprisonment with the intention to incapacitate is often used by criminal justice systems against habitual criminals who recidivate. Incapacitation also focuses on removing the ability of the offenders to commit future crimes. [1]criminal justice systemshabitual criminals recidivate [1]

Deterrence Deterrence is the use of punishment as a threat to deter people from offending. Deterrence is often contrasted with retributivism, which holds that punishment is a necessary consequence of a crime and should be calculated based on the gravity of the wrong done.punishmentretributivism The concept of deterrence has two key assumptions: the first is that specific punishments imposed on offenders will "deter" or prevent them from committing further crimes; the second is that fear of punishment will prevent others from committing similar crimes. [1] [1]

1.Specific deterrence focuses on the individual in question. The aim of these punishments is to discourage the criminal from future criminal acts by instilling an understanding of the consequences. 2.General or indirect deterrence focuses on general prevention of crime by making examples of specific deviants. The individual actor is not the focus of the attempt at behavioral change, but rather receives punishment in public view in order to deter other individuals from deviance in the future. The argument that deterrence, rather than retribution, is the main justification for punishment is a hallmark of the rational choice theory and can be traced to Cesare Beccaria whose well-known treatise On Crimes and Punishments.rational choice theoryCesare BeccariaOn Crimes and Punishments