Point of Contact :Doug Ingerson Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration WJ Hughes Technical Center Fire Safety Branch, AAR-440 Bldg.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Engine Nacelle Halon Replacement, FAA, WJ Hughes Technical Center
Advertisements

BRIEF OVER VIEW OF THE MINIMUM PERFORMANCE STANDARD FOR ENGINES describes geometry for a fixture loosely representing an aircraft engine nacelle describes.
Engine Nacelle Halon Replacement, FAA, WJ Hughes Technical Center Point of Contact :Doug Ingerson Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration.
Point of Contact :Doug Ingerson Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration WJ Hughes Technical Center Fire Safety Branch, AAR-440 Bldg.
Recent Simulator Activity Baseline Testing –Fire testing performed during the first week of May 2000 –Agent testing performed during the third and fourth.
Engine Nacelle Halon Replacement, FAA, WJ Hughes Technical Center Point of Contact :Doug Ingerson Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration.
Presented to: By: Date: Federal Aviation Administration International Aircraft Materials Fire Test Working Group Developing an In-flight Fire Condition.
Point of Contact :Doug Ingerson Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration WJ Hughes Technical Center Fire Safety Branch, AAR-440 Bldg.
JET A VAPORIZATION IN A SIMULATED AIRCRAFT FUEL TANK (INCLUDING SUB-ATMOSPHERIC PRESSURES AND LOW TEMPERATURES) C. E. Polymeropoulos, and Robert Ochs Department.
Modeling of Fuel Tank Inerting for FAA OBIGGS Research
WJH FAA Technical Center John W. Reinhardt
William Cavage AAR-440 Fire Safety Branch Wm. J
Combustion Design Considerations
First Law of Thermodynamics - Open Systems
Chapter 4 Mass and Energy Analysis of Control Volumes (Open Systems)
Lecture# 9 MASS AND ENERGY ANALYSIS OF CONTROL VOLUMES
Advanced Thermodynamics Note 6 Applications of Thermodynamics to Flow Processes Lecturer: 郭修伯.
Jet-A Vaporization In an Experimental Tank Part II: Experimental Results at Atmospheric and Sub-Atmospheric Pressures Robert Ian Ochs Rutgers, The State.
Modeling Wing Tank Flammability Dhaval D. Dadia Dr. Tobias Rossmann Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey Piscataway, New Jersey Steven Summer Federal.
Cargo Bay Fire Protection with a Fuel Tank Inerting System William Cavage AAR-440 Fire Safety Branch Wm. J. Hughes Technical Center Federal Aviation Administration.
An Update on FAA Fuel Tank Ullage Modeling
Presented to: International Aircraft Systems Fire Protection Working Group By: Date: April 2-3, 2008 Federal Aviation Administration Next-Generation Oil.
Forces Acting on a Control Volume Body forces: Act through the entire body of the control volume: gravity, electric, and magnetic forces. Surface forces:
Modeling of Single Bay Fuel Tank Inerting for FAA OBIGGS Research
Engine Nacelle Halon Replacement, FAA WJ Hughes Technical Center Point of Contact :Doug Ingerson Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration.
Modeling In-flight Inert Gas Distribution in a 747 Center-Wing Fuel Tank William Cavage AAR-440 Fire Safety Branch Wm. J. Hughes Technical Center Federal.
22nd AIAA Aerodynamic Measurement Technology and Ground Testing Conference June 24th-26th, 2002 Adams Mark Hotel - St. Louis, MS Modeling Inert Gas Distribution.
The First Law of Thermodynamics
Federal Aviation Administration 0 Composite Wing Tank Flammability April 2-3, Composite and Aluminum Wing Tank Flammability Comparison Testing Steve.
ALTERNATIVE AGENT UPDATE Louise C. Speitel Fire Safety Branch AAR-440 FAA W.J. Hughes Technical Center Atlantic City International Airport, NJ
Federal Aviation Administration Status of Research & Testing to Replace Halon Extinguishing Agents in Civil Aviation Fire Safety Team FAA Wm. J. Hughes.
Presented to: By: Date: Federal Aviation Administration Forced-flow Fire Testing with “cold”-soaked FK International Aircraft Systems Fire Protection.
Federal Aviation Administration Handheld Advisory Circular Update Louise Speitel Fire Safety Branch FAA Wm. J. Hughes Technical Center Atlantic City International.
Presented to: By: Date: Federal Aviation Administration Burnthrough Test Method for Aircraft Thermal/Acoustic Insulation: Burner Replacement Investigation.
A culvert representing the fuselage of an airplane was positioned 1 m downwind of the fuel pan (Figs. 2 and 3). The culvert had a nominal diameter of 2.7.
Presented to: By: Date: Federal Aviation Administration In-Flight Burn- Through Tests Aluminum vs. composite materials Aircraft Systems Fire Working Grp.
Federal Aviation Administration Radiant Panel Test for Thermal/Acoustic Insulation 0 Federal Aviation Administration International Aircraft Materials Fire.
Engine Nacelle Halon Replacement, FAA, WJ Hughes Technical Center Point of Contact :Doug Ingerson Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration.
Auto Ignition, Premixed & Diffusive Combustion in CI Engines
Experimental and numerical studies on the bonfire test of high- pressure hydrogen storage vessels Prof. Jinyang Zheng Institute of Process Equipment, Zhejiang.
Presented to: IAMFTWG, Renton, WA By: Robert Ochs Date: March 3, 2010 Federal Aviation Administration NexGen Burner for Seat Cushion Fire Testing.
Federal Aviation Administration Aircraft Ducting 0 Federal Aviation Administration International Aircraft Materials Fire Test Working Group Savannah, GA.
Cargo Bay Fire Protection with a Fuel Tank Inerting System
Federal Aviation Administration Halon 1211 Stratification/ Localization in Aircraft Louise Speitel Fire Safety Branch FAA Wm. J. Hughes Technical Center.
Federal Aviation Administration 0 Composite Wing Tank Flammability November 20, Composite and Aluminum Wing Tank Flammability Comparison Testing.
Jet Fuel Vaporization and Condensation: Modeling and Validation Robert Ochs and C.E. Polymeropoulos Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey International.
Point of Contact :Doug Ingerson Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration WJ Hughes Technical Center Fire Safety Branch, ATO-P (formerly.
OBIGGS Sizing Data for Transport Canada Trade Study William Cavage AAR-440 Fire Safety Branch Wm. J. Hughes Technical Center Federal Aviation Administration.
Engine Nacelle Halon Replacement, FAA, WJ Hughes Technical Center Point of Contact :Doug Ingerson Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration.
October 30-31, 2002 International Aircraft Systems Fire Protection Working Group Atlantic City, NJ Inerting of a Scale 747SP Center Wing Fuel Tank During.
Point of Contact :Doug Ingerson Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration WJ Hughes Technical Center Fire Safety Branch, AJP6320 Bldg.
Federal Aviation Administration 0 Composite Wing Tank Flammability May 19 th, Composite and Aluminum Wing Tank Flammability Comparison Testing Steve.
Federal Aviation Administration 0 Composite Wing Tank Flammability May 20, Composite and Aluminum Wing Tank Flammability Comparison Testing Steve.
Systems Fire Protection Working Group DTA - Grenoble, France June 21-22, 2003 Preliminary Results of FAA Fuel Tank Inerting Flight Testing on the NASA.
Federal Aviation Administration Status of Research & Testing to Replace Halon Extinguishing Agents in Civil Aviation Douglas Ingerson Louise Speitel Constantine.
MULTI-COMPONENT FUEL VAPORIZATION IN A SIMULATED AIRCRAFT FUEL TANK C. E. Polymeropoulos Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Rutgers University.
IASFPWG – Atlantic City, NJ Limiting Oxygen Concentration (LOC) Work Update International Aircraft Systems Fire Protection Working Group Atlantic.
Presented to: By: Date: Federal Aviation Administration Engine Nacelle Halon Replacement International Aircraft Systems Fire Protection Working Group Mr.
The Fuel Tank Flammability Assessment Method November 2, 2005 Federal Aviation Administration 0 0 The Fuel Tank Flammability Assessment Method Steve Summer.
Chapter 12 Compressible Flow
Engine Nacelle Halon Replacement, FAA, WJ Hughes Technical Center Point of Contact :Doug Ingerson Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration.
Presented to: By: Date: Federal Aviation Administration Engine Nacelle Halon Replacement International Aircraft Systems Fire Protection Working Group Douglas.
Wing Tank Flammability Testing William Cavage Steven Summer AAR-440 Fire Safety Branch Wm. J. Hughes Technical Center Federal Aviation Administration International.
Federal Aviation Administration Aircraft Ducting 0 Federal Aviation Administration International Aircraft Materials Fire Test Working Group Atlantic City,
Shock waves and expansion waves Rayleigh flow Fanno flow Assignment
Presented to: International Aircraft Materials Fire Test Working Group By: Robert Ochs Date: Wednesday, October 21, 2009 Federal Aviation Administration.
First Law of Thermodynamics applied to Flow processes
Chapter 5 The First Law of Thermodynamics for Opened Systems
MAE 5360: Hypersonic Airbreathing Engines
Fluid kinematics Chapter 3
Presentation transcript:

Point of Contact :Doug Ingerson Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration WJ Hughes Technical Center Fire Safety Branch, AAR-440 Bldg 205 Atlantic City Int'l Airport, NJ USA tel: fax: web page: Federal Aviation Administration ~ WJ Hughes Technical Center Fire Safety Branch, AAR-440 ~ Atlantic City Int’l Airport, NJ USA International Aircraft Systems Fire Protection Working Group Atlantic City, NJ USA – 1-2November2005 Engine Nacelle Halon Replacement

Slide #2 Federal Aviation Administration ~ WJ Hughes Technical Center Fire Safety Branch, AAR-440 ~ Atlantic City Int’l Airport, NJ USA International Aircraft Systems Fire Protection Working Group Atlantic City, NJ USA – 1-2November2005 PRESENTATION CONTENTS  REVIEW EQUIVALENCE DATA TO DATE  DISCUSS PROGRESS REGARDING OBSERVED OVER-PRESSURES  DISCUSS STATUS

Slide #3 Federal Aviation Administration ~ WJ Hughes Technical Center Fire Safety Branch, AAR-440 ~ Atlantic City Int’l Airport, NJ USA International Aircraft Systems Fire Protection Working Group Atlantic City, NJ USA – 1-2November2005 REVIEWING EQUIVALENCE DATA TO DATE Agent Ventilation configuration Fire Threat Equivalent Concentration (%v/v) {FIXED DURATION/OBSOLETE VALUES IN BRACES} HFC-125 High JP8 spray17.5 {16.9} JP8 pool7.6 {9.6} Low OIL spray16.4 (a) {15.8} JP8 pool8.1 (a) {not determined} CF3I High JP8 spray5.6 {5.8} JP8 poolIncomplete Low OIL spray7.2 (a,b) {7.2} JP8 poolIncomplete (a) Bracketing method used to find mass equivalent (b) Partial result, JP8 verification incomplete as of November 2005

Slide #4 Federal Aviation Administration ~ WJ Hughes Technical Center Fire Safety Branch, AAR-440 ~ Atlantic City Int’l Airport, NJ USA International Aircraft Systems Fire Protection Working Group Atlantic City, NJ USA – 1-2November2005 REVIEWING EQUIVALENCE DATA TO DATE AgentFuel Peak, Critical or Design Concentration (%v/v) REFERENCE CF3I PROPANE6.5 (p)NFPA 2001, TABLE A JP8 SPRAY3.2 (c)NIST SP890, V.2, TBL 10, p.115 JP8 POOL6.8 (c)NIST SP890, V.2, TBL 10, p.115 OIL7.2 (d)FAATC; none; work in progress... HFC-125 METHANE14.7 (p)NFPA 2001, TABLE A PROPANE15.7 (p)NFPA 2001, TABLE A PROPANE  12.6 (p) NIST SP890, V.2, FIG. 41, p.78 JP8 SPRAY8.7 (c)NIST SP890, V.2, TBL 10, p.115 JP8 POOL12 (c)NIST SP890, V.2, TBL 10, p.115 JP8 SPRAY, LoVent25.4 (d)AFRL-VA-WP-TR JP8 SPRAY, HiVent18.2 (d)AFRL-VA-WP-TR JP817.5 (d)FAATC; none; work in progress... OTHER REPORTED or CALCULATED CONCENTRATIONS

Slide #5 Federal Aviation Administration ~ WJ Hughes Technical Center Fire Safety Branch, AAR-440 ~ Atlantic City Int’l Airport, NJ USA International Aircraft Systems Fire Protection Working Group Atlantic City, NJ USA – 1-2November2005 OVER-PRESSURE BEHAVIOR – BRIEF OVERVIEW  IN 2004, TWO HALON REPLACEMENT CANDIDATES WERE OBSERVED TO PRODUCE OVER-PRESSURE PHENOMENA SUBSEQUENT TO REIGNITION WITHIN THE TEST FIXTURE FLOW PATH  2-BTP  HFC-125  HFC-125 & 2-BTP APPEARED TO ACT AS A FUEL IN SOME INSTANCES  THE PHENOMENA WAS NOT 100% RELIABLE  INVESTIGATION REQUIRED DUE TO FREQUENT OCCURRENCE  OUTCOMES  2-BTP WITHDRAWN FROM CONSIDERATION  ENVIRONMENTAL BEHAVIORS FOR HFC-125 DURING OVER- PRESSURE EVENTS WILL BE RECORDED IN NEAR-TERM TESTING TO PERMIT FUTURE DECISION-MAKING ACTIVITY

Slide #6 Federal Aviation Administration ~ WJ Hughes Technical Center Fire Safety Branch, AAR-440 ~ Atlantic City Int’l Airport, NJ USA International Aircraft Systems Fire Protection Working Group Atlantic City, NJ USA – 1-2November2005 OVER-PRESSURE BEHAVIOR – SCHEMATIC ORIENTATION RETURN SPRAY FIRE ZONE. AGENT INJECTION DUCT INTERFACE. TEST SECTION EXIT = 22” DIA EXHAUST DUCT ENTRANCE = 33” DIA GAP BETWEEN CIRCULAR PLANES = 8” ~ 240 Inches ~ 123 Inches ~ 65 Inches AIR FLOW RED EXHAUST DUCT TEST SECTION

Slide #7 Federal Aviation Administration ~ WJ Hughes Technical Center Fire Safety Branch, AAR-440 ~ Atlantic City Int’l Airport, NJ USA International Aircraft Systems Fire Protection Working Group Atlantic City, NJ USA – 1-2November2005 OVER-PRESSURE BEHAVIOR – DUCT INTERFACE IMAGE DUCT INTERFACE.

Slide #8 Federal Aviation Administration ~ WJ Hughes Technical Center Fire Safety Branch, AAR-440 ~ Atlantic City Int’l Airport, NJ USA International Aircraft Systems Fire Protection Working Group Atlantic City, NJ USA – 1-2November2005 OVER-PRESSURE BEHAVIOR – ACTIVITIES/PLANS TO DATE  INSTRUMENTATION IS INSTALLED IN TEST FIXTURE & RED DUCT TO CAPTURE ENVIRONMENTAL BEHAVIORS DURING OVER-PRESSURE EVENTS  4 THERMOCOUPLES TO MONITOR TEMPERATURES IN RED DUCT  2 PRESSURE TRANSDUCERS TO RECORD STATIC PRESSURE  4 PHOTOCONDUCTIVE PHOTODIODES TO DETECT FLAME  DUCT INTERFACE CAN BE ISOLATED FROM TEST BAY  MINIMIZED THE IMPACT ON THE VENTILATION STREAM ASSOCIATED WITH DUCT INTERFACE ISOLATION  PERFORMING ANALYTICAL EVALUATIONS OF THE DUCT INTERFACE  BERNOULLI VELOCITY MEASUREMENTS  1 ST LAW OF THERMODYNAMICS  WILL RECORD ENVIRONMENTAL BEHAVIORS NEAR-TERM  FIRE TESTING WITH NO AGENT, HALON 1301, & HFC-125  OIL & JP8 (??) SPRAY FIRES  DUCT INTERFACE OPEN & CLOSED

Slide #9 Federal Aviation Administration ~ WJ Hughes Technical Center Fire Safety Branch, AAR-440 ~ Atlantic City Int’l Airport, NJ USA International Aircraft Systems Fire Protection Working Group Atlantic City, NJ USA – 1-2November2005 OVER-PRESSURE –TELEMETRY PLACEMENT STA 502 THERMOCOUPLE PHOTOCONDUCTIVE PHOTODIODE STATIC PRESSURE TRANSDUCER THERMOCOUPLES SPACED EVERY 2 FEET ALONG 12:00 & THE BEADS ARE LOCATED 8 INCHES OFF THE DUCT WALL PHOTODIODES ORIENTED TO VIEW 12:00 AT SPRAY FIRE ZONE, EXHAUST NOZZLE ENTRANCE, EXHAUST NOZZLE EXIT, & RED DUCT PRESSURE TRANSDUCERS RECORD STATIC PRESSURE IN TEST SECTION & THE RED DUCT

Slide #10 Federal Aviation Administration ~ WJ Hughes Technical Center Fire Safety Branch, AAR-440 ~ Atlantic City Int’l Airport, NJ USA International Aircraft Systems Fire Protection Working Group Atlantic City, NJ USA – 1-2November2005 OVER-PRESSURE –TELEMETRY BEHAVIORS/OPEN DUCT INTERFACE INLET TEMPERATURE = 90°F BULK AIR TEMPERATURE = 250°F D/I open, duct vents closed

Slide #11 Federal Aviation Administration ~ WJ Hughes Technical Center Fire Safety Branch, AAR-440 ~ Atlantic City Int’l Airport, NJ USA International Aircraft Systems Fire Protection Working Group Atlantic City, NJ USA – 1-2November2005 OVER-PRESSURE –TELEMETRY BEHAVIORS/CLOSED DUCT INTERFACE INLET TEMPERATURE = 93°F BULK AIR TEMPERATURE = 250°F D/I closed, duct vents open to 512 in^2

Slide #12 Federal Aviation Administration ~ WJ Hughes Technical Center Fire Safety Branch, AAR-440 ~ Atlantic City Int’l Airport, NJ USA International Aircraft Systems Fire Protection Working Group Atlantic City, NJ USA – 1-2November2005 OVER-PRESSURE BEHAVIOR – ANALYTICAL EVALUATION  RECORD STATIC PRESSURE IN RED DUCT AT 2 LOCATIONS  21 INCHES FROM INLET & 7 INCHES OFF DUCT WALL (21/7)  16 INCHES FROM INLET & 4 INCHES OFF DUCT WALL (16/4)  ALL FLOWS WERE THE SAME TEMPERATURE; NON-COMBUSTING  WORKED WITH STREAM LINES FROM TEST BAY INTO RED DUCT; SMOKE TRAIL OBSERVATIONS INDICATED :  21/7 WAS IN THE FLUCTUATION BETWEEN THE TEST BAY EDUCTION FLOW & THE TEST SECTION EJECTA  16/4 WAS IN THE TEST BAY EDUCTION FLOW SOLELY  VELOCITIES (mass flows identified in parentheses are based on an assumption that speed is an average value for the annular surface area of the duct inlet where test bay air is entering; i.e. Q=AV; A=0.31 m^2)  21/7 :  T_bay= 13°C, V = 3 m/s (mdot  1.1 kg/s)  T_bay= 26°C, V = 2.9 m/s (mdot  1.1 kg/s)  16/4 : T_bay= 26°C, V = 3.3 m/s (mdot  1.2 kg/s) BERNOULLI VELOCITY ANALYSIS

Slide #13 Federal Aviation Administration ~ WJ Hughes Technical Center Fire Safety Branch, AAR-440 ~ Atlantic City Int’l Airport, NJ USA International Aircraft Systems Fire Protection Working Group Atlantic City, NJ USA – 1-2November2005 OVER-PRESSURE BEHAVIOR – ANALYTICAL EVALUATION BERNOULLI VELOCITY ANALYSIS

Slide #14 Federal Aviation Administration ~ WJ Hughes Technical Center Fire Safety Branch, AAR-440 ~ Atlantic City Int’l Airport, NJ USA International Aircraft Systems Fire Protection Working Group Atlantic City, NJ USA – 1-2November2005 OVER-PRESSURE BEHAVIOR – ANALYTICAL EVALUATION 25Sep05 BERNOULLI VELOCITY ANALYSIS

Slide #15 Federal Aviation Administration ~ WJ Hughes Technical Center Fire Safety Branch, AAR-440 ~ Atlantic City Int’l Airport, NJ USA International Aircraft Systems Fire Protection Working Group Atlantic City, NJ USA – 1-2November2005 OVER-PRESSURE BEHAVIOR – ANALYTICAL EVALUATION  CONTAINED DUCT INTERFACE WITHIN A CONTROL VOLUME (CV)  NON-COMBUSTING FLOW CONDITIONS  ESTIMATING MASS FLOW FROM THE TEST BAY INTO RED DUCT  THE PROBLEM IS UNDER-SPECIFIED  THE CV WAS “MODELED” FOR VARIABLE INPUTS TO OBSERVE BEHAVIOR OVER A RANGE OF CONDITIONS  HEAT TRANSFER TO THE BAY ASSUMED NEGLIGIBLE  WORK = 0  MASS FLOW FROM THE TEST SECTION IS REASONABLY SIMILAR ACROSS THE AMBIENT CONDITIONS TO TREAT AS A CONSTANT VALUE (1 lbm/s +/- 0.1 lbm/s; 0.45 kg/s +/ kg/s) 1 ST LAW OF THERMODYNAMICS

Slide #16 Federal Aviation Administration ~ WJ Hughes Technical Center Fire Safety Branch, AAR-440 ~ Atlantic City Int’l Airport, NJ USA International Aircraft Systems Fire Protection Working Group Atlantic City, NJ USA – 1-2November2005 OVER-PRESSURE BEHAVIOR – ANALYTICAL EVALUATION 1 ST LAW OF THERMODYNAMICS red duct, inlet to exhaust test section, exhaust nozzle Control Volume

Slide #17 Federal Aviation Administration ~ WJ Hughes Technical Center Fire Safety Branch, AAR-440 ~ Atlantic City Int’l Airport, NJ USA International Aircraft Systems Fire Protection Working Group Atlantic City, NJ USA – 1-2November2005 OVER-PRESSURE BEHAVIOR – ANALYTICAL EVALUATION 1 ST LAW OF THERMODYNAMICS

Slide #18 Federal Aviation Administration ~ WJ Hughes Technical Center Fire Safety Branch, AAR-440 ~ Atlantic City Int’l Airport, NJ USA International Aircraft Systems Fire Protection Working Group Atlantic City, NJ USA – 1-2November2005 OVER-PRESSURE BEHAVIOR – ANALYTICAL EVALUATION 1 ST LAW OF THERMODYNAMICS TEST BAY = 29°C JUMP TO TEST FIXTURE SCHEMATIC

Slide #19 Federal Aviation Administration ~ WJ Hughes Technical Center Fire Safety Branch, AAR-440 ~ Atlantic City Int’l Airport, NJ USA International Aircraft Systems Fire Protection Working Group Atlantic City, NJ USA – 1-2November2005 OVER-PRESSURE BEHAVIOR – SUMMATION TO DATE  TEST FIXTURE IS READY FOR TESTING IN OPEN & CLOSED DUCT INTEFACE CONFIGURATIONS  ANALYSIS OF VENTILATION AT DUCT INTERFACE NEARING COMPLETION  SPEEDS FOR RED DUCT & TEST BAY FLOWS HAVE NEGLIGIBLE IMPACT ON CALCULATIONS FOR TEST BAY MASS FLOWS  ONLY WHEN AIR TEMPERATURE DIFFERS BETWEEN TEST SECTION & TEST BAY  NEGLIGIBLE IMPACT ILLUSTRATED BY CALCULATED CURVES IN THE REASONABLE REGION OF BULK TEMPERATURE FOR THE RED DUCT FLOW ( °F/65-93°C)  THE GREATEST SENSITIVITY TO THE FLOW SPEEDS EXISTS WHEN THE 3 MASS FLOWS ARE THE SAME TEMPERATURE  ESTIMATING 1 kg/s OR LESS ENTERING RED DUCT FROM THE TEST BAY VIA THE INTERFACE  FUEL/AIR RATIOS TO BE CALCULATED

Slide #20 Federal Aviation Administration ~ WJ Hughes Technical Center Fire Safety Branch, AAR-440 ~ Atlantic City Int’l Airport, NJ USA International Aircraft Systems Fire Protection Working Group Atlantic City, NJ USA – 1-2November2005 CURRENT STATUS  NEED TO COMPLETE :  HFC-125 OVER-PRESSURE CHARACTERIZATION  WORKING ON FUEL-AIR RATIO INFORMATION FOR JP8, OIL, & HYDRAULIC FLUID  TEST PLAN REQUIRES FINALIZATION  CF3I EQUIVALENCE TESTING  JP8 POOL, HIGH & LOW VENTILATION  JP8 SPRAY, LOW VENTILATION  COLD-SOAK HFC-125 PROOF (FIRE) TESTS  WRITE/PUBLISH REPORT & MPSE  WILL CONSOLODATE WORDS FORMING MPSE & PASS AROUND TO TASK GROUP FOR COMMENT  MPSE TO BE APPENDIX MATERIAL IN FINAL REPORT  REPORT BODY TO DESCRIBE HISTORY & LESSONS LEARNED  DRAFT REPORT DUE SEP 2006