Stefania Trovati EPFL - CERN S. Trovati - SATIF 101.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Simulations des niveaux de radiations en arrêt machine M. Brugger, D. Forkel-Wirth, S. Roesler (SC/RP)
Advertisements

Stefan Roesler SC-RP/CERN on behalf of the CERN-SLAC RP Collaboration
HZDR FLUKA activities in support of the MYRRHA Project Short summary with a focus on activation problems Anna Ferrari, Stefan Müller, Jörg Konheiser.
RAL 27 April 2006The beta-beam task, EURISOL1 Status of the beta-beam study Mats Lindroos on behalf of the EURISOL beta-beam task.
Interaction of radiation with matter - 5
1 Activation problems S.Agosteo (1), M.Magistris (1,2), Th.Otto (2), M.Silari (2) (1) Politecnico di Milano; (2) CERN.
NNN05, 8/4/05 1 A BASELINE BETA-BEAM Mats Lindroos AB Department, CERN on behalf of the Beta-beam Study Group
Induced Activity Calculations in Support of D&D Activities at SLAC Joachim Vollaire, Radiation Protection Department.
Beta Beams Safety issues and WBS E. Benedetto and E. Wildner EUROnu Safety Workshop 9-10 June 2011, CERN Outline Introduction: the Beta Beams Tentative.
1 Induced radioactivity in the target station and in the decay tunnel from a 4 MW proton beam S.Agosteo (1), M.Magistris (1,2), Th.Otto (2), M.Silari (2)
EUROnu Annual Meeting 2-4 June Beta-Beam Costing Exercise Elena Wildner, CERN 03/06/10 1 EUROnu Annual Meeting, 2-4 June 2010.
1 Radiation Safety Aspects of the Linear Collider B. Racky, A. Leuschner, N. Tesch Radiation Protection Group TeV Superconducting Linear Accelerator.
Loss problems associated with the acceleration of radioactive beams and what we can do about it A.Jansson f fermilab Loss issues (and ideas for solutions)
I. Strasik et al. ● Halo Collimation of Proton and Ion Beams in FAIR Synchrotron SIS 100 ● CERN Halo Collimation of Proton and Ion Beams in.
Proposal for Experiment S291: " Residual radioactivity induced by U ions - experimental investigation and longtime predictions" GSI, Darmstadt: G.Fehrenbacher,
LER Workshop, CERN, October 11-12, 2006Detector Safety with LER - Henryk Piekarz1 LHC Accelerator Research Program bnl-fnal-lbnl-slac Accelerator & Detector.
TRACKING AND PARTICLE- MATTER INTERACTION STUDIES IN THE BETA-BEAM DECAY RING E.Wildner, A. Fabich (CERN) Common EURISOL DS - EURONS Town Meeting Helsinki,
Experimental part: Measurement the energy deposition profile for U ions with energies E=100 MeV/u - 1 GeV/u in iron and copper. Measurement the residual.
Mats Lindroos Future R&D: beta-beam Mats Lindroos.
Review of Quench Limits FermilabAccelerator Physics Center Nikolai Mokhov Fermilab 1 st HiLumi LHC / LARP Collaboration Meeting CERN November 16-18, 2011.
Experimental and Theoretical Study of Energy Deposition and Residual Activation Induced by Uranium Ions to Model the Beam Loss Hazards in the GSI Future.
Integrated Radiation Measurement and Radiation Protection of BES Ⅲ Zhang Qingjiang, Wu protection group, accelerator center, IHEP,
Managed by UT-Battelle for the Department of Energy Residual Does Rate Analyses for the SNS Accelerator Facility I. Popova, J. Galambos HB2008 August 25-29,
Updates on FLUKA simulations of TCDQ halo loads at IR6 FLUKA team & B. Goddard LHC Collimation Working Group March 5 th, 2007.
Beam loads & dump concepts T. Kramer, B. Goddard, M. Benedikt, Hel. Vincke.
First radiological estimates for the HIRADMAT project H. Vincke and N. Conan 1.
Radiation Protection aspects for SHIP Doris Forkel-Wirth, Stefan Roesler, Helmut Vincke, Heinz Vincke CERN Radiation Protection Group 1 st SHIP workshop,
NuFact'06 WG3, Aug. 2006A. Fabich, CERNBeta-beam Ion Losses, 1 The EURISOL Beta-beam Acceleration Scenario: Ion Losses A. Fabich, CERN NuFact’06, UCIrvine.
Estimates of Radiation Levels in the Main Linac Tunnel and Beam Dump Caverns for the CLIC Design Study Sophie Mallows, Thomas Otto SATIF 10, S.
CERN, 15/03/05EURISOL - Beta Beam Task1 EURISOL and the Beta-Beam Task Status and Planning Michael Benedikt Mats Lindroos AB-Department, CERN.
Risk Analysis P. Cennini AB-ATB on behalf of the n_TOF Team  Procedure  Documents in preparation  Conclusions Second n_TOF External Panel Review, CERN,
Considerations for an SPL-Beamdump Thomas Otto CERN in collaboration with Elias Lebbos, Vasilis Vlachoudis (CERN) and Ekaterina Kozlova (GSI) Partly supported.
Radiation Protection in J-PARC neutrino beam line Sep Yuichi Oyama (KEK) for T2K neutrino beam line construction group Happy birthday.
HL-LHC Standards and Best Practices Workshop CERN, June 13, 2014 Best Practices for ALARA C. Adorisio and S. Roesler on behalf of DGS-RP.
NToF - Radiation Protection M. Brugger, P. Cennini, A. Ferrari, E. Lebbos, V. Vlachoudis CERN AB/ATB/EET.
Radiation study of the TPC electronics Georgios Tsiledakis, GSI.
Radiation Protection and Radiation Safety for Particle Accelerator Facilities J. Vollaire, Radiation Protection Group CERN Compact Accelerators for Isotope.
Welcome to the CHARMS See – Tea Saturday, March 05, 2016 Comparison of ISOLDE yields with calculated in- target production rates Strahinja Lukić,
Shielding the 140 mm option F. Cerutti, L.S. Esposito on behalf of CERN FLUKA team.
1 July 2004 Radiation Protection Issues 1 M.Brugger, D.Forkel-Wirth, S.Roesler, H.Vincke SC/RP Review of the LHC Collimation Project 30 June – 2 July 2004.
1 Activation by Medium Energy Beams V. Chetvertkova, E. Mustafin, I. Strasik (GSI, B eschleunigerphysik), L. Latysheva, N. Sobolevskiy (INR RAS), U. Ratzinger.
Ma zhongjian Ding yadong Wang qingbin Wu qingbiao Radiation Protection Group/IHEP.
E.B. Holzer BLM Meeting: Q & A March 20, Questions and Answers.
EURISOL DS Task meeting Orsay, 07 Janvier Preliminary shielding assessment of EURISOL Post Accelerator D. Ene, D. Ridikas. B. Rapp.
Neutron double differential distributions, dose rates and specific activities from accelerator components irradiated by 50 – 400 MeV protons F. Cerutti.
Orsay, 03/Feb/05EURISOL - Beta Beam TaskM. Benedikt 1 The Beta-Beam Task Status and Planning 02/2005 to 01/2006 Michael Benedikt AB-Department, CERN.
EURISOL, TASK#5, Bucuresti, November 1 Preliminary shielding assessment of EURISOL Post Accelerator D. Ene, D. Ridikas. B. Rapp.
GSI Helmholtzzentrum für Schwerionenforschung GmbH Status of the FAIR Antiproton Target K. Knie.
Halo Collimation of Protons and Heavy Ions in SIS-100.
Activation by Heavy-Ion Beams
Status of the magnet studies in the ARCS (FLUKA)
MARS15 Simulation of Radiation Environment at the ESS Linac
Heating and radiological
On behalf of the FLUKA team
Induced-activity experiment:
Analyses to Support Waste Disposition of SNS Inner Reflector Plug
A.Lachaize CNRS/IN2P3 IPN Orsay
Measurements and FLUKA Simulations of Bismuth and Aluminum Activation at the CERN Shielding Benchmark Facility(CSBF) E. Iliopoulou, R. Froeschl, M. Brugger,
Radiation protection of Linac4 M. Silari Radiation Protection Group
Status of the beta-beam study
DEBRIS IMPACT IN THE TAS-TRIPLET-D1 REGION
Beam-Induced Energy Deposition Studies in IR Magnets
Collimation for beta-beams
Status of energy deposition studies IR7
E.Wildner, A. Fabich (CERN)
Joint session – Beta-beams
US LHC Accelerator Research Program
Review of Quench Limits
CEPC Radiation and Shielding
Presentation transcript:

Stefania Trovati EPFL - CERN S. Trovati - SATIF 101

Outline  Beta-beams  Decay ring  Activation studies: residual dose rates ○ collimation section ○ arcs airborne activity S. Trovati - SATIF 102

EURISOL Beta-beams (CERN, IPNO, CEA, GSI, MSL) Neutrino Source Decay Ring Ion production ISOL target & Ion source Proton Driver SPL SPS Acceleration to medium energy RCS PS Acceleration to final energy PS & SPS Experimen t Ion acceleration Linac Beam preparation Pulsed ECR Ion productionAccelerationNeutrino source 3

Objectives & Methods  Radiological risk assessment for the beta-beam facility at CERN: full evaluation of all radiation protection aspects of the machines  feasibility at CERN.  Problem: no available experimental data for 18 Ne and 6 He  Monte Carlo calculations, carefully…  MC calculations for prompt radiation and induced activity studies: shielding design for tunnels, residual doses and airborne doses.  MC code: FLUKA with BME  nucleus-nucleus interactions below 100 MeV/u. S. Trovati - SATIF 104

30 o 60 o 5 Comparison study between data and FLUKA with BME 20 Ne -> Copper 100 MeV/u (T. NAKAMURA et al., “Measurements of secondary neutrons produced from thick targets bombarded by high energy Neon ions”, J. Nucl. Sci. Tech., 36, 42 (1999))

The Decay Ring (DR)  Primary beams: 6 He and 18 Ne ions at ~92 GeV/u.  Decay losses in bumps and arcs (  ± decays).  Collimation losses in the collimation section.  Total number of decays/s in the DR: Loss maps: calculated by ACCSIM code. For collimation by ACCSIM+FLUKA. S. Trovati - SATIF 10 Same length as SPS m injection 602 m 2510 m Collimation section bumps 6 He/s: 1.6 E Ne/s: 2 E+13 6

Residual dose rates during maintenance  The beta-beam facility will work for 10 7 seconds  3 months.  Irradiation cycle: 3 month irradiation followed by 1 hour, 1 day, 1 week waiting times.  The residual H*(10) rate in  Sv h -1 scored along the tunnel.  MC calculations: electromagnetic cascade off in prompt radiation, on in decay.  Radionuclide yields estimated. S. Trovati - SATIF 107

Collimation section and bumps  The collimation section stays in between the two bumps and foresees the combination of a primary and two secondary collimators, all made of carbon. In between the collimators and all along the section there are several carbon absorbers. Collimators Bump area S. Trovati - SATIF 108

Bump areas: magnet geometry in FLUKA Magnet layouts from SESAME. Different lengths  different masses Quadrupole: 2 m long Dipole: 12 m long Beampipe: 8 cm aperture hor., 1.5 cm vert., 1mm thick. 76 cm 45.3 cm 4 cm 20 cm S. Trovati - SATIF 109

2 nd BN3 in the first bump  dipole+quadrupole+ long straight section  25 m 2 nd BN3 BN2 BN3 QQ Q Q Q Q Q ~10 10 parts s -1 over 25 m QQ S. Trovati - SATIF 1010

6 He After 1 hour After 1 day After 1 week S. Trovati - SATIF 1011 The dose rate doesn’t change much between a 1-day and a 1-week waiting

Dominant residual radionuclides and their specific activities in the bump magnets Pipe RadionuclideA (Bq g -1 ) Cr E+05 Mn E+05 V E+04 Mn E+04 Sc E+04 Mn E+04 Sc-44m2.50E+04 Ti E+04 Ni E+04 Co E+04 Na E+03 Yoke RadionuclideA (Bq g -1 ) Cr E+05 V E+05 Mn E+05 Mn E+05 Mn E+05 Fe E+05 Sc E+05 Ti E+04 Co E+04 Coils RadionuclideA (Bq g -1 ) Cu E+05 Co E+05 Cr E+04 Co E+04 Co E+04 Co E+04 V E+04 Mn E+04 Mn E+04 Mn E+04 Ni E+04 Sc E+04 Ni E+04 S. Trovati - SATIF 10 after 1 hour for 6 He 12

Summary 1h 1d 1w 6 He 18 Ne 6 He 18 Ne 6 He 18 Ne 1 st Q- 1 st BN nd Q rd Q - 1 st BN th Q nd BN3 - 7 th Q nd BN2 - 9 th Q S. Trovati - SATIF 10 BN2 BN3 QQ Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Dump before 2 nd BN3 – 7 th Q and 2 nd BN2 – 9 th Q Dump before 2 nd BN3 – 7 th Q and 2 nd BN2 – 9 th Q 13 Dumps

Collimation section: 18 Ne S. Trovati - SATIF 10 > 100 mSv h After 1 week the residual dose around the primary collimator is still above the prohibited area limit. Power deposited in quadrupoles after the primary collimator  absorbers required, decrease of factor 4 on average Courtesy of E. Bouquerel

Arcs  Arcs are composed of cold magnets, LHC- like.  A large aperture allows to avoid losses in the straight sections (ss) BUT high power deposited in the first dipole in the arcs (10 W/m in ss)  dumps.  Worst case study here, with no dumps.  Two configurations under study to avoid magnet quench and high induced activity absorbers between the magnets open mid-plane magnets S. Trovati - SATIF 1015

Arcs Case 1: layout for coils in the absorber configuration For dipoles: copper wedges implemented separately from cables. For quadrupoles: compound material that includes copper wedges into cables. Yoke material composition: 98% iron, 1% nichel, 0.4% manganese, 0.1 % silicon, 0.1% carbonium, 0.2 % copper. *Courtesy of F. Cerutti ( specifications by J. Miles - N. Mokhov) * S. Trovati - SATIF 1016 C. Hoa M. Mauri

Arcs Case 2: open mid-plane magnets and no absorbers S. Trovati - SATIF 10 Aluminum absorbers in the mid-plane 17

ARC DIPOLES & QUADRUPOLES Design by J. Bruer Dipole length: m Quadrupole length: 2 m Absorber length: 1 m Absorber material: steel S. Trovati - SATIF 1018

6 He: with absorbers 18 Ne: with absorbers 6 He: without absorbers 18 Ne: without absorbers Residual dose rates in the arcs with absorbers or with open mid-plane dipoles. mSv h -1 6 He 18 Ne 1 hour1 day1 week1 hour1 day1 week With absorbers Open mid- plane dipoles S. Trovati - SATIF 10  Sv h -1 19

Airborne activity  Limits for airborne activity: Swiss directive HSK-R-41.  0.2 mSv maximum annual Effective Dose for inhalation.  For CERN 10 μSv y -1 for all the installations.  1 μSv y -1 is assumed for each machine in beta-beam complex.  Conversion coefficients Bq->Sv from CERN-SC IE-TN.  Reference population group: 240 m from the stack (ISOLDE stack).  Outdoor and indoor exposures are weighted according to occupancy factors. S. Trovati - SATIF 1020

Methods  Air activity: FLUKA simulations: n, p,    track length spectrum scoring in the air tunnel. Off-line folding of particle track-length spectra with isotope production cross sections: n j = atomic concentration (per cm 3 ) of the element j in the material  ijk = cumul. cross section for the nuclide i in the reaction of a particle of type k and energy E with a nucleus of element j  k = track length sum of hadrons of type k and energy E  Analytical model for the air diffusion in the tunnel, through the ducts. S. Trovati - SATIF 1021 Φ F A surface Vol l

 The dominating reaction channels are: Half-life < 1day: ○ 11 C (spallation on N and O): 14 N(p,  ) 11 C, 14 N( ,  H) 11 C. ○ 13 N reactions on nitrogen: (n,2n). ○ 14 O: (p,n) on nitrogen, neutron removal on oxygen. ○ 15 O (reactions with oxygen, especially neutron removal): (n,2n), ( ,2n). ○ 41 Ar (low-energy neutron capture on argon). Half-life > 1 day: ○ 7 Be (spallation by high energy reactions on N (most) and O): reactions on Ar play a minor role. ○ Cl spallation on argon dominated by neutrons. S. Trovati - SATIF 1022

Airborne activity in DR RadionuclideHalf-life Annual dose (  Sv) Ar-41hours6.94E-03 N-13minutes1.26E-03 C-11minutes1.60E+00 Be-7months3.88E-01 O-15minutes9.27E-01 Cl-39minutes3.54E-03 Cl-38minutes6.16E-02 P-32days1.38E-01 Na-24hours3.47E-03 O-14seconds9.29E-03 6 He case. F = m 3 h -1 Tunnel volume = m 3 Exit duct volume = 300 m 3 The total annual dose is of 4.5  Sv ISOLDE conversion coefficients S. Trovati - SATIF 1023

Airborne activity in DR RadionuclideHalf-life Annual dose (  Sv) Ar-41hours1.50E+00 N-13minutes1.43E+00 C-11minutes1.36E+00 Be-7months5.89E-01 O-15minutes2.52E-01 Cl-39minutes1.86E-01 Cl-38minutes8.12E-02 P-32days7.71E-02 Na-24hours5.63E-02 O-14seconds2.07E Ne case. F = m 3 h -1 Tunnel volume = m 3 Exit duct volume = 300 m 3 The total annual dose is of 5.6  Sv ISOLDE conversion coefficients S. Trovati - SATIF 1024

Conclusions  Released airborne activity is within Swiss constraints, but above assumed limits for CERN machines.  Area classification according to CERN: limited stay controlled area to high radiation area, accessible after 1 week or more depending on the position.  Dumps before the arcs are needed.  Remote handling during maintenance for the collimator area.  Need for experimental data for comparisons! S. Trovati - SATIF 1025

II. Safety code F, classification of areas and personnel Radiation areas: classification Occupationally exposed workers: Class A> 6 mSv / 12 months Class B< 6 mSv / 12 months S. Trovati - SATIF 1026