BUNKERWORLD – MARINE FUEL SUSTAINABILITY FORUM OCTOBER 25, 2007

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
MARPOL Annex VI TRIPARTITE TOKYO 20th SEPTEMBER 2007.
Advertisements

Air Emissions Regulations Update Tripartite meeting 15/16 September 2006; Seoul
ASTM INTERNATIONAL SEMINAR ENVIRONMENTAL REQUIREMENTS DECEMBER 9, 2009
Air Emissions from Ships
Freight by Water Conference Teesside 7 September 2012 Sulphur Directive Impacts.
Hellenic Forum Athens 6 March 2007 Peter M. Swift.
EU-MOP FINAL WORKSHOP Madrid, 24 January 2008 Escuela Técnica Superior de Ingenieros Navales Miguel Palomares Director, Marine Environment Division International.
USE OF MDO BY SHIPS PART OF A HOLISTIC APPROACH BUNKER SUMMIT – GREECE 2007
World Ports Climate Conference “ Big Steps - Small Footprint: The Challenge for Shipping ” 9 July 2008, Rotterdam Peter M. Swift Managing Director, INTERTANKO.
Environmental Bunker legislation and the Potential Impact on the Vancouver Market May 2014 May
UPDATE ON THE REVISION OF MARPOL ANNEX VI LATIN AMERICAN PANEL March 12-13, 2008 Miami Beach, Florida.
UPDATE ON THE REVISION OF MARPOL ANNEX VI NORTH AMERICAN PANEL March 17, 2008 Stamford, CT.
AIR EMISSIONS FROM SHIPPING Revision of MARPOL Annex VI: The Distillate Option Paris 24 May 2007 Peter M. Swift.
Clean Fuels for Ships Practical Solution for MARPOL Annex VI and GHG Emissions Reduction MARTECMA Seminar 21 January 2008 Athens Dragos Rauta - INTERTANKO.
| 1 | 1 REDUCING THE IMPACT OF SHIPPING ON THE ENVIRONMENT DECARBONISATION.
Air Emissions from Ships. Society is driving the requirement for ships to reduce harmful air emissions from engine exhausts.
1 MARPOL – Annex VI Control of Air Pollution from Ships from Ships and its Current Revision process Dr. Tim Gunner, Technical Consultant, Intertanko.
MARPOL ANNEX VI AMENDMENTS PRACTICAL CONSEQUENCES Tripartite Meeting Beijing CCS Headquarters November 8/9, 2008.
NAMEPA 2014 Annual Conference New York City Canada and North American Emission Control Area RDIMS #
NAMEPA 2014 World Maritime Day Observance Cozumel, Mexico Canada's Experience with the North American Emission Control Area RDIMS #
INTERTANKO Asian Panel Tokyo 18 September 2007
AIR EMISSIONS from OCEANGOING VESSELS INTERTANKO Houston Tanker Event 2007 AIR EMISSIONS from OCEANGOING VESSELS INTERTANKO Houston Tanker Event 2007 Keith.
IMO requirements to reduce emission to air from ships by Manager Research and Projects Gdansk April 2008 ‘
Air pollution from ships: recent developments by Lex Burgel by Lex Burgel.
MARITIME TALKS 2007 Ship Air Emission Controls – Onboard or Overboard? –
CALIFORNIA STATE LANDS COMMISSION CUSTOMER SERVICE MEETING OCTOBER 28, 2009 MARINE AIR EMISSION CONTROL AND FUEL SWITCHING JOE ANGELO DEPUTY MANAGING DIRECTOR.
GWS SMS INTRODUCTION EMS Manual. 3. PROCEDURES FOR BILGE AND WASTE OIL MANAGEMENT OF MACHINERY SPACES As far as possible, the OWS must not be used.
TANKERS ADAPTING TO NEW RULES AND REGULATIONS Peter M. Swift Managing Director, INTERTANKO.
Tanker performance and Annex VI compliance Manager Research and Projects St. Petersburg 25 November 2008 Vostoc Capital’s The.
Marine Services Sustainable Shipping Conference Sustainable Energy in Marine Transportation Zabi Bazari and Gill Reynolds Lloyd ’ s Register EMEA IMarEST.
Marine Fuels Where are we? Where are we going? How will we get there?
Håkon B. Thoresen, DNV Petroleum Services, Norway 31 Jan 2011 Fuel Quality - Update INTERTANKO Bunker Sub-committee, London.
LATIN AMERICAN PANEL OCTOBER 16, 2009 MARINE ISSUES JOSEPH ANGELO DEPUTY MANAGING DIRECTOR.
Anti-Trust/Competition Law Compliance Statement INTERTANKO’s policy is to be firmly committed to maintaining a fair and competitive environment in the.
IBC 2009 APRIL 23, 2009 FACING THE CHALLENGES TO REDUCE AIR EMISSIONS FROM SHIPS JOSEPH ANGELO DEPUTY MANAGING DIRECTOR.
1 INTERTANKO – Latin American Panel Meeting Miami Beach, Florida 12 March 2008 Tom Kirk ABS Americas Director, Technology & Business Development ABS Class.
Leading the way; making a difference INTERTANKO HELLENIC - MEDITERRANEAN PANEL Athens, March 2012 Update on the Environmental Committee’s Activities by.
The INTERTANKO option to meet stricter Annex VI requirements to reduce emission to air from ships by Manager Research and Projects.
North American Panel Stamford, CT. 19 March 2007 Peter M. Swift.
The Product Tanker Market and Phase-Out Implications by Manager Research and Projects 4th Annual Combined Chemical & Product.
NORTH AMERICAN PANEL OCTOBER 7, 2009 INTERTANKO OVERVIEW REPORT JOSEPH ANGELO DEPUTY MANAGING DIRECTOR.
A Practical guide to wartsila scrubber systems
The INTERTANKO option for the revision of Annex VI - IMO regulation for the Prevention of Air Pollution from ships by Manager.
Air Emissions Regulations INTERTANKO Strategy NORTH AMERICAN PANEL MEETING 24 OCTOBER 2006.
Leading the way; making a difference EXPONAVAL – TRANSPORT 2014 December 3, 2014 Environmental Regulatory Challenges Facing the Maritime Industry JOSEPH.
IBIA ANNUAL CONVENTION SEPTEMBER 11, 2007 REDUCING AIR EMISSIONS FROM SHIPS JOSEPH ANGELO DIRECTOR, REGULATORY AFFAIRS AND THE AMERICAS.
AIR EMISSIONS FROM SHIPPING Reducing Atmospheric Pollution Globally: Kristian R. Fuglesang The distillate solution.
Hellenic Forum 27 March 2008 Athens Peter M. Swift.
MARINE LOG GLOBAL GREENSHIP CONFERENCE SEPTEMBER 21, 2007 WHAT’S ON IMO’S ENVIRONMENTAL AGENDA JOSEPH ANGELO DIRECTOR, REGULATORY AFFAIRS AND THE AMERICAS.
Leading the way; making a difference North American Panel October 29, 2014 AIR EMISSIONS/ FUEL QUALITY JOSEPH ANGELO DEPUTY MANAGING DIRECTOR.
Leading the way; making a difference NOx Tier III requirements 1. 1.The NOx Tier III enforcement date of 1 January 2016 is kept for already designated.
The INTERTANKO options to meet marine environmental challenges by Manager Research and Projects Global Forum Strategic Planning.
Reduction of harmful emissions from ships by Manager Research and Projects Lausanne 12 September 2008
Tanker performance and Annex VI compliance Manager Research and Projects St. Petersburg 25 November 2008 Vostoc Capital’s The.
Sustainable Seaborne Transport — Our Common Challenge Shipping Emissions — What are the next steps? Peter M. Swift Managing Director, INTERTANKO.
Greek Shipping Summit 2007 Athens 8 November 2007 Peter M. Swift.
What have we learned in the meantime?
AMERICAN PILOTS ASSOCIATION OCTOBER 22, 2008 INTERTANKO PARTNERING WITHPILOTS JOSEPH ANGELO DEPUTY MANAGING DIRECTOR.
EEB Clean Air Seminar 20 Nov Lisbon Air Pollution from ships Portuguese perspective.
2007 세계해양포럼 World Ocean Forum 2007 Session II: Ocean and Shipping Tanker Shipping and the New Environmental Challenges Tim Wilkins Regional Manager Asia-Pacific.
NORTH AMERICAN PANEL OCTOBER 22, 2007 REDUCING AIR EMISSIONS FROM SHIPS JOSEPH ANGELO DEPUTY MANAGING DIRECTOR.
MARPOL.
MARITIME AIR EMISSIONS Lloyd’s List events 11 December 2007 Distillates THE Solution THE holistic solution for the revision of MARPOL Annex VI Peter.
SSS & MoS FOCAL POINTS MEETING
PREVENTION OF AIR POLLUTION FROM SHIPS
“The Environmental Challenge”
Presented by Lydia Ngugi
Compliance with MARPOL Annex VI Convention
IMO work to address GHG emissions from ships
IMO GLOBAL SULPHUR LIMIT 2020, IMPACTS TO MAJOR FLAGS AND MEASURES TO HELP SHIPOWNERS AND OPERATORS 2019.
Presentation transcript:

BUNKERWORLD – MARINE FUEL SUSTAINABILITY FORUM OCTOBER 25, 2007 REDUCING AIR EMISSIONS FROM SHIPS JOSEPH ANGELO DEPUTY MANAGING DIRECTOR

INTERTANKO INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF INDEPENDENT TANKER OWNERS MEMBERSHIP 260+ MEMBERS 2,650+ TANKERS 220+ MILLION DWT MORE THAN 75% OF INDEPENDENT TANKER FLEET 300+ ASSOCIATE MEMBERS

INTERTANKO MISSION PROVIDE LEADERSHIP TO THE TANKER INDUSTRY IN SERVING THE WORLD WITH THE SAFE, ENVIRONMENTALLY SOUND AND EFFICIENT SEABORNE TRANSPORTATION OF OIL, GAS AND CHEMICAL PRODUCTS

INTERTANKO PRIMARY GOAL LEAD THE CONTINUOUS IMPROVEMENT OF THE TANKER INDUSTRY’S PERFORMANCE IN STRIVING TO ACHIEVE THE GOALS OF: ZERO FATALITIES ZERO POLLUTION ZERO DETENTIONS

AIR EMISSIONS - IMO SEPT 1997 – IMO ADOPTS ANNEX VI TO MARPOL, REGS FOR THE PREVENTION OF AIR POLLUTION FROM SHIPS MAY 2005 – ANNEX VI ENTERS INTO FOR INTERNATIONALLY (USA CURRENTLY NOT PARTY) JULY 2005 – MEPC 53 DECIDES ANNEX VI SHOULD BE REVISED TO REDUCE AIR EMISSIONS FROM SHIPS

IMO ANNEX VI REVISION TIMETABLE AIR EMISSIONS IMO ANNEX VI REVISION TIMETABLE MEPC 54 (March 2006) – Proposals for revision. The work is delegated to BLG Sub-Committee BLG 10 (April 2006) – Initial review of the proposals and documents (over 30 documents) Two correspondence groups (April – October 2006) INTERSESSIONAL MEETING OSLO (November 2006) BLG 11 (April 2007) – consider draft proposals for revised Annex VI, the NOx Code and Guidelines MEPC 56 (July 2007), BLG 12 (Feb 2008) & MEPC 57 (March 2008) – final rounds for approval

AIR EMISSIONS COVERED BY ANNEX VI Oxides of Nitrogen (NOx) – create Ozone Sulphur Oxides (SOx) – create acidification Hydrocarbons (HC) – gas, soot and some particulates Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) Refrigerant Gases NOT COVERED (CURRENTLY) BY ANNEX VI Particulate Matter Carbon Dioxide (CO2) Carbon Monoxide (CO)

PROPOSALS FOR AMENDMENTS AIR EMISSIONS PROPOSALS FOR AMENDMENTS - Lower limits for SOx & NOx emissions - SECAs with lower S cap (1.0% or 0.5%) - NOx emission limitation on existing engines - NECAs – NOx controlled areas - Restrict Particulate Matters (PM) emissions - Restrict on VOC emissions from cargo oil tanks - Restriction on CO2 emissions

AIR EMISSIONS – SOX DATE SHIP TYPE WHERE max. % S REG. 19.05.2005 All Everywhere 4.5 IMO 19.05.2006 All Baltic Sea 1.5 IMO & EU 11.08.2006 All All EU Ports EU MGO (DMA and DMX) 0.2 MDO (DMB and DMC) 1.5 11.08.2006 Passenger ships EU 1.5 EU 1.01.2007 All aux. & diesel-electric 24 miles off California shore CARB main engines on all ships MGO (DMA grade) -- MDO (DMB grade) 0.5 11.08.2007 All North Sea & English Channel 1.5 EU 22.11.2007 All North Sea & English Channel 1.5 IMO 1.01.2010 All All EU ports 0.1 EU 1.01.2010 Inland waterway ships All EU inland waterways 0.1 EU 1.01.2010 All aux. & diesel-electric 24 miles off California shore CARB main engines on all ships MGO (DMA grade) 0.1 1.01.2012 16 Greek ferries Greek ports 0.1 EU

AIR EMISSIONS INTERTANKO EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE GUIDING PRINCIPLES – ENSURE A SOLID PLATFORM OF REQUIREMENTS BE REALISTIC AND FEASIBLE SEEK POSITIVE REDUCTION IN AIR EMISSIONS FROM SHIPS CONTRIBUTE TO A LONG TERM AND PREDICTABLE REGULATORY REGIME PREVENT UNILATERAL/REGIONAL REGULATIONS – IMO STANDARDS

AIR EMISSIONS INITIAL PROPOSALS FOCUSED ON AIR EMISSIONS STANDARDS AND ABATEMENT EQUIPMENT FUEL STANDARD WAS NOT BEING CONSIDERED MAIN PURPOSE OF INTERTANKO SUBMISSION WAS TO “PRESENT ISSUES THAT MERIT FURTHER DISCUSSION BY IMO WORKING GROUP WHEN CONSIDERING REVSION OF ANNEX VI OF MARPOL”

INTERTANKO SUBMISSION AIR EMISSIONS INTERTANKO SUBMISSION DISTILLATE FUELS WITH SULPHUR CAP: - FROM [2010], MAXIMUM OF 1% SULPHUR - FOR ENGINES INSTALLED AFTER [2015], MAXIMUM OF 0.5% SULPHUR GLOBAL SULPHUR EMISSION CONTROL AREA REVISION OF CHECKING AND MONITORING OF COMPLIANCE

IMO WORKING GROUP PROPOSALS – SOX AIR EMISSIONS IMO WORKING GROUP PROPOSALS – SOX A. Status Quo - No change B. Sulphur Emissions Control Area (SECA): A global sulphur cap (unchanged or lower value) SECA sulphur cap lowered in two tiers: 1.0% in [2010] 0.5% in [2015] C1. Change to distillate fuels (ref. INTERTANKO): Use of distillate fuels for all ships A global sulphur cap in two tiers: 1.0% in [2012] Include in MARPOL Annex VI the specification for the distillate fuel to be used by ships C2. Global cap – As C1 but allows use of residual fuel + scrubbers

AIR EMISSIONS IMO BULK LIQUID & GASES (BLG) SUBCOMMITTEE MET APRIL 16-20 TO CONSIDER THE OUTCOME OF ITS NOVEMBER WG MEETING ADDITIONAL SUBMISSIONS MADE BY THE US, NORWAY, SWEDEN, ICS, OCIMF, BIMCO, FOEI AND OTHERS

AIR EMISSIONS USA PROPOSAL SOx & PM – GLOBALLY CONSIDER INTERTANKO PROPOSAL FOR MDO [BUT WITH 0.5% S CAP] SOx & PM – EMISSION LIMITS AT [200] NM FROM SHORE STARTING 2011 [0.1% S CAP] NOx STANDARDS FOR EXISTING (pre-2000) ENGINES - 20% REDUCTION NOx FOR NEW ENGINES: Tier II - 15% – 25% as from 2011 Tier III - 80% only in defined areas (NECAs) as from 2016

AIR EMISSIONS BIMCO PROPOSAL RETAIN THE CURRENT ANNEX VI STRUCTURE, BUT LOWER EMISSION LIMITS GLOBALLY AND IN SECAs GLOBALLY - 3% SULPHUR CAP IN 2012 - 1.5% SULPHUR CAP IN 2016 - USE TREATMENT TECHNOLOGIES IN SECAs SHIPS SHOULD USE MDO ONLY - 1% SULPHUR CAP IN 2011 - 0.5% (0.1%?) SULPHUR CAP IN 2015 - ALSO USE TREATMENT TECHNOLOGIES

AIR EMISSIONS OUTCOME FROM BLG MEETING: RETAIN 6 OPTIONS, 4 FROM WG MTG PLUS US AND BIMCO OPTIONS; AND IMO SG WILL PROPOSE STUDY TO DETERMINE THE EFFECTS OF THE OPTIONS

AIR EMISSIONS MEPC 56 MET IN JULY 9 – 13 “NOTES” OUTCOME OF BLG 11 NEXT STEPS AT IMO: IMO SG INITIATES STUDY BLG WORKING GROUP MEETING IN OCTOBER IN GERMANY BLG MEETS FEBRUARY 2008 MEPC 57 MEETS MARCH/APRIL 2008

TWO BASIC ALTERNATIVES AIR EMISSIONS TWO BASIC ALTERNATIVES “CLEAN” FUELS - Low sulfur residual fuel oils (LSRFO) - Distillate fuels (MDO) And/Or SHIPBOARD TECHNOLOGY

AIR EMISSIONS LSRFO FUELS Increase storage capacity for LSRFO Segregation of HSFO and LSF/MDO tanks Requires fuel switching Additional storage for lower BN number lube/cylinder oil Manifolds modifications for bunkering & fuel sampling Requires the use of exhaust gas scrubbers Availability (?) Cost (?)

AIR EMISSIONS European refineries have no real incentive to produce LS RMFO unless the premiums are such that its price would resemble distillates Commerically speaking, refineries would have a clear incentive for further conversion of its entire residual streams to distillate products compared to residue desulphurisation to produce more LS RMFO Ship owners may just as well resort to burning MDO to meet the 1.5% sulphur cap

DISTILLATE FUELS (MDO) AIR EMISSIONS DISTILLATE FUELS (MDO) Applies to ALL existing ships/engines With no other measure, immediately reduces: SOx emissions by 80% to 90% PM emissions by 90% NOx emissions by 10% to 15% Reduces fuel consumption by some 4% for ALL Ships Facilitates further NOx reductions by in-engine modifications for IMO’s Tier II & III Eliminates the need of retrofitting of additional bunker storage capacity and associated piping Eliminates current onboard fuel treatment plants - additional cargo volume

AIR EMISSIONS OTHER ENVIRONMENTAL BENEFITS OF MDO SIGNIFICANTLY REDUCES ONBOARD ENGINEROOM GENERATED WASTE “CLEANER” WASTE, FREE OF HAZARDOUS ELEMENTS FOUND IN RESIDUAL FUELS NEGATES NEED FOR ABATEMENT TECHNOLOGY AND ASSOCIATED WASTES AND DISPOSAL OF SUCH WASTE POTENTIAL BUNKER SPILLS SIGNIFICANTLY LESS HARMFUL

AIR EMISSIONS SAFETY BENEFITS OF MDO LESS INCIDENTS WITH ENGINE BREAKDOWNS DUE TO POOR QUALITY FUELS NO NEED FOR COMPLEX FUEL CHANGE OVER OPERATIONS NO RISK OF INCOMPATIBILITY OF BLENDED FUELS SAFER WORKING ENVIRONMENT FOR SHIPS CREW

UNRESOLVED ISSUES RELATED TO MDO AIR EMISSIONS UNRESOLVED ISSUES RELATED TO MDO AVAILABILITY COST CO2

AIR EMISSIONS SHIPBOARD TECHNOLOGIES Scrubber technologies are not yet proven and have their own environmental as well as economic and availability challenges “Cold ironing” - with associated problems like lack of international standards for voltage/frequency of power shore/ship connection systems and compatibility with shipboard requirements for power supply for hydraulic power sources (compressors needing up to several MW)

AIR EMISSIONS EXHAUST GAS SCRUBBERS Filters for PM Storage tank for solid waste Water waste treatment plant

AIR EMISSIONS - For a main engine of 20 MW, seawater up to 22,000 t/day needs to be processed (45 t/hr/MW*) (supplemented with some 6,500 t/day to lower pH) - Up to 100 kg/day of hazardous sludge (5kg/day/MW*) * data supplied by Krystallon

AIR EMISSIONS SCRUBBERS EXTREMELY LARGE IN SIZE TAKING CONSIDERABLE SPACE ON SHIP MORE THAN ONE NEEDED FOR MOST SHIPS, UP TO FOUR FOR LARGER SHIPS MASSIVE AMOUNTS OF WATER NEEDED ON A CONTINUAL BASIS NEW WASTE STREAM FROM SHIP THAT MUST BE DISPOSED AT SEA OR ASHORE ADDITIONAL SHIP OPERATIONAL PROCESSES AND PROCEDURES FOR ALREADY OVERWORKED CREW

AIR EMISSIONS SCUBBERS – CO2 EMISSIONS NEWCASTLE UNIVERSITY - RESIDUES FROM SCRUBBING MIXED WITH SEAWATER RELEASES CO2 - 1 KG OF SULPHUR SCRUBBED PRODUCES 2.75 KG OF CO2 SWEDISH RESEARCH INSTITUTE - LESS CO2 RELEASED INTO ATMOSPHERE WHEN OIL IS DESULPHURIZED IN OIL REFINERIES

AIR EMISSIONS SCRUBBERS – COST - AVERAGE COST TO FIT SCRUBBERS – $2 MILLION PER SHIP - TOTAL NUMBER OF SHIPS FITTED – ESTIMATE 50,000 - TOTAL COST - $100 BILLION API STUDY – COST FOR REFINERIES TO PRODUCE MDO FOR ALL SHIPS $60 - $120 BILLION

AIR EMISSIONS SCRUBBER INSTALLATION 4 scrubbers/ship time to retroift – at least 30 days/ship 100 shipyards (ships over 30,000 dwt) RETROFIT ( 2 ships/shipyard every day): for 15,000 ships: 6+ years for 30,000 ships: 12+ years

UNRESOLVED ISSUES RELATED TO SCRUBBERS AIR EMISSIONS UNRESOLVED ISSUES RELATED TO SCRUBBERS AVAILABILITY COST CO2

FINAL THOUGHTS FOR THOSE THAT ADVOCATE A CHOICE FOR COMPLIANCE, ARE THEY CERTAIN THEY WILL HAVE A CHOICE?? WILL THE FUEL PRODUCERS ENSURE ADEQUATE SUPPLIES OF MDO WORLDWIDE FOR THOSE SHIPOWNERS THAT DO NOT WISH TO USE SCRUBBERS?? OR WILL ALL SHIPOWNERS HAVE TO INSTALL AND USE SCRUBBERS IN CASE MDO IS NOT AVAILABLE WORLDWIDE??

FINAL THOUGHTS WHO SHOULD BE RESPONSIBLE FOR VERIFICATION AND COMPLIANCE? SHIPOWNER for: Cost and installation of technology Combustion process Exhaust gas emission standards Disposal of by-products OR FUEL PRODUCER for: Quality of fuel supplied AND ENGINE MANUFACTURERS Facilitate engine design that copes with a predictable rule development on lowering emissions

FINAL THOUGHTS Marine Diesel Oil ADDRESSES THE ROOT CAUSE OF AIR POLLUTION FROM SHIPS RATHER THAN THE EFFECTS OF CLEANING UP THE AIR POLLUTION ON THE SHIP AFTER IT HAS BEEN CREATED

THANK YOU WWW.INTERTANKO.COM