Congress Mr. Ognibene AP Government

Congress 535 Members of Congress Senate 100 Members Addressed As : Senator House of Representatives 435 Members Addressed As : Congressman/woman Representative Mr./Ms. The Federal Legislative Process

The Federal Legislative Process 113 th Congress HouseSenate Republicans24046 Democrats19152 Independents2 Vacancies4

The Federal Legislative Process Larger (435) Elected every 2 years More restraints Smaller constituency Specialists (avg 2 committees) Less media coverage Power less evenly distributed Less reliant on staff More partisan Only the House of Representatives originates revenue bills Smaller (100): 2 from each state Elected every 6 years Fewer restraints Larger constituency Generalists (avg 4 committees) More media coverage Power more evenly distributed More reliant on staff Less partisan Only the Senate consents to treaties and certain nominations Differences Between House and Senate

Objective for Congress Chapter The purpose of this chapter is to describe the roles and organization of Congress. After reading and reviewing the material in this chapter, the student should be able to do each of the following: Explain the differences between a congress and a parliament and delineate the role that the Framers expected the United States Congress to play. Pinpoint the significant eras in the evolution of Congress. Describe the characteristics of members of Congress and outline the process for electing members of Congress. Identify the functions that party affiliation plays in the organization of Congress. Describe the formal process by which a bill becomes a law. Identify the factors that help to explain why a member of Congress votes as he or she does.

The Evolution of Congress The intent of the Framers: –To oppose the concentration of power in a single institution –To balance large and small states Bicameralism They expected Congress to be the dominant institution

Organization of the House Historically, power struggles have occurred between members and leadership 1994 brought changes: –Committee chairs hold positions for only 6 years

Organization of the House Reduced the number of committees and subcommittees The Speaker dominated the selection of committee chairs The Speaker set the agenda (Contract with America) and sustained high Republican discipline in 1995

Evolution of the Senate The Senate escaped many of the tensions encountered by the House The major struggle in the Senate was about how its members should be chosen; 17th amendment (1913) The filibuster is another major issue: restricted by Rule 22 (1917), which allows a vote of cloture

Table 11.4: Party Polarization in Congressional Voting, (percentage of all votes)

Who is in Congress? The House has become less male and less white Membership in Congress became a career Incumbents still have a great electoral advantage But in 1994, voters opposed incumbents due to budget deficits, various policies, legislative-executive bickering, and scandal THEME A: WHO GETS TO CONGRESS

Table 13.1: Blacks, Hispanics, and Women in Congress,

Theme A Discussion Questions 1.Members of Congress tend to have a particular demographic profile—most members are middle-aged, male, white, well- educated attorneys. Is this a matter of concern? Does the preponderance of a particular demographic and professional group compromise the quality of representation provided by the U.S. Congress? In 1992, feminist organizations encouraged women to vote for women congressional candidates by noting that every member of the Senate Judiciary Committee, which had confirmed Clarence Thomas for the Supreme Court, had just this profile. How important is descriptive representation? (Note that immediately following the 1992 election, two women were appointed to this committee—Dianne Feinstein, a white Democrat from California; and Carol Moseley-Braun, an African-American Democrat from Illinois. Moseley-Braun was defeated in her bid for re-election in 1998, but Feinstein continues to serve on the Judiciary Committee.)

2.Why have Senate races been more competitive historically than House races? What factors would constrain the incumbency advantage of senators? If senators have a six-year term to prepare for reelection and House members have only a two-year term, shouldn’t senators experience greater success in their campaigns? 3.What factors combined to make House races more competitive in the 1990s? Which of these developments has surfaced in your local elections? On the basis of the electoral outcomes since 2000, which party do you expect will control the legislative and executive branches in the future? 4.Should the number of terms served by members of Congress be limited, as they are for the president? If not, what justification exists for imposing a term requirement on the president but not on Congress? Wouldn’t corruption be less likely if members of Congress were regularly rotated in office?

The Incumbency Advantage Media coverage is higher for incumbents Incumbents have greater name recognition due to franking, travel to the district, news coverage Members secure policies and programs for voters THEME B: DOES CONGRESS REPRESENT CONSTITUENTS’ OPINIONS?

Figure 11.1: Changing Percentage of First- Term Members in Congress Sources: Data for 90th through 103rd Congresses are from Congressional Quarterly Weekly Reports. Data for 69th through 89th Congresses are adapted from Nelson W. Polsby, "The Institutionalization of the U.S. House of Representatives," American Political Science Review (March 1968): 146. Data for 1st through 68th Congresses are from Stuart A. Rice, Quantitative Methods in Politics (New York: Knopf, 1928), , as reported in Polsby, 146. Data for Senate are from N.J. Ornstein, TlJ. Mann, and M.J. Malbin, Vital Statistics on Congress, (Washington, D.C.: Congressional Quarterly Press, 1990), 56-57, 59-60; and Stanley Harold and Richard Niemi, Vital Statistics on American Politics (Washington, D.C.: Congressional Quarterly Press, 2001).

Figure 13.2: Percentage of Incumbents Reelected to Congress Harold W. Stanley and Richard G. Niemi, Vital Statistics on American Politics, (Washington, D.C.: Congressional Quarterly Press, 2000), table 1-18; 2004 updated by Marc Siegal.

Table 11.2: Incumbents in Congress Reelected by 60 Percent or More

Member Behavior Representational view: members vote to please their constituents, in order to secure re-election Organizational view: where constituency interests are not vitally at stake, members primarily respond to cues from colleagues Attitudinal view: the member’s ideology determines her/his vote

Theme B Discussion Questions Which of the theories listed above do you believe is practiced by most members of Congress during campaign season? Would you expect the longer term of Senators (6 years) compared to Representatives (2 years) to result in their practicing a different theory of representation? Which of the three theories listed above do you endorse as a citizen? Which would you endorse as a member of Congress? Explain why your perspective did or did not change, depending on your political role. Suppose you want your representative in Congress to vote for the policies you prefer—the representational theory of congressional voting. How could you make this happen? What is party unity voting? If representatives vote with their party, does that necessarily mean they are less likely to be representing constituents’ attitudes?

Party Structure in the Senate President pro tempore presides; this is the member with most seniority in majority party (a largely honorific office) Leaders are the majority leader and the minority leader, elected by their respective party members THEME C: CONGRESSIONAL ORGANIZATION AND PROCEDURES

Party Structure in the Senate Party whips: keep leaders informed, round up votes, count noses Each party has a policy committee: schedules Senate business, prioritizes bills Committee assignments are handled by a group of Senators, each for their own party

Party Structure in the House Speaker of the House is leader of majority party and presides over House Majority leader and minority leader: leaders on the floor Party whips keep leaders informed and round up votes Committee assignments and legislative schedule are set by each party

Congressional Caucuses Caucus: an association of members of Congress created to advocate a political ideology or a regional or economic interest Intra-party caucuses: members share a similar ideology Personal interest caucuses: members share an interest in an issue Constituency caucuses: established to represent groups, regions or both

Table 11.5: Congressional Caucuses

Committees Committees are the most important organizational feature of Congress Consider bills or legislative proposals Maintain oversight of executive agencies Conduct investigations

Types of Committees Standing committees: basically permanent bodies with specified legislative responsibilities Select committees: groups appointed for a limited purpose and limited duration

Types of Committees Joint committees: those on which both representatives and senators serve Conference committee: a joint committee appointed to resolve differences in Senate and House versions of the same piece of legislation before final passage

Committee Practices The number of committees has varied; significant cuts in number of House committees in 1995, and in the number of House and Senate subcommittees Majority party has majority of seats on the committees and names the chair

Congressional Staff Constituency service is a major task of members’ staff Legislative functions of staff include devising proposals, negotiating agreements, organizing hearings, and meeting with lobbyists and administrators Members’ staff consider themselves advocates of their employers

Figure 13.4: The Growth in Staffs of Members and Committees in Congress,

How a Bill Becomes a Law Bill must be introduced by a member of Congress Bill is referred to a committee for consideration by either Speaker or presiding officer of the Senate Revenue bills must originate in the House Most bills die in committee

How a Bill Becomes a Law After hearings and mark-up sessions, the committee reports a bill out to the House or Senate Bill must be placed on a calendar to come for a vote before either house House Rules Committee sets the rules for consideration

How a Bill Becomes a Law Bills are debated on the floor of the House or Senate If there are major differences in the bill as passed by the House and Senate, a conference committee is appointed The bill goes to the president

How a Bill Becomes Law The president may sign it If the president vetoes it, it returns to house of origin Both houses must support the bill, with a two-thirds vote, in order to override the president’s veto

How Things Work: How a Bill Becomes Law

Questions re: Bill becoming a Law Look at the chart “How a Bill Becomes Law” in the text, and list the hurdles a bill must surmount if it is to become law. Is the legislative process too inefficient? There are two especially significant facts about the legislative process. First, almost all legislation is considered in subcommittees composed of from six to ten members. Second, much legislation enacted into law passes with few changes in the way the bill is reported from committee. To be successful, therefore, wouldn’t interest groups have to influence only a few members of Congress? Does Congress so strongly support the work of its committees?

Consider each of the following features of Congress (including some that no longer apply), and discuss the policy implications of each. Does each (a) lead to more or less logical and coherent policies? (b) lead to more or less representation of various local and parochial interests? (c) make it easier or harder to pass legislation? Party voting in Congress A powerful Speaker of the House A highly specialized committee structure Committee reforms that have taken power away from chairs Ideological caucuses Open meetings of committees Large staffs, including those of Congressional members, committees, and staff agencies Powerful support for the president in Congress The filibuster The closed rule

Post 9-11 Congress 9-11 Commission recommended Congress make fundamental changes in how it oversees agencies involved in intelligence- gathering and counter-terrorism Congress passed some of those proposals after some opposition in both parties