Www.tie.net Leadership Academy November 5, 2008  Dr. Joe Hauge  Jeanne Cowan  Janet Hensley Please fill out contact / conversation starters.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
School Leadership that Works:
Advertisements

Principals Session: Introduction to NTI Goals and Session Framework for Principals EngageNY.org.
School Leadership that Works
S-1 SUPERVISION. S-2 Instructional Leadership Development Framework for Data-driven Systems QUALITY STUDENT PERFORMANCE ETHICS AND INTEGRITY Curriculum/Instruction/
April 6, 2011 DRAFT Educator Evaluation Project. Teacher Education and Licensure DRAFT The ultimate goal of all educator evaluation should be… TO IMPROVE.
The State Role in Promoting Instructional Leadership Glenda Copeland Georgia State Liaison.
 Jeanne Cowan  Janet Hensley PIRLL Partnership for Improvement in Rural Leadership and Learning February.
April 3, 2009 PIRLL  Jeanne Cowan  Janet Hensley Mentors.
Presenters: Jeanne Cowan Janet Hensley
Webinar #1 The Webinar will begin shortly. Please make sure your phone is muted. (*6 to Mute, #6 to Unmute) 7/3/20151.
Presented by Margaret Shandorf
Professional Growth= Teacher Growth
+ Hybrid Roles in Your School If not now, then when?
Essential Concepts for School for Prevention First Patricia Berry, M.A. CSAP Essential Concepts for School m 1 BUILDING THE 5 ESSENTIAL.
A School Leader: 21Responsibilities
Shared Decision Making: Moving Forward Together
Administrative Evaluation Committee – Orientation Meeting Dr. Christine Carver, Associate Superintendent of Human Capital Development Mr. Stephen Foresi,
Improving Assessment Literacy School-wide. School and System Improvement Improvement by Contract -external threats and rewards Improvement by Culture.
Collaborative Data Teams
OSSE School Improvement Data Workshop Workshop #4 June 30, 2015 Office of the State Superintendent of Education.
Aligning Academic Review and Performance Evaluation (AARPE)
WASC Visiting Committee Final Presentation for Overseas Schools International School Eastern Seaboard March , 2011.
Webinar: Leadership Teams October 2013: Idaho RTI.
Name of Facilitator Instructional Leadership:. Welcome ©AZ Board of Regents, BEST Professional Development, All rights reserved. Name of Superintendent.
Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation 1.
Leading Change Through Differentiated PD Approaches and Structures University-District partnerships for Strengthening Instructional Leadership In Mathematics.
Leadership: Connecting Vision With Action Presented by: Jan Stanley Spring 2010 Title I Directors’ Meeting.
ISLLC Standard #1 ISLLC Standard #1 Planning School Improvement Name: Planning School Improvement that Ensures Student Success Workshop Facilitator.
Instructional leadership: The role of promoting teaching and learning EMASA Conference 2011 Presentation Mathakga Botha Wits school of Education.
Missouri Integrated Model Mid-Year Meeting – January 14, 2009 Topical Discussion: Teams and Teaming Dr. Doug HatridgeDonna Alexander School Resource SpecialistReading.
How We Approach Leadership in a High-Performing Schools Dr. Akram M. Zayour Dubai International School AlQuoz Branch 9/19/20151.
INSTRUCTIONAL EXCELLENCE INVENTORIES: A PROCESS OF MONITORING FOR CONTINUOUS IMPROVEMENT Dr. Maria Pitre-Martin Superintendent of Schools.
ISLLC Standard #2 Implementation
Why principal evaluation? Because Leadership Matters!
ISLLC Standard #4 ISLLC Standard #4 Monitoring Diverse Needs Name Workshop Facilitator.
Recruit, Retain, Reward Presented by: Kimberly Goff.
Supporting and Sustaining Volunteers Nonprofit Learning Point September 23, 2015.
McREL’s Balanced Leadership
Name Workshop Facilitator Instructional Leadership: Creating Demand.
June 4,  Why are we spending time discussing elements of effective group work ?  Effective and collaborative group work requires an intentional.
Powerful Coaching- OCAMP Mentor Training Day 3 November 2011.
Instructional Coaches Academy (ICAD3) 1.  Choose a movie title that describes your school experience and why.  Discuss in your table groups. 2.
Learning Focused Observations BEST Leadership Roundtable February 1 st, 2012.
Reform Model for Change Board of Education presentation by Superintendent: Dr. Kimberly Tooley.
ISLLC Standard #6 Monitoring Education Stakeholders Name Workshop Facilitator.
 Jeanne Cowan  Janet Hensley SDI+ / PIRLL Partnership for Improvement in Rural Leadership and Learning July.
OCM BOCES Day 2 Principal Evaluator Training 1. Back to the beginning: 2 Nine Components.
Instructional Leadership Supporting High Standards.
INSTRUCTIONAL LEADERSHIP Supporting Common Assessments (Time for Common Assessments) © AZ Board of Regents, All rights reserved, 2012.
Technology Action Plan By: Kaitlyn Sassone. What is Systemic Change? "Systemic change is a cyclical process in which the impact of change on all parts.
ISLLC Standard #4 Collaborating with Families (and Stakeholders) Name Workshop Facilitator.
ISLLC Standard #3 Planning for School – wide Behavior Management
ISLLC Standard #6 ISLLC Standard #6 Supporting Education Reform Name Workshop Facilitator.
KEEPING THE FOCUS ON STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT Stephanie Benedict Academic Development Institute & Center on Innovations in Learning.
ISLLC Standard #6 ISLLC Standard #6 Implementing Educational Policy Name Workshop Facilitator.
Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report School Accreditation Sugar Grove Elementary September 29, 2010.
Common Core Parenting: Best Practice Strategies to Support Student Success Core Components: Successful Models Patty Bunker National Director Parenting.
Professional Learning Communities AKA Purposeful Learning and Collaboration PLCs.
 Jeanne Cowan  Janet Hensley PIRLL Partnership for Improvement in Rural Leadership and Learning August 10,
Instructional Leadership: Applying Concern & Use Name Workshop Facilitator.
 Jeanne Cowan  Janet Hensley PIRLL Partnership for Improvement in Rural Leadership and Learning August 31,
Implementing the Professional Growth Process Session 3 Observing Teaching and Professional Conversations American International School-Riyadh Saturday,
A lens to ensure each student successfully completes their educational program in Prince Rupert with a sense of hope, purpose, and control.
Instructional Leadership Supporting Common Assessments.
ISLLC Standard #3 Implementing Effective Meetings Name Workshop Facilitator.
Alexander Graham Bell Elementary School
February 8, 2017.
Welcome! Leadership Academy November 5, 2008 Dr. Joe Hauge
February 21-22, 2018.
2010 NEASC Self-Study and Evaluation Visit
Presentation transcript:

Leadership Academy November 5, 2008  Dr. Joe Hauge  Jeanne Cowan  Janet Hensley Please fill out contact / conversation starters.

10:00-11:30Welcome / Overview of SDI+ and Leadership Academy Dr. Joe Hauge, Jeanne Cowan, Janet Hensley Overview of Cognitive Coaching Model (Marilyn Hofer) 11:30 –12:15Lunch (served on-site in the Sheridan Room) 12:15- 1:45Introduction to Balanced Leadership model 1:45 – 2:00Break(cookies in the Sheridan Room) 2:00 – 3:00Planning for Effective School Leadership 3:00-3:15Closure and Evaluation 3:15 – 4:00Meet with Mentors/General Information

Update on SDI+ and Leadership Academy Understand the purpose and process for utilizing mentors to strengthen leadership skills Build background of ‘Cognitive Coaching Model’ Overview of ‘Balanced Leadership Model’ Begin forming mentor-principal relationships

Norms  Take care of your own needs  Limit side conversations in large group  Raised hands = rejoin the large group  Mute cell phones  Respect others’ opinions and viewpoints  Others?

Mileage forms... * PROJECT: ________PIRLL________________________PLEASE FILL OUT COMPLETELY * DATE OF EVENT: __Nov 4 th 2008_to May ___ Revised 10/10/08 * COORDINATOR: _Janet Hensley and Jeanne Cowan__ TIE / BHSSC Travel Reimbursement Voucher 1925 Plaza Blvd. Rapid City, SD Name (Please Print):Social Security #: Address: City, State, Zip: Phone:*Destination: *Reason for Travel / Event: Departure Date:Time:AM PM Return Arrival Date:Time:AM PM Transportation - Mileage (round trip):MilesPersonal Vehicle School Vehicle (NOTE: As of July 1, 2006, mileage will only be reimbursed if you travel out of the district where you work.) List Passengers Commercial Airlines – Cost of airfare (attach receipt): $ Lodging: (Attach Original receipts for parking, taxi, etc. as appropriate.) Signature of Claimant:Date:

Recruitment and Retention

Individual Leadership Roles & Responsibilities

Individual Effective Performance

School-based Performance

Outcomes  Understanding of the essence of Cognitive Coaching SM  Experience the power of a structured professional conversation.

A coaching metaphor  Coach – a means of conveyance. To convey a valued person from where he/she is to where he/she wants to be.

Coaching paradigm Existing State Vague Plan Superficial Reflection Problem – stuck (low S.O.M.) Desired State Precise plan Deep reflections for learning Resourceful (high states of mind

The Mission of Cognitive Coaching SM The mission of Cognitive Coaching SM is to produce self-directed persons with the cognitive capacity for high performance both independently and as members of a community.

Mission of Cognitive Coaching SM

Roam and buzz 1. Individually, write down one thing that happens nonverbally between two people when relating well. 2. Move around the room quickly listening, not writing collecting orally as many ideas as you can. 3. At the signal, return to your chair and write down as many as you can remember.

Rapport  Mirroring/matching is the technology whereby we offer back another’s non- verbal behavior.  When we mirror people, through matching their behavior, we are offering them not only invisible and subconscious images of themselves, but images that are delivered without our meanings attached to them.

Mirroring taken to an extreme is mimicking which is highly irritating and ineffective.

Model conversation – Data collection Pairs A - pay attention to the verbal and non-verbal behaviors of the coach. B - pay attention to the verbal and non-verbal behaviors of the speaker A and B record your observations during the conversation Share with your partner

ROLE PLAY SCENARIO # 2 A colleague says to you, “I’ve done everything I know to do and this teacher is still having difficulty with classroom management.” Role play scenario #1

A colleague sees you at a meeting and loudly complains about the overload of forms and paperwork that is piling up. Role play scenario #2

A parent comes to the principal and says, “I’ve had it with that teacher! I want my child taken out of her class TODAY!” Role play scenario #3

Foundations of Support Support Functions

Outcomes  Understanding of the essence of Cognitive Coaching SM  Experience the power of a structured professional conversation.

 Refocusing activity:  Consider what you do as a leader to influence student achievement.  Make a list of practices that you use to influence student learning. Welcome back!

We want you to know that we have attempted to use key elements of high-quality professional development today.  Application to YOUR practice  Collaboration  Dialogue  Differentiation  Guided application  Networking  Reflection Your Professional Development

 Designed and presented by MCREL  Sponsored by the South Dakota Department of Education and School Administrators of South Dakota  Second cohort beginning in June 2009 Balanced Leadership Academy

Marzano’s School Leadership that Works.

 Higher expectations  Greater accountability  Rapid increases in information  Public scrutiny  Work overload Changing Environments

 Leading increasingly complex change  Relentless focus on improving student achievement  Sharing leadership New Expectations

Provides a simple model that helps us define, understand and emphasize a set of leadership responsibilities that are associated with higher levels of student achievement. Helps to integrate and apply research findings to support YOUR practice. Balanced Leadership Framework

Four components: 1. Leadership 2. Focus of Change 3. Magnitude of Change 4. Purposeful Community Balanced Leadership Framework

1. There is a relationship between leadership and student achievement; leadership matters. 2. There are 21 leadership responsibilities, each with a statistically significant and positive relationship to student achievement. 3. Leaders perceived as strong do not always have a positive impact on achievement (focus or magnitude of implementation).

 There is a relationship between leadership and student achievement.  What principals do has an effect on student achievement.  Increases in leadership behavior are associated with increases in student achievement. Finding #1: Leadership Matters

Finding #2: Responsibilities & Practices 21 leadership responsibilities 66 leadership practices All correlated to student achievement Each correlation is statistically significant

AffirmationInvolvement with CIA Change AgentKnowledge of CIA CommunicationMonitor/Evaluate Contingent RewardsOptimize CultureOrder DisciplineOutreach FlexibilityRelationships FocusResources Ideals/BeliefsSituational Awareness InputVisibility Intellectual Stimulation

Each group will need three colors of cards. In your small group: 1.Consider each leadership responsibility card. (blue) 2.Match each leadership responsibility with its corresponding description (salmon). 3.Match the paired description and responsibility cards with the corresponding practices card. (yellow)

 Check your answers with the handout.  What surprises you about the leadership responsibilities and practices?  What questions do the responsibilities and practices raise for you?  Share your thoughts with a partner.

Leaders perceived as strong do not always have a positive effect on student achievement. McREL’s interpretation:  Focus of the change—Are we focused on the right work?  Magnitude of the change—Is it first- or second-order change? Finding #3: Differential impact of leadership

“The problem in low- performing schools is not getting people to work, it is getting them to do the right work.” Richard Elmore:

 Focus on improving practices that are already well-developed and implemented.  Focus on practices that are marginally implemented.  Focus on practices that lack evidence for improving student achievement. Examples of ineffective focus

Order of Change Order of change is the magnitude and implications of changes for the people expected to implement them or those who will be impacted by them. (Waters, Marzano, & McNulty, 2003).

 Responsibilities associated with purposeful community  Responsibilities associated with managing change.  Responsibilities associated with choosing the right focus.

Break

Marzano’s Research Students come in at 50% Leave at the end of the year Average School Average Teacher 50% Highly Ineffective School Highly Ineffective Teacher 50%3% Highly Effective School Ineffective Teacher 50%37% Ineffective School Highly Effective Teacher 50%63% Highly Effective School Highly Effective Teacher 50%96% Highly Effective School Average Teacher 50%78%

Old Proverb... “A vision without a plan is just a dream. A plan without a vision is just drudgery. But a vision with a plan can change the world.” As leaders, we need to identify the right work and then lead the conditions that impact that work. A Plan for Effective School Leadership

1. Develop a strong school leadership team.  Solution to the amount of work is to shift leadership schools to a team of individuals.  4 major concepts – 1 st concept-Collective Efficacy – the shared belief that “we can make a difference.”  A better predictor of student success than socioeconomic status Marzano - 5 steps for this plan.

 Financial resources Shared vision  Physical resources ◦ The leader needs to articulate his/her ideals and beliefs and invite teachers to share theirs so as to identify commonalities. 2. Development and use of all available assets

 It is up to the building principal to keep the common goals articulated in all discussions for all staff members. ◦ Not just words but actions!  These include: ◦ Visibility – frequent contact with teachers & students  The principal’s strong presence communicates that administration and staff are working as a team. 3. Accomplishment of goals that matter to ALL community members 3. Accomplishment of goals that matter to ALL community members

◦ Situational Awareness – the principal’s awareness of details and undercurrents in the school.  Forecast and head off potential problems. Invite staff to discuss issues openly. ◦ Relationships – the principal establishes a purposeful community – the principal must be aware of personal aspects related to the staff. ◦ Communication – open, honest ◦ Culture – bi-monthly or monthly meetings where teachers discuss instruction issues. – working at consistencies. 3. Accomplishment of goals that matter to ALL community members (cont.)

 Input is important ◦ Open-door policy that gives every faculty member access ◦ Schedule individual meetings with each staff member  9 of the 21 responsibilities are necessary for the principal in establishing a purposeful community.  Optimizer (principal is champion) Situational Awareness  Affirmation (Principal leads celebrations) Relationship  Ideals/BeliefsCommunication  VisibilityCulture Input 4. Agreed-upon process

 Principal needs to stay involved!  Different members of the leadership team can share the responsibility of research, techniques and strategies for different academic areas. 2. Distribute responsibilities

 This is so important. ◦ P  4. Prioritize – identify the order of the selected work. ◦ Need to prioritize and focus. 3. Select the ‘right’ work 3. Select the ‘right’ work

 qso qso Are We Doing the Right Thing?

 Examples would be: ◦ Optimizer (champion) that the whole staff is operating as a cohesive group.  The leadership team can support this by identifying strengths of the staff. ◦ Can devote portions of all staff meetings acknowledging accomplishments. 5. Match management style to the change initiative

Reflection (chapter 7)

 The Balanced Leadership Profile is an online feedback tool based on the leadership practices identified in School Leadership that Works  Survey responses give principals, including assistant and aspiring principals, valuable information about leadership related to a specific change initiative.  FREE  Directions provided in handout. Balanced Leadership Profile

63 Leadership Action Plan  Using the Balanced Leadership Profile, identify 2 or 3 leadership responsibilities positively correlated with leading second order change.  Use this information to formulate leadership goals.  Goals must be:  Specific  Measurable  Attainable  Results oriented  Timely  Identify specific strategies to meet this goal.

Goal (based on Leadership Responsibilities) Strategies and ActionsPerson(s) Responsible TimelineEvidence of Effectiveness Leadership Action Plan Principal ’ s Name __________________ Mentor ’ s Name ________________ Date _____________ School ____________________________________

Professional Learning Communities Enjoy “Passion and Persistence”.

 tree.com/Public/Search.aspx?ListProducts=true& Criteria1=plc&ProductType=DVDs

 Discuss initial date to meet.  Individually complete both sides of the feedback/evaluation form.  With your mentor, dialogue about your responses.  Leave these forms on your table, please! Closing and Feedback

 Thanks for all you do!  Have a super year!  See you at the Summer Institute on May 26-27!  All materials available at SDI+ wiki Leadership

 Mileage  Time cards  Contracts  Contact logs – will mail to you  LODGING Dec. 4 & 5 th – Sign up. Mentors