1 Performance measurement data are displayed for 10 individual survey cycles, including 3 cycles for each of the fiscal years 2001 through 2003 and the.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
County of Fairfax, Virginia Department of Transportation Review and Discussion of Draft Scope of Work for Study of Issues Associated with Increasing Transportation.
Advertisements

Maintenance Rating Program Training 2014 KYTC Division of Maintenance Tracy Nowaczyk, P.E.
Columbia County Road Department. Ditching Road Grading Work Performed By County Road Crews.
Created by: Victor Lund, PEKen Johnson, PE, PTOE St. Louis CountyMnDOT.
Columbia County Road Department Department Presentation June, 2013 By David Hill.
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
MOWING PRACTICES Where, When, Why, and How Grass Type Perennial – vegetative reproduction through rhizomes, stolons, and tillering Annual – weedy grasses.
Commonwealth of Kentucky Transportation Cabinet Department of Highways - District 5 The Slow Uphill Climb Matt Bullock, P.E. Chief District Engineer.
Steve Varnedoe Condition Assessment & Funding Needs for North Carolina’s Highway System North Carolina Department of Transportation Report to the Joint.
1 PAVEMENT DATA ITEMS. 2 Climate_Shapes (4 LTPP zones) Soil_Shapes Metadata Estimates Section level data HPMS Pavement Data Summary level data.
Highway Maintenance Performance Measurement Annual Report September 2004.
E20 TALLINN - NARVA RECONSTRUCTION MAARDU - VALGEJÕE.
Idaho Transportation Department Karen A. Strauss, P.E. Pavement Management Engineer.
Making Roadways Safer for Motorcycles Awareness Suggestions Discussion.
LAND AREA: 688 SQ. MI. – 3RD LARGEST IN OHIO 421 C/L MILES 393 BRIDGES (275 NBIS) 1,800 CULVERTS 5,000+ SIGNS 10 RAILROAD CROSSINGS (at grade) CURRENT.
MDOT’ Maintenance Management System Southeast Regional Maintenance Conference Biloxi MS Ken Hauser - MDOT.
Mississippi DOT Roadsides, Drainage & Vegetation Management Standards.
Things to look for and remember while preparing FD05 Estimates.
EXAM 2 REVIEW. 1. Drainage problem (25 pts) Below you see a cross-section of a ditch. It runs parallel to a 200-acre field consisting of permanent pasture.
MAINTENANCE RATING PROGRAM Allen Mattox District Five Technical Support Manager.
PAVEMENT CONDITION SURVEYS. Instructional Objectives n Need for condition surveys n Collection methodologies n Basic types of condition surveys n Different.
Preventive Maintenance
Road Maintenance Report Warm Springs Reservation.
Highway Maintenance & Rehabilitation
Safety Audit Components Safety assessment for risk Management.
Bridge Maintenance and Repair.
2014 CONSTRUCTION ESTIMATES Estimates Estimates 3 Point of the illustration? Document your assumptions.
MoDOT’s Inventory Systems and Measures for Pavement Marking and Roadway Signing Jim Carney State Maintenance Engineer October 2004.
Transportation Safety Issues on our Indian Reservations Dennis Trusty Director- Northern Plains TTAP 2009 Transportation Safety Conference Pierre, SD.
Countermeasures That Work Transportation Safety Conference Pierre, SD February 22, 2007.
"The Use of Condition Assessments to Improve Maintenance Level of Service in Texas" Joe S. Graff, P.E. Texas Department of Transportation.
Texas Maintenance Assessment Program (TxMAP). Background Developed by TxDOT’s Maintenance Division in 1999 to document the condition of the highway system.
Pavement Analysis and Design
Pavement Preservation Preventive Maintenance
Vegetation Control For Safety Russ Johnson – Maintenance Supervisor - WSDOT Don Petersen – Safety/Design Engineer - FHWA.
2009 ACEC/ODOT CONFERENCE ODOT’S 1R PROGRAM Liz Hunt, P.E. ODOT Pavement Services Engineer.
Influence of Pavement Condition on Project Selection
PAVEMENT MAINTENANCE 1:
Things to look for and remember while preparing FD05 Estimates.
Condition Assessment & Funding Needs for North Carolina’s Highway System Report to the Joint Legislative Transportation Oversight Committee December 12,
Westfield Public Works Department Jeremy Lollar, Director June 8, 2015.
Airport Lighting, Markings and Sign Systems
Louisiana Local Road Safety Program
Mike McColeman, P.E. Assistant Maintenance Administrator Ohio Department of Transportation Defining Desired Outcomes Defining Desired Outcomes.
Safety Signs. Traffic Light Ahead Slow down and prepare to stop.
Traffic Signs Part Two. What do these 2 signs tell you?
FY 2011 PMIS Scores CST DivisionDE/DD/OD/RD MeetingAugust 16-18, 2011.
The Highway Fund – Planning, Measuring, and Reporting Mike Holder, PE, Chief Engineer 2015 CAPA / DOT Workshop February 24, 2015.
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION MAINTENANCE RATING PROGRAM.
Road Maintenance in Estonia
District 7 (Los Angeles and Ventura Counties) State Highway System San Gabriel Mountains National Monument Area SAN GABRIEL MOUNTAINS NATIONAL MONUMENT.
Tehama County Public Works Department “ National Public Works Week” Board of Supervisors Presentation May 10, 2016 Gary B. Antone, PE, PLS Director.
INDOT Roadway Preservation Initiative Update
Roadway Pavement Management Plan
City of Abilene Pavement Condition Survey 2017 Results and Discussion
Rehabilitation Project
Interdisciplinary teams Existing or new roadway
Approach Road Inspection and Rating
Traffic Signs Regulatory Warning Informational/Guide.
ALDOT Pavement Preservation Policy
Grade Separation Inspection and Rating.
Traffic Operations Division
State Highway System San Gabriel Mountains National Monument Area
Maintenance Rating Program Training
Safety Audit Components
Grade Separation Inspection and Rating.
Grade Separation Inspection and Rating.
Project Selection Policy Update
Louis E. Feagans, P.E. Statewide Technical Services Director, INDOT
Grade Separation Inspection and Rating.
Presentation transcript:

1 Performance measurement data are displayed for 10 individual survey cycles, including 3 cycles for each of the fiscal years 2001 through 2003 and the fiscal year 2004 cycle completed August 29. This allows review of 3 year trends and seasonal fluctuations. Weighted Scores Weighted scores combine a number of elements into a few scores for road surface, shoulders, roadside/drainage, traffic services to provide a broad view of the status of the system statewide and in each of the six districts. Weighting Factors yield a possible score of 100 for each category and composite score These Safety elements are assigned a weight of 5 for the percent passing: Pavement Potholes/Spalls & Ruts; Shoulder Drop-off/Build-up; Clear Zone Encroachment; Guard Rail, Paint Striping, Signs, Raised Pavement Markings. These Motorist Services elements are assigned a weight of 3 for the percent passing: Pavement Shoving, Rolldown, Faults, Bumps, Depressions; Shoulder Potholes/Spalls, Bumps, Depressions, Cross-slope; Mowing, Noxious Weeds, Markers, Litter, Junk Dead Animals. These Preservation elements are assigned a weight of 1 for the percent passing: Pavement Cracks/Joints, Surface Condition; Shoulder Cracks/Joints, Surface Condition, Rolldown, Faults; Culverts, Ditch Debris, Drains, Erosion/Slides.

2

3

4 Additional Analysis for Selected Elements Recent Performance Measurement Reports have compared condition status of selected elements with projected costs to reach the reallocation thresholds for those elements. This report compares element status with historical work accomplishment hours. Elements Selected for Additional Analysis in this Report Of the 10 elements selected for action plan recommendations in January, the following 5 were selected for additional analysis in this report: w-beam guardrail, unpaved shoulder drop-off, paint striping, culverts and ditch debris. These elements directly align with function codes used in work accomplishment reporting. Also, this report includes the 2 elements of mowing and noxious weeds. Work accomplishment hours are provided for each of these seven elements in each district for the most recent three fiscal years.

5 Additional Analysis for Selected Elements Elements Not Selected for Additional Analysis in this Report The following 5 elements from the January action plan recommendations were not selected for additional analysis in this report: PCC potholes/spalls, granular cross slope greater than 8%, PCC cracks/joints, ACC transverse/random cracks and ACC surface condition. These performance measurement elements do not align well with function codes used in work accomplishment reporting. As an example the performance measurement element of PCC potholes/spalls could be addressed by the following functions: 609, spall patching; 613, pavement replacement; and 617, permanent surface repair. Also, these same 3 functions could be applied to these additional performance measurement elements: ACC potholes; ACC bumps/depressions; PCC bumps/depressions.

6

7 Percent Passing Compared with Reallocation Thresholds and Work Accomplishment Hours 1.Work accomplishment hours are provided for each of the seven elements in each district for the most recent three fiscal years. 2.The seven elements selected for additional analysis directly align with function codes used in work accomplishment reporting. The elements and related function codes are: W-Beam Guardrail – Function 670 Unpaved Shoulder Drop-off – Function 634 Paint Striping – Functions 663 & 664 Culverts – Function 657 Ditch Debris – Function 655 Mowing – Functions 636, 638 & 645 Noxious Weeds – Function Mean sample sizes per cycle are provided for each of the seven elements in each district.

8 Percent Passing Compared with Reallocation Thresholds and Work Accomplishment Hours 4.Starting with the FY03.3 cycle, surveyors have been reporting more detailed data about the types of defects for several performance measurement elements. This report includes specifics about the following types of defects for each district: W-beam guardrail - percent of height defects compared to structural damage; Unpaved shoulder – percent of drop-off defects compared to build up; Culverts – percent of structural damage defects compared to plugged culverts.

9

10

11

12

13

14

15