Framework for an overall ‘Vision’ A vision framework that speaks to need across modes Bike Ped Transit Passenger Rail.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
KEEP MOVING TO KEEP AHEAD MAY MnDOT Vision and Mission Vision: Transportation leader, committed to upholding public needs and collaboration with.
Advertisements

Transport for Canberra 07 November2013. Transport for NSW: Regional Transport Plan ACT, whilst not part of the region, is an important destination Transport.
Performance Measures CTP 2040 Policy Advisory Committee August 19, 2014.
White Paper 2011 and Development Perspectives of Transport System in Latvia Guntars Jansons Manager Development Planning.
 City of Mesa Council Presentation October 23, 2014.
Comprehensive Freight Movement Plan Pennsylvania Rail Freight Seminar May 22, 2013 Pennsylvania Long Range Transportation Plan Pennsylvania Long Range.
Community Transportation Association of Idaho Supporting, Coordinating and Promoting Mobility in Idaho.
Caltrans 5-Year Strategic Plan D-11 Planning Division Summary.
Transport Policy as an Enabling Framework for Green Growth in South Africa Ngwako Makaepea Department of Transport 18 May 2010.
SB 360 and Multi-Modal Impact Fees & Efficiently Managing a Street Lightning System.
International Partnership Meeting Thursday, January 17, 2013 Washington D.C. 1.
May 28, Vision Statement and Goals, Objectives and Performance Measures for the 2040 LRTP Status of these items: Draft Approved by LRTP Subcommittee.
Workshop on Infrastructures Sustainable Infrastructure for Efficient Mobility: the Key Challenges Luc Bourdeau ECTP Secretary General Industrial Technologies.
Materials developed by K. Watkins, J. LaMondia and C. Brakewood Regulation & Finance Unit 7: Forecasting and Encouraging Ridership.
Overview of the IT 3 Initiative CONFIDENTIAL Discussion Document September 2008.
06/20/2007 Virginia Department of Rail and Public Transportation (DRPT) Update on FTA New Initiatives on Transportation Services.
FY 2012 President’s Budget Released February 14, 2011.
TRB Transportation Planning Applications Conference Houston, Texas May 2009 Ann Arbor Transportation Plan Update-- Connecting the Land Use & Transportation.
Freight Bottleneck Study Update to the Intermodal, Freight, and Safety Subcommittee of the Regional Transportation Council September 12, 2002 North Central.
1 1 Executive Board January 22, 2009 Update to the Regional Transportation Plan TRANSPORTATION 2040.
AFF TOPIC LECTURE SCFI INCREASING TRANSPORTATION FUNDING Benefits.
Practical Design in ODOT Roadway Conference April 13, 2010 Cathy Nelson, PE Technical Services Manager/ Chief Engineer.
Orange County Business Council Infrastructure Committee December 14, 2010 Draft Long-Range Transportation Plan Destination 2035.
Quality Region Principles The New Visions Plan addresses the region’s quality of life in a number of important ways and provides a framework for improving.
Sustainable travel for Limerick and Area By Professor Lewis Lesley.
A New Regional Vision ASPA Conference April 2010 Steve Heminger, MTC Executive Director.
Freight Issues in the Report of the National Surface Transportation Policy and Revenue Study Commission Transportation for Tomorrow.
MnDOT-ACEC Annual Conference March 5,  Capital planning and programming at MnDOT  Major considerations  A more transparent and collaborative.
Performance Analysis Presentation to the National Capital Region Transportation Planning Board (NCR-TPB) November 28, 2012 Adopted: July 18, 2012 Item.
Effective Transportation Planning City of Seattle, WA.
Jeff’s slides. Transportation Kitchener Transportation Master Plan Define and prioritize a transportation network that is supportive of all modes of.
KEY PROVISIONS OF THE DRIVE* ACT H.R. 22, as passed by the Senate on July 30, 2015 *Developing a Reliable and Innovative Vision for the Economy Thomas.
What Transport for Cambridge? The Sub-Region Development Strategy and Transport Policies.
1 Round One Public Outreach Workshops Fall 2005 DRAFT Bay Area Regional Rail Plan August 2007 Workshops.
North Central Texas Council of Governments Transportation Department Summary Presentation January 2004 MOBILITY 2025: THE METROPOLITAN.
1 Transportation Policy and Performance: The challenges and opportunities of performance-based programs Deputy Administrator Therese McMillan Federal Transit.
Authorization of a New Federal Transportation Program AASHTO Executive Director John Horsley Subcommittee on Design Albuquerque, New Mexico July 15, 2008.
Managed Lanes CE 550: Advanced Highway Design Damion Pregitzer.
Highway Program Structure Highway Recommendations Neil Pedersen Chair, ASC Highway Legislative Team Vice Chair, AASHTO Standing Committee on Highways Administrator,
Comprehensive Plan Update Kevin O’Neill Seattle Bicycle Advisory Board September 2, 2015.
1 The Future of Transportation: What have we been doing? Where should we be going? Lisa Aultman-Hall, Professor and Director Transportation Research Center.
Mn/DOT and Economic Development ACEC Annual Meeting March 2, 2010.
1/14 Next Steps for Participating Economies to Develop EE Urban Passenger Transportation 5 March, 2012 APERC Workshop, Kuala Lumpur Bing-Chwen Yang Team.
Environmental Justice: Context Sensitive Planning Grant Program California Department of Transportation Division of Transportation Planning Office of Community.
The Regional Transport Strategy Transport for Regional Growth Conference Edinburgh 5 November 2015 John Saunders SEStran.
2015 Emerald Coast Transportation Symposium Stephanie Lane, Director CSX Industrial Development November 13, 2015.
A New Transit and Mobility Vision. A New Relationship TRANSIT REVENUE TRANSIT DEMAND.
30-Year National Transportation Policy Framework to the Future September 12,
Regional Transportation Council Mobility Plan Workshop North Central Texas Council of Governments November 12, 2015.
Submission Document went to cabinet … Planning for the Future Core Strategy and Urban Core Plan (the Plan) is a key planning document and sets out the.
Community Transportation Association of Idaho Supporting, Coordinating and Promoting Mobility in Idaho Workforce Development Council February 24, 2010.
Key Trends Shaping Transportation System Management Operations Timothy Papandreou CIO, Director Office of Innovation San Francisco Municipal Transportation.
Public Transportation Coordination – Barriers, Constraints & Opportunities Texas Transportation Commission November 16, 2006.
ADVANCED TRANSPORTATION AND CONGESTION MANAGEMENT TECHNOLOGIES DEPLOYMENT (ATCMTD) PROGRAM 1 Bob Arnold, Director Office of Transportation Management,
Pedestrian Master Plan Update Seattle Planning Commission Michelle Marx, Ian Macek, Kevin O’Neill May 26, 2016.
DESTINATION 2030 Regional Local Personal Adopted May 24, 2001.
Planning Commission Ian Macek May 26, 2016 Freight Master Plan.
WIS DOT MCLARY MANAGEMENT PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT.
1.  Transportation Vision  Near-term Recommendations  Ongoing Work / Next Steps 2.
Patricia McDonald, Secretary Vermont Agency of Transportation
Oregon State Rail Plan Update
West of England Joint Transport Study
A Position Statement 14th October 2016
What is the Regional Transportation Plan?
VicRoads – Movement & Place
“efficient movement of goods across the entire state of Oregon”
VicRoads – Movement & Place
Transportation Task Force Mission and Vision
What is TSMO? TSMO encompasses a broad set of strategies that aim to optimize the safe, efficient, and reliable use of existing and planned transportation.
What is TSMO? TSMO encompasses a broad set of strategies that aim to optimize the safe, efficient, and reliable use of existing and planned transportation.
Presentation transcript:

Framework for an overall ‘Vision’ A vision framework that speaks to need across modes Bike Ped Transit Passenger Rail

Framework for an overall ‘Vision’ A vision framework that speaks to both urban and rural need Urban bike, ped, transit needs Rural bike, ped, public transportation needs

Notes from Previous Sub Meetings: What is the ‘vision’ for a transportation system across all modes? (bike, ped, transit and passenger rail) “sufficient and stable funding to meet current need” “funding sufficient to meet future need and growth related challenges” “bike, ped, transit and rail options as a tool to reduce roadway congestion” “A connected and integrated transportation system (across jurisdictions)” “Improve public health (in terms of transportation safety and physical activity)” “meet statewide goals for air quality and emissions reductions” “An integrated and seamless transportation system (between modes)”

Key Concepts: 1.Safety and public health outcomes 2.Connectivity and integration (jurisdictional): 3.Connectivity and integration (modal): 4.Sustainability and emissions outcomes: 5.[Congestion relief outcomes:] 6.Revenue

Vision Discussion: 1.What is the overarching subcommittee vision that speaks across modes (bike, ped, transit) and across regions (urban, suburban, and rural)?* *Question: How do we incorporate goals of congestion relief into this vision? Subcommittee Deliverable: A draft subcommittee vision statement (expressed in 3-5 sentences)

Bike/Ped/Transit/Rail safety and public health outcomes: ConceptGoals (long term)Strategy or Potential Recommendations (near term) A transportation system that enhances public health though improved safety and increased physical activity (active transportation). 1.A drastic reduction in transportation related death and injury, particularly for vulnerable populations 2.A population with lower rates of obesity, heart disease, etc., stemming from an increase in active transportation a)Roadway system designs that enhance safety for vulnerable users b)Investment in bike/ped outside the existing ROW c)Enhancement of Safe Routes to Schools programs d)Enhancement of Transportation Options programs that encourage active transportation e)Investment in first mile/last mile connections that improve safety

Bike/Ped/Transit/Rail: connectivity and integration (jurisdictional): ConceptGoals (long term)Strategy or Potential Recommendations (near term) A connected and integrated transportation system across transportation providers, and jurisdictions 1.Public transportation users can rely on a system that is integrated across multiple jurisdictions 2.Transportation assets are optimized for greatest possible efficiency 3.Mobility hubs (such as the Salem Transit Depot) integrate transportation service across providers and jurisdictions a)Address gaps in network of transit providers across state b)Coordinate assets of rural/urban transit and transportation providers (fixed route transit, paratransit, senior, student, tribal transportation, etc.) c)Improve efficiency, reliability and integration of transportation across jurisdictions and providers through innovative technology d)Identify ways to reduce cost and improve efficiency of student transportation e)Develop Public Private Partnerships for paratransit and on-demand transit

Bike/Ped/Transit/Rail: connectivity and integration (modal): ConceptGoals (long term)Strategy or Potential Recommendations (near term) A connected and integrated transportation system between transportation modes 1.Integration between modes is optimized through first mile/last mile connections 2.Mobility hubs provide a link between modes and last mile connections a)Improve efficiency, reliability and integration of transportation across modes through innovative technology b)Prioritize investment in first mile/last mile connections that enhance efficacy and safety for transportation system users c)Identify ways to reduce cost and improve efficiency of student transportation

Bike/Ped/Transit/Rail sustainability and emissions outcomes: ConceptGoals (long term)Strategy or Potential Recommendations (near term) A transportation system that supports Oregon’s statewide sustainability and emissions reduction goals. 1.A system that provides a measurable reduction in air pollution and carbon emissions 2.A system that limits future growth in VMT as a consequence of a growing population 3.Reduction in roadway demand and congestion through transit and bike/ped system improvements 4.Increase in mode share of [mode] to [x] percent a)Investment in transportation modes that reduce emissions b)Investment in transit and bike/ped system improvements that target congested roadway corridors

Congestion relief outcomes: ConceptGoals (long term)Strategy or Potential Recommendations (near term) Reduce congestion on the transportation system through investments in transit, bike, ped, and passenger rail For discussion: what is the long term goal that this subcommittee sees? For discussion: What are the specific strategies that address the congestion concept?

Transit (near term revenue): ConceptNear Term GoalsNear Term Strategy or Potential Recommendations A public transportation system that has stable and sufficient funding to meet current system needs. 1.Revenue that is sufficient to leverage federal funding 2.Revenue that is sufficient to close critical system gaps across the state 3.Operations revenue sufficient to meet current demand 4.Revenue sufficient to meet the needs of the elderly and disabled a)Enhance revenue options for local governments and transit districts I.Employee payroll tax? II.Local funding tools for senior and disabled transit? III.Greater flexibility for use of revenue dedicated to yellow bus service b)Increase the state investment in public transportation I.Sufficient to leverage federal funds II.New or existing state revenue sources?

Transit (long term revenue): ConceptLong Term GoalsLong Term Strategy or Potential Recommendations A public transportation system that has stable and sufficient funding to meet future mobility and growth-related challenges 1.A system that meets future demand from a growing and aging population 2.A system that limits future growth in VMT as a consequence of a growing population a)Capital investment in, and expansion of, the public transportation system to meet a growing population b)Address constitutional restrictions associated with future transportation finance strategies (e.g., VMT tax, tolling, carbon tax, etc.) c)New revenue sources sufficient to cover operating costs of an expanded system: I.Expand local options for public transit? II.Employee payroll tax? III.“Sin taxes” (e.g., cigarette, cannabis, alcohol. Etc.) IV.Other new sources of transportation revenue?

Bike/Ped (revenue): ConceptGoalsStrategy or Potential Recommendations A bike and pedestrian transportation system that has stable and sufficient funding to meet current system needs and future mobility and growth-related challenges 1.Off-system improvements or connectivity where appropriate 2.Revenue sufficient to create a safe network for those who bike and walk, targeting zero deaths Near Term: a)Revenue to address gaps and ‘critical connections’ in existing system b)Investments in enhancements inside existing ROW c)Prioritize investment in user safety Long Term: a)Address constitutional restrictions associated with future transportation finance strategies (e.g., VMT tax, tolling, carbon tax, etc.) to provide greater flexibility for off-system improvements

Passenger Rail (revenue): ConceptGoals (long term)Strategy or Potential Recommendations (near term) Revenue needed to maintain current service Revenue needed to improve the existing corridor to higher speed service From Outline: 1.Improve intercity passenger rail service, high-speed rail improvements that provide a backbone of fast, efficient, frequent, and reliable service between Eugene, Oregon and Vancouver, British Columbia. 2.Increase job access, link communities and major educational institutions, and connect potential customers to goods and services. a)Identify a sustainable revenue source for Passenger Rail service that meets current need, and lays the groundwork for future rail enhancements… b)Recommend Alternative 1?

Strategy/Recommendations Discussion: Do these concepts capture the breadth of subcommittee findings? Are there more specific strategies or recommendations that can be teased out of these concepts? What should be the top-priority recommendations?