What is Micro-teaching Lesson Study (MLS)?. Lesson study, microteaching, and MLS  MLS was developed by combining elements of lesson study and microteaching.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Know role of and characteristics of effective feedback

Advertisements

School Year Session 5: November 6, 2013 Planning for Reasoning, Reasons for Planning 1.1.

How Do You Know That Your Students Are Learning? 2012 Curators’ Teaching Summit Nov. 12, 2012 – Session 3.

Lesson Study Overview Unlocking Minds Preparing Osceola County Students for a Bright Future Gladys Moreta K-12 Program Specialist Curriculum & Instruction.

Micro Teaching: Part 4 Lecture # 19 Dr G L Gulhane.

Aka Peer Review aka Peer Editing. Peer response is when students of the same level read each other’s papers and give feedback on them. The idea is that.

Learning Community II Survey Spring 2007 Analysis by Intisar Hibschweiler (Core Director) and Mimi Steadman (Director of Institutional Assessment)

Assessing Peer Performance in PBL Groups: how technology can help Carolyn K. Manning Associate Professor Dept of Health, Nutrition & Exercise Sciences.

Integrating Culture in the Language Classroom Iris Moye and Leslie Opp-Beckman University of Oregon.

11 Planning for Instruction Permission granted to reproduce for educational use only.© Goodheart-Willcox Co., Inc. Planning for Instruction Teachers.

“We will lead the nation in improving student achievement.” CLASS Keys TM Module 1: Content and Structure Spring 2010 Teacher and Leader Quality Education.

Burton Style Analysis Essay: Plan, Outline, & Draft Plan, outline, and draft your essay (see rubric) Remember the prompt: What have you learned about style.

Topic 13 – Lesson Plan Review Facilitation Guideline Zone and Date

ADEPT 1 SAFE-T Evidence. SAFE-T 2 What are the stages of SAFE-T? Stage I: Preparation  Stage I: Preparation  Stage II: Collection.

1 What are the roles of learning targets and success criteria in my classroom? – I can specify plans for engaging my students with learning targets.

NC Teacher Evaluation Process

Delicious banana is here to say, Bananas taste good in a certain way, Peel a banana and throw it on the floor, And watch your teacher slide out of the.

Second session of the NEPBE I in cycle Dirección de Educación Secundaria February 22, 2013.

Project supervision and Proces report 1. Supervision The supervisor Project supervision is a dialogue about the project and the methods used between the.

Florida Education: The Next Generation DRAFT March 13, 2008 Version 1.0 Lesson Study Presented by: Darliny G. Katz, Instructional Reading Specialist Florida.

WELCOME BACK TO CAMP!. Agenda Warm-Up for statistical and probabilistic thinking Norms for our PD Teaching through problem solving Break Lesson Study:

Summative vs. Formative Assessment. What Is Formative Assessment? Formative assessment is a systematic process to continuously gather evidence about learning.

P.R.I.D.E. School Professional Day :45 am- 3:30 pm.

Outcomes By the end of the session, we will have : Reflected on our own perspectives about assessment. Considered a rationale for on-going assessment.

 Sign In and find your assigned table  Enjoy breakfast items  You will NOT need a computer until much later  Be ready to share at 9 a.m. a check for.

Read aloud. Take turns reading your essays out loud to your group. As you are reading, your group members need to take notes on the following items: What.

Trickster Tales From Around the World. Assign new roles for yourself in your Learning Groups Facilitator/Questionaire (generates questions for the group.

Differentiating Your Instruction Through Guided Reading.

Senior Research Project Three Genre Quiz. Questions 1-6 (of 20) 1.What is the name of the selection for your main genre? 2.Who is its author? 3.From which.

Santa Cruz County Office of Education Teaching Algebraic Thinking Professional Development Focus on Lesson Study October 11, 2010.

Peer Editing/Revision EDG 4410 Teaching Strategies and Classroom Management University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL Dr. Verkler Fall 2014.

Mara Barbosa Alejandra Carrillo-Muñoz.  You will…  Identify appropriate and effective strategies to present evidence of teaching effectiveness.  Plan,

Peer Review Workshop ENG 113: Composition I. What Is a Peer Review Workshop?  You will be paired with a classmate  Read each narrative  Provide detailed.

MICROTEACHING By – Shalini 1.

Trickster Tales From Around the World. Assign new roles for yourself in your Learning Groups Determine how you will read and annotate each of the following.

Teaching for Deep Learning in an active and engaging way Session 9.

ECO 561 Week 6 Individual Final Proposal NEW To purchase this material click below link Individual-Final-Proposal-NEW.

Conceptual Change Theory

Instructional Review and School improvement

Planning Instruction Component 3: Session 4

Helping Students Practice Skills, Strategies, and Processes

EFFECTIVE LESSON PLANNING Teacher Academy

Peer Review Workshop ENG 113: Composition I.

FLIPPED CLASSROOM ACTIVITY CONSTRUCTOR – USING EXISTING CONTENT

Teacher and Leader Quality Education Support and Improvement

Common Core Implementation in the Classroom

SEI 500 Competitive Success-- snaptutorial.com

SEI 500 Education for Service-- snaptutorial.com

SEI 500 Teaching Effectively-- snaptutorial.com

BANKED TUESDAY REFLECTION AND REVISION OCTOBER 18TH, 2016.

Module 21 Formative Assessment to Improve Teaching K-12

Planning Instruction Component 3: Session 4

Instructional Review and School improvement

Georgia Department of Education

Assessment and Units of Study

Engaging in Argumentation and Explanation Through Questions, Claims, and Evidence Secondary Science Teachers Professional.

Welcome to the Annual Meeting of Title I, Part A Parents and Families

Welcome to the Annual Meeting of Title I, Part A Parents and Families

LESSON STUDY ..

Cooperative Learning Concepts

Welcome to the Annual Meeting of Title I, Part A Parents and Families

Lesson 21: Timed writing About this lesson

Welcome to the Annual Meeting of Title I, Part A Parents and Families

Planning a lesson & the lesson overview slide

Learning Community II Survey

Writing Instruction Kim Bowen, NCDPI ELA Consultant

Information July 15, 2015.

Classroom Teaching Demonstrations

This week in project 2 TODAY - PEER REVIEW: As a group, work through the next slide and provide feedback for all your table members. WEDNESDAY- SHOW.

Using the Lesson Study model to develop guided reasoning with higher achieving pupils. St. Michael with St. John.

Presentation transcript:

What is Micro-teaching Lesson Study (MLS)?

Lesson study, microteaching, and MLS  MLS was developed by combining elements of lesson study and microteaching (Fernández, 2005). Then, what is Lesson study ? How did Mcmahon and Hines (2008) define Lesson study? Can you explain the lesson study cycle? What advantages and disadvantages does Lesson study have? Discuss these questions with your group members.

The cycle of Lesson Study

 Now, let’s talk about the micro-teaching. How do Mergler & Tangen (2010) explain microteaching? What advantages and disadvantages does microteaching have to develop teachers’ teaching of mathematics? What are the differences between micro-teaching and Lesson Study? Again, discuss these questions with your groups.

The example of microteaching =144159

Compare MLS, Microteaching, and Lesson study by using Fernández’s (2010) table 1 MLSMicroteachingLesson study Lesson content Structure of experience Forms of feedback Implementation setting Products

The cycle of MLS PLANNINGIMPLEMENTATIONANALYSISREVISION What advantages did you find about MLS compared to micro-teaching and Lesson Study?

Guide for MLS group project (Adapted from the work of Fernández (2005, 2008, 2010) and Molina (2012))  Groups plan a lesson together for a given goal and mathematics topic and submit a First Lesson Plan Draft. This paper should include discussions of the following:  What dilemmas or difficulties is your group facing with regard to this lesson and its implementation?  What lesson-related goals does your group have for the students?  What student responses, comments, or questions will your group look for as evidence of understanding and achieving lesson goals and objectives.

 The first group member implements the lesson with a small group of peers while being videotaped. (approx min)  Group members analyze the videotape of the lesson and come together to discuss and revise the lesson. Then, groups should hand in a Second Lesson Plan Draft. This paper should include a summary of your group’s observations and revisions about the First Teaching of the lesson.  What were the strengths and weaknesses of the lesson?  What will your group change the second time the the lesson is taught?  During at least one revision cycle, the instructor will provide feedback or engage in the discussion.

 The second group member implements the lesson with a different small group of peers, also while being videotaped. (approx min)  Group members analyze the second videotape of the lesson. Then, again type a summary of your group’s observations and what your group will change the third time the lesson is taught and submit a Third lesson plan Draft. Be sure to explain why your group is making the changes. During at least on revision cycle, the instructor will provide feedback or engage in the discussion.

 The third group member implements the lesson to yet another small group of peers while being videotaped. (approx min)  Group members analyze the third videotape of the lesson and come together to discuss and revise the lesson. Finally, the group submits the last revision of the lesson ( Final Revision Lesson Plan ). Be sure to indicate any final adjustments your group would make to the lesson. Also, explain why.