NSCI 314 LIFE IN THE COSMOS 14 - EXTRASOLAR PLANETS (CONTINUED) AND THE DRAKE EQUATION Dr. Karen Kolehmainen Department of Physics, CSUSB

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
© 2005 Pearson Education Inc., publishing as Addison-Wesley Extrasolar Planets Since our Sun has a family of planets, shouldnt other stars have them as.
Advertisements

Destination: A Planet like Earth Caty Pilachowski IU Astronomy Mini-University, June 2011 Caty Pilachowski Mini-University 2011.
Habitable Zone ASTR 1420 Lecture 8 Sections
Chapter 15 The Formation of Planetary Systems
Chapter 13 Other Planetary Systems The New Science of Distant Worlds.
A Search for Habitable Planets 1 NASA’s first mission to detect Earth-size planets orbiting in the habitable zone of sun-like stars. Launched March 6,
The Earth and Beyond.
Extra-Solar Planets Astronomy 311 Professor Lee Carkner Lecture 24.
Other Planetary Systems (Chapter 13) Extrasolar Planets
Extra-Terrestrial Life and the Drake Equation Astronomy 311 Professor Lee Carkner Lecture 25.
Extrasolar planets Although current observations suggest that Earth-size rocky planets may be common, their abundance is quite uncertain. The information.
The Next 25(?) Years Future Missions to Search for Extra-solar Planets and Life.
NSCI 314 LIFE IN THE COSMOS 14 -THE DRAKE EQUATION Dr. Karen Kolehmainen Department of Physics, CSUSB
Extra-Terrestrial Life and the Drake Equation Astronomy 311 Professor Lee Carkner Lecture 25.
Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. Extrasolar Planetary Systems.
Astronomy190 - Topics in Astronomy Astronomy and Astrobiology Lecture 4 : Astronomy Basics Ty Robinson.
Extra-Solar Planets Astronomy 311 Professor Lee Carkner Lecture 24.
Clicker Questions Chapter 4 The Solar System Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc.
Today’s APODAPOD  Begin Chapter 8 on Monday– Terrestrial Planets  Hand in homework today  Quiz on Oncourse The Sun Today A100 – Ch. 7 Extra-Solar Planets.
Extra-terrestrial Civilizations. Are we alone? Contact … Direct contact through traveling to the stars and their planets Will be a challenge because of.
Stars Interstellar matter Shape of the Galaxy. Recap Canvas assignment for next Wednesday will be posted soon Relative sizes and distances between objects.
The Origin and possible existence of Life in the Universe.
Martin Crow Crayford Manor House Astronomical Society.
Exoplanets Astrobiology Workshop June 29, 2006 Astrobiology Workshop June 29, 2006.
Chapter 21 Section 4 Star Systems And Galaxies. Done By Nick White And Gina Heath.
Overview of Astronomy AST 200. Astronomy Nature designs the Experiment Nature designs the Experiment Tools Tools 1) Imaging 2) Spectroscopy 3) Computational.
NSCI 314 LIFE IN THE COSMOS 15 - THE DRAKE EQUATION: HOW COMMON ARE EXTRATERRESTRIAL CIVILIZATIONS THAT ARE SUFFICIENTLY TECHNOLOGICALLY ADVANCED THAT.
Extra-Solar Planets Astronomy 311 Professor Lee Carkner Lecture 24.
NSCI 314 LIFE IN THE COSMOS 13 - WHERE TO SEARCH FOR LIFE OUTSIDE OUR SOLAR SYSTEM: SUITABLE STARS AND PLANETS AND EXTRASOLAR PLANETS Dr. Karen Kolehmainen.
Galaxy Collisions Top left is an image of the Cartwheel galaxy. The ring of young stars was likely created as a smaller galaxy passed through the disk.
Lecture Outline Chapter 10: Other Planetary Systems: The New Science of Distant Worlds © 2015 Pearson Education, Inc.
18.3 Life Around Other Stars Our goals for learning Are habitable planets likely? Are Earth-like planets rare or common?
NSCI 314 LIFE IN THE COSMOS 13 - EXTRASOLAR PLANETS Dr. Karen Kolehmainen Department of Physics, CSUSB
Worlds Unnumbered Lecture Twenty-Nine, Apr. 14, 2003.
Final Exam Comprehensive –Most questions from Ch , some from Ch. 4-14, few from Ch. E-3 Multiple choice plus few short answer questions Please study:
NSCI 314 LIFE IN THE COSMOS 19 - THE FERMI PARADOX Dr. Karen Kolehmainen Department of Physics, CSUSB
E X P L O R I N G A S T R O B I O L O G Y: Is there life elsewhere in the Universe? Even if there isn’t any other life in our solar system, it probably.
How Common Is Life? George Lebo 28 November 2012 AST
THE LIGHTS IN THE SKY ARE STARS. SPECULATION: IS THERE LIFE ON OTHER WORLDS - PLANETS AROUND OTHER STARS OR PLANETS AND MOONS WITHIN OUR OWN SOLAR SYSTEM?
Chapter 19: Origin of the Solar System
NSCI 314 LIFE IN THE COSMOS 11 - WHERE TO SEARCH FOR LIFE OUTSIDE OUR SOLAR SYSTEM: EXOTIC LIFE Dr. Karen Kolehmainen Department of Physics, CSUSB
Lecture 13 6/29/07 Astronomy Difficulties It is extremely difficult to detect extrasolar planets Stars are a billion times brighter than the reflected.
Homework 8 Due: Monday, Nov. 28, 9:00 pm, Exam 2: Weds., Nov. 30.
Searching for Extraterrestrial Civilizations. The Drake Equation N civil = N *  f p  n p  f l  f i  f c  f L where N * =the number of stars in the.
Lecture 34 ExoPlanets Astronomy 1143 – Spring 2014.
Extraterrestrial Life and the Drake Equation. Basic Ideas Number of Civilizations in our Galaxy –Product of Number of stars and fractions N(ever) = N.
Late Work Due 12/20/13 Remember ain’t no butts about it! Sticking your head in the sand won’t make the deadlines go away 11 Days Remain.
NSCI 314 LIFE IN THE COSMOS 13 - WHERE TO SEARCH FOR LIFE OUTSIDE OUR SOLAR SYSTEM: SUITABLE STARS AND PLANETS AND EXTRASOLAR PLANETS Dr. Karen Kolehmainen.
Are We Alone? Objective 1: The process of cosmic evolution as it is currently understood. 2: Evaluate the chances of finding life in the solar system.
NASA’s Kepler and K2 Missions:
Extra-Solar Planet Populations George Lebo 10 April 2012 AST
Introducing the Stars. There’s No Shortage! What We Would Like to Know Distances (Critical for many purposes!) Distances (Critical for many purposes!)
The Chances for Intelligent Lift? The Chances for (Intelligent) Life?  Is there intelligent life elsewhere?  How could we contact them?  How will humanity.
Life on Other Worlds? Please pick up your transmitter and swipe your ID.
Chapter 21 Galaxy Evolution Looking Back Through Time Our goals for learning How do we observe the life histories of galaxies? How did galaxies.
Honors 228: Astrobiology using Bennett et al. Chapter 11 overview Spring 2005 Prof. Geller.
SETI. Extra Terrestrial Intelligence Is there intelligent life on other planets? If so, –Can we find them? –Can we try to communicate? SETI is the Search.
Lecture Outline Chapter 10: Other Planetary Systems: The New Science of Distant Worlds.
Lecture Outlines Astronomy Today 8th Edition Chaisson/McMillan © 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 15.
ASTR368 Exoplanet Detections. Kepler.
Origin and Evolution of the Solar System. 1.A cloud of interstellar gas and/or dust (the "solar nebula") is disturbed and collapses under its own.
© 2017 Pearson Education, Inc.
Chapter 10: Other Planetary Systems: The New Science of Distant Worlds
Goal: To understand life in our universe.
Guiding Questions What role could comets and meteorites have played in the origin of life on Earth? Have spacecraft found any evidence for life elsewhere.
The Immensity of the Universe
Interested in majoring (or minoring) in physics or astronomy
Astrobiology Workshop June 29, 2006
The Quest for Extraterrestrial Intelligence
Astrobiology Workshop June 29, 2006
Presentation transcript:

NSCI 314 LIFE IN THE COSMOS 14 - EXTRASOLAR PLANETS (CONTINUED) AND THE DRAKE EQUATION Dr. Karen Kolehmainen Department of Physics, CSUSB

METHODS FOR DETECTING EXTRASOLAR PLANETS (PLANETS ORBITING OTHER STARS) DIRECT OBSERVATION TRANSITS GRAVITATIONAL LENSING ASTROMETRY DOPPLER EFFECT (MOST SUCCESSFUL)

WHAT CAN WE DETERMINE? ORBITAL PERIOD (TIME NEEDED FOR ONE ORBIT) AVERAGE DISTANCE OF PLANET FROM STAR ECCENTRICITY (SHAPE) OF ORBIT LOWER LIMIT ON PLANET’S MASS

RESULTS OVER 200 EXTRASOLAR PLANETS HAVE BEEN DISCOVERED SINCE 1995, MOST USING THE DOPPLER EFFECT TECHNIQUE. SEVERAL STARS HAVE BEEN FOUND TO HAVE TWO OR MORE PLANETS. MOST PLANET MASSES ARE IN JUPITER RANGE. (MANY ARE EVEN HEAVIER.) THE LIGHTEST PLANET FOUND SO FAR IS 5.5 EARTH MASSES. MOST PLANETS ARE VERY CLOSE TO STAR. –HALF OF ALL DISCOVERED PLANETS ARE CLOSER IN THAN 0.5 AU –MANY ARE CLOSER TO THEIR STARS THAN MERCURY IS TO OUR SUN MOST ORBITS ARE VERY ECCENTRIC (HIGHLY ELLIPTICAL - FAR FROM CIRCULAR).

DISTRIBUTION OF PLANETS MERCURYVENUSEARTH 0.5 A.U.1.0 A.U. MARS 1.0 A.U.2.0 A.U. 2.3 A.U. 2.5 A.U. 3.3 A.U.

THE PROBLEM IN UNDERSTANDING THIS OUR MODELS OF SOLAR SYSTEM FORMATION PREDICT SMALL ROCKY PLANETS CLOSE TO STAR AND MASSIVE GAS GIANTS FARTHER AWAY (>5 AU), AS IN OUR SOLAR SYSTEM BUT MOST OBSERVED SOLAR SYSTEMS HAVE MASSIVE PLANETS (PROBABLY GAS GIANTS) CLOSE TO STAR

EXPLANATION?? OBSERVED MASSIVE PLANETS WERE FORMED FARTHER OUT FROM STAR (>5 AU) AFTER FORMATION, THE PLANETS MIGRATED TO NEW ORBITS DUE TO GRAVITATIONAL INTERACTIONS WITH –OTHER PLANETS –MATERIAL IN THE PROTOPLANETARY DISK –OTHER STARS PASSING NEARBY

MIGRATING PLANETS COMPUTER MODELING INDICATES –PLANETS ARE MORE LIKELY TO MIGRATE INWARD THAN OUTWARD –NEW ORBIT IS USUALLY HIGHLY ECCENTRIC –WHEN A LARGE PLANET MIGRATES, SMALLER PLANETS ARE PROBABLY THROWN INTO THE STAR OR OUT OF THE SOLAR SYSTEM BY GRAVITY OF MIGRATING MASSIVE PLANET –HENCE THERE ARE PROBABLY NO SUITABLE PLANETS IN THE SYSTEM

ARE MIGRATING PLANETS COMMON? IF THEY ARE THE NORM, PLANETS THAT ARE SUITABLE FOR LIFE MAY BE RARE. BUT KEEP IN MIND THAT… –MASSIVE PLANETS CLOSE TO THEIR STARS ARE EASIEST TO DETECT (LARGEST DOPPLER EFFECT). –THEREFORE “OBSERVATIONAL BIAS” IS PRESENT. OUR SAMPLE OF KNOWN EXTRASOLAR PLANETS IS NOT REPRESENTATIVE. –OUR CURRENT TECHNOLOGY CANNOT DETECT EARTH-LIKE PLANETS.

WE ARE JUST BEGINNING TO BE ABLE TO DETECT JUPITER-LIKE PLANETS (AT JUPITER'S DISTANCE FROM THE STAR). THERE ARE REPORTS OF A FEW SUCH PLANETS. SOLAR SYSTEMS CONTAINING JUPITER-LIKE PLANETS FARTHER OUT ARE MORE LIKELY TO HAVE EARTH-TYPE PLANETS CLOSER IN TO THE STAR. WE HAVE FOUND EXTRASOLAR PLANETS ORBITING ABOUT 10% OF STARS EXAMINED. MAYBE THE OTHER 90% OF STARS (OR MANY OF THEM, AT LEAST) MAY HAVE PLANETARY SYSTEMS MORE LIKE OURS, WHICH WE CANNOT YET DETECT. IMPROVED TECHNOLOGY WILL ANSWER THIS, PROBABLY WITHIN THE NEXT DECADE. –NASA IS PLANNING A “TERRESTRIAL PLANET FINDER.”

STELLAR/PLANETARY HIERARCHY STARS 0.08 TO 20 SOLAR MASSES BROWN DWARFS TO 0.08 SOLAR MASSES JUPITER MASSES MASSES IN BETWEEN THOSE OF PLANETS AND STARS GAS GIANT PLANETS 0.04(?) - 13 JUPITER MASSES ROCKY (TERRESTRIAL) PLANETS <0.04(?) JUPITER MASSES (1 EARTH MASS ~ JUPITER MASSES)

THE DRAKE EQUATION THIS EQUATION IS USED TO ESTIMATE THE NUMBER OF “TECHNOLOGICAL” CIVILIZATIONS IN THE MILKY WAY GALAXY. –WE DEFINE A “TECHNOLOGICAL” CIVILIZATION AS ONE THAT IS CAPABLE OF (AND INTERESTED IN) ENGAGING IN INTERSTELLAR COMMUNICATIONS WITH OTHER CIVILIZATIONS. –NOTE: WE ARE ONLY MAKING THIS ESTIMATE FOR OUR GALAXY, BUT THE NUMBER SHOULD BE ABOUT THE SAME FOR ANY SIMILAR SPIRAL GALAXY. THIS IS THE NUMBER OF CIVILIZATIONS THAT COULD BE SENDING OUT RADIO (OR OTHER) SIGNALS THAT WE MIGHT BE ABLE TO RECEIVE.

THE DRAKE EQUATION WHY TRY TO ESTIMATE THE NUMBER OF TECHNOLOGICAL CIVILIZATIONS? –IF THE ESTIMATED NUMBER IS VERY SMALL, SEARCHES FOR SIGNALS FROM ALIEN CIVILIZATIONS MIGHT NOT BE WORTH THE TIME, EFFORT, AND EXPENSE. –IF THE ESTIMATED NUMBER IS LARGE, SEARCHES ARE MORE LIKELY TO BE SUCCESSFUL. THEREFORE IT’S EASIER TO ARGUE THAT THE TIME, MONEY, AND EFFORT ARE WORTH IT. KEEP IN MIND THAT: – WE CAN’T MAKE AN EXACT CALCULATION OF THE NUMBER OF CIVILIZATIONS, ONLY A VERY ROUGH ESTIMATE. –OUR ESTIMATE WILL APPLY ONLY TO LIFE THAT IS SIMILAR TO TERRESTRIAL LIFE. IF EXOTIC LIFE EXISTS, CIVILIZATIONS MAY BE MORE COMMON.

DRAKE EQUATION N = N * f s n p f l f i f c f L N = Number of civilizations in the MW galaxy capable of communication (what we'd like to find) N * = Number of stars in the MW galaxy f s = fraction of stars that are suitable stars (so the result of N * f s is number of suitable stars in MW galaxy)

DRAKE EQUATION N = N * f s n p f l f i f c f L n p = average number of planets that are suitable for life per each suitable star (result of N * f s n p is number of suitable planets in MW galaxy) f l = fraction of suitable planets on which life actually originates (result of N * f s n p f l is number of planets with life in MW galaxy)

DRAKE EQUATION N = N * f s n p f l f i f c f L f i = fraction of those planets with life on which intelligent life evolves (result of N * f s n p f l f i is number of planets with intelligent life in MW galaxy) NOTE: By “intelligent,” we mean of roughly human intelligence.

DRAKE EQUATION N = N * f s n p f l f i f c f L f c = fraction of planets with intelligent life on which technology sufficient for interstellar communication develops (result of N * f s n p f l f i is number of planets with technological life in MW galaxy) You might think we're done, but there is one more factor!

DRAKE EQUATION N = N * f s n p f l f i f c f L f L = fraction of those civilizations that exist NOW (as opposed to ones that existed in the past, but don’t exist any more) We find f L via f L = L/t L = average lifetime of a technological civilization t = age of Milky Way galaxy (This assumes that the probability of a civilization arising has remained constant over the lifetime of our galaxy.)

FACTORS IN THE DRAKE EQUATION N = N * f s n p f l f i f c f L N = Number of technological civilizations in the Milky Way galaxy To calculate an estimated value of N, we must first estimate the other factors in the Drake Equation. Let’s go through these one by one. Many of these factors are not very well known. N * =Number of stars in the MW galaxy N * = 400 billion stars (may be off by ~30%)

SUITABLE STARS Drake Equation: N = N * f s n p f l f i f c f L f s =fraction of stars that are suitable Recall that properties of a suitable star are: - main sequence - long enough main sequence lifetime - reasonable sized habitable zone - enough heavy elements (younger star) - not too near center of galaxy - not in a binary or multiple star system?

SUITABLE STARS Drake Equation: N = N * f s n p f l f i f c f L f s =fraction of stars that are suitable f s = 0.1 = 1/10 (optimistic case) f s = = 1/1000 (pessimistic case) f s = 0.05 = 1/20 (my best estimate)

SUITABLE PLANETS Drake Equation: N = N * f s n p f l f i f c f L n p =average number of suitable planets per suitable star - in habitable zone - reasonably circular orbit - massive enough to keep an atmosphere - has a large moon?? - giant planets found in desirable locations within solar system?? - Our solar system has one for sure (Earth), and several others that are almost but not quite suitable (Mars and Venus). - If we consider Europa-type planets or moons, the number could be higher. - If solar systems like those containing known extrasolar planets are common, the number could be lower.

SUITABLE PLANETS Drake Equation: N = N * f s n p f l f i f c f L n p =average number of planets that are suitable for life per each suitable star n p = 2 (optimistic case) n p = 0.1 = 1/10 (pessimistic case) n p = 0.5 = 1/2 (my best estimate)

DEVELOPMENT OF LIFE Drake Equation: N = N * f s n p f l f i f c f L f l =fraction of suitable planets on which life actually originates Problem: we know of only one suitable planet (Earth), so we have little information on this. But… Life got started very early on the earth, basically as soon as the earth cooled off sufficiently. This suggests that it is “easy” for life to originate.

DEVELOPMENT OF LIFE Drake Equation: N = N * f s n p f l f i f c f L f l =fraction of suitable planets on which life actually originates f l = 1 (optimistic case - life will always arise if the planet is suitable) f l = = 1/200 (pessimistic case) f l = 1 (my best estimate)

DEVELOPMENT OF INTELLIGENCE Drake Equation: N = N * f s n p f l f i f c f L f i = fraction of those planets with life on which intelligent life evolves There are actually two (at least) steps here: first the evolution of “complex” life forms (e.g., multicellular life), and then the evolution of intelligent life. We don’t know how likely these developments are, but let’s examine some “pro and con” arguments.

DEVELOPMENT OF INTELLIGENCE ARGUMENTS WHY INTELLIGENCE SHOULD ARISE EASILY -Evolution produces a wide diversity of life forms, so perhaps it is inevitable that mutations leading to intelligence will eventually arise. -Intelligence bestows a tremendous selective advantage on organisms possessing it: -Better at finding food -Better at escaping from predators -Better at attracting a mate -Based on terrestrial fossil evidence over the last few million years, it appears that there has been an increase in intelligence over time for many types of mammals and birds.

DEVELOPMENT OF INTELLIGENCE ARGUMENTS WHY INTELLIGENCE MAY NOT ARISE EASILY - The development of intelligence is not the “goal” or “purpose” of evolution. -Life on earth existed for a long time before multicellular life evolved. -Multicellular life on earth existed for a long time before intelligent life (humans) evolved. -A lot of organisms on earth have been highly successful without developing intelligence. -Perhaps the evolution of multicellularity and/or intelligence wouldn’t have happened without special circumstances (e.g., specific climate changes) that might not be common on other planets.

DEVELOPMENT OF INTELLIGENCE Drake Equation: N = N * f s n p f l f i f c f L f i = fraction of planets with life on which intelligent life evolves f i = 1 (optimistic case) f i = = 1/1000 (pessimistic case) f i = 0.01 = 1/100 (my best estimate)

DEVELOPMENT OF TECHNOLOGY Drake Equation: N = N * f s n p f l f i f c f L f c =fraction of planets with intelligent life on which technology sufficient for interstellar communication develops - Is technology a natural consequence of intelligence? Again, in the absence of any information about what happened on other planets, let’s examine life on earth as a guide.

DEVELOPMENT OF TECHNOLOGY -Is technology a natural consequence of intelligence, or are other things besides intelligence also necessary in order for technology to develop? -Dolphins are probably the second smartest species on Earth (after humans). If dolphins were a little smarter, could they have developed technology? -Possible reasons why they might not: - They have no hands with which to manipulate objects - A creature that lives in water might not be likely to develop certain types of technology - A creature that lives in water might not develop an understanding of astronomy

DEVELOPMENT OF TECHNOLOGY Some human civilizations on Earth have developed technology and others have not. Why? Unfortunately, some people believe in racist explanations, i.e., innate superiority of some groups of people. More likely explanation – some locations on Earth are more conducive to the development of technology than others, due to: –Better or more varied climates –Differences in the availability of natural resources –Animals that can be domesticated –See “Guns, Germs, and Steel” by Jared Diamond

DEVELOPMENT OF TECHNOLOGY Drake Equation: N = N * f s n p f l f i f c f L f c =fraction of planets with intelligent life on which technology sufficient for interstellar communication develops f c =1 (optimistic case) f c = 0.01 = 1/100 (pessimistic case) f c = 0.5 = 1/2 (my best estimate)

DO THEY EXIST NOW? Drake Equation: N = N * f s n p f l f i f c f L f L = Probability that they’re around NOW (as opposed to civilizations that existed in the past, but don’t exist any more) = L/t t = Age of MW galaxy = 10 billion years L = Average lifetime of a technological civilization (measured in years) = Average lifetime of civilization with ability and desire to communicate

LIFETIMES OF CIVILIZATIONS L = Average lifetime of a technological civilization L = 10 billion years (optimistic case) = Age of galaxy L = 100 years (pessimistic case) Civilizations destroy themselves quickly or lose interest in communication! NOTE: L is the least well-known factor in the Drake equation!

DRAKE EQUATION EXTREME OPTIMISTIC CASE (Use optimistic values of all factors except L) N = 400 billion x 0.1 x 2 x 1 x 1 x 1 x L/10 billion RESULT: N = 8 L Now look at different values of L: IF L = 100 YEARS (pessimistic case for L), THEN N = 800 IF L = 10 BILLION YRS (optimistic case for L), THEN N = 80 BILLION

DRAKE EQUATION MY BEST ESTIMATE N = 400 billion x 0.05 x 0.5 x 1 x 0.01 x 0.5 x L/10 billion RESULT: N = L = L/200 Now look at different values of L: IF L = 100 YEARS (pessimistic case for L), THEN N = 0.5 IF L = 10 BILLION YRS (optimistic case for L), THEN N = 50 MILLION

DRAKE EQUATION EXTREME PESSIMISTIC CASE (Use pessimistic values of all factors except L) N = 400 billion x x 0.1 x x x 0.01 x L/10 billion RESULT: N = L = 2 X L Now look at different values of L: IF L = 100 YEARS (pessimistic case for L), THEN N = IF L = 10 BILLION YRS (optimistic case for L) THEN N = 2

DRAKE EQUATION WE KNOW THAT N MUST BE AT LEAST 1 BECAUSE WE EXIST! THEREFORE: IF THE EXTREME PESSIMISTIC CASE IS CORRECT (N = 2 X L), WE WOULD CONCLUDE THAT L > 5 BILLION YEARS. THIS WOULD MEAN THAT CIVILIZATIONS ARE LONG-LIVED!

DRAKE EQUATION WE KNOW THAT N MUST BE AT LEAST 1 BECAUSE WE EXIST! THEREFORE: IF THE EXTREME OPTIMISTIC CASE IS CORRECT (N = 8L), WE CONCLUDE THAT L > 1/8 YEAR. BUT WE ALREADY KNOW THIS! (WE’VE HAD THE RELEVANT TECHNOLOGY FOR ABOUT 50 YEARS SO FAR.)

DRAKE EQUATION WE KNOW THAT N MUST BE AT LEAST 1 BECAUSE WE EXIST! THEREFORE: IF MY BEST ESTIMATE IS CORRECT (N = L), WE CONCLUDE THAT L > 200 YEARS.

DRAKE EQUATION CONCLUSIONS BASED ON THE FACT THAT WE EXIST 1.EITHER N = L IS VERY ROUGHLY CORRECT (TO WITHIN A FACTOR OF A FEW HUNDRED OR A FEW THOUSAND), AS IN THE EXTREMELY OPTIMISTIC CASE OR MY BEST ESTIMATE OR 2. IF THE EXTREMELY PESSIMISTIC VALUES OF VARIOUS FACTORS ARE CLOSE TO CORRECT, THEN L MUST BE VERY LARGE

DRAKE EQUATION BUT WE SUSPECT FROM HUMAN EXPERIENCE THAT L COULD EASILY BE SMALL! (MORE ON THIS LATER) THEREFORE WE CAN PROBABLY EXCLUDE THE EXTREMELY PESSIMISTIC CASE. REALITY IS PROBABLY CLOSER TO THE OPTIMISTIC CASE (N ~ L) OR TO MY BEST ESTIMATE (N ~ L/200).

DRAKE EQUATION N = # OF CIVILIZATIONS IN MW GALAXY CAPABLE OF INTERSTELLAR COMMUNICATION L = AVERAGE LIFETIME OF SUCH A CIVILIZATION IN YEARS RESULT: N ~ L VERY ROUGHLY, (TO WITHIN A FACTOR OF A FEW 100 OR FEW 1000) BUT HOW LARGE IS L?? (BIGGEST SOURCE OF UNCERTAINTY)