Simulation of Spin Interference and Echo Effect Abstract Successively jumping across a depolarization resonance twice produces interesting spin dynamics.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Measurements of adiabatic dual rf capture in the SIS 18 O. Chorniy.
Advertisements

Bunch compressors ILC Accelerator School May Eun-San Kim Kyungpook National University.
The Siberian Snake Kai Hock Liverpool Group Meeting, 12 August 2008.
July 22, 2005Modeling1 Modeling CESR-c D. Rubin. July 22, 2005Modeling2 Simulation Comparison of simulation results with measurements Simulated Dependence.
Accelerating Polarized Protons Mei Bai Collider Accelerator Department Brookhaven National Laboratory PHNIX Focus, Feb. 24,
Electron and Ion Spin Dynamics in eRHIC V. Ptitsyn Workshop on Polarized Sources, Targets and Polarimetry Charlottesville, VA, 2013.
Nov. 17, 2005Fermi Lab AP Seminar AC Dipole Based Diagnostics Mei Bai, C-A Department.
AC dipole for LHC Mei Bai Collider Accelerator Department Brookhaven National Laboratory.
Proton beams for the East Area The beams and their slow extraction By : Rende Steerenberg PS/OP.
Physics 361 Principles of Modern Physics Lecture 8.
08/06/ FCC-ee with kinks Can we conserve polarized beams?
Simulation of direct space charge in Booster by using MAD program Y.Alexahin, N.Kazarinov.
AGS/Booster PP Setup Plan Jan. 11, 2013 RSC Meeting Haixin Huang.
Particle dynamics in electron FFAG Shinji Machida KEK FFAG04, October 13-16, 2004.
3 He Polarization Tests at UIUC Danielle Chandler David Howell UIUC.
Emittance Growth from Elliptical Beams and Offset Collision at LHC and LRBB at RHIC Ji Qiang US LARP Workshop, Berkeley, April 26-28, 2006.
Thomas Roser Snowmass 2001 June 30 - July 21, 2001 Polarized Proton Acceleration and Collisions Spin dynamics and Siberian Snakes Polarized proton acceleration.
Multiple spin resonance crossing in accelerators. A.M. Kondratenko (1), M.A. Kondratenko (1) and Yu. N. Filatov (2) (1) GOO “Zaryad”, Novosibirsk (2) JINR,
October 4-5, Electron Lens Beam Physics Overview Yun Luo for RHIC e-lens team October 4-5, 2010 Electron Lens.
Simulation of direct space charge in Booster by using MAD program Y.Alexahin, A.Drozhdin, N.Kazarinov.
Plans for Polarized Beams at VEPP-2000 and U-70 Yu.Shatunov BINP, Novosibirsk P S IN 2006.
A U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science Laboratory Operated by The University of Chicago Argonne National Laboratory Office of Science U.S. Department.
Spin Injection June 5, 2015 APEX Meeting H. Huang, P. Oddo, V. Ptitsyn.
APEX Report: February 26-27, 2008 Fulvia Pilat Time Meeting, March 4, 2008.
Possible Approach for Reaching High Energy Polarized Electron- Positron Beams M. Bai, T. Roser Collider Accelerator Department Brookhaven National Laboratory,
J-PARC Spin Physics Workshop1 Polarized Proton Acceleration in J-PARC M. Bai Brookhaven National Laboratory.
RHIC Store Energy Scan Mei Bai Collider Accelerator Dept. Brookhaven National Laboratory.
Thomas Roser SPIN 2008 October 10, 2008 The Future of High Energy Polarized Proton Beams Spin dynamics and depolarizing resonances Early multi-GeV polarized.
By Verena Kain CERN BE-OP. In the next three lectures we will have a look at the different components of a synchrotron. Today: Controlling particle trajectories.
09-21 Study of bunch length limits Goals: To identify and observe effects which put limits on the minimum bunch length in RHIC. Try to distiguish the limitation.
Orbit related issues of the spin tune control at RHIC V.Ptitsyn, M.Bai, W.MacKay, T.Roser.
Numerical Model of an Internal Pellet Target O. Bezshyyko *, K. Bezshyyko *, A. Dolinskii †,I. Kadenko *, R. Yermolenko *, V. Ziemann ¶ * Nuclear Physics.
Introduction: Vectors and Integrals. Vectors Vectors are characterized by two parameters: length (magnitude) direction These vectors are the same Sum.
Thomas Roser Derbenev Symposium August 2-3, 2010 Polarized Beam Acceleration In their seminal paper “Radiative Polarization: Obtaining, Control, Using”
Polarized Proton at RHIC: Status and Future Plan Mei Bai Collider Accelerator Dept. BNL A Special Beam Physics Symposium in Honor of Yaroslav Derbenev's.
BBFP J. Wei’s Fokker-Planck solver for bunched beams November 21 st, 2007 CLIC Beam dynamics meeting Y. Papaphilippou.
Present MEIC IR Design Status Vasiliy Morozov, Yaroslav Derbenev MEIC Detector and IR Design Mini-Workshop, October 31, 2011.
About polarized protons acceleration at U-70 A.Otboyev, P.Shatunov, Yu.Shatunov BINP, Novosibirsk S.Ivanov, S.Nurushev IHEP, Protvino Dubna Spin-05.
Haixin Huang AGS Cold Snake: Status and Plans.
Thomas Roser SPIN 2006 October 3, 2006 A Study of Polarized Proton Acceleration in J-PARC A.U.Luccio, M.Bai, T.Roser Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton,
Status of RHIC Polarization Studies. Summary of Polarization Studies during Run09 Tune scans: – Nearby 0.7 – Near integer tune Polarization ramp measurement.
Analysis of Garren’s 27-Jul-2011 Hybrid Synchrotron Lattice J. Scott Berg Brookhaven National Laboratory Advanced Accelerator Group Meeting February 2,
Polarization of CEPC M. Bai Collider Accelerator Department Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, NY Dec , 2013 International workshop on.
Numerical Simulations for IOTA Dmitry Shatilov BINP & FNAL IOTA Meeting, FNAL, 23 February 2012.
APEX Status and Plan Phil’s Meeting, March 20, 2012 M. Bai.
Quasi-frozen spin concept and its possible application into Cosy ring
People who attended the meeting:
Academic Training Lecture 2 : Beam Dynamics
Deuteron Polarization in MEIC
Energy calibration issues for FCC-ee I. Koop, BINP, Novosibirsk
Large Booster and Collider Ring
Acceleration of Polarized Protons and Deuterons at HESR/FAIR
Preservation and Control of Ion Polarization in MEIC
Multiturn extraction for PS2
Possibility for polarized beam at J-PARC Summary of Satellite Workshop on Polarized Proton Beam at J-PARC Satellite Workshop Program: Overview of the status.
I Alexander Nass for the JEDI collaboration
Collider Ring Optics & Related Issues
JLEIC Collaboration meeting Spring 2016 Ion Polarization with Figure-8
Spin Transparency Study and Test
Progress in Code Benchmarking
RHIC Spin Flipper M. Bai, T. Roser Collider Accelerator Department
Racetrack Booster Option & Initial Spin Tracking Results
Update on MEIC Ion Polarization Work
Update on MEIC Ion Polarization Work
Yu.N. Filatov, A.M. Kondratenko, M.A. Kondratenko
JLEIC Weekly R&D Meeting
Integration of Detector Solenoid into the JLEIC ion collider ring
Status of Proton & Deuteron Spin Tracking in Racetrack Booster
Current Status of Ion Polarization Studies
Presentation transcript:

Simulation of Spin Interference and Echo Effect Abstract Successively jumping across a depolarization resonance twice produces interesting spin dynamics effects. The dynamics involves an interplay among four parameters:  depolarization resonance strength epsilon  the jump in spin tune ∆ν  the time duration between the two jumps  the spin tune spread of the beam. By adjusting these parameters, the beam polarization after the second jump exhibits a wealth of effects:  constructive interference  destructive interference  spin echo. A simulation code is written to study these effects. Subtleties such as control of numerical noise and how to prepare the beam polarization condition at the launch are resolved. The simulation results are compared with analysis [Chao/Courant, PRST-AB, 2007]. Experiments are proposed for AGS and RHIC. M. Bai 1, A. Chao 2, T. Roser 1

Introduction  Spin motion at the vicinity of a depolarizing resonance ε  While the spin component in the horizontal plane precesses around the vertical direction, the vertical component is given by

Interference-overlap effect of multi resonance crossing  Polarization after crossing a resonance twice depends on the spin phase advance Ω ( θ - θ 1 ) between the two crossings.  For single pt, the vertical component of final polarization is

Interference-overlap effect of multi resonance crossing  Destructive case  Constructive case θ1θ1 θ2θ2 multiple particles with Gaussian distributed momentum spread σ E /E= ε 0 =0.005, A=0.01, jump size:0.02

Spin Echo Effect Shock response from the 1st resonance jump. It precess with frequency Ω A sudden spin signal occurs at θ 2 −θ 1 after the second resonance jump For a beam of polarized particles with a momentum spread of σ δ in Gaussian distribution

Spin Echo Effect  Condition:  interference terms are insigficant:  Jump length:  The magnitude of echo signal A sudden spin signal occurs at θ 2 −θ 1 after the second resonance jump Spin jump is within resonance width

Numerical Simulation of Spin Echo Effect beam energy G γ =4.6 Single resonance is induced by an rotating field with a constant spin kick around an axis which rotates at a fixed frequency a total of 1201 particles with an rms energy spread resonance is adiabatically turned on to a strength at a fixed tune of The jump size is 0.002

Simulation result 40,000 turns between two jumps

Smearing of Spin Echo Effect  The echo signal can be smeared out due to high order dependence of omega on the momentum spread, i.e.  The echo signal is significant damped if

Simulation of Spin Echo Smearing 300,000 turns

Observe echo at AGS  Beam energy: G γ =4.6  AGS An ac dipole at frequency ~100kHz and 20 Gauss-m  ε 0 =  This requires:  A=  Momentum spread: σ δ ~ 4x10 -6  This is very difficult to obtain  In addition, the oscillating field of single ac dipole drives two resonances instead of one. This introduces additional motions

Oscillating field vs. Rotating field  A single ac dipole was adiabatically ramped to 333Gauss-m with a fixed tune at 0.01 away from spin tune at Ggamma=4.6  Two ac dipoles with a 90 degrees spin rotator in the middle to provide a rotating field. Each ac dipole was adiabatically ramped to 333 Gauss-m

Possible experiments at RHIC  RHIC spin flipper provides a rotating field with a maximum strength of ε 0 =  Small spin tune spread because the two full snakes which removes the spin tune dependence on the beam energy  Source of Spin tune spread  difference of horizontal divergence of the beam at the two snakes. This causes a spread of horizontal angle between the two snakes. The spin tune spread is given by Beam emittance Twiss parameter at snakes

Simulation of Spin Echo in the presence of full snakes two snakes apart by 180 degrees spin tune spread is achieved through the spread of the angle between the two snake axis 1201 particles. ε 0 = , A= spin tune spread 4d-5 Tune jump from to in 200

Simulation of Spin Echo in the presence of full snakes 70,000 turns

Conclusion  The interference-overlap effect when a single resonance is jump crossed twice was studied through numerical simulation. The single resonance excited by a rotating field which consists of two ac dipoles and a 90 degree spin rotator in between.  Simulation of using the same rotating field in the presence of two full Siberian snakes also shows an spin echo effect can be generate if the condition is met. This suggests that it may be possible to observe the spin echo effect at RHIC injection  Simulation of using single ac dipole was also done and shows that the extra term excited by the oscillating field introduces extra noises to the spin signal  Work to be done in the future:  Detailed simulation using RHIC lattice  Design and propose experiment at RHIC