Sensing Hazards with Operational Unmanned Technology: NOAA's multi-year plan to deploy the NASA Global Hawk aircraft for high impact weather Michael L.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Richard (Rick) Jones Regional training Workshop on Severe Weather SEA, Macau, 8-13 April, 2013.
Advertisements

Robbie Hood, Alexander MacDonald, Robert Atlas, Frank Marks, Steve Koch, Jim McFadden, Robert Rogers, Joseph Cione, Michael Black, Eric Uhlhorn, Christopher.
A Review of the NOAA IFEX Hurricane Field Experiments Conducted in 2007 John F. Gamache NOAA/AOML/Hurricane Research Division.
The NOAA Unmanned Aircraft Systems (UAS) Program: Status and Activities Gary Wick Robbie Hood, Program Director Sensing Hazards with Operational Unmanned.
Robbie Hood NOAA UAS Program Director 20 June 2013.
Hurricane and Severe Storm Sentinel (HS3): 2014 Results Dr. Scott Braun, HS3 PI Paul Newman, HS3 Deputy PI NASA Goddard Space Flight Center IHC, Jacksonville,
Targeted observations and Observing System simulation Experiments Within THORPEX Yucheng Song IMSG/EMC/NCEP/NOAA Camp Springs, MD THORPEX Review, Feb 25.
THORPEX-Pacific Workshop Kauai, Hawaii Polar Meteorology Group, Byrd Polar Research Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio David H. Bromwich.
Climate Prediction Center (CPC) Services, Products, Partnerships, Potential for the PRIDE Alaska Coastal Climatologies Wind/Wave Workshop Jim Laver August.
AVAPS – Dropsonde HS Field Program & Global Hawk NOAA G-4 Intercomparison HS3 Science Meeting May 5-6, 2015 NCAR EOL ISF 2015 Terry Hock 1, Holger.
Evaluation of Potential Performance Measures for the Advanced Hydrologic Prediction Service Gary A. Wick NOAA Environmental Technology Laboratory On Rotational.
Analyses from the Final Two MDR Flights & Hurricane Edouard Jason P. Dunion 1, Ryan Torn 2, Gary Wick 3, Robbie, Hood 3, Mike Black 4 1 University of Miami.
Evaluation of Satellite-Derived Air-Sea Flux Products Using Dropsonde Data Gary A. Wick 1 and Darren L. Jackson 2 1 NOAA ESRL, Physical Sciences Division.
Robbie Hood Office of Oceanic and Atmospheric Research 3 November 2010.
AVAPS F LIGHT S UMMARY HS NOAA ESRL G ARY W ICK R YAN S PACKMAN D ARREN J ACKSON D AVE C OSTA NCAR T ERRY H OCK D EAN L AURITSEN C HARLIE M ARTIN.
NOAA Climate Service V. Ramaswamy and Chet Koblinski WCRP JSC-31 Antalya Turkey February 16, 2010.
HEMS-related Aviation Weather R&D Steve Abelman Dec 18, 2013.
Observing Strategy and Observation Targeting for Tropical Cyclones Using Ensemble-Based Sensitivity Analysis and Data Assimilation Chen, Deng-Shun 3 Dec,
NSF Hurricane Research National Science Foundation Pamela Stephens Geosciences Directorate.
The NOAA Unmanned Aircraft Systems (UAS) Program: Status and Activities Gary Wick Robbie Hood, Program Director Sensing Hazards with Operational Unmanned.
Interdepartmental Hurricane Conference Charleston, SC Tuesday, March 4, 2008 Hurricane and Severe Storm Sentinel (HS 3 ) Scott Braun (GSFC) Paul Newman.
NOAA’s Role in Weather Forecasting and Community Preparedness Decision Support NOAA remains focused on supporting high impact events where weather is a.
Dr. Scott Braun Principal Investigator. Hurricane Intensity Is Difficult To Predict Intensity prediction is difficult because it depends on weather at.
April nd IBTrACS Workshop 1 Operational Procedures How can we build consistent, homogeneous, well- documented climate quality data?
1 Requirements for hurricane track and intensity guidance Presented By: Vijay Tallapragada and Sam Trahan (NWS/NCEP) Contributors: HWRF Team at EMC, NHC.
Adaptive targeting in OSSE Outline Adaptive observing / data processing techniques in OSSE Addition to OSSE Link with THORPEX Link with T-PARC.
1 Precipitation verification Precipitation verification is still in a testing stage due to the lack of station observation data in some regions
NASA GRIP 2010 Brief status report Ed Zipser, Univ. of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT on behalf of the GRIP Science Team.
30 November December International Workshop on Advancement of Typhoon Track Forecast Technique 11 Observing system experiments using the operational.
United States of America8 Dec 2009, GenèveSAP Workshop for WMO FFI Forecasting in the USA The National Weather Service River Forecast System (NWSRFS),
U.S. National Tsunami Hazard Mitigation Program 5-Year Review David Green, NOAA Tsunami Program Manager National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.
National Weather Association Annual Meeting Richard W. Spinrad, Ph.D. Assistant Administrator NOAA Office of Oceanic and Atmospheric Research October 18,
NASA’s Hurricane and Severe Storm Sentinel (HS3): Results from the 2012 Deployment and Plans for 2013 Scott Braun Paul Newman (NASA/GSFC) 3/5/201367th.
NHC Activities, Plans, and Needs HFIP Diagnostics Workshop August 10, 2012 NHC Team: David Zelinsky, James Franklin, Wallace Hogsett, Ed Rappaport, Richard.
1 The NCAR/NOAA Global Hawk Dropsonde System Gary Wick 1, Terry Hock 2, and Ryan Spackman 1 1 NOAA ESRL/PSD, 2 NCAR/EOL.
CalWater 2 – Ocean Winds FY15 Implementation Plan Chris Fairall (ESRL), Paul Chang (NESDIS), Allen White (ESRL), Ryan Spackman (STC/ESRL), Marty Ralph.
Mesoscale Predictability Experiment MPEX National Center for Atmospheric Research Research Aviation Facility.
An Overview of the Hurricane Imaging Radiometer (HIRAD) Robbie Hood, Ruba Amarin, Robert Atlas, M.C. Bailey, Peter Black, Courtney Buckley, Shuyi Chen,
Insert Date 1 Hurricanes-Inundation Overview Objectives: Improve forecasts of tropical cyclones and related inundation hazards to enhance mitigation decisions.
1 Results from Winter Storm Reconnaissance Program 2008 Yucheng SongIMSG/EMC/NCEP Zoltan TothEMC/NCEP/NWS Sharan MajumdarUniv. of Miami Mark ShirleyNCO/NCEP/NWS.
1 Results from Winter Storm Reconnaissance Program 2007 Yucheng SongIMSG/EMC/NCEP Zoltan TothEMC/NCEP/NWS Sharan MajumdarUniv. of Miami Mark ShirleyNCO/NCEP/NWS.
Review of NOAA Intensity Forecasting Experiment (IFEX) 2008 Accomplishments and Plans for 2009 Eric Uhlhorn, Frank Marks, John Gamache, Sim Aberson, Jason.
Mission Science lessons learned Flight Should be able to switch Ku coverage in flight – Dave F. Scientists need to keep a close eye on cloud top height.
The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) is working to use Unmanned Aircraft Systems (UAS) to improve its ability to monitor the global.
PI: Scott Braun Deputy PI: Paul Newman PM: Marilyn Vasques PS: Ramesh Kakar.
1 Critical Water Information for Floods to Droughts NOAA’s Hydrology Program January 4, 2006 Responsive to Natural Disasters Forecasts for Hazard Risk.
Educator Resources Lauren Ritter, NASA Education Pathways Intern Hurricane and Severe Storm Sentinel (HS3) Global Precipitation Measurement (GPM) Soil.
Use of Unmanned Aircraft Systems (UAS) For Environmental Applications Robbie Hood, NOAA UAS Program Director NOAA Office of Oceanic and Atmospheric Research.
Munehiko Yamaguchi, Sharanya J. Majumdar (RSMAS/U. Miami) and multiple collaborators 3 rd THORPEX International Science Symposium 14 Sep Coordinated.
HS3 Review and Planning Meeting Scott Braun. Goals of Meeting Review 2012 campaign – Initial science results – Lessons learned Prepare for 2013 campaign.
Assimilating Moisture Information from GPS Dropwindsondes into the NOAA Global Forecast System A NOAA/Joint Hurricane Testbed Project Jason P. Dunion 1.
OSSEs and NOAA’s Quantitative Observing Systems Assessment Program (QOSAP) Bob Atlas, Craig MacLean, Lidia Cucurull (NOAA, USA) Sharan Majumdar, Tom Hamill.
Tools for Coordinating Aircraft During Hurricane Field Campaigns: Real Time Mission Monitor and Waypoint Planning Tool Richard Blakeslee / NASA Marshall.
Tropical Cyclone Operations & Research Mary M. Glackin Deputy Under Secretary for Oceans & Atmosphere | NOAA 62 nd Interdepartmental Hurricane Conference.
NOAA G-IV AIRCRAFT TRACK AROUND HURRICANE IVAN. ETKF PLANNED FLIGHT ACTUAL G-IV FLIGHT.
2015 HS3 Science Team Meeting Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, CA.
Asia Flood Network— A USAID Program for Flood Mitigation and Preparedness in Asia Asia Flood Network Program Objective –Identify and fill gaps in end-to-end.
Doppler Lidar Winds & Tropical Cyclones Frank D. Marks AOML/Hurricane Research Division 7 February 2007.
Potential Use of the NOAA G-IV for East Pacific Atmospheric Rivers Marty Ralph Dave Reynolds, Chris Fairall, Allen White, Mike Dettinger, Ryan Spackman.
Adaptive Observations at NWS Lacey Holland, SAIC at EMC/NCEP/NWS Zoltan Toth, EMC/NCEP/NWS Acknowledgements:
1 63 rd Interdepartamental Hurricane Conference March 3, 2009 Justyna Nicinska Alexander E. MacDonald NOAA Oceanic and Atmospheric Research (OAR) 2008.
NAME SWG th Annual NOAA Climate Diagnostics and Prediction Workshop State College, Pennsylvania Oct. 28, 2005.
1 Current and planned research with data collected during the IFEX/RAINEX missions Robert Rogers NOAA/AOML/Hurricane Research Division.
AOML Research Review Postmortem Robert Atlas Atlantic Oceanographic and Meteorological Laboratory May 1, 2012 Welcome and introduction.
Hurricane Joaquin Frank Marks AOML/Hurricane Research Division 10 May 2016 Frank Marks AOML/Hurricane Research Division 10 May 2016 Research to Improve.
Rosenstial School of Marine and Atmospheric Science
Developing an OSSE Testbed at NASA/SIVO
Atlantic Oceanographic and Meteorological Laboratory
NOAA Intensity Forecasting Experiment (IFEX)
La Plata Basin Originated from sub-seasonal workshop focussing on link seamless prediction climate to weather.
Presentation transcript:

Sensing Hazards with Operational Unmanned Technology: NOAA's multi-year plan to deploy the NASA Global Hawk aircraft for high impact weather Michael L. Black Gary A. Wick Robbie E. Hood NOAA UAS Program SHOUT

SHOUT Objectives 2 Overall Goal Demonstrate and test prototype UAS concept of operations that could be used to mitigate the risk of diminished high impact weather forecasts and warnings in the case of polar-orbiting satellite observing gaps Objective 1 Conduct data impact studies Observing System Experiments (OSE) using data from UAS field missions Observing System Simulation Experiments (OSSE) using simulated UAS data Objective 2 Evaluate cost and operational benefit through detailed analysis of life-cycle operational costs and constraints

SHOUT Proposed Mission Plans – Collaboration with NASA HS3 – August 26 to September 29, NASA Wallops – Up to 15 total flights – NOAA input to mission design 2015 – NOAA led Missions – September – November, NASA Armstrong – Tropical cyclones (ATL, EPAC)and high impact weather targets (Pacific, Alaska) – Single deployment location adds flexibility for potential targets- Atlantic, EPAC, Pacific, Arctic – Possibility for 2 GH aircraft to be explored – potential flights 2016 – NOAA led Mission – September – November, NASA Armstrong – NASA EV-2 programs would lead to NASA collaborations and parnership with NOAA

PROPOSED SHOUT HIGH-IMPACT WEATHER MISSIONS 5 Early period: Tropical cyclones Forecast improvements for track and intensity Option for both Atlantic and Pacific Basins Atlantic tradeoff of deployment costs vs station time Later period: High-impact storms affecting the continental US and Alaska weather: Coastal flooding Atmospheric rivers Forecast improvement for threats such as extreme precipitation and damaging winds Targeted lead times of 3-7 days Potential contribution to satellite calibration/validation

HS th week in place on NASA schedule Agreements drafted with both NASA Goddard and Armstrong NOAA adding: Up to 5 flights 240 dropsondes Mission science support and guidance Real-time data transmission/assimilation planned Targeting methodology for missions possible

SHOUT ADAPTIVE OPERATIONAL STRATEGY 6 Tropical cyclones – SUNY group proposed to explore methodology (R. Torn, J. Dunion, Grad. Student) – Collaborations with AOML and ESRL NOAA Labs. High-impact weather events – Zoltan Toth (ESRL) proposed to explore methodologies – Identification of high- impact weather threat cases – Fully automated Ensemble Transform sensitivity algorithm to identify sensitive areas – Produce “ optimized ” flight track to sample sensitive region for selected threat

PROPOSED NADINE FLT TRACK

10 ACTUAL NADINE FLT TRACK

Typical AV-6 Flight Pattern IP - ~ 600 nmi- <-To WFF FP

Possible Modified AV-6 Flight Pattern with approaching trough to the west <-To WFF IP - ~ 600 nmi- FP Extra Drops

IP - ~ 600 nmi- <-To WFF FP Possible Modified AV-6 Flight Pattern with building ridge to the NE Extra Drops

Possible Modified AV-6 Flight Pattern with SAL East of Center IP - ~ 600 nmi- <-To WFF FP Extra Drops

Does a butterfly pattern (2 crossings) at the beginning of the pattern yield more symmetric coverage?

Does a butterfly pattern (multiple long leg crossings) yield more symmetric coverage and still provide adequate environmental sampling?

CONSIDERATIONS FOR NOAA-MODIFIED MISSIONS: 8 HS3 objectives and goals come first- especially with AV-1 NOAA objectives are complimentary to those of NASA Modifications proposed only when there is adequate time on station for changes Try to minimize alterations to the NASA proposed flight tracks We would like to fly with NOAA IFEX missions (P3s and G-IV) when possible Some coordinated portion of flight legs with NOAA P3s and/or the G-IV is beneficial to compare radars NOAA slightly more interested with AV-6 flights (AVAPS) but would like to evaluate and, possibly, modify a couple of AV-1 flights, especially if NOAA is flying Cooperation and coordination will yield success for both agencies

To the new, brilliant italian GH scientist: 8 WE ARE COUNTING ON YOU TO PROVIDE GOOD HDVIS AND NIGHT TIME GH IMAGERY!!! :) “Sì, posso fare”(YES, I CAN DO)