Examine the ways in which supporters of slavery in the 19 th century used legal, religious and economic arguments in its defense. A Three Point Blueprint

Legal argument: Nowhere in the United States were blacks given citizenship rights. The precedent was set legally that blacks could be considered property (Dred Scott Decision) For purposes of census / population numbers, blacks were counted as 2/3 of a person. Blacks had no legal standing in the courts. The Constitution protected slave holders rights to their “property.”

Religious argument: Slaves were taken care of by their owners and were much better off than the “Northern wage slaves.” Without the guidance of the white slave master, Africans would not have been introduced to Christianity and would continue in their savagery. Southerners would use biblical passages to support this belief: Abraham had slaves The Ten Commandments: "Thou shalt not covet thy neighbor's house,... nor his manservant, nor his maidservant." "slaves, obey your earthly masters with fear and trembling" (Ephesians 6:5) "tell slaves to be submissive to their masters and to give satisfaction in every respect" (Titus 2:9) “Slaves, obey your earthly masters in everything; and do it, not only when their eye is on you and to win their favor, but with sincerity of heart and reverence for the Lord” (Colossians 3:22)

Economic argument: Northern blacks (and whites) were slaves to wages (their pay). In 1850 the average worker had to work 16 hour days for 16 cents an hour. Southern plantation owners argued that the slave on their plantation had better conditions than the slums of Northern cities. Slave owners took care food, housing, medical needs, etc. while the poor workers in the North lived in squalor. Without slavery, the economic system of the South would crumble, hurting both the South and the North (higher cotton prices = damages the profitability of Northern factories). Without slavery, free blacks would then compete with whites for jobs (Herrenvolk democracy).