NLC - The Next Linear Collider Project Possible 20 mrad Crossing Angle Geometry for ILC MDI Tom Markiewicz SLAC TESLA MDI mtg. 26 August 2004.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Background studies Takashi Maruyama SLAC GDE Baseline Assessment Workshop SLAC, January 18-21, 2011.
Advertisements

ILC – The International Linear Collider Project Univ. of Colorado, Boulder, November ILC Valencia SIMULATION OF BEAMCAL WITH B FIELDS SIMULATION.
Angular resolution of LAT Agnieszka Kowal University of Science and Technology, Cracow TESLA Workshop on Forward Calorimetry Cracow, 10 October 2003.
NLC - The Next Linear Collider Project Discussion Detector Multiplicities & Timing Requirements Warm vs. Cold Tom Markiewicz SLAC ALCPG SLAC 8 January.
Summary of wg2a (BDS and IR) Deepa Angal-Kalinin, Shigeru Kuroda, Andrei Seryi October 21, 2005.
NLC - The Next Linear Collider Project IR Layout Tom Markiewicz SLAC LCWS Cornell 15 July 2003.
Pair backgrounds for different crossing angles Machine-Detector Interface at the ILC SLAC 6th January 2005 Karsten Büßer.
NLC - The Next Linear Collider Project Detector Design Issues:  Interaction Region David Asner/LLNL Linear Collider Retreat, Santa Cruz, June 27-29,
NLC - The Next Linear Collider Project NLC IP Layout What’s New? Tom Markiewicz LC’99, Frascati, Italy October 1999.
NLC - The Next Linear Collider Project NLC IR Layout and Background Estimates Jeff Gronberg/LLNL For the Beam Delivery Group LCWS - October 25, 2000.
1 M. Woods, SLACMDI SLAC WORKSHOP Machine-Detector Interface at the International Linear Collider Jan. 6-8, 2005SLAC Introduction to Topic of.
Background Studies Takashi Maruyama SLAC ALCPG 2004 Winter Workshop January 8, 2004.
LCWS ’05 Machine Detector Interface Design Updates Tom Markiewicz SLAC 22 March 2005.
NLC - The Next Linear Collider Project Backgrounds Update Tom Markiewicz SLAC LCWS Cornell 15 July 2003.
NLC - The Next Linear Collider Project IR Working Group Summary Tom Markiewicz LC R&D Workshop, UCSC June 29, 2002.
Background comparison between 20 mrad and 2 mr crossings Takashi Maruyama SLAC Machine-Detector Interface Workshop SLAC January 6-8, 2005.
Status of ongoing studies for comparing 2-mrad and 20-mrad IRs T. Maruyama SLAC.
IR Beamline and Sync Radiation Takashi Maruyama. Collimation No beam loss within 400 m of IP Muon background can be acceptable. No sync radiations directly.
SiD Forward Region Tom Markiewicz/SLAC KILC’12, Taegu, Korea 24 April 2012.
NLC - The Next Linear Collider Project NLC Backgrounds What’s New? Tom Markiewicz LC’99, Frascati, Italy October 1999.
The GLD Concept. MDI Issues Impact on Detector Design L*  Background (back-scattered e+-, , n) into VTX, TPC Crossing angle  Minimum veto angle for.
David Attié Club ‘ILC Physics Case’ CEA Saclay June 23, 2013 ILD & SiD concepts and R&D.
Karsten Büßer Beam Induced Backgrounds at TESLA for Different Mask Geometries with and w/o a 2*10 mrad Crossing Angle HH-Zeuthen-LC-Meeting Zeuthen September.
1 LumiCal Optimization and Design Takashi Maruyama SLAC SiD Workshop, Boulder, September 18, 2008.
Aug/16/05 Su DongSiD Vertexing: Snowmass 05 SiD trk+vtx1 SiD VXD Geometry Update Su Dong SLAC.
Karsten Büßer Beam Induced Backgrounds at TESLA for Different Mask Geometries with and w/o a 2*10 mrad Crossing Angle LCWS 2004 Paris April 19 th 2004.
Re-evaluating the Need for a anti-DID in SiD T. Markiewicz/SLAC SiD Optimization Meeting
About L* i.e. the distance between the end of the last quadrupole “QD0” and the IP Until now, L* has been different for SiD and ILD, -> due to detector.
March 2004LCWS Stanford Instrumentation of the Very Forward Region of a Linear Collider Detector Wolfgang Lohmann, DESY.
LOI Planning The Very Forward Region Tom Markiewicz/SLAC Takashi Maruyama/SLAC Uriel Nauenberg/UCB SiD Collaboration Meeting, Boulder, CO 19 September.
SiD IR & MDI Engineering Progress Prelude to a Discussion of Integration with ILD and Based on Marco Oriunno’s Jan 2008 Talk at SiD CM Tom Markiewicz/SLAC.
PID for super Belle (design consideration) K. Inami (Nagoya-u) - Barrel (TOP counter) - Possible configuration - Geometry - Endcap (Aerogel RICH) - Photo.
Simulation of Beam-Beam Background at CLIC André Sailer (CERN-PH-LCD, HU Berlin) LCWS2010: BDS+MDI Joint Session 29 March, 2010, Beijing 1.
MDI DBD Editors Report Tom Markiewicz/SLAC SiD Collaboration Meeting, SLAC 22 August 2012.
1Frank Simon ALCPG11, 20/3/2011 ILD and SiD detectors for 1 TeV ILC some recommendations following experience from the CLIC detector study
Septembre SLAC BeamCal W. Lohmann, DESY BeamCal: ensures hermeticity of the detector to smallest polar angles -important for searches Serves as.
Karsten Büßer Instrumentation of the Forward Region of the TESLA Detector International Europhysics Conference on High Energy Physics Aachen, July 19th.
Beam-Beam Background and the Forward Region at a CLIC Detector André Sailer (CERN PH-LCD) LC Physics School, Ambleside 22st August, 2009.
NLC - The Next Linear Collider Project IR Geometries & Constraints on Forward Detectors Tom Markiewicz SLAC ALCPG SLAC 08 January 2004.
Philip Burrows Snowmass 2005: SiD Concept Plenary, 15/8/05 SiD and MDI issues Philip Burrows Queen Mary, University of London Thanks to: Toshiaki Tauchi,
Silicon Detector Tracking ALCPG Workshop Cornell July 15, 2003 John Jaros.
“Huge” Detector Concept 3 Sep 2004 ECFA LC Durham Satoru Yamashita ICEPP, University of Tokyo On behalf of many colleagues Towards our common.
J-C Brient-DESY meeting -Jan/ The 2 detector options today …. SiD vs TDR [ * ] [ * ] J.Jaros at ALCPG-SLAC04 ECAL ECAL tungsten-silicon both optionsHCAL.
ILC-GDE Meeting Beijing Feb Effect of MDI Design on BDS Collimation Depth Frank Jackson ASTeC Daresbury Laboratory Cockcroft Institute.
Re-evaluating the Need for a anti-DID in SiD T. Markiewicz/SLAC SiD Optimization Meeting Updated
SiD Collaboration Meeting Highlights Tom Markiewicz/SLAC ILC BDS Meeting 08 May 2007.
An Hybrid QD0 for SID ? Marco Oriunno (SLAC), Nov. 14, 2013 LCWS13, TOKYO.
SiD MDI Issues Tom Markiewicz/SLAC Beijing ACFA/GDE Meeting 05 February 2007.
Palaiseau, 13/1/ 2005 P. Colas - Optimising tracking 1 Optimising a Detector from the Tracking Point-of-View P.Colas, CEA Saclay constraints role Optimisation.
Tungsten-Silicon Luminosity Detector with Flat Geometry Ronen Ingbir Tel Aviv University High Energy Physics Experimental Group.
1/24 SiD FCAL Takashi Maruyama Tom Markiewicz SLAC TILC’09, Tskuba, Japan, April 2009 Contributors: SLAC M. BreidenbachFNALW. Cooper G. Haller K.
Mokka simulation studies on the Very Forward Detector components at CLIC and ILC Eliza TEODORESCU (IFIN-HH) FCAL Collaboration Meeting Tel Aviv, October.
September 2007SLAC IR WS Very Forward Instrumentation of the ILC Detector Wolfgang Lohmann, DESY Talks by M. Morse, W. Wierba, myself.
Boogert and Miller; Luminosity Measurement questions; calorimeter-related. 1 Luminosity Measurement questions; calorimeter-related Stewart Takashi Boogert.
1 LoI FCAL Takashi Maruyama SLAC SiD Workshop, SLAC, March 2-4, 2009 Contributors: SLAC M. BreidenbachFNALW. Cooper G. Haller K. Krempetz T. MarkiewiczBNLW.
Eunil Won/Korea U1 A study of configuration for silicon based Intermediate Trackers (IT) July Eunil Won Korea University.
Implication of gamma-gamma on 14mr tunnels discussion (questions for discussion with WG-C and WG-A) Valery Telnov Budker INP IRENG07, Sept.19, 2007, SLAC.
SiD MDI Update Topics for Discussion Tom Markiewicz/SLAC ILC BDS Meeting 15 May 2007.
SuperB Gen meeting Oct 5-9, 2009 IR Interface 1 IR Interface Issues M. Sullivan For M. Boscolo, K. Bertsche, E. Paoloni, S. Bettoni, P. Raimondi, et al.
October 2014Silicon Pixel Tracker – Chris Damerell 1 Tracking sensor, one of 12,000, 8x8 cm 2, 2.56 Mpixels each Matching endcaps (only one layer shown)
Machine Detector Interface Design Updates
Interaction Region of gamma gamma colliders
Effect of L* Changes on Vertex Detector and Forward Calorimeter Performance LCWS 2015 Whistler, BC, Canada November Bruce Schumm UCSC/SCIPP 1.
Layout of Detectors for CLIC
CLIC detector at SiD meeting 28/3/2010
Changes to SiD since the DBD
Report about “Forward Instrumentation” Issues
Simulation of Neutron Backgrounds in the ILC Extraction Line Beam Dump
Backgrounds using v7 Mask in 9 Si Layers at a Muon Higgs Factory
LAT performance studies
Presentation transcript:

NLC - The Next Linear Collider Project Possible 20 mrad Crossing Angle Geometry for ILC MDI Tom Markiewicz SLAC TESLA MDI mtg. 26 August 2004

Tom Markiewicz NLC - The Next Linear Collider Project SD Forward Masking, Calorimetry & Tracking

Tom Markiewicz NLC - The Next Linear Collider Project SiD Forward Masking, Calorimetry & Tracking LowZ BeamPipe SD0 QD1 QD2 QF1 LUMOM Q0 PacManEndCap_Muon Support Tube ECALECAL HCAL

Tom Markiewicz NLC - The Next Linear Collider Project Differences Switch from W to HCAL as a pairs-shield and the overall shorten in length This is more aggressive from the point of view of protection from the pair albido/photons.

Tom Markiewicz NLC - The Next Linear Collider Project Changes The extra-thick W-Si nose-cone mrad has been made identical to the ECAL: this is well above the pair deadzone so standard ECAL low-occupancy technology is fine. The junction has changed nominally to 48mrad given the new z position and the size of the pair dead region at that z. We remove the complicated cylindrical tungsten mask, wedge W mask and Carbon support tube in favor of a clean C-Fiber tube that end-butts onto an HCAL unit. This seems better for the physics and is probably fine for the backgrounds, subject to verification. The attachment and transfer of weight from the QD0 support (when endcap door is open) to the detector (when door closed and we are in vibration sensitive mode) should be easy. –This is cartooned as the gray wedges joining the support cylinder to the yoke

Tom Markiewicz NLC - The Next Linear Collider Project Changes While it is not visually evident in the colorized picture, my plan is to have what it appears we are now calling the BeamCal as a device 25mrad in diameter. The z=3.15m radius is then 7.88cm which, at 5 Tesla, is enough to catch all the pairs. Visually it would just cover the face of QD0. The region not well drawn in the color picture is the mrad. In the picture it is indistinguishable from BeamCal. It is also in a low occupancy region outside the pair deadcone. I imagine this region covered by a separate ECAL-like disk or by a BeamCal-like disk, but without the fancy timing and with perhaps better resolution readout. Part of my goal in this redesign was to emphasize that the SUSY region that needs aggressive R&D is limited to 25mrad in SiD. One cannot cover this angular region with the "nose-cone" at low z (1.8m) because of the parabola of the pair dead cone, so it is easiest to put it at the back, or, as in the case of the TESLA design, at an intermediate z.

Tom Markiewicz NLC - The Next Linear Collider Project Next Iteration The next version of this picture should explicitly indicate this 25-48mrad (Forward Bhabha monitor?) detector and explicitly call out any spatial pair position detector on the upstream face of BeamCal (if that is the plan).