Leading Learning in a School & District Dr. Brad Balch, Indiana State University Mrs. Leslie Ballard, AdvancED Indiana

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
[Imagine School at North Port] Oral Exit Report Quality Assurance Review Team School Accreditation.
Advertisements

King Kekaulike Complex Math Academy Mission: It is the mission of KKCMA to prepare all students for success in math as measured by performance on school,
Professional Learning Communities Connecting the Initiatives
Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report District Accreditation Forsyth County Schools February 15, 2012.
Site-Based Decision Making Campus Planning. Restructuring A process through which a district or school alters the pattern of its structures (vision, rules,
STRATEGIC PLAN Community Unit School District 300 7/29/
A relentless commitment to academic achievement and personal growth for every student. Redmond School District Graduates are fully prepared for the demands.
April 6, 2011 DRAFT Educator Evaluation Project. Teacher Education and Licensure DRAFT The ultimate goal of all educator evaluation should be… TO IMPROVE.
Knows and performs Illinois Professional Teaching Standards including working with diverse learners Demonstrates basic competency in planning, instruction,
Forward Moving Districts Information Summarized by Iowa Support Team as they Study Identified Buildings and Districts Actions in those Buildings and Districts.
Presenters: Jeanne Cowan Janet Hensley
Enter System Name AdvancED TM External Review Exit Report Catalyst High School May 11,12,13, 2014.
Sustaining Community Based Programs CYFAR Conference Boston, 2005.
Ohio Improvement Process (OIP) Facilitating District-wide Improvement in Instructional Practices and Student Performance.
Professional Learning Communities in Schools Online Workshop.
February 8, 2012 Session 4: Educational Leadership Policy Standards 1 Council of Chief School Officers April 2008.
Practicing the Art of Leadership: A Problem Based Approach to Implementing the ISLLC Standards, 4e © 2013, 2009, 2005, 2001 Pearson Education, Inc. All.
Building a Data Culture Data Guru Roles, Responsibilities & Expectations.
COLLEGE-READY LEARNER CRITICAL THINKER ADAPTABLE & PRODUCTIVE LEADERRESPONSIBLE DECISION MAKER SKILLED COMMUNICATOR HISD.
School Leadership Evaluation System Orientation SY13-14 Evaluation Systems Office, HR Dr. Michael Shanahan, CHRO.
WASC Visiting Committee Final Presentation for Overseas Schools International School Eastern Seaboard March , 2011.
Webinar: Leadership Teams October 2013: Idaho RTI.
Tom Corbett, Governor ▪ William E. Harner, Acting Secretary of Educationwww.education.state.pa.us Principal Effectiveness: Domains Domain 1: Strategic/Cultural.
Read On, Indiana! Anna Shults, Reading Specialist John Wolf, Reading Specialist Indiana Reading Initiatives.
Missouri Integrated Model Mid-Year Meeting – January 14, 2009 Topical Discussion: Teams and Teaming Dr. Doug HatridgeDonna Alexander School Resource SpecialistReading.
FewSomeAll. Multi-Tiered System of Supports A Comprehensive Framework for Implementing the California Common Core State Standards Professional Learning.
Communication System Coherent Instructional Program Academic Behavior Support System Strategic FocusBuilding Capacity.
Characteristics of Effective Learning Communities PowerUp Orientation.
PANAMA-BUENA VISTA UNION SCHOOL DISTRICT
Culture, Practice, and Leadership: Where Do I Stand? Tiffany Young, M. Ed. Equity & Diversity Coordinator Josh Deason, M.A. Equity & Diversity Specialist.
The Challenge We must realize that the system is the cause of weak execution due to lack of clarity, commitment, collaboration and accountability resulting.
BUILDING CAPACITY THROUGH PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT AND INSTRUCTIONAL LEADERSHIP DR. SANDRA J. MOORE DR. ROBERT C. MCCRACKEN RADFORD UNIVERSITY COLLEGE.
Intro to TPEP. A new evaluation system should be a model for professional growth, supporting collaboration between teachers and principals in pursuit.
AdvancED District Accreditation Process © 2010 AdvancED.
Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report District Accreditation Bibb County Schools February 5-8, 2012.
Building and Recognizing Quality School Systems DISTRICT ACCREDITATION © 2010 AdvancED.
SACS-CASI Southern Association of Colleges and Schools Council on Accreditation and School Improvement FAMU DRS – QAR Quality Assurance Review April 27-28,
PLC & RTI Tammy Rasmussen Southern Oregon RTI Dean Richards Oregon RTI.
Building and Recognizing Quality School Systems Brevard Public Schools District Accreditation.
Leading at All Levels to Support MDC Implementation
CSA Retreat July 2012 LEADERSHIP AT THE TOP. Focus District leadership Building leadership Coaching of principals Developing a culture dedicated to improvement.
Systems Accreditation Berkeley County School District School Facilitator Training October 7, 2014 Dr. Rodney Thompson Superintendent.
Professional Learning Community Rolling Green Elementary January, 2012 Rolling Green Elementary January, 2012.
Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report School Accreditation AUTEC School 4-8 March 2012.
Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report School Accreditation Center Grove High School 10 November 2010.
ANNOOR ISLAMIC SCHOOL AdvancEd Survey PURPOSE AND DIRECTION.
Simpson County Schools Summer Leadership Retreat 2011 Enhancing Leadership Capacity and Effectiveness to Impact Student Learning and Staff Performance.
Accreditation (AdvancED) STANDARD #2: GOVERNANCE & LEADERSHIP
Ohio Improvement Process (OIP) Facilitating District-wide Improvement in Instructional Practices and Student Performance.
A HANDBOOK FOR PROFESSIONAL LEARNING COMMUNITIES AT WORK CHAPTERS 1-3 Learning by Doing.
Staff All Surveys Questions 1-27 n=45 surveys Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree The relative sizes of the colored bars in the chart.
Summary and Learning from conference room 2
Superintendent’s Entry & Learning Plan Jeremy Ray.
Loudon County Schools External Review Exit Report February 19-21, 2013.
About District Accreditation Mrs. Sanchez & Mrs. Bethell Rickards Middle School
Office of Service Quality
Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report School Accreditation Sugar Grove Elementary September 29, 2010.
Systems Accreditation Berkeley County School District Accreditation Team Chair Training October 20, 2014 Dr. Rodney Thompson Superintendent.
Vision Statement We Value - An organization culture based upon both individual strengths and relationships in which learners flourish in an environment.
Verneice DanielsELA / Reading Kitari LewisMath Abraham RiserMath L. Washington – ThomasELA / Reading Jetta WilliamsSocial Studies.
SACS Governance & Leadership Committee September 26, 2012.
External Review Exit Report Campbell County Schools November 15-18, 2015.
Huntsville City Schools AdvancEd Survey District Accreditation Cathy C. McNeal, Ed.D. January 8, 2013.
Chapter 1: Cultivating Community, Culture, and Learning Dr. Rob Anderson Spring 2011.
Clinical Practice evaluations and Performance Review
Professional Learning Communities
Achieving the Dream Mark A. Smith.
Project Outcomes (separate handout)
February 21-22, 2018.
School Leadership Evaluation System Orientation SY12-13
Presentation transcript:

Leading Learning in a School & District Dr. Brad Balch, Indiana State University Mrs. Leslie Ballard, AdvancED Indiana

Standard 2 The school operates under governance and leadership that promote and support student performance and school effectiveness.

Growth Culture Leadership and staff foster a culture consistent with the school’s purpose and direction.

Indicator 2.4 Leaders and staff align their decisions and actions toward continuous improvement to achieve the school’s purpose? They expect all students to be held to high standards in all courses of study? All leaders and staff are collectively accountable for student learning? School leaders support innovation, collaboration, shared leadership, and professional growth? The culture is characterized by collaboration and a sense of community?

Supervision and Evaluation Leadership and staff supervision and evaluation processes result in improved professional practice and student success.

Supervision & Evaluation Consider: What is the purpose of a supervision and evaluation system? What does a highly effective system look like?

Indicator 2.6 Read the four performance levels for this indicator. – What rating would you give your school on this indicator? – Why? – What evidence do you have to support that rating?

Program Evaluation The systematic assessment of the design, implementation, improvement or outcomes of a program with the intent of improving it. Programs could be initiatives such as a tutoring program, grading policies, PLCs, professional development, academic programs such as Read 180, High Ability, ELL, Special Education, and so on. Ideally program evaluation is built into the program from the beginning.

Purpose of Program Evaluation Demonstrate program effectiveness to stakeholders Improve the implementation and effectiveness of programs Better manage limited resources Document program accomplishments Justify current program funding Support the need for increased levels of funding Document program development and activities to help ensure successful replication

Types of Program Evaluation Context Evaluation Formative Evaluation Process Evaluation Performance or Program Evaluation Impact Evaluation Outcome Evaluation

Learning Leaders: The Key to Successful Schools and Districts High-performing schools have leadership capacity that understands which practices improve student achievement, brings about positive change, supports teacher practices that help all students, and prepares accomplished teachers to become school leaders. (Adapted from SREB, 2004)

Reorient Your Learning Team: Affirm Commitment, Insight & Passion 1.I became an administrator/teacher because… 2.My big hope for our school improvement team is to… 3.Think of an effective team you’ve worked with. What made it effective. 4.What are the most important issues facing your team?

Building a Committed Learning Team Establish a clear vision and mission. Define member roles and responsibilities. Listen to one another. Set goals. Establish ground rules for meetings. Get to know each other.

Resistance to Working in Teams Lack of conviction that the Learning Team is worth the effort. Discomfort and riskiness for individuals. The Learning Team lacks clear focus on performance and success. (Adapted from Katzenback and Smith, 1993)

We believe in the power of education. © 2012 AdvancED 15