DBRAC Work Session 12/5/15. DBRAC Values Framework Values Framework Reference: Guiding Values: Access (page 5) Regardless of any student demographic,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Baldrige Model of Performance Excellence
Advertisements

Critical Condition Triaging School Enrollment Growth School Board Work Study November 13, 2013.
Title I, Part A District Budget Planning The “Small” Stuff Julie McGuire, MEd Federal Funds Coordinator Carrollton-Farmers Branch ISD.
Northeast Regional Program in Charles City Questions & Answers.
S TATUS R EPORT : S UPERINTENDENT ’ S A DVISORY C OMMITTEE ON E NROLLMENT AND T RANSFER (SACET)
Merger Study Grade Level Configurations Options and Rationale.
Alameda Articulation Area Facilities Proposal Creating Schools to Meet the Growing Needs of our Communities.
Enrollment Data Analysis and Plans to Address Overcrowding Update to School Board February 17, 2015.
Rezoning Study -Committee Meeting 2- November 15, 2011.
WELCOME COLBY SCHOOL DISTRICT Stakeholder Driven Strategic Planning January 8, 2014.
Attendance Boundary Realignment FONTANA UNIFIEDSCHOOL DISTRICT November 19, 2008.
Looking ahead to school year
Chapter 9 The Program Plan Russell & Jamieson.
AGC Update November Wyoming Public Schools’ Middle College is a collaboration between Wyoming Public Schools and Grand Rapids Community College.
Community Budget Presentation April 2014.
2016 Transitional GEO Work Programme Discussion & CONSOLIDATION Session 10, 2015 GEO Work Plan Symposium Geneva, 7 May 2015 Alan Edwards (IPWG) Giovanni.
GUIDELINES FOR DEVELOPMENT OF STUDENT ASSIGNMENT BOUNDARIES Board of Education Meeting Eugene Street Board Room July 12, 2011.
Our recommendations were informed by an initial screen of all schools, community feedback and impact analyses, building walkthroughs, program assessments.
Closing the Achievement Gap Leadership Academy Quarterly Meeting- January 17, 2012.
- 0 - Community Forums OUSD School Admissions and Attendance Boundary Policies Spring 2008.
KCCT Kentucky’s Commonwealth Accountability Testing System Overview of 2008 Regional KPR.
Analysis of Salvador and El Centro School Boundaries SEPTEMBER 16, 2015.
Karen Sprowal, Class Size Matters Oct. 2, 2014 WHY DOE’S C4E PLAN VIOLATES THE LANGUAGE AND INTENT OF THE LAW.
School Configurations Recommendations from the Instructional Services Division April 2008.
EVAAS for Educators Mary Keel, Ed.D. Robin Loflin Smith, Ed.D. Tara Patterson, MSA.
West Sylvan Enrollment and Capacity
Planning for the Future of Dual Language in West Salem Response to DL Community Input.
Brookings School District All Day Kindergarten Update Presentation Contains Projected Data.
Ridgefield School District Capital Facilities Plan March 9, 2010.
Warren Township Study To Examine Enrollment Project (STEEP) Project Plan & Criteria High Level Timeline Sub-Committee Goals & Deliverables Revised October.
Revision the Future Strengthening our Magnet Programs October 20, 2015.
Growing Great Schools: Enrollment Balancing 10/29/15.
Expanding Opportunities Advanced Coursework Network Information.
K-12 Balanced Literacy Selling it as an Investment.
Community Schools in Madison Wisconsin Campus Compact December 18, 2015.
Planning for the Future: Superintendent’s Acceleration Agenda Phase II: Strengthening Operations Presentation to the Boston School Committee May 8, 2008.
Math Placement and Diagnostic Feedback Together! Bruce Arnold CMC-South Annual Conference November 6, 2015.
- 0 - School Portfolio Management MSDF Impact Assessment.
Financial Update and Impact Pinconning Area School District January 2010.
Huntsville City Schools Enrollment & Facilities Planning April 13,
Time to answer critical and inter-related questions: Whom will we serve? What will we offer? How will we serve them?
Student Assignment Analysis for the Lexington Public Schools Project Progress & Scenario Presentation for The Lexington School Committee March 8, 2016.
Secondary School Review Summary. 2 Student Success K-12 “What will our secondary school programming look like when they enter grade 9?!”
April 12, Presentation Overview  Review of the Past  Board Motions:  January, February, November – 2015  Future Considerations.
March 8, Presentation Overview  Review of the Past  Board Motions:  January, February, November – 2015  February – 2016  Education Act and.
DISTRICT-WIDE ENROLLMENT BALANCING SUPERINTENDENT SCENARIO CAROLE SMITH, SUPERINTENDENT MARCH 9,
A Strategic Agenda for Pinellas County’s Future Growth Whit Blanton, FAICP Pinellas Planning Council & Pinellas Metropolitan Planning Organization August.
Illustration (Staffordshire University, 2013b) Project Aim This research project will aim to investigate what Staffordshire University (SU) is doing in.
Student Assignment Analysis for the Lexington Public Schools Public Forum & School Committee Workshop March 16, 2016.
Las Virgenes Unified School District Local Control Funding Formula and the Local Control Accountability Plan Parent and Community Meetings.
Wahoo Public School District Facility Planning Update April 18, 2016.
1. Every Student Succeeds Act ESSA December
Program and Accommodation Review Burlington Secondary Schools Director’s Preliminary Report October 5, 2016.
Portland Public Schools Proposed Budget
Delivering Great Schools
February 24, 2011 Board of Education Workshop
Regina Catholic School Division Deshaye Catholic School Parent Information Meeting April 12, 2016.
Moore County Schools Guiding Principles in Student Assignment Planning
Elementary Rebalance.
Dublin Unified School District
Title I Schools: “ESSA” Every Student Succeeds Act Information Meeting Pershing M. School Library October 12, 2017 Pershing Middle School Houston Independent.
Student Assignment Advisory Committee
Regina Catholic School Division École St
Texas Literacy Initiative (TLI)
Studio School Title I Annual Meeting Title I Program Overview for Schoolwide Program (SWP) Schools Federal and State Education Programs Branch.
DRAFT Buffer Zone Policy
Long Range Planning Advisory Committee
Westport Public Schools
Houston K-8 School Enrollment Information Report
Houston K-8 School Enrollment Information Report
Presentation transcript:

DBRAC Work Session 12/5/15

DBRAC Values Framework Values Framework Reference: Guiding Values: Access (page 5) Regardless of any student demographic, every student will have access to, and opportunities to benefit from, equitable and effective academic programs, including enrichment/elective offerings and appropriate individualized support services that ensure that they can thrive and achieve their potential in Portland Public Schools

DBRAC Values Framework Environment (page 6) In order to enable equitable access to programs, all school facilities should have the appropriate student enrollment, configuration and physical support for programmatic needs that match the size of the facility.

DBRAC Values Framework Values Framework Reference: Desired Outcome: Strong and stable enrollment in all schools This is achieved by: –The elimination of under-enrollment and overcrowding at PPS schools; and –The continuation of high rates of school-aged students attending District schools.

Staff criteria for scenarios All K-5/K-8 schools 50+ students per grade level –As many schools as possible have the potential to reach 75+ students per grade level All middle schools 150+ students per grade level

Staff criteria for scenarios As many schools as possible below 105% utilization –Lower utilization preferred for Title I schools, schools with expected enrollment growth Consolidation of middle grades Immersion programs where feasible Alignment of HS feeder patterns Compact boundaries

Highest lever Grade reconfiguration is more effective at achieving right-sized schools rapidly— particularly at the middle grades –Boundary change is a slow transition –Due to student density, some boundaries would have to be much larger—school closures possible –Program changes impact a limited range of schools

New information since Thursday Individual School KPIs Foundation funding One-pager for each current K-8 neighborhood school

How to read the one-pager New

Reconfiguration key question: Aligned with Decision Point One What criteria should be used to determine which K-8 schools should remain the same or be reconfigured in order to offer core program in adequate space? –alternative: What conditions would allow schools to remain below 50 students per grade level or above 105% utilization?

Group Process Organize into 3 groups –Southeast –ALL Jefferson dual assignment +Roosevelt + Skyline –Grant + Madison Begin with individual thinking/writing Small group discussion Large group share out/discussion