Religion. God Problems Religious Language Religion v Science Now faith is confidence in what we hope for and assurance about what we do not see - Hebrews.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Fine-Tuning Argument One common response to this argument goes thus: Of course the universe is of a sort suitable for life. If it were not, no one.
Advertisements

Is Religion Reasonable? Are religious beliefs (about the universe’s relation to the supernatural) reasonable? Faith seeking understanding: ontological,
Philosophy and the proof of God's existence
a) AO1 – Knowledge and Understanding Explain in detail Use technical terms (and explain them) Include quotations Link back to the question Make sure your.
Introduction to Philosophy Lecture 6 Pascal’s wager
© Michael Lacewing Pascal’s Wager Michael Lacewing.
Faith & Reason: Kierkegaard, Clifford, & Aquinas ~ slide 1
How Philosophy is Integrated Term 1:Philosophy Term 2:Scripture Term 3:Justice Term 4:Spirituality (Anglican tradition and practice throughout year)
Is there a rational basis for the belief in God..
The Cosmological Argument.
Goals Define “God” by the Judeo-Christian definition Define omnipotence, omniscience, omni- benevolence, and omni-presence Be able to list and defend several.
Rights and Wrongs of Belief Clifford, James. W.K. Clifford This short essay remains quite famous today. Clifford is worried about cases it’s.
The Perfect God Anselm’s clever trick.
Phil 1000 Bradley Monton Class 2 The Cosmological Argument.
Is Religion Reasonable? Faith Seeking Understanding The ontological argument The cosmological argument The teleological argument (from design)
Ontological arguments Concept of God: perfect being –God is supposed to be a perfect being. –That’s just true by definition. –Even an atheist can agree.
Is Belief in God Reasonable? Faith Seeking Understanding A posteriori arguments (based on experience): The teleological argument (from design) The cosmological.
Is there such a thing as conscious will?. What is “conscious will”?! Having “free will” or “conscious will” basically means being in control of one’s.
Life and Death Philosophical Perspectives. Two problems To discuss whether life after death is possible we need to understand two related philosophical.
Perspectives on Religious Belief: Evidentialism-1  Definition: belief in God must be supported by objective evidence  Natural theology: attempt to prove.
Philosophy of Religion What is religion? “Religion is the state of being grasped by an ultimate concern, a concern which qualifies all other concerns as.
Pascal’s Wager. Epistemic Reasons Epistemic reasons to believe are related to truth. If I believe there is a God because I think the evidence supports.
Introduction to Philosophy Lecture 6 Pascal’s wager By David Kelsey.
Introduction to Philosophy Lecture 5 The Ontological Argument By David Kelsey.
 Religious Rationalism: The existence of God can be proven. Unbelief is irrational. Anselm, Aquinas, Paley. Forget faith, brothers, I’ve got logic.
Why I Believe... In God.
Modern Theology. René Descartes Argument from Thought Where do we get our concept of God? It’s the concept of something perfect We never experience perfection.
ENLIGHTENMENT OR MODERNITY? Jonathan Davies Powerpoint will be on the website.
Chapter 6 Medieval Philosophy. What is a covenant and how it is important to Judaism, Christianity, and Islam? What sorts of philosophy do we find in.
An argument for the existence of God based on the nature of God’s being Saint Anselm ( CE) relied purely on reason … if we were to conceive of.
LECTURE 19 THE COSMOLOGICAL ARGUMENT CONTINUED. THE QUANTUM MECHANICAL OBJECTION DEPENDS UPON A PARTICULAR INTERPRETATION WE MIGHT REASONABLY SUSPEND.
PHILOSOPHY OF RELIGION  Preliminary Issues:  Agreement vs. Tolerance  Different Religions ARE Incompatible  Religious Claims Aren’t True FOR Individuals.
Introduction to Philosophy Lecture 5 The Ontological Argument By David Kelsey.
What is faith? “Now faith is confidence in what we hope for and assurance about what we do not see.” - Hebrews 11:6.
Anselm’s “1st” ontological argument Something than which nothing greater can be thought of cannot exist only as an idea in the mind because, in addition.
The Ontological Argument for the Existence of God August 15, 2015 George Cronk, J.D., Ph.D. Professor of Philosophy & Religion Bergen Community College.
The Ontological Argument
Just Looking … What Evidence is there for the Existence of God?
Anselm’s Ontological Argument STARTER TASK: ‘Fools say in their hearts, “There is no God”’ Psalm 14:1 Copy this statement down. What do you think it is.
Anselm & Aquinas. Anselm of Canterbury ( AD) The Ontological Argument for the Existence of God (Text, pp )
WEEK 3: Metaphysics Natural Theology – Anselm’s Ontological Argument.
Philosophical Problems January 11, 2015 Pascal's Wager.
Revision Notes Courtesy of Mr Dixon. Instructions This PowerPoint has all the information you need to complete your Revision Booklets for the Science.
Philosophy of Religion What is religion? “Religion is the state of being grasped by an ultimate concern, a concern which qualifies all other concerns as.
Leaving Certificate Religious Education Proofs for the existence of God.
Ontological Argument (Ontological is from the Greek word for being, named by Kant) Learning Objectives To know the specification content To know the meaning.
Introduction to Philosophy
Philosophy of Religion Ontological Argument
Philosophy Here and Now: chapter two
History of philosophy.
Gaunilo’s response the stage one of Anselm’s argument
How do you defend that there is God to an atheist?
Unit 2: Arguments relating to the existence of God.
Ontological arguments for God’s existence:
The Ontological Argument: An Introduction
Is Religion Reasonable?
THE ONTOLOGICAL ARGUMENT
In pairs, write a list of all the reasons people believe in God.
THE ONTOLOGICAL ARGUMENT.
Explore key ideas in the ontological argument. (8 marks)
Anselm & Aquinas December 23, 2005.
Explore the use of a’priori reasoning in the ontological argument
The Big Picture Deductive arguments - origins of the ontological argument Deductive proofs; the concept of ‘a priori’. St Anselm - God as the greatest.
THE ONTOLOGICAL ARGUMENT.
Read Ch. 6 (p.48) from the Fundamentals of Faith
Religion and Science • Scientific and Christian ideas about the origins of the world and life and the relationship between the two • The place of humanity.
The Existence of God Part 2: Pascal’s Wager, Innate Desire Argument, Transcendental Argument By Stephen Curto For Homegroup November 4, 2018.
IN SUPPORT OF THE ONTOLOGICAL ARGUMENT
Faith and the Arts: Filling the God-shaped hole?
Presentation transcript:

Religion

God

Problems

Religious Language

Religion v Science Now faith is confidence in what we hope for and assurance about what we do not see - Hebrews 11.1

The argument from design This most beautiful system of the sun, planets and comets, could only proceed from the counsel and dominion of an intelligent and powerful Being - Isaac Newton

The First Cause

Whys and hows

Faith and Reason

Saint Thomas Aquinas Saint Thomas Aquinas (1225–1274)

Anselm’s Ontological Argument Therefore, if that than which nothing greater can be conceived exists in the understanding alone, the very being than which nothing greater can be conceived is one than which a greater can be conceived. But obviously this is impossible. Hence there is no doubt that there exists a being than which nothing greater can be conceived, and it exists both in the understanding and in reality.

Pascal’s Wager “God is, or He is not.” But to which side shall we incline? Reason can decide nothing here. There is an infinite chaos which separated us. A game is being played at the extremity of this infinite distance where heads or tails will turn up... Which will you choose then? Let us see. Since you must choose, let us see which interests you least. You have two things to lose, the true and the good; and two things to stake, your reason and your will, your knowledge and your happiness; and your nature has two things to shun, error and misery. Your reason is no more shocked in choosing one rather than the other, since you must of necessity choose... But your happiness? Let us weigh the gain and the loss in wagering that God is... If you gain, you gain all; if you lose, you lose nothing. Wager, then, without hesitation that He is.

Ad ignorantium fallacy There is an infinity of possible things that one might believe- unicorns, fairies, millions of things- and just because you can’t disprove them doesn’t mean there is anything plausible about them - Richard Dawkins

Religious Experience

The God Delusion

The Sea of Faith

The movement from an understanding of religion centred on dogmatic belief to one centred in spirituality and ethical activity may seem irresistible. Why do people then resist it so strongly? Because it is coupled with the admission, at last, that religion is entirely human, made by us for ourselves. This admission is now inescapable, and the next stage in the development of religious thought that will have to be based upon it, but it need no more imply any reduction in our sense of the ultimate importance of religion in our lives than does the corresponding admission in the case of art.

Religion and Knowledge

Linking Questions