Recent Studies on ILC BDS and MERIT S. Striganov APD meeting, January 24.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Stefan Roesler SC-RP/CERN on behalf of the CERN-SLAC RP Collaboration
Advertisements

Question from the GDE : Could local “doughnut” type muon spoilers like those in SLC be substituted for the 5 meter magnetized wall? 5m magnetized wall.
1 Activation problems S.Agosteo (1), M.Magistris (1,2), Th.Otto (2), M.Silari (2) (1) Politecnico di Milano; (2) CERN.
1 Vacuum Requirements in the Detector Region from Beam Gas and other Considerations Takashi Maruyama (SLAC) LCWA 2009, Albuquerque October 2, 2009.
MARS15 Simulations of the MERIT Mercury Target Experiment Fermilab March 18, Neutrino Factory and Muon Collider Collaboration meeting Sergei.
Hall D Photon Beam Simulation and Rates Part 1: photon beam line Part 2: tagger Richard Jones, University of Connecticut Hall D Beam Line and Tagger Review.
Target & Capture for PRISM Koji Yoshimura On behalf of PRISM Target Group Institute of Particle and Nuclear Science High Energy Accelerator Research Organization.
Harold G. Kirk Brookhaven National Laboratory MERIT Experiment Status NFMCC Collaboration Meeting FNAL March 17-20, 2008.
Operated by Brookhaven Science Associates for the U.S. Department of Energy A Pion Production and Capture System for a 4 MW Target Station X. Ding, D.
Pion capture and transport system for PRISM M. Yoshida Osaka Univ. 2005/8/28 NuFACT06 at UCI.
Harold G. Kirk Brookhaven National Laboratory The MERIT High-Power Target Experiment Muon Collider Design Workshop BNL December 3-7, 2007.
Shielding Studies using MARS Monte Carlo code Noriaki Nakao (SLAC) Jan. 6, 2005, WORKSHOP Machine-Detector Interface at ILC, SLAC.
Pair backgrounds for different crossing angles Machine-Detector Interface at the ILC SLAC 6th January 2005 Karsten Büßer.
Energy Deposition of 4MW Beam Power in a Mercury Jet Target Xiaoping Ding UCLA Target Studies Mar. 9, 2010 (Update of talk on Feb. 9, 2010)
Harold G. Kirk Brookhaven National Laboratory Target System Update IDS-NF Plenary Meeting Arlington, VA October 18, 2011.
NLC - The Next Linear Collider Project NLC IR Layout and Background Estimates Jeff Gronberg/LLNL For the Beam Delivery Group LCWS - October 25, 2000.
PROBLEM: Radiation Dose Rate in IR2 When IR1 is Operating (and Vice Versa) Muon Dose Rate > 1 mRem/hr for 0.1% Collimated Halo.
MARS flux simulations - update Sergei Striganov Fermilab August 12, 2009.
Background Studies Takashi Maruyama SLAC ALCPG 2004 Winter Workshop January 8, 2004.
Harold G. Kirk Brookhaven National Laboratory Recent Results from MERIT NUFACT09 Illinois Institute of Technology July 22, 2009.
Operated by Brookhaven Science Associates for the U.S. Department of Energy Optimized Parameters for a Mercury Jet Target X. Ding, D. Cline, UCLA, Los.
The MERIT experiment at the CERN PS Leo Jenner MOPC087 WEPP169 WEPP170.
NLC - The Next Linear Collider Project Backgrounds Update Tom Markiewicz SLAC LCWS Cornell 15 July 2003.
BDSIM simulations/results: Synchrotron Radiation and Muons Motivation and History Tracking results Synchrotron Radiation Tracking of Halo Muons News from.
IR Beamline and Sync Radiation Takashi Maruyama. Collimation No beam loss within 400 m of IP Muon background can be acceptable. No sync radiations directly.
Target and Absorbers L2 Manager: K McDonald, Princeton U March xx, 2013 Presenter’s Name | DOE Mini-Review of MAP (FNAL, March 4-6, 2013)1 Mission Target:
1 Induced radioactivity in the target station and in the decay tunnel from a 4 MW proton beam S.Agosteo (1), M.Magistris (1,2), Th.Otto (2), M.Silari (2)
NLC - The Next Linear Collider Project NLC Backgrounds What’s New? Tom Markiewicz LC’99, Frascati, Italy October 1999.
Radiological Aspects of ILC Hee-Seock Lee Pohang Accelerator Laboratory 2 nd Workshop of Korean ILC at PAL.
Design of the Photon Collimators for the ILC Positron Helical Undulator Adriana Bungau The University of Manchester Positron Source Meeting, July 2008.
SHMS Optics and Background Studies Tanja Horn Hall C Summer Meeting 5 August 2008.
NEW COMMENTS TO ILC BEAM ENERGY MEASUREMENTS BASED ON SYNCHROTRON RADIATION FROM MAGNETIC SPECTROMETER E.Syresin, B. Zalikhanov-DLNP, JINR R. Makarov-MSU.
Target & Capture for PRISM Koji Yoshimura Institute of Particle and Nuclear Science High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (KEK)
NEUTRON OPTICS & SHIELDING GROUP NATALIIA CHERKASHYNA TAP MEETING 23 RD OF JANUARY, 2014 Latest Developments on Shielding and Backgrounds.
1 Optical Diagnostic Results of MERIT Experiment and Post-Simulation H. Park, H. Kirk, K. McDonald Brookhaven National Laboratory Princeton University.
Backgrounds in the NLC BDS ISG9 December 10 – Takashi Maruyama SLAC.
Secondary Particle Production and Capture for Muon Accelerator Applications S.J. Brooks, RAL, Oxfordshire, UK Abstract Intense pulsed.
NESTOR SIMULATION TOOLS AND METHODS Antonis Leisos Hellenic Open University Vlvnt Workhop.
J. Pasternak First Ideas on the Design of the Beam Transport and the Final Focus for the NF Target J. Pasternak, Imperial College London / RAL STFC ,
LCWS2004 Paris 1 Beam background study for GLC Tsukasa Aso, Toyama College of Maritime Technology and GLC Vertex Group H.Aihara, K.Tanabe, Tokyo Univ.
1 Muon Collider Backgrounds Steve Geer Fermilab Steve Geer MC Detector & Physics DOE June 24, 2009.
Detector Monte-Carlo ● Goal: Develop software tools to: – Model detector performance – Study background issues – Calculate event rates – Determine feasibility.
Latifa Elouadrhiri Jefferson Lab Hall B 12 GeV Upgrade Drift Chamber Review Jefferson Lab March 6- 8, 2007 CLAS12 Drift Chambers Simulation and Event Reconstruction.
March 2, 2011 TJRPhysics Processes Missing from our Current Simulation Tools 1 Tom Roberts Muons, Inc. This is the current list − Please help us to complete.
Experimental Studies of Spatial Distributions of Neutrons Produced by Set-ups with Thick Lead Target Irradiated by Relativistic Protons Vladimír Wagner.
Interaction Region Backgrounds M. Sullivan for the MEIC Collaboration Meeting Oct. 5-7, 2015.
Target Simulations for Hadron, Electron and Heavy-Ion Beams 2 nd High-Power Targetry Workshop Oak Ridge, TN October 10-14, 2005 Fermilab High-Power Targetry.
Dec 2004 Low Energy backgrounds in the TESLA IR Impact on feedback BPMs FONT collaboration  QMUL: P Burrows, G Christian, C Clarke, G White, S Molloy.
Notes About MARS background simulations for BTeV A Summary of how far we’ve come and how far we have to go. By DJ Wagner 9/12/98 Vanderbilt University.
Dec 2004 Simulation of Low Energy backgrounds in the TESLA IR Impact on feedback BPMs FONT collaboration  QMUL: P Burrows, G Christian, C Clarke, G White,
L. Keller 3/18/02 Beam-Gas-Bremsstrahlung and Coulomb Scattering in the NLC Beam Delivery System Conditions for Calculation: 1. Program is DECAY TURTLE.
IHEP/Protvino for FP420 R&D Collaboration 1 IHEP/Protvino Group: Igor Azhgirey Igor Bayshev Igor Kurochkin + one post-graduate student Tools:
Radiation Shielding Assessment for MuCool Experimental Enclosure C. Johnstone 1), I. Rakhno 2) 1) Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory, Batavia, Illinois.
Radiation study of the TPC electronics Georgios Tsiledakis, GSI.
1 Giuseppe G. Daquino 26 th January 2005 SoFTware Development for Experiments Group Physics Department, CERN Background radiation studies using Geant4.
Present status of production target and Room design Takashi Hashimoto, IBS/RISP 2015, February.
MDI Simulations at SLAC Takashi Maruyama, Lew Keller, Thomas Markiewicz, Uli Wienands, SLAC MAP Collaboration Meeting, FNAL June 21, 2013.
N_TOF EAR-1 Simulations The “γ-flash” A. Tsinganis (CERN/NTUA), C. Guerrero (CERN), V. Vlachoudis (CERN) n_TOF Annual Collaboration Meeting Lisbon, December.
EURISOL, TASK#5, Bucuresti, November 1 Preliminary shielding assessment of EURISOL Post Accelerator D. Ene, D. Ridikas. B. Rapp.
Dark Current and Radiation Shielding Studies for the ILC Main Linac
PARTICLE FLUX CALCULATION-III
Radiation Physics requirements for the IR
Physics Processes Missing from our Current Simulation Tools
End Station Test Beam (ESTB) at SLAC
Fassò, N. Nakao, H. Vincke Aug. 2, 2005
Higgs Factory Backgrounds
GEANT Simulations and Track Reconstruction
Geant4 in HARP V.Ivanchenko For the HARP Collaboration
MAP 2014 Spring Workshop Fermilab May, 2014
Background Simulations at Fermilab
Presentation transcript:

Recent Studies on ILC BDS and MERIT S. Striganov APD meeting, January 24

Muon background from ILC BDS  Halo interacts with thin primary spoilers and produces electrons and photons  Electons and gammas hit thick secondary collimators  Electromagnetic shower produce muons – about muon/lost electron  Muon background can be reduced about 2000 by using two magnetized spoilers

New tunnel geometry

Magnetized wall

Concrete wall and doughnuts

Condition 6.5 m radius detector 1 bunch 2.5 m radius TPC 200 bunches 2.0 m radius TPC 160 bunches 5 m long magnetized wall fills tunnel at 349 m, 2m concrete wall – MARS 13 (3) 387 (152)192 (74) 11, 4 m long “doughnuts” same polarity, 1 m unmagnetized wall – Lew, 2m concrete wall – MARS 8 (9.6) (all same sign) 847 (1268) (all same sign) 448 (646) (all same sign) 11, 4 m long “doughnuts” alternating polarity, 1 m unmagnetized wall Summary Table Number of Muons in Detector for Three Shielding Conditions Push-pull IR, 500 GeV CM, BDS 2006c Black numbers – Keller, red numbers - MARS * Collimate 0.1% halo, muons from both beams October 24, 2006

Keller v.s. MARS Halo distribution: MARS and Keller – from STRUCT Interactions with primary collimator: MARS – internal routine, Keller – TURTLE (electron/positron only, no photon transport) Interaction with secondary collimator: MARS – internal routine, Keller – approximation of shower Muon production: MARS and Keller – based on same model Muon transport: MARS – internal routine, Keller uses MUCARLO – no fluctuation of energy loss, simplified multiple Coulomb scattering

Source TURTLE does not transport photons – there are no photons (about 60% of total energy) produced on primary collimator in Keller simulations. All photon energy goes to electrons/positrons. Secondary electrons/positrons and gammas produced in MARS calculations agree well with STRUCT.

Geometry update

Detailed comparizon

Conclusions Acceptable agreement between Keller and MARS calculations in collimation section Large differences in bending sections Zeuthen package based on GEANT3 gave 2-3 times more muons than MUCARLO (TESLA, 1994)

Target for muon collider

MERIT experiment The MERIT experiment, to be run at CERN in 2007, is a proof-of-principle test for a target system that converts a 4-MW proton beam into a high- intensity muon beam for either a neutrino factory complex or a muon collider. The target system is based on a free mercury jet that intercepts an intense proton beam inside a 15-T solenoidal magnetic. The Hg jet delivery system will generate a 1-cm diameter mercury stream with velocities up to 20 m/s.

MERIT geometry in MARS

Simulations tasks  Particle fluxes, energy deposition, absorbed doses and residual activities in experimental hall  Absorbed dose and activation of mercury vapor analyzer  Activation of hydraulic fluid  Activation of mercury vapor filter  Secondary particles production

Radiation levels Absorbed dose in Gy/ protons30day/1day residual activity in mSv/h

Radiation levels in detector elements Absorbed dose in mercury vapor analyzer is 630 Gy (top) and 14 Gy (back). Acceptable level is Gy. Residual dose rate on contact after 5 day of irradiation and 1 hour of cooling: mercury vapor analyzer – 0.17 mSv/hr (top), mSv/hr (back), hydraulic fluid – mSv/hr, mercury vapor filter mSv/hr. Acceptable level is about 1 mSv/hr at FNAL, 0.1(?) mSv/hr at CERN

Detector positions and particle fluxes per pulse ( protons). charged hadrons (E>200 keV) neutrons (E>100 keV)

Detector positions and particle fluxes per pulse ( protons). electrons (E>200 keV)gammas (E>200 keV)

Energy spectra ( 0 degree detector). Blue lines – all particles, red lines- particles created in attenuator.

Time distributions in 0 degree detector

Energy spectra ( 6.7 degree detector). Blue lines – all particles, red lines- particles created in attenuator.

Energy spectra ( 11.5 degree detector). Blue lines – all particles, red lines- particles created in attenuator.

Energy spectra ( 45 degree detector). Blue lines – all particles, red lines- particles created in attenuator.

Time distribution in 45 degree detector