Presented to: By: Date: Federal Aviation Administration International Aircraft Materials Fire Test Working Group Special Conditions for Passenger Airplanes,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
METAL CAN SURFACE COATING MACT COMPLIANCE ASSURANCE 40 CFR PART 63, SUBPART KKKK June 2006 June CFR PART 63, SUBPART KKKK June 2006 June 2006.
Advertisements

METAL COIL SURFACE MACT COMPLIANCE ASSURANCE 40 CFR PART 63, SUBPART SSSS May 2006 May 2006.
International Aircraft Materials Fire Test Working Group Meeting
Presented to: By: Date: Federal Aviation Administration International Aircraft Materials Fire Test Working Group Meeting Task Group Session on Revised.
Industry Priorities for the Next TSO-C127 Revision
Presented to: By: Date: Federal Aviation Administration International Aircraft Materials Fire Test Working Group Meeting Discussion on Format of New Test.
Surrogate Testing and Proposed Certification Procedures for Altered Interior Surfaces Tim Marker FAA Technical Center.
Exceptional Events Elements of an Effective Demonstration Darren Palmer US EPA Region 4.
Product Recall – Airworthiness Directive (AD) 1 What: FAA issued a telegraphic Amendment to Airworthiness Directive (AD) The actions.
Aircraft Security: Beyond the Flight Deck Door
Tim Marker Laboratory & Full Scale Testing of Non Traditional Lightweight Aircraft Seats FAA Technical Center.
What options do states have? What is Georgia planning to do? What are some of the other states doing? What are the possible implications to permit fees?
Presented By: Claire Fleece A Solution to Fighting Inaccesible Fires.
1 ETCTN phase 2 accrual goal vs minimum requirement in UM1 parent grant supplements  Total budget is $7.2M for supplements and maximum direct costs per.
The Pilot Records Improvement Act of 1996
Appendices Subpart R Steel Erection
08 June 2006Portland; Oregon; USAPeter Corbeeel Reducing the risk of smoke and fire in transport airplanes: related EASA rulemaking actions Peter Corbeel.
Federal Aviation Administration
International Aircraft Materials Fire Test Working Group Meeting
Federal Aviation Administration RTCA Update 0 RTCA Update Federal Aviation Administration International Aircraft Materials Fire Test Working Group Bremen,
Federal Aviation Administration Southern Region FAASTeam CFI Special Emphasis Program Pilots Airworthiness Responsibilities Presented by: Mark L. Laughridge.
Federal Aviation Administration RTCA Update 0 Federal Aviation Administration Pat Cahill AJP-632; Fire Safety Team Wm. J. Hughes Technical Center Federal.
Presented to: sUAS ARC Certification Working Group By: Richard Posey, AIR-200, UAS Experimental Certification Team Lead Date: June 26, 2008 Federal Aviation.
Presented to: By: Date: Federal Aviation Administration Airworthiness Preventive Maintenance R1.
Review of Handbook Chapters Pat Cahill
Federal Aviation Administration 0 Continued Airworthiness Initiatives in the United States June 9, Continued Airworthiness Initiatives in the United.
Federal Aviation Administration 0 Certification Standards for New Technologies June 9, 2005 Certification Standards for New Technologies Presentation to:
Sound solutions delivered uncommonly well Understanding the Permitting Impacts of the Proposed Ozone NAAQS Pine Mountain, GA ♦ August 20, 2015 Courtney.
Exceptional Events Meredith Kurpius US EPA Region 9.
Federal Aviation Administration RTCA Update 0 Federal Aviation Administration Pat Cahill AJP-632; Fire Safety Team Wm. J. Hughes Technical Center Federal.
Presented by: Roger Sultan, FAA Aviation Safety Inspector; AFS-400 Date: February 25, 2015 Federal Aviation Administration Operational impact of §
Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Contents. Code of Federal Regulations The regulations first published in the Federal Register on a daily basis are then.
School Bus Thermal Events: An increasing phenomenon?
FAA CRASHWORTHINESS RESEARCH PROGRAM
Federal Aviation Administration RTCA Update 0 Federal Aviation Administration Pat Cahill AJP-632; Fire Safety Team Wm. J. Hughes Technical Center Federal.
IAMFTWG MEETING OCTOBER 19, 2011 STATUS REPORT. BACKGROUND ARAC: Aviation Rulemaking Advisory Committee Working Group: Given a specific task with a time.
1 Exceptional Events Rulemaking Proposal General Overview March 1, 2006 US EPA.
Lithium Batteries Fuel Cells
1 Modeling Under PSD Air quality models (screening and refined) are used in various ways under the PSD program. Step 1: Significant Impact Analysis –Use.
Federal Aviation Administration Aircraft Ducting 0 Federal Aviation Administration International Aircraft Materials Fire Test Working Group Savannah, GA.
Background Numerous FAR’s mandate fire protection in aircraft powerplant fire zones Parts 23, 25, 27, 29, 33… FAR Part 1 Section 1.1 – Definitions and.
Overview Background Harmonization Goals
Federal Aviation Administration Halon 1211 Stratification/ Localization in Aircraft Louise Speitel Fire Safety Branch FAA Wm. J. Hughes Technical Center.
Presented to: By: Date: Federal Aviation Administration International Aircraft Materials Fire Test Working Group Update Handbook Chapters IAMFT WG, Cologne,
Exceptional Events and Fire Policy Presented by Don Hodge, U.S. EPA Region 9 Interagency Air and Smoke Council meeting May 2, 2012 Disclaimer: Positions.
Federal Aviation Administration 0 Composite Wing Tank Flammability May 19 th, Composite and Aluminum Wing Tank Flammability Comparison Testing Steve.
Federal Aviation Administration 0 Composite Wing Tank Flammability May 20, Composite and Aluminum Wing Tank Flammability Comparison Testing Steve.
Presented at:Friends/Partners in Aviation Weather By:Tom Bond, FAA – Aircraft Icing Technical Advisor Date:November 19, 2015 Location:Las Vegas Convention.
Tim Marker FAA Technical Center Development of a Lab-Scale Test For Evaluating Toxic Gas Decomposition Products Generated Inside a Fuselage During a Postcrash.
Presented to: By: Date: Federal Aviation Administration International Aircraft Materials Fire Test Working Group Discussion of Full-Scale Testing of Leather.
Federal Aviation Administration 0 EFB Hazard Assessment November 17, Electronic Flight Bag (EFB) Hazard Assessment Steve Summer Federal Aviation.
Federal Aviation Administration Flammability Requirements Improvement June 24, 2010.
CAN THE CANNED FORMS: Practical Advice in Implementing HIPAA Privacy Policies and Forms Margaret Marchak, Esq. Rachel Nosowsky, Esq. HIPAA Summit West.
Federal Aviation Administration CAA Training Videos Development Richard Hill Program Manager, Fire Safety Team FAA Wm. J. Hughes Technical Center Atlantic.
Tim Marker Laboratory & Full Scale Testing of Non Traditional Lightweight Aircraft Seats FAA Technical Center.
Presented to: By: Date: Federal Aviation Administration International Aircraft Materials Fire Test Working Group Meeting Test Cell Airflow Study For Cargo.
Airworthiness Directives A Lesson By Team A. Introduction An Airworthiness Directive (AD) is a directive issued by the Federal Aviation Administration.
Abstract Analysis Mohammad Danial bin Mohammad Suhaimi (ME092584) Muhammad Khairil bin Amiruddin (ME092594)
July 13, 2016 Department of Environmental Quality Proposed Amendments to UST Rules 15A NCAC 02N and 02O Ruth Strauss.
September 8, 2016 Department of Environmental Quality Proposed Amendments to UST Rules 15A NCAC 02N and 02O Ruth Strauss.
International Aircraft Materials Fire Test Working Group Meeting
Exceptional Events Rulemaking Proposal
Exceptional and Natural Events Rulemaking
TRTR Briefing September 2013
Contract Support Costs
AIRCRAFT FIRE REGULATIONS
Wildland Fire Policy Revision
North Carolina Department of Insurance Office of State Fire Marshal
Presentation transcript:

Presented to: By: Date: Federal Aviation Administration International Aircraft Materials Fire Test Working Group Special Conditions for Passenger Airplanes, Seats with Non-Traditional, Large Non-Metallic Panels IAMFTWG Niagara Falls Tim Marker, FAA Technical Center June 17, 2008

2 of 15 Federal Aviation Administration Seat Special Conditions June 17, Example: Notice SC for 737 airplanes, although FAA intends to issue Special Conditions for all transport category airplane types with more than 19 passengers.

3 of 15 Federal Aviation Administration Seat Special Conditions June 17, History 1980’s, research on postcrash cabin fire; development of 2 new standards, one for seat cushion flammability, another for large surface area interior panels. Heat release rate corollary to postcrash fire survival time. Materials that comply with the new standard extend survival time by approximately 2 minutes. At the time these new standards were being written, the application of the heat release and smoke emission requirements to seats was investigated. It was determined that the overall effect on survivability was negligible, therefore the requirements did not address seats. One primary reason seats were excluded was because of the recently-adopted standards for flammability of seat cushions would greatly inhibit involvement of the seats.

4 of 15 Federal Aviation Administration Seat Special Conditions June 17, Background August 8, 2005, Boeing applied for a design change to Type Certificate No. A16WE for installation of seats that include non-traditional, large, non-metallic panels in Boeing Model series airplanes. Type Certificate No. A16WE does not require seats to meet the more stringent flammability standards required of large, non-metallic panels in the cabin interior. At the time applicable Rules were written, seats were designed with a metal frame covered by fabric, not with large, non-metallic panels. Seats also met the recently adopted oil burner test for cushions. With seats designed mostly of fabric and metal, their contribution to a cabin fire had been minimized and not considered a threat. For these reasons, seats did not need to be tested to the HRR and smoke emission requirements.

5 of 15 Federal Aviation Administration Seat Special Conditions June 17, Seat designs have now evolved to occasionally include non-traditional, large, non-metallic panels. Taken in total, the surface area of these panels is on the same order as the sidewall and overhead stow bin interior panels. To provide the level of passenger protection intended by the airworthiness standards, these non-traditional, large, non-metallic panels in the cabin must meet the standards of Title 14 CFR, Part 25, Appendix F, parts IV and V. Background

6 of 15 Federal Aviation Administration Seat Special Conditions June 17, Example of Seat with Non-Traditional Large, Non-Metallic Panel

7 of 15 Federal Aviation Administration Seat Special Conditions June 17, Example of Seat with Non-Traditional Large, Non-Metallic Panel

8 of 15 Federal Aviation Administration Seat Special Conditions June 17, Example of Seat with Non-Traditional Large, Non-Metallic Panel

9 of 15 Federal Aviation Administration Seat Special Conditions June 17, Example of Seat with Non-Traditional Large, Non-Metallic Panel

10 of 15 Federal Aviation Administration Seat Special Conditions June 17, Memorandum , Guidance for Flammability Testing of Seat/Console Installations, Oct 17, 1997 Memo issued when it became clear that seat designs were evolving to include large, non-metallic panels with surface areas that would impact survivability during a cabin fire event, comparable to partitions or galleys. Memo noted that large surface area panels must comply with heat release and smoke emission requirements, even if they were attached to a seat. In the absence of this policy, the use of panels on seat structures would have been a loophole in the airworthiness standards that would result in an unacceptable decrease in survivability during a cabin fire event.

11 of 15 Federal Aviation Administration Seat Special Conditions June 17, Definition of Non-Traditional, Large, Non-Metallic Panel A non-traditional, large, non-metallic panel is defined as a panel with exposed surface areas greater than 1.5 square feet installed per seat place. The panel may consist of either a single component or multiple components in a concentrated area. Examples of seat parts where these non-traditional panels are installed include, but are not limited to: seat backs, seat bottoms, leg/foot rests, kick panels, back shells, credenzas, and associated furniture. Examples of traditional exempted parts of the seat include: Arm caps, armrest close-outs such as end bays and armrest-styled center consoles, food trays, video monitors, and shrouds.

12 of 15 Federal Aviation Administration Seat Special Conditions June 17, “Exposed” is considered to include those panels directly exposed to the pas- senger cabin in the traditional sense, plus those panels enveloped such as by a dress cover. Clarification of “Exposed” Traditional fabrics or leathers currently used on seats are excluded from these special conditions. Non-traditional, large, non-metallic panels covered with traditional fabrics or leathers will be tested without their coverings or covering attachments.

13 of 15 Federal Aviation Administration Seat Special Conditions June 17, Final Rule at Amendment Final Rule at Amendment clarified the definition of minimum panel size: “It is not possible to cite a specific size that will apply in all installations; however, as a general rule, components with exposed surface areas of one square foot or less may be considered small enough that they do not have to meet the new standards. Components with exposed surface areas greater than two square feet may be considered large enough that they do have to meet the new standards. Those with exposed surface areas greater than one square foot, but less than two square feet, must be considered in conjunction with the areas of the cabin in which they are installed before a determination can be made”.

14 of 15 Federal Aviation Administration Seat Special Conditions June 17, Final, Special Conditions …the following special conditions are issued as part of the type certification basis for Boeing Model 737 series airplanes. 1.Except as provided in paragraph 3 of these special conditions, compliance with Title 14 FR part 25, Appendix F, parts IV and V, heat release and smoke emission, is required for seats that incorporate non-traditional, large, non-metallic panels that may either be a single component or multiple components in a concentrated area in their design. 2. The applicant may designate up to and including 1.5 square feet of non-traditional non-metallic panel material per seat place that does not have to comply with special condition 1, above. A triple seat assembly may have a total of 4.5 square feet excluded on any portion of the assembly (e.g., outboard seat place 1 square foot, middle 1 square foot, and inboard 2.5 square feet).

15 of 15 Federal Aviation Administration Seat Special Conditions June 17, Seats do not have to meet the test requirements of Title 14 CFR part 25, Appendix F, parts IV and V, when installed in compartments that are not otherwise required to meet these requirements. Examples include: a. Airplanes with passenger capacities of 19 or less, b. Airplanes that do not have Sec , Amendment or later, in their certification basis and are not subject to the requirements of 14 CFR , c. Airplanes exempted from Sec , Amendment or later. 4. Only airplanes associated with new seat certification programs applied for after the effective date of these special conditions will be affected by the requirements in these special conditions. Previously certificated interiors on the existing airplane fleet and follow-on deliveries of airplanes with previously certificated interiors are not affected. Final, Special Conditions