 NSSE Results 2005-2011 Austin Peay State University.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
2008 National Survey of Student Engagement – SUNY Oneonta Patty Francis Steve Perry Fall 2008.
Advertisements

Gary Whisenand Director, Institutional Research August 26, 2011.
Gallaudet Institutional Research Report: Annual Campus Climate Survey: 2010 Pat Hulsebosch: Executive Director – Office of Academic Quality Faculty Senate.
Prepared by: Fawn Skarsten Director Institutional Analysis.
National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) Comparisons of the survey results for UPRM Office of Institutional Research and Planning University of Puerto.
Using the 2005 National Survey of Student Engagement in Student Affairs Indiana State University.
You will be familiar with the five NSSE benchmarks and the survey items that make up each benchmark. You will be familiar with the comparison groups.
DATA UPDATES FACULTY PRESENTATION September 2009.
Indiana State University Assessment of General Education Objectives Using Indicators From National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE)
Gallaudet University Results on National Survey of Student Engagement Office of Institutional Research August, 2007.
2012 National Survey of Student Engagement Jeremy D. Penn & John D. Hathcoat.
Students who are… …engaged in the classroom – pass; …engaged in their academic program - return; …engaged in deep learning – graduate. What constitutes.
College of Engineering. Table of Contents Introduction about the National Survey of Student engagement. NSSE response rate Benchmarking areas Areas of.
Getting to know your audience: Queen’s Students Roger Healey, Office of Institutional Research and Planning.
GGC and Student Engagement.  NSSE  Overall: 32%  First Year: 30%  Seniors: 33%  GGC  Overall: 28%  First Year: 26% (381)  Seniors: 38% (120)
Presentation to Student Affairs Directors November, 2010 Marcia Belcheir, Ph.D. Institutional Analysis, Assessment, & Reporting.
NSSE When?Spring, 2008 Who?Freshmen and Seniors random sample How?Electronic and Snail mail follow up Respondents?30% response rate 26% freshmen.
Basic Reports and Data Dissemination Strategies Regional Users’ Workshop October 6-7, 2005.
Mind the Gap: Overview of FSSE and BCSSE Jillian Kinzie NSSE.
Urban Universities: Student Characteristics and Engagement Donna Hawley Martha Shawver.
National Survey of Student Engagement University of Minnesota, Morris NSSE 2002.
National Survey of Student Engagement University of Minnesota, Morris NSSE 2004.
BENCHMARKING EFFECTIVE EDUCATIONAL PRACTICE IN COMMUNITY COLLEGES What We’re Learning. What Lies Ahead.
National Survey of Student Engagement, 2008 Results for UBC-Okanagan.
Derek Herrmann & Ryan Smith University Assessment Services.
Results of AUC’s NSSE Administration in 2011 Office of Institutional Research February 9, 2012.
Community College Survey of Student Engagement CCSSE 2014.
NSSE – Results & Connections Institutional Research & Academic Resources California State Polytechnic University, Pomona October 2, 2013 – Academic Senate.
An Equal Opportunity University Third Annual Meeting of the Provost’s Committee on Undergraduate Student Success October 22, 2009.
Selected Results of NSSE 2003: University of Kentucky December 3, 2003.
An Introduction: NSSE and the Concept of Student Engagement.
Student Engagement at Northeastern Illinois Analysis and Use of the National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) 2009.
2009 National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) Report Institutional Research & Information November 18, 2009.
Student Engagement: 2008 National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) Office of Institutional Research and Planning Presentation to Senate November 2008.
NSSE 2005: Student Perceptions of Enriching Educational Experiences Kathryn Doherty, Ed.D. January 18, 2006.
National Survey of Student Engagement, 2008 Results for UBC-Vancouver.
Gallaudet Institutional Research Report: National Survey of Student Engagement Pat Hulsebosch: Executive Director – Office of Academic Quality Faculty.
APSU 2009 National Survey of Student Engagement Patricia Mulkeen Office of Institutional Research and Effectiveness.
2009 National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) Report Institutional Research & Information November 18, 2009.
1 Student Engagement Retreat: Progress Updates February 15, 2013.
2009 National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) Report Institutional Research & Information November 18, 2009.
Results from the National Survey of Student Engagement Margaret Harrigan Office of Academic Planning and Analysis University of Wisconsin-Madison.
National Survey of Student Engagement 2009 Missouri Valley College January 6, 2010.
CCSSE 2010: SVC Benchmark Data Note: Benchmark survey items are listed in the Appendix (slides 9-14)
National Survey of Student Engagement 2007 Results for Students in Graduate and Professional Studies.
NSSE 2013 How to Use Results (or “Why you should care about NSSE”) 8/26/
NATIONAL SURVEY OF STUDENT ENGAGEMENT AT IU KOKOMO Administrative Council 26 September 2007.
NSSE 2005 CSUMB Report California State University at Monterey Bay Office of Institutional Effectiveness Office of Assessment and Research.
Looking Inside The “Oakland Experience” Another way to look at NSSE Data April 20, 2009.
Student Engagement as Policy Direction: Community College Survey of Student Engagement (CCSSE) Skagit Valley College Board of Trustees Policy GP-4 – Education.
Highlights of NSSE 2001: University of Kentucky December 10, 2001.
Student Engagement and Academic Performance: Identifying Effective Practices to Improve Student Success Shuqi Wu Leeward Community College Hawaii Strategy.
National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) Comparison on the survey results at UPRM with peers Office of Institutional Research and Planning University.
Jennifer Ballard George Kuh September 19, Overview  NSSE and the Concept of Student Engagement  Select Linfield results:  NSSE 2011  Brief explanation.
NSSE Working Student Study Assessment Day Presentation Office of Assessment Fitchburg State College.
1 NSSE Results Fort Lewis College (2010) Richard A. Miller Exec. Dir – OIRPA.
UNDERSTANDING 2012 NATIONAL SURVEY OF STUDENT ENGAGEMENT (NSSE) RESULTS Nicholls State University October 17, 2012.
GGC and Student Engagement.  NSSE  Overall: 27% (down 5%)  First Year: 25% (down 5%)  Seniors: 28% (down 5%)  GGC  Overall: 35% (up 7%)  First.
The University of Texas-Pan American National Survey of Student Engagement 2005 Results & Recommendations Presented by: November, 2005 S. J. Sethi, Ph.D.
Office of Institutional Research and Effectiveness 1 The University of Texas-Pan American National Survey of Student Engagement 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006.
The University of Texas-Pan American Susan Griffith, Ph.D. Executive Director National Survey of Student Engagement 2003 Results & Recommendations Presented.
National Survey of Student Engagement Executive Snapshot 2007.
Faculty Senate Pat Hulsebosch, Office of Academic Quality 11/17/08.
The University of Texas-Pan American
NSSE Results for Faculty
NSSE 2004 (National Survey of Student Engagement)
The University of Texas-Pan American
The University of Texas-Pan American
GGC and Student Engagement
Faculty In-Service Week
Presentation transcript:

 NSSE Results Austin Peay State University

NSSE Multi-year Benchmarks First Year Students

NSSE Multi-year Benchmarks Senior Students

NSSE Comparison of Retained and Not Retained students Values Not Retained to First Fall Retained to First FallGrand Total CI for Difference of Means NCount LAC (P value) Level of Academic Challenge Avg LAC (.009, 3.631) StdDev LAC Active and Collaborative Learning AvgACL ( ) StdDev ACL E-05 Student-Faculty Interaction Avg SFI (2.15, 7.4) StdDev SFI Enriching Educational Experiences Avg EEE (1.75, 5.78) StdDev EEE Supportive Campus Environment Avg SCE (0.41, 5.59) StdDev SCE

NSSE Comparison of Traditional and Non-Traditional students

Curricular Trends Students are studying longer … and feel that we emphasize studying

Curricular Trends Students are working harder than they thought they could … and learn more by analyzing, synthesizing and applying theories

Curricular Trends Fewer course texts, books and course packets Fewer and shorter papers

Support Trends Friendlier students and faculty… … and administration

Support Trends Students feel academically supported … and Traditional students feel increasingly socially supported

Support Trends Students don’t feel supported outside the university … and Non-Traditional students don’t feel supported socially or outside the university

Engagement Trends Increasing use of electronic media Increasing involvement in Practicums, Internships, Community Service, International and Capstone

Engagement Trends Decreasing involvement in Linked classes, Independent study, and Foreign Languages Lessening of curricular conversations outside class with faculty

Student-Faculty Trends More discussions with faculty about assignments, more questions asked and prompt feedback But Non-Trads work less with faculty in clubs and organizations

Co-Curricular Trends Still most students are disengaged from co-curricular activities …especially Non-Trad students

Active and Collaborative Trends Non-Trads study much less with their peers on projects in class … and to prepare for assignments outside class