OFFICE OF SCIENCE 1 Closeout Report on the DOE/SC CD-3b Review of the Utilities Upgrade Project (UUP) Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory August 11-12, 2015 Raymond Won Committee Chair Office of Science, U.S. Department of Energy

OFFICE OF SCIENCE 2 SC Organization

OFFICE OF SCIENCE 3 Charge Questions 1.At this stage of the project, is the project scope, if successfully completed, sufficient to achieve the project’s key performance parameters? 2.Is the bid solicitation package for Phase B scope consistent with the approved Project Execution Plan? Are bids or quotes already in hand? If so, are the base bids or quotes within the cost estimates, and consistent with the approved cost and schedule performance baseline? 3.Are cost, schedule, and scope contingency adequate to address the remaining risks? Are project risks being actively managed? 4.Are environment, safety and health requirements properly addressed? Are Integrated Safety Management principles being followed? 5.Has the Integrated Project Team responded appropriately to recommendations from prior reviews including those applicable to the proposed Phase B work?

OFFICE OF SCIENCE Review Committee Participants 4 Raymond Won, DOE/SC, Chairperson

OFFICE OF SCIENCE 5 2. Technical S. Wells, SLAC / Subcommittee 1 Findings Comments Recommendations 1.At this stage of the project, is the project scope, if successfully completed, sufficient to achieve the project’s key performance parameters? 2.Is the bid solicitation package for Phase B scope consistent with the approved Project Execution Plan? Are bids or quotes already in hand? If so, are the base bids or quotes within the cost estimates, and consistent with the approved cost and schedule performance baseline? 5.Has the Integrated Project Team responded appropriately to recommendations from prior reviews including those applicable to the proposed Phase B work?

OFFICE OF SCIENCE 6 3. Environment, Safety and Health B. Dunn, ANL / Subcommittee 2 4.Are environment, safety and health requirements properly addressed? Are Integrated Safety Management principles being followed? 5.Has the Integrated Project Team responded appropriately to recommendations from prior reviews including those applicable to the proposed Phase B work? Findings Comments Recommendations

OFFICE OF SCIENCE 7 4. Cost and Schedule S. Langish, PPPL / Subcommittee 3 1.At this stage of the project, is the project scope, if successfully completed, sufficient to achieve the project’s key performance parameters? 2.Is the bid solicitation package for Phase B scope consistent with the approved Project Execution Plan? Are bids or quotes already in hand? If so, are the base bids or quotes within the cost estimates, and consistent with the approved cost and schedule performance baseline? 3.Are cost, schedule, and scope contingency adequate to address the remaining risks? Are project risks being actively managed ? 5.Has the Integrated Project Team responded appropriately to recommendations from prior reviews including those applicable to the proposed Phase B work? Findings Comments Recommendations

OFFICE OF SCIENCE 8 4. Cost and Schedule S. Langish, PPPL / Subcommittee 3 PROJECT STATUS Project TypeMIE / Line Item / Cooperative Agreement CD-1Planned:Actual: CD-2Planned:Actual: CD-3Planned:Actual: CD-4Planned:Actual: TPC Percent CompletePlanned: _____%Actual: _____% TPC Cost to Date TPC Committed to Date TPC TEC Contingency Cost (w/Mgmt Reserve)$_____% to go Contingency Schedule on CD-4b______months_____% CPI Cumulative SPI Cumulative

OFFICE OF SCIENCE 9 5. Management G. Bloom, ORNL / Subcommittee 4 1.At this stage of the project, is the project scope, if successfully completed, sufficient to achieve the project’s key performance parameters? 2.Is the bid solicitation package for Phase B scope consistent with the approved Project Execution Plan? Are bids or quotes already in hand? If so, are the base bids or quotes within the cost estimates, and consistent with the approved cost and schedule performance baseline? 5.Has the Integrated Project Team responded appropriately to recommendations from prior reviews including those applicable to the proposed Phase B work? Findings Comments Recommendations