San Juan College Assessment Team Chair: Andrea Cooper, PhD Spring 2014.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Measuring Student and Teacher Technology Literacy for NCLB Whats an LEA to do? 2004 National School Boards Association Conference Denver Carol D. Mosley.
Advertisements

Literacy in the middle years of schooling focusing on Aboriginal Students.
Teacher Preparation and Education Reform: A Behavioral Systems Perspective Çhair: Ronnie Detrich, Wing Institute Discussant: Chuck Salzberg, Utah State.
Click here to add text Click here to add text. Local Control, Accountability, and Transforming How We Finance Our Schools Elk Grove Unified School District.
Teaching Methods Related to Student Progress in Lower-level STEM Courses Steve Benton, Ph.D. Senior Research Officer IDEA Emeritus Professor, Kansas State.
April 6, 2011 DRAFT Educator Evaluation Project. Teacher Education and Licensure DRAFT The ultimate goal of all educator evaluation should be… TO IMPROVE.
Common Core State Standards OVERVIEW CESA #9 - September 2010 Presented by: CESA #9 School Improvement Services Jayne Werner and Yvonne Vandenberg.
Academic Alignment CROSBY TURNAROUND COMMITTEE
Overview of the New Massachusetts Educator Evaluation Framework Opening Day Presentation August 26, 2013.
Working with Rubrics: Using the Oral Communication, Writing, and Critical Thinking Rubrics VALUE Rubrics Ashley Finley, Ph.D Senior Director of Assessment.
Conceptual Framework What It Is and How It Works Kathe Rasch, Maryville University Donna M. Gollnick, NCATE October 2005.
TeacherSchoolStudent Percentile Average 50 The Effects of Teachers and Schools on Student Achievement Over 2 consecutive years Marzano, R. J. (2003).
Using the Internet to Connect Educators and Their Instructional Ideas ANYONE CAN SIGN
San Juan High School Intermediate Intervention/Under-performing School Program By Mike Peebles, Teacher Partial fulfillment of ED251 Instructors: Duane.
Unit Assessment Plan Weber State University’s Teacher Preparation Program.
Student (and other) Course Evaluations Response Rates, Relevance and Results Kathleen Norris Plymouth State University, NH.
San Juan College Assessment Team Andrea Cooper, PhD.
Revised Illinois Professional Teaching Standards Rori R. Carson Western Illinois University.
What should be the basis of
performance INDICATORs performance APPRAISAL RUBRIC
Formative Assessment in Idaho Idaho is committed to the idea that a system of assessment will yield far better information about teaching and learning.
Standards Aligned System April 21, 2011 – In-Service.
Check-in on Curriculum Progress Next Steps.  Brings all of the pieces together.  Transparency  Creates curriculum conversation  A tool for the journey.
PDC Procedures – Individual Growth Action Plan The Individual Growth Action Plan (IGAP) is a plan each individual completes describing professional.
SOCIAL SCIENCES STANDARDS REVIEW AND REVISION February 2009-June 2011 PRESENTATION TO THE STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION.
Standard 5 - Faculty Qualifications, Performance, and Development Kate Steffens St. Cloud State University.
Leadership: Connecting Vision With Action Presented by: Jan Stanley Spring 2010 Title I Directors’ Meeting.
PARENT COORDINATOR INFORMATION SESSION PARENT ACCOUNTABILITY Wednesday, July 20, 2011 Madelene Chan, Supt. D24 Danielle DiMango, Supt. D25.
40 Performance Indicators. I: Teaching for Learning ST 1: Curriculum BE A: Aligned, Reviewed and Monitored.
“Current systems support current practices, which yield current outcomes. Revised systems are needed to support new practices to generate improved outcomes.”
Closing the Loop: The Assessment Process from Outcomes to Academic Excellence, Budgetary Competence and Community Engagement.
The College of Saint Rose School of Education Department of Literacy and Special Education Teacher Candidate Assessment.
Closing the Loop: The Assessment Process from Outcomes to Academic Excellence, Budgetary Competence and Community Engagement January 2012.
Implementing Formative Assessment Online Professional Development What Principals Need to know.
SASIT Thomas E. Gluck, Acting Secretary of Education Amy Morton, Deputy Secretary, Office of Elementary and Secondary Education Ed Vollbrecht, Ph.D., Director,
Professional Performance Process Presented at March 2012 Articulation Meetings.
A significant and historic opportunity for states to collectively develop and adopt a core set of academic standards in Mathematics and English/Language.
Welcome to TEAMS Mid-Year Training. Workshop Goals 1.Identify and share successes with TEAMS implementation 2.Identify and problem solve concerns with.
Graduate Portfolio to Document Impact on Student Learning CEC-TED 2004 Albuquerque, New Mexico Deborah S. Wallace, Ph.D. Susan B. Brown, Ph.D.
Expeditionary Learning Queens Middle School Meeting May 29,2013 Presenters: Maryanne Campagna & Antoinette DiPietro 1.
SACS-CASI Southern Association of Colleges and Schools Council on Accreditation and School Improvement FAMU DRS – QAR Quality Assurance Review April 27-28,
Welcome to Curriculum Mapping… The attendee will understand the purpose of curriculum mapping, with a focus on the alignment of instruction with desired.
WORKING TOGETHER TO IMPROVE SCIENCE EDUCATION PRESENTED BY GIBSON & ASSOCIATES A CALIFORNIA MATH AND SCIENCE PARTNERSHIP RESEARCH GRANT WISE II Evaluation.
Standards Aligned System What is SAS? A collaborative product of research and good practice Six distinct elements Clear Standards Fair.
Primary Purposes of the Evaluation System
Teacher Growth and Assessment: The SERVE Approach to Teacher Evaluation The Summative or Assessment Phase.
DPASII Criterion Rubrics for Teachers. Component 1: Planning and Preparation Criterion 1a: Selecting Instructional Goals ELEMENT Value, sequence and alignment.
Putting All the Pieces Together DISTRICT IMPROVEMENT Six Systems SIP Core Disciplines Vision STUDENT SUCCESSSTUDENT SUCCESS.
Curriculum Overview New Teacher Staff Development August 2007.
An Integral Part of Professional Learning Communities.
ANNOOR ISLAMIC SCHOOL AdvancEd Survey PURPOSE AND DIRECTION.
QEP Update Primary Outcomes improvement of students’ critical thinking skills 1. Measurable improvement of students’ critical thinking skills at the course,
Assessment Committee. Communicate what we Think about Assessment. Learn to Integrate assessment into our teaching practice and Act on it toward continuous.
SASIT Thomas E. Gluck, Acting Secretary of Education Amy Morton, Deputy Secretary, Office of Elementary and Secondary Education Ed Vollbrecht, Ph.D., Director,
Standards-Based Education
ACS WASC/CDE Visiting Committee Final Presentation South East High School March 11, 2015.
9 Common Characteristics of Successful Schools From: What we know about successful school leadership (2003). - American Education Research Association.
July 11, 2013 DDM Technical Assistance and Networking Session.
East Longmeadow Public Schools SMART Goals Presented by ELPS Leadership Team.
Taking Institutional Level Assessment to the Course Level Journey – Challenges – Discoveries Mesa Community College DIVING INTO DEEPER LEARNING.
ACS WASC/CDE Visiting Committee Final Presentation Panorama High School March
Blurred Lines: An MAT model designed to support struggling learners in the general curriculum Sally Drew, Laura Jacobson, & Joan Nicoll-Senft Central Connecticut.
NM Teacher Evaluation Planning & Preparation Creating an Environment of Learning Professionalism Teaching for Learning Evaluation.
+ Priory Curriculum & Instruction Faculty Inservice, August 2014.
As Good As It Gets…For Now:
IMPLEMENTATION - JANUARY 2013
Philippine Professional Standards for Teachers
New Teacher Evaluation Process
Institutional Learning Outcomes Assessment
Project (Problem) Based Learning
Presentation transcript:

San Juan College Assessment Team Chair: Andrea Cooper, PhD Spring 2014

Institutional CSLOs Assessment Team Program Assessment Plan Academic Schools Course Department Classroom Instructor Gen Ed CSLOs Assessment Team

Broad and Specialized Learning (BSL) Critical Thinking (CT) Cultural and Civic Engagement (CCE) Effective Communication (EC) Integrating Technologies (IT)

1. Teachers Teach to Clear Objectives to Support Student Learning. - Teachers align course design and daily lesson objectives with Syllabus/Course Learning Outcomes. 2. Teachers Apply Effective Practices in Curriculum and Instruction to Support Student Learning. - Teachers base best practices on discipline needs, professional development, collaboration with colleagues, and research. 3. Teachers Frequently Assess Student Learning. - Teachers use formative (non-graded) and summative (graded) assessments to guide student learning towards and identify student achievement of objectives and Course Learning Outcomes. - Departments use course level assessments and solicit external feedback from stakeholders to evaluate student performance. 4. Teachers Use Assessments to Revise Curriculum and Instruction to Improve Student Achievement. - Teachers use best practices research, professional development, and collaboration with colleagues to guide curricular revisions.

Total artifacts assessed=106

 Areas 2 and 3 have no data currently.  These areas have revealed challenged with our data collection. Either artifacts were not available for certain courses or content experts were needed for assessment.  The Assessment Team is working hard to meet these challenges.

4 5 15

5=Exemplary 4=Proficient 3=Competent 2=Developing 1=Unsatisfactory CSLO Assessment Total Artifacts assessed=436 Average

 Artifacts collected last semester (FA 13) will be assessed this semester (SP14).

 During CLSO assessment, online courses are part of our random selection every semester.  27% of sample since 2009  Online courses that have been sampled include: › SAFE 250 › SAFE 251 › SAFE 260 › PTAP 260 (2 sections) › COSC 125 › POLS 250 › PSYC 230 › ENGL 211 › ENGL 218 (2 sections) › ENGL 262

 Bigger sample sizes are more accurate › Focused on collecting CCE artifacts  Focus on CT › Held several workshops/sessions › Discussed how we teach CT and how we can teach it more effectively  In the last 2 years, 17 assessment sessions/workshops have been held to increase understanding and participation. Over 330 people have participated.

 Questions or comments?  Contact: › Andrea Cooper, PhD   School Reps: Janet Peterson-Humanities Gordon DeSpain-Math/Science Murdoch Maloney-Business Dean Patscheck-Energy Kerry Meier-T&T Amy Cooper-Health Sciences