Commission proposal for a new LIFE Regulation (2014-2020) Presentation to Directors Meeting DK 22 May 2012.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Technical Press Briefing LIFE Sub-programme for Climate Action Commission proposal for a new LIFE Regulation ( ) 12 December 2011.
Advertisements

Commission proposal for a new LIFE Regulation ( ) Committee of the Regions 16 February 2012.
The LIFE Integrated Projects
EU Wetland conservation policy. Communication on the Wise Use and Conservation of Wetlands (1995) => first European document dedicated exclusively.
The new LIFE Programme Opportunities for IL stakeholders Esther Pozo Vera Sector Coordinator Neighbourhood, Central Asia and Gulf States European.
1 Danube Transnational Programme Zsuzsanna Drahos Ministry for National Economy Department of Territorial Development Planning 17 April 2015.
PART 2: THE SUB-PROGRAMMES AND TYPES OF INTERVENTION LIFE presentation1.
1 MINISTRY OF AGRICULTURE AND FOOD Rural Development Policy
EUROPEAN COHESION POLICY AT A GLANCE Introduction to the EU Structural Funds Ctibor Kostal Sergej Muravjov.
Regional Policy Managing Authorities of the ETC programmes Annual Meeting W Piskorz, Head of Unit Competence Centre Inclusive Growth, Urban and.
Integrated Projects Spetember 2013 Maja Mikosinska DG Environment European Commission.
04/2007 European Funds in Bulgaria Supported by the European Commission (DG ENV)
The implementation of the rural development policy and its impacts on innovation and modernisation of rural economy Christian Vincentini, European Commission.
LIFE CLIMATE ACTION and the 2014 Call for proposals
A project implemented by the HTSPE consortium This project is funded by the European Union SUSTAINABLE GROWTH LIFE
Investing in Climate Action, investing in LIFE Introduction to the new LIFE Programme Charlotte Slater, ICF GHK 12/06/2014 Greek workshop.
REGIONAL POLICY EUROPEAN COMMISSION The EU Recovery Plan and the proposal amending the European Regional Development Fund Regulation.
EMFF Operational Programme EMFF programme: 6 main elements 1. Ex-ante conditionalities 2. Ex-ante evaluation 3. SWOT analysis & needs analysis.
EU Cohesion Policy 2014 – 2020 Measures, tools, methods for supporting cross-border cooperation prepared used for adoption and implementation of joint.
Implementation of TARGET 2 of the EU 2020 Biodiversity Strategy Claudia Olazábal Unit – Biodiversity DG ENV European Commission Nature Directors Meeting.
Joanna Fiedler Enlargement and Neighbouring Countries Unit DG Environment European Commission REReP → RENA Vision of the European Commission PEIP Regional.
Guidance notes on the Intevention Logic and on Building a priority axis 27 September 2013.
Strategic Priorities of the NWE INTERREG IVB Programme Harry Knottley, UK representative in the International Working Party Lille, 5th March 2007.
1 Multiannual Financial Framework Thematic Programming.
Managing the Natura 2000 network: state of play, challenges and opportunities.
European Development Fund (EDF)
Ministerul Mediului si Gospodaririi Apelor Session 6 - Enhancing National GEF Coordination, Communication and Outreach Developing the National Capacity.
Regional Policy EU Cohesion Policy 2014 – 2020 Proposals from the European Commission.
1 LIFE+ COUNCIL WORKING GROUP 4 OCTOBER Discussion Points 1. LIFE+ in Context: Environment funding under the Financial Perspectives.
The new governance focus of the future LIFE Programme ( ) ADAM D NAGY DIRECTORATE D - I MPLEMENTATION, G OVERNANCE & S EMESTER DG ENV.
DG Enlargement – Effective Support for Enlargement Conference, Brussels 19 October 2009 Concluding Remarks of the Co-chairs.
Investing in Climate Action, investing in LIFE Introduction to the new LIFE Programme Charlotte Slater, ICF GHK 12/06/2014 Greek workshop.
Loretta Dormal Marino Deputy Director General DG for Agriculture and Rural Development, European Commission IFAJ Congress 2010 – Brussels, 22 April 2010.
Expert Group on Natura 2000 Management Meeting of 19 May 2011 Fact Sheet on Member State Natura 2000 Management Planning THE N2K GROUP.
1 EUROPEAN FUNDS IN HALF-TIME NEW CHALLENGES Jack Engwegen Head of the Czech Unit European Commission, Directorate General for Regional Policy Prague,
REGIONAL POLICY EUROPEAN COMMISSION The contribution of EU Regional/Cohesion programmes Corinne Hermant-de Callataÿ European Commission,
Results Focus & Partnership Kirsti Mijnhijmer, Secretariat How to Apply Seminar 1st October 2014, Strathpeffer, Scotland.
"The challenge for Territorial Cohesion 2014 – 2020: delivering results for EU citizens" Veronica Gaffey Acting Director EUROPEAN COMMISSION, DG for Regional.
Jela Tvrdonova, The EU priorities:  Use the Leader approach for introducing innovation in the thematic axis  better governance at the local level.
European Commission Directorate General Environment Page 1 Regulation (EC) No 2152/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning monitoring.
The 7th Framework Programme for Research: Strategy of international cooperation activities Robert Burmanjer Head of Unit, “International Scientific Cooperation.
Richard Escritt, Director – Coordination of Community Actions DG Research, European Commission “The development of the ERA: Experiences from FP6 and reflections.
1 The urban dimension of cohesion policy 2014 – 2020.
The LIFE Programme Iñigo Ortiz de Urbina LIFE External Assistance Regional coordinator Technical Assistance to Support the Development of Green.
Monitoring Expert, NEEMO GEIE
LIFE Stefanie Hugelier FOD VVVL – DG Leefmilieu
PRIORITIES FOR THE FUTURE
GEF governance reforms to enhance effectiveness and civil society engagement Faizal Parish GEC, Central Focal Point , GEF NGO Network GEF-NGO Consultation.
Directorate General for Agriculture and Rural Development
07/11/2018 The new LIFE Programme Sylvie LUDAIN Laszlo BECSY DG ENV
The LIFE program 13th Meeting of the Marine Strategy Coordination Group (MSCG), Brussels, 13/05/2014 Dørte PARDO LÓPEZ DG Environment, Unit E.3 European.
ESF Committee plenary meeting in Rome
Task 1.2 Review existing and new financing instruments relevant for MSFD implementation.
of EU-level green and blue infrastructure
Workshop with the 8 PAF related Proposals & the Habitats Committee
Prioritised Action Frameworks for financing Natura 2000
A new financial instrument
Financing Natura 2000 in the next MFF
Restoration in the context of the EU Biodiversity Strategy
The new LIFE Programme Marine aspects
FINANCING NATURA 2000 Agenda item 2.1 CGBN Co-ordination Group
Commission proposal for a new LIFE Regulation CGBN meeting
Unit D.3 "Nature Protection"
The – new – LIFE program (Integrated Projects)
Technical Press Briefing LIFE Sub-programme for Climate Action Commission proposal for a new LIFE Regulation ( ) 12 December 2011.
Natura 2000 management group Brussels, 19 May 2011
Reform of the Common Fisheries Policy
CGBN Co-ordination Group for Biodiversity and Nature
Environment in Cohesion Policy framework for
Programme for the Environment and Climate Action
Presentation transcript:

Commission proposal for a new LIFE Regulation ( ) Presentation to Directors Meeting DK 22 May 2012

Context: The LIFE instrument The only EU financial instrument specifically targeting the environment. Since 1992, financed over 3100 projects contributing to over €2.7 billion to the protection of the environment.

Structure Creation of two sub-programmes: LIFE sub-programme for Environment LIFE sub-programme for Climate Action

Structure: the sub-programme for Environment Biodiversity: Focused on Natura2000 (in particular Integrated Projects to implement Prioritised Action Frameworks); and the implementation of EU Biodiversity Strategy 2020; Best practice and demonstration for nature and biodiversity 50% of resources allocated to biodiversity projects under the sub-programme for Environment.

Structure: the sub-programme for Environment LIFE sub-programme for Environment: three priority areas: Environment & Resource Efficiency: Development, testing and demonstration of policy approaches, best practices and solutions to environmental problems; Shift focus towards implementation through Integrated Projects (waste, water, air); Includes a specific objective in relation to Resource efficiency; Private sector oriented market-replication excluded (to be covered under Horizon 2020).

Structure: the sub-programme for Environment Environmental Governance & Information: Supports information and awareness raising projects and activities and facilitates knowledge sharing; Supports cooperation networks, and best practices for enforcement and compliance; Promotes better governance and supports environmental NGOs.

Integrated Project: what is it? IP are larger projects that shall: Implement plans, programmes or strategies required by EU environmental or climate legislation or pursuant to other acts or developed by MS authorities; Have a Larger scale, e.g., regional, multiregional, national; Be primarily in the areas of nature, water, waste, air, climate mitigation and adaptation Involve, where appropriate, stakeholders (NGOs, private sector, farmers, water companies, transport companies, etc.) Promote, when possible, the coordination with and mobilisation of other EU funds

Examples: IP - Nature A Region develops a Regional Programme for Natura2000 covering all 100 sites under its jurisdiction It identifies a range of management and conservation activities. The region then identifies the financial needs for the implementation of these activities and submits a proposal for a LIFE Integrated Project. This project clearly specifies the activities or group of activities among those included in the programme that will be financed by LIFE e.g. the restoration and connectivity activities, capacity building, awareness raising. In addition, it may present evidence on how it will use other funds (EARDF, ERDF, private) to implement the complementary measures compensation payments, correction of power lines, infrastructure etc.

Ensuring success of Integrated Projects At EU level: Ensure better link and coordination with other EU Funds - Common Strategic Framework Simplify selection process for IP: the 2-step approach Simplify reporting obligations for IP Active dissemination of examples and good practices by LIFE and in the specific working groups and committees for the sectors concerned Technical assistance for MS facing problems to prepare an IP For Natura2000: LIFE+ is already financing Prioritised Action Frameworks (PAFs) that will serve as a basis for IP.

Multi Annual Work Programmes Shift from a pure bottom-up approach to a flexible top-down approach; Prepared by the Commission in consultation with the MS. These will cover e.g., priorities, allocation of resources between interventions, and targets for the period – not exhaustive. Closer links to EU policy priorities and possibility to create critical mass in specific areas. They set priorities for at least 2 years ensuring stability for potential applicants. Priorities are not exhaustive: a proposal may be submitted if it falls within the priority areas included in the Regulation. Limitation: Integrated Projects primarily in areas referred to by the Regulation.

Territorial Scope Possible participation of Third Countries (as per current LIFE+). Possible co-operation with International Organisations (e.g., international studies such as TEEB). Activities outside the Union possible in exceptional cases: Action outside the EU is indispensable to achieve EU environmental/climate objectives; or To ensure the effectiveness of interventions carried out in the MS; and The coordinating beneficiary is based in the EU.

Simplification and complementarity Most problematic categories of cost for beneficiaries to be considered ineligible (VAT, permanent staff costs). To compensate for the loss of these categories, there is an increase in the co-financing rate (from 50 to 70% - to 80% for IPs).

A budget for achieving LIFE objectives €3.6 billion for (only 0.3% of EU budget): €2.7 billion for the sub- programme for Environment. €0.9 billion for the sub- programme for Climate Action The budget has been calculated in a bottom-up manner as the minimum to achieve objectives and targets.

National allocations : did they work?

Thank you for your attention