Precision Management Techniques for Forage Production Systems By Andy Clifford.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Grazing Management: Systems
Advertisements

Module #6 Forage Selection Pine Silvopasture in the Southeast.
Guidelines for Setting “Proper” Stocking Rate
Basic Agricultural Terminology A Quiz for New Farmers If you want to “walk-the-walk” you have to “talk-the-talk”
Economics of Producing Cattle on Forage R. Curt Lacy, Ph.D. Extension Economist-Livestock.
MAKING FORAGES WORK IN TODAY’S PRODUCTION ENVIRONMENT Jon Repair Extension Agent, Crop and Soil Science Virginia Cooperative Extension.
Silage and Haylage: facing new economic realities Stan Smith Fairfield County, OSU Extension.
Paddock Layout and Design. Before Building Fence Guideline #1: Flexibility.
Teff Grass as a Warm Season Forage for Backgrounding Calves in the Shenandoah Valley Brian Jones – Agronomy Jason Carter – Animal Science.
Grazing and Oak Trees Glenn Nader University of California Livestock & Natural Resources FA.
Photo from NRCS Range and Pasture Management.  Benefits of grazing management  How grass grows  Steps to effective grazing management  Estimating.
Guidelines for Setting “Proper” Stocking Rate K. Launchbaugh UDSA-ARS.
Primary Resource Activities
why, where and when of Pasture Management Willie Lantz Extension Educator Ag and Natural Resources Garrett County, Maryland.
What is the value of TGM to the consultant and a producer?
The University of Tennessee Agricultural Extension Service A Decision Tool for Improved Beef Cattle Production, Management and Marketing System Analysis.
Livestock Feeding Practices By: Mariah Gumfory, Arlene Barrett, Haley Vrazel, & Dennis Bratton.
SILVOPASTURE IN SOUTHEAST Presented by: Joshua Idassi, Ph.D. Extension Forester Tennessee State University Cooperative Extension Program.
Grazing Economics: Yeah, but will it make money? Dr. Curt Lacy Agricultural Economists University of Georgia.
Polk County Soils and Crops Conference Dr. Weston Walker Missouri State University February 7, 2006.
Food and Agriculture Chapter 15.
USING A TEST HAY FOR FEEDING LIVESTOCK Shelby J. Filley Regional Livestock & Forage Specialist Proper nutrition at a lower cost.
Module #1 Economic Considerations Pine Silvopasture in the Southeast.
Grazing Arithmetic Dennis Hancock Extension Forage Specialist UGA – Dept. of Crop and Soil Sciences Dennis Hancock Extension Forage Specialist UGA – Dept.
Basic Record Keeping Information - Inventory Student name here.
Grazing Management 101 Basic Concepts
Corn, Soybeans and ? ? ? Crop rotations and the economic realities Stan Smith Fairfield County, OSU Extension.
Does Grazing Lower My Cost of Production? Kenny Burdine University of Kentucky.
11 Livestock Forage Disaster Program (LFP) James B. Johnson Emeritus Professor MSU Department of Agricultural Economics and Economics Billings, MT January.
Pasture management and output Dr. Dan Morrical Iowa State University.
Precision Equine Grazing Management By: Tamara Knaust.
DGM:ISU:2013 Sheep and Pastures Dr. Dan “Grumpy” Morrical Sheep Extension Specialist Animal Science Department
 Improved animal performance  High yielding  Renovating cool season pasture  Double cropping system  Emergency situations  “Salvage crop” Advantages.
Low input Pasture Renovation through multi species intensive grazing. Low input renovation of a long fallow pasture by intensively grazing feeder lambs.
SMALL GROUP ACTIVITY ON FORAGE ECONOMICS: 3 Options GEOFF BENSON EXTENSION ECONOMIST DEPT. OF AGRICULTURAL & RESOURCE ECONOMICS NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY.
GRAZING ECONOMICS: YEAH, BUT WILL IT MAKE MONEY? Dr. Curt Lacy Agricultural Economists University of Georgia.
Equine Science Classes of Feeds
Managing Your Pasture Joyce E. Meader Dairy/ Livestock Educator Cooperative Extension, U. Conn.
Meeting the Nutritional Needs of Livestock on Pasture Donna M. Amaral-Phillips University of Kentucky.
ECONOMICS OF IMPROVED GRAZING SYSTEMS Dr. Tommie Shepherd, Dr. John McKissick and Dr. Curt Lacy Extension Economist-Livestock University of Georgia.
Winter (and Spring) Forage Management Dennis Hancock Extension Forage Agronomist Crop and Soil Sciences Dennis Hancock Extension Forage Agronomist Crop.
MiG basics: Layout and Design of Grazing Cells Jim Gerrish American GrazingLands Services LLC Patterson, Idaho V.2012.
Bob Woods Area Extension Agronomy Specialist, NE Oklahoma Central OK Cattle Conference 2009.
Potassium Cycle, Fertilizer, and Organic K Sources. Fundamentals of Nutrient Management Training. August Morgantown, WV. Ed Rayburn West Virginia.
FORAGE PRODUCTION IN SOUTH GEORGIA. PASTURES CAN PROVIDE: INEXPENSIVE HIGH QUALITY FEED IN THE FORM OF GRAZING, HAY OR SILAGE PASTURES AND HAY CAN SUPPLY.
ASPP-300 Forage Planning Software J. A. Jennings and M. S. Gadberry University of Arkansas.
Classes of Feeds for Horses Presentation Part 4: Roughages (Continued 2) #8895-B.
Forage Yield, Distribution, and Quality: (Matching forage production with animal needs) Nick Hill, Dept. Crop and Soil Sciences, Athens.
Pasture Rotation Karen Hutchinson Virginia Cooperative Extension This presentation is from Virginia Tech and has not been edited by the Georgia Curriculum.
Introduction to Concentrated Animal Feeding Operations CAFOs Christina Richmond West Virginia Department of Agriculture.
Grazing Management to Minimize Cost
Multiple Species Grazing In Oklahoma
Partial Budgeting AAE 320 Paul D. Mitchell.
Charles Brummer UGA Forage Breeding
Top Ten Pasture Management Tips Dan Morrical Iowa State University
Optimizing the size, number, and layout of your paddocks
How does beef get From a cattle Farm to our Fork?
Towards a Sustainable Agriculture
Livestock Feeding Practices
Partial Budgeting AAE 320 Paul D. Mitchell.
Grazing Management Basics
Sustainable Agriculture
Being ready for one before one happens
Cattle Market Update Derrell S. Peel
Setting a Stocking Rate
Grazing Methods and Their Role in Pasture Management
Variable Seeding Rate in Sweet Sorghum
Forage Selection Pine Silvopasture in the Southeast 4/5/
Calculating Forage Requirements and Yield
Partial Budgeting AAE 320 Paul D. Mitchell.
Presentation transcript:

Precision Management Techniques for Forage Production Systems By Andy Clifford

The Value of Forage In Oklahoma, excluding livestock, hay is the second most valuable crop, behind winter wheat.In Oklahoma, excluding livestock, hay is the second most valuable crop, behind winter wheat. Hay has a value of 302 million dollars annually just in the state of Oklahoma, wheat has a value of 386 million dollars.Hay has a value of 302 million dollars annually just in the state of Oklahoma, wheat has a value of 386 million dollars. There was 625,000 tons of silage cut in the year 2000 in Oklahoma.There was 625,000 tons of silage cut in the year 2000 in Oklahoma.

The Value of Forage cont’d. LivestockLivestock –Cattle, sheep, horses, and goats all spend the majority of their life on some type of pasture. –The 5.4 million head of cattle in Oklahoma account for 1.57 billion dollars added to the economy annually. –300,000 horses and 55,000 sheep.

Pasture in Oklahoma 27 million acres of Oklahoma is planted or used as some type of pasture27 million acres of Oklahoma is planted or used as some type of pasture 44,020,480 acres in Oklahoma.44,020,480 acres in Oklahoma. 61% of the surface area of Oklahoma is in some type of permanent or temporary pasture.61% of the surface area of Oklahoma is in some type of permanent or temporary pasture.

Grain and Fiber Crops Production mainly focused on the production of seed or fiber associated with the seed.Production mainly focused on the production of seed or fiber associated with the seed. Harvest does not usually occur until the plant has reached maturity.Harvest does not usually occur until the plant has reached maturity. Production aimed towards producing the most seed rather than the most green forage.Production aimed towards producing the most seed rather than the most green forage.

Forage Crops Production mainly aimed towards the production of high quality green forage per unit of land area.Production mainly aimed towards the production of high quality green forage per unit of land area. Harvest occurs over a longer period before and after the plant reaches maturity.Harvest occurs over a longer period before and after the plant reaches maturity.

Traditional Forage Systems Continuous Livestock GrazingContinuous Livestock Grazing Hay ProductionHay Production Greenchop Forage and Drylot SystemsGreenchop Forage and Drylot Systems Silage ProductionSilage Production

Methods for increasing productivity or profitability through additional management Decrease production costs and inputsDecrease production costs and inputs Increase total volume of forage producedIncrease total volume of forage produced Increase quality of forage producedIncrease quality of forage produced Increase overall value of forage producedIncrease overall value of forage produced Increased forage harvest efficiencyIncreased forage harvest efficiency

Precision Management Nutrient ManagementNutrient Management –Soil Testing Grid soil samplingGrid soil sampling –Sensor based nutrient mgmt. Water ManagementWater Management –Natural Rainfall –Irrigation MIGMIG

What is MIG? The use of additional management to improve profitability or sustainability of a livestock and forage operation.The use of additional management to improve profitability or sustainability of a livestock and forage operation. Most often a combination of rotational grazing, improved forages, irrigation, and other types of intensive management techniques.Most often a combination of rotational grazing, improved forages, irrigation, and other types of intensive management techniques.

Forage Quantity and Quality

Rotational Grazing Systems

Stocking Rates The number of animals placed in a paddock is determined by several factors related to the livestock and to the forage.The number of animals placed in a paddock is determined by several factors related to the livestock and to the forage. –Weather and other environmental conditions –Forage QualityQuality QuantityQuantity SpeciesSpecies –Livestock SpeciesSpecies AgeAge SizeSize

How stocking rates are determined Stocking rates are usually determined based on the measure known as Animal Units (A.U.) or AUE.Stocking rates are usually determined based on the measure known as Animal Units (A.U.) or AUE. –One Animal Unit requires 26 pounds of dry matter per day.

Calculating AUE Kind or Class Forage Consumption (pounds of DM/day) AUE Cows261.0 Cows with calves # steers Bulls321.3 Horses Sheep70.2 Goats60.16 Deer60.16

Forage quality and quantity Animal units are usually based just on the quantity of forage.Animal units are usually based just on the quantity of forage. Could stocking rates be more accurately set if the quality of the forage was also taken into consideration?Could stocking rates be more accurately set if the quality of the forage was also taken into consideration?

Nutrient requirements of livestock. Livestock’s nutrient requirements are less as they grow older.Livestock’s nutrient requirements are less as they grow older. –Young calves require higher quality forage than older steers or heifers. –Yearling cattle require higher nutrient levels than mature stock cows. –Etc.

Determining forage availability. Most common method is based on a combination of “eyeball” estimates and local averages.Most common method is based on a combination of “eyeball” estimates and local averages. A more accurate and precise method is a forage inventory.A more accurate and precise method is a forage inventory.

Forage inventory What is a forage inventory? An enclosure such as a quadrant or hula hoop of known dimensions is placed in a representative area of a field.An enclosure such as a quadrant or hula hoop of known dimensions is placed in a representative area of a field. The forage from within the enclosure is clipped and sorted based on species and desirability of the forage.The forage from within the enclosure is clipped and sorted based on species and desirability of the forage.

Forage Inventory cont’d The desirable forages are weighed and measure for quality.The desirable forages are weighed and measure for quality. This measure is taken in several other locations within the paddock or pasture to obtain a representative sample.This measure is taken in several other locations within the paddock or pasture to obtain a representative sample. A stocking rate can be established based on these measurements.A stocking rate can be established based on these measurements.

Advantages –More precise and accurate stocking rates can be established. –Forage availability is known and there will be less of a need for purchased feed. –Prevents over- or underutilization of forage. –Reduces Spatial variability in paddocks or pastures. –Maintains ideal species balance in pastures. –Environmental benefits.

Disadvantages –Requires more time and management. –Requires more labor. –Additional knowledge of forage species, plant physiology and nutrient management is required. –Can create severe problems if producer neglects the system for extended periods.

Cattleman, grassfarmer, or Both? Most ranchers view themselves as caretakers of livestock.Most ranchers view themselves as caretakers of livestock. A more profitable approach might be to view yourself as a grassfarmer who utilizes livestock to harvest his forage.A more profitable approach might be to view yourself as a grassfarmer who utilizes livestock to harvest his forage.

Tools which might be useful if developed. SensorsSensors –On the go fertilizer applicators which use sensors. –A sensor which can provide an accurate quantitative and qualitative measure available forage in a paddock or pasture.

References Oregon State University,Management Intensive Grazing Pagehttp:// ems/Techniques/MIG/What.htmlOregon State University,Management Intensive Grazing Pagehttp:// ems/Techniques/MIG/What.htmlhttp:// ems/Techniques/MIG/What.htmlhttp:// ems/Techniques/MIG/What.html Gerrish, J.R., Basic Concepts of Management Intensive Grazing, Iowa State University Extention service, Beef Cattle Handbook, J.R., Basic Concepts of Management Intensive Grazing, Iowa State University Extention service, Beef Cattle Handbook, Rollins, Dale, Determining Native Range Stocking Rates, Oklahoma Sate University Extension service. Pub. # F Dale, Determining Native Range Stocking Rates, Oklahoma Sate University Extension service. Pub. # F Oklahoma Agricultural Statistics Service. Agricultural Statistics Service.

Questions