Feature Extractor Dima Chirkin, LBNL The future is here.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
VETO Analysis Update Michael Wood University of Massachusetts, Amherst Outline Introduction and basics Reconstruction packages Efficiencies Simulation.
Advertisements

Analog-to-Digital Converter (ADC) And
On-Chip Processing for the Wave Union TDC Implemented in FPGA
1 Scintillating Fibre Cosmic Ray Test Results Malcolm Ellis Imperial College London Monday 29 th March 2004.
29 June 2004Paul Dauncey1 ECAL Readout Tests Paul Dauncey For the CALICE-UK electronics group A. Baird, D. Bowerman, P. Dauncey, C. Fry, R. Halsall, M.
Y. Karadzhov MICE Video Conference Thu April 9 Slide 1 Absolute Time Calibration Method General description of the TOF DAQ setup For the TOF Data Acquisition.
Investigation for Readout Electronics of WAC in LHAASO Shubin Liu University of Science & Technology of China April 22nd, 2009.
Design and test of a high-speed beam monitor for hardon therapy H. Pernegger on behalf of Erich Griesmayer Fachhochschule Wr. Neustadt/Fotec Austria (H.
Ph. Farthouat CERN ELEC 2002 ADC 1 Analog to Digital Conversion  Introduction  Main characteristics –Resolution –Dynamic range –Bandwidth –Conversion.
ECAL electronics Guido Haefeli, Lausanne PEBS meeting 10.Jan
Mott DAQ Speed December 18, How to speedup DAQ I.Reject low-energy electrons before reaching DAQ: 1.Increase E-detector hardware threshold 2.Vetoing.
TOF Electronics Qi An Fast Electronics Lab, USTC Sept. 16~17, 2002.
The Transverse detector is made of an array of 256 scintillating fibers coupled to Avalanche PhotoDiodes (APD). The small size of the fibers (5X5mm) results.
Sean Grullon with Gary Hill Maximum likelihood reconstruction of events using waveforms.
DOM Input Issues: PMT Output, ATWD input, and Trigger Comparator Design Criteria ICENOTE105 DOM input issues Gerald Przybylski Lawrence Berkeley National.
1 S. E. Tzamarias Hellenic Open University N eutrino E xtended S ubmarine T elescope with O ceanographic R esearch Readout Electronics DAQ & Calibration.
Tests with JT0623 & JT0947 at Indiana University Nagoya PMT database test results for JT0623 at 3220V: This tube has somewhat higher than usual gain. 5×10.
KamLAND Experiment Kamioka Liquid scintillator Anti-Neutrino Detector - Largest low-energy anti-neutrino detector built so far - Located at the site of.
Diana Parno – July 22, 2008 January PREx Test Run: Compton Photon Analysis Diana Parno Carnegie Mellon University HAPPEX Collaboration Meeting.
14/02/2007 Paolo Walter Cattaneo 1 1.Trigger analysis 2.Muon rate 3.Q distribution 4.Baseline 5.Pulse shape 6.Z measurement 7.Att measurement OUTLINE.
IceCube: String 21 reconstruction Dmitry Chirkin, LBNL Presented by Spencer Klein LLH reconstruction algorithm Reconstruction of digital waveforms Muon.
Time calibration IceCube reconstruction workshop UMD, November 2004 Dmitry Chirkin, LBNL.
TOF Meeting, 9 December 2009, CERN Chiara Zampolli for the ALICE-TOF.
1 N eutrino E xtended S ubmarine T elescope with O ceanographic R esearch Operation and performance of the NESTOR test detector.
GEM MINIDRIFT DETECTOR WITH CHEVRON READOUT EIC Tracking Meeting 10/6/14 B.Azmoun, BNL.
“End station A setup” data analysis Josef Uher. Outline Introduction to setup and analysis Quartz bar start counter MA and MCP PMT in the prototype.
NA62 Gigatracker Working Group Meeting 23 March 2010 Massimiliano Fiorini CERN.
The DRS2 Chip: A 4.5 GHz Waveform Digitizing Chip for the MEG Experiment Stefan Ritt Paul Scherrer Institute, Switzerland.
UW Engineering DOM Studies Kael Hanson University of Wisconsin – Madison LBNL DOM Workshop 23 July 2003.
Mar 20, 2005 Iterative pe finder: IceTop data compression applied to In-ice D. Seckel, Univ. of Delaware.
Feature Extraction IceCube Collaboration meeting in Berkeley, March 2005 Dmitry Chirkin, LBNL.
Feature Extractor: overview and history of recent changes Dmitry Chirkin, UW Madison Goal: Given an ATWD or FADC waveform, determine arrival times of some.
DOM Main PCB Testing Gerald Przybylski October 23, 2002 Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.
FADC Time Study EJ, HD 10/09. Purpose: to test Hai Dong’s firmware implementation of Indiana U. timing algorithm NOT meant to be a definitive study of.
(s)T3B Update – Calibration and Temperature Corrections AHCAL meeting– December 13 th 2011 – Hamburg Christian Soldner Max-Planck-Institute for Physics.
DOM MB Test Results at LBNL Main Board Readiness Status Review LBNL, July 2003 Azriel Goldschmidt.
5 June 2002DOM Main Board Engineering Requirements Review 1 DOM Main Board Hardware Engineering Requirements Review June 5, 2002 LBNL David Nygren.
Time and amplitude calibration of the Baikal-GVD neutrino telescope Vladimir Aynutdinov, Bair Shaybonov for Baikal collaboration S Vladimir Aynutdinov,
Jean-François Genat Fast Timing Workshop June 8-10th 2015 FZU Prague Timing Methods with Fast Integrated Technologies 1.
M. LefebvreATLAS LAr week, November 19th HEC-EMEC beam test data analysis Filtering weight synchronization and timing issues TDC timing Cubic timing.
1 EMCAL Reconstruction in Pass pp 900 GeV 29/03/2010 Gustavo Conesa Balbastre.
Development of a pad interpolation algorithm using charge-sharing.
A. Tsirigotis Hellenic Open University N eutrino E xtended S ubmarine T elescope with O ceanographic R esearch Reconstruction, Background Rejection Tools.
Status of Detector Characterization a.k.a. Calibration & Monitoring Project Year 2 objectives ( → Mar ‘04) 1. Calibration plan (first draft in March.
Muon Energy reconstruction in IceCube and neutrino flux measurement Dmitry Chirkin, University of Wisconsin at Madison, U.S.A., MANTS meeting, fall 2009.
Digitization at Feed Through R&D (2) Digitizer Performance Evaluation Student: John Odeghe ; SC State, Fermi Lab Intern Supervisor: JinYuan Wu; Fermi Lab.
New zero suppression in simulation: current status David Adams BNL November 25, 2015 DUNE 35-ton simulation, reconstruction and analysis.
PHOTOTUBE SCANNING SETUP AT THE UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND Doug Roberts U of Maryland, College Park.
28/11/02Guy Dewhirst1 Ultra Light Weights Method Guy Dewhirst Imperial College London.
Proposal for the after-pulse effect suppression  Observation of pulses and after-pulses  Shape measurement  Algorithm  Results  Efficiencies for after-pulse.
11 june 2002 CMS ECAL : Patrick Jarry ( Saclay) 1 Pulse shape reconstruction : CMS ECAL Introduction –the problem –the tools –experimental pulse shape.
DAQ and Trigger for HPS run Sergey Boyarinov JLAB July 11, Requirements and available test results 2. DAQ status 3. Trigger system status and upgrades.
 13 Readout Electronics A First Look 28-Jan-2004.
Feb C.Smith UVA EC energy calibration – g13 pass0 For pass0 data were cooked with CALDB calibration constants reset to nominal 10 channels / MeV.
Transient Waveform Recording Utilizing TARGET7 ASIC
Jinfan Chang Experimental Physics Center , IHEP Feb 18 , 2011
EZDC spectra reconstruction and calibration
ETD meeting First estimation of the number of links
South Pole Ice model Dmitry Chirkin, UW, Madison.
L. Ratti, M. Manghisoni Università degli Studi di Pavia INFN Pavia
Design of Digital Filter Bank and General Purpose Digital Shaper
A First Look J. Pilcher 12-Mar-2004
Time resolution measurement with Madison test-DAQ
Time calibration Dmitry Chirkin, LBNL UC Berkeley, November 2004.
String-21 Flasher Analysis
BESIII EMC electronics
TLK10xxx High Speed SerDes Overview
Geometry and Timing Verification with Flashers
Reconstruction of the SC with rime
CAL crosstalk issues and their implications
Presentation transcript:

Feature Extractor Dima Chirkin, LBNL The future is here

What is Feature Extraction Given an ATWD or FADC waveform, determine arrival times of all photons which contributed: hit series (DisableHitSeries) FEInfo: combination or leading edge, width, charge (or amplitude) reco pulse series:  Timestamp  Charge

Unnecessary waveform “features” undershooting: 1 mV for 50 mV pulse (due to transformer droop; corrected by the fat-reader and DOMCalibrator) pedestal drift (corrected for by the fat-reader)

FADC pedestal and droop correction Plots by Kael and Nobuyoshi

FADC pedestal and droop correction pedestal found dynamically from data temperature from monitoring data permeability scaled to match measurements at +25 and –45 C. FADC is feature extracted and results match those from ATWDs

FADC-ATWD timing offset The offset between FADC and ATWD:  5 (FADC pipeline stages) * 25 ns (FADC bin size)  ns (FADC aperture time)  ns (delay line time)  4 (number of ATWD pre-bins) * ~3.5 ns (ATWD bin size) Comes up to 5.2 ns + 4*ATWD bin size ~ 19 ns The 4.68 ns is mostly due to the uncertainty in the FADC timing  for ATWD (scaling this down a factor 25/3.5) we get 0.65 ns

Root fit method (MaxNumHits)

Bayesian unfolding: FastPeakUnfolding

Transient time correction (PMTTransient) A correction proportional to high-voltage needs must made to describe high-voltage- dependent delay of the developing signal in the PMT  Laser DFL calibration should be sufficient?  also estimated by the domcal in ice, provides somewhat less precise results (higher timing rms with the flasher data)

Importance of the raw wf info poor resolution in flasher runs (double or even triple peak structures) were a result of false maximum estimation in the saturated wavefroms or fitting of prepulses. This is corrected by choosing the first saturated point when looking for a maximum. Then the leading edge is well defined.

FastFirstPeak options: bits 0 and 1 A multitude of the fast first peak options were implemented: FastFirstPeak is a 0-7: bitmask, bits 0-2 are used: * bit[0]=0 (values of 0,2): largest peak and its charge 1. look for the first time bin, which value is 1022 in ATWD counts of the ATWD channel, which was used for this bin (normally the highest channel available). 2. find the bin where the waveform reaches its maximum among bins from 0 to the one found in step 1 (or, if it was not found, all bins), which are above the threshold (set with ADCThreshold). 3. from the maximum found in step 2 go downhill to the beginning of the waveform and find the pair of bins between which the increment (i.e., the estimate of the derivative) is the largest. 4. draw a line though these two points and find its intersection with the baseline; that's an estimate of the LE. Fit a parabola in the vicinity of the bin corresponding to the waveform maximum, found in step 2, to get an estimate on the location and amplitude at the maximum; assuming a standard pulse shape (which depends on the 3 parameters and the baseline) find the charge estimate Q contained in the part of the waveform, which is closest to the found LE and maximum. * bit[0]=1 (values of 1,3): first peak above the threshold and the total waveform charge 1. Advancing through the waveform (from the first time bin), find the first pair of bins with values above the threshold, for which the increment is locally at maximum (i.e., it gets smaller for the next pair, and was smaller for the pair before the found one). 2. draw a line through these two points and find its intersection with the baseline; that's an estimate of the LE. Sum all bin values in the waveform, which are above the threshold; this is an estimate of charge Q. bit[0]=0 bit[0]=1

FastFirstPeak options: bits 2 and 3 bit[2]:  0: default.  1: enforce the total above the baseline charge calculation when bit[0]=0 (as is done for bit[0]=1). bit[3]:  0: default.  1: Feature-extract FADC.

FeatureExtractor options MaxNumHits [default=0]: Maximum number of SPE-like fits to combine. Set to 0 to perform a fast le fit and charge estimate only (w/o root fit). Set to 1 to refine this result with the root fit (still only one pulse per waveform is fit). DO NOT USE: mostly obsolete MinSPEWidth [default=4]: Minimum SPE-like pulse width in [ns] MaxSPEWidth [default=20]: Maximum SPE-like pulse width in [ns] InitialHitSeriesReco [default="InitialHitSeriesReco"]: The name of the produced hit series in the RecoHitSeriesData DataReadoutName [default="ATWDReadout"]: The name to be used for reading the datareadout from the event FeatureExtractor [default="FeatureExtractor"]: The name of the analog Info produced by FeatureExtractor

FeatureExtractor options FastFirstPeak [default=0]: select the initial solution method (or the only solution if both of the multi-peak reconstruction methods are disabled ADCThreshold [default=0.4]: ADC Threshold in terms of SPE discriminator threshold FastPeakUnfolding [default=-1]: Fast fit unfolding: set to 0 to enable. This can be used as the only multi-peak extraction algorithm, or in a combination with the root fits. The latter is enabled if FastPeakUnfolding is positive and MaxNumHits is not 0. If the total charge in the waveform is less than FastPeakUnfolding, the fast unfolding is performed, otherwise the root fits are used. PMTTransient [default=2]: Add PMT transient time to extracted hit times if 1 (linear with Voltage) or 2 (wider range sqrt fit). Use 0 to disable. DisableHitSeries [default=0]: Disable hit series generation - use to speed up processing of waveforms with very large charge.