The Metropolitan Transportation Plan for North Central Texas Public Meetings January 2016.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
General Update March Background As the region grows, increased travel demand on our aging Metro Highway System will continue to create additional.
Advertisements

I-66 Corridor Improvements Outside the Beltway CTB Briefing
Infrastructure Planning and Funding MID-REGION COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS MID-REGION METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION MARCH 19, 2015 NAIOP-NEW MEXICO CHAPTER.
City of Ashland Transportation System Plan Update September 6 th, 2012.
Tysons 1 Operational Analysis of Dulles Toll Road Ramps to Tysons Board Transportation Committee Meeting September 17, 2013 Seyed Nabavi Fairfax County.
Joe Olson SW Region Director December 8,  History/Background  Next Steps (Planning & Environmental Linkages (PEL)  PEL Process  Schedule  Questions.
Dr Lina Shbeeb Minister of Transport. Jordan
21 st Century Committee Report Recommendations NC 73 Council of Planning Annual Meeting January 22, 2009.
1 Status Report on the Bus Systems in the National Capital Region Report of the Regional Bus Subcommittee to the Access for All Advisory Committee April.
1 Multi-Sector Approach to Reducing Greenhouse Gas Emissions in the Metropolitan Washington Region Land Use and Transportation Strategies Prepared for:
December 11, 2007 Michael Morris, P.E., Director of Transportation North Central Texas Council.
2030 Long-Range Transportation Plan Ithaca-Tompkins County Transportation Council Public MeetingFernando de Aragón TCPL October 15, 2008Staff Director.
1 Multi-Sector Approach to Reducing Greenhouse Gas Emissions in the Metropolitan Washington Region Land Use and Transportation Strategies Prepared for:
May 28, Vision Statement and Goals, Objectives and Performance Measures for the 2040 LRTP Status of these items: Draft Approved by LRTP Subcommittee.
Improving Your World. RS&H tradition began in 1941 Employee-owned company Six programs of client-focused services Multi-disciplined team of planners,
RTC Mobility Plan Workshop North Central Texas Council of Governments July 9, 2015.
Dan Lamers, P.E. North Central Texas Council of Governments March 20, 2012.
The Southern Gateway IH 35E/US 67 Transportation Study November 18 & 21, 2002 The Southern Gateway IH 35E/US 67 Transportation Study Public Meetings.
Polk Transportation Planning Organization 2035 Mobility Vision Plan June 2010 Steering Committee - January 28, 2010 Polk Transportation Planning Organization.
Freight Bottleneck Study Update to the Intermodal, Freight, and Safety Subcommittee of the Regional Transportation Council September 12, 2002 North Central.
From Planning to Pouring: The Evolution of Safe Routes to School Julie Walcoff, Ohio DOT, Columbus, OH Alex Smith, Columbus Public Health, Columbus, OH.
Orange County Business Council Infrastructure Committee December 14, 2010 Draft Long-Range Transportation Plan Destination 2035.
MnDOT-ACEC Annual Conference March 5,  Capital planning and programming at MnDOT  Major considerations  A more transparent and collaborative.
Regional Transportation Investments: Alaskan Way Viaduct / Seawall Port of Seattle Commission Meeting March 28, 2006 Item No. xx Supp. Meeting.
TSM&O FLORIDA’S STATEWIDE IMPLEMENTATION Elizabeth Birriel, PEElizabeth Birriel, PE Florida Department of TransportationFlorida Department of TransportationTranspo2012.
BPAC. “Congestion management is the application of strategies to improve transportation system performance and reliability by reducing the adverse impacts.
KEY PROVISIONS OF THE DRIVE* ACT H.R. 22, as passed by the Senate on July 30, 2015 *Developing a Reliable and Innovative Vision for the Economy Thomas.
Green Transport Dr Lina Shbeeb Minister of Transport. Jordan.
Presentation to ***(group) on ***(date) 1.  Cities - 11  Highway districts – 3  Ada and Canyon Counties  School districts – 2  Valley Regional Transit.
Dallas County Area Transportation Projects Update Dallas County Commissioner John Wiley Price.
Missoula Long Range Transportation Plan 11 December 2008 Open House.
What Transport for Cambridge? The Sub-Region Development Strategy and Transport Policies.
North Central Texas Council of Governments Transportation Department Summary Presentation January 2004 MOBILITY 2025: THE METROPOLITAN.
May 14, Our transportation system will provide a safe and accessible range of options that enhances existing urban areas communities while providing.
OPEN HOUSE #4 JUNE AGENDA OPEN HOUSE 6:00 PM  Review materials  Ask questions  Provide feedback  Sign up for list  Fill out comment.
Dallas ICM Pioneer Site Stage 1 Lessons Learned Webinar July 24, 2008.
Transportation and Transit Committee 4 December 2002 Albion Road Corridor Study.
Ohio Department of Transportation Steering Committee Meeting #3 Steering Committee Meeting #1May 30, 2012 Steering Committee Meeting #1 WELCOME Steering.
On the Road to a New Metropolitan Transportation Plan Spokane Regional Health District Board of Health April 25, 2013.
MOBILITY 2030: THE METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN FOR THE DALLAS-FORT WORTH METROPOLITAN AREA North Central Texas Council of Governments Transportation.
Comprehensive Plan Update Kevin O’Neill Seattle Bicycle Advisory Board September 2, 2015.
Creating the 2040 Regional Transportation Plan. Today’s Presentation Now Developing the Next RTP  Very Early Stages of Development  Website: 2040Plan.org.
S.H. 121 – Dallas, Texas Case Study Presentation National Summit on Future Transportation Funding and Finance Strategies April 11, 2007 Michael Morris,
Transportation Investment Act of 2010 AASHTO/MTAP Conference December 6-9, 2010 Savannah, Georgia Steve Kish, Transit Program Manager Georgia Department.
RESOURCE ALLOCATION IN THE HOUSTON-GALVESTON AREA NATIONAL FORUM ON PERFORMANCE- BASED PLANNING AND PROGRAMMING.
Palm Beach MPO Draft Complete Streets Policy Palm Beach MPO Draft Complete Streets Policy Advisory Committees September
Regional Transportation Committee (RTC) 10-Year Project Milestone Policy Transportation and Trinity River Project Committee October 26, 2015.
What is a TSP? Provides City with guidance for operating and improving a multimodal transportation system Focuses on priority projects, policies, and programs.
2040 LONG RANGE PLAN UPDATE 2040 LRTP Update – Needs Plan Development October 6, 2015 City of Lynn Haven.
What is a TSP? Provides City with guidance for operating and improving a multimodal transportation system Focuses on priority projects, policies, and programs.
County of Fairfax, Virginia Fairfax County Comprehensive Transit Plan and Transit Development Plan Board Transportation Committee December 1, 2015 Randy.
Regional Transportation Council Mobility Plan Workshop North Central Texas Council of Governments November 12, 2015.
Regional Transportation Council Mobility Plan Workshop North Central Texas Council of Governments November 12, 2015.
1 Status Report on the Bus Systems in the National Capital Region Report of the Regional Bus Subcommittee to the National Capital Region Transportation.
Regional Mobility Plan I. Introduction This process for creating a regional mobility plan is designed for geographic areas with a small to medium sized.
Central States Air Resource Agencies Region Advance Program Organizations Conference Call Examples of Local SmartWay Initiatives Lori Clark April 23, 2015.
Planning Commission Study Session: Preferred Plan July 23, 2015.
Valley Metro Update Open House and Public Hearing March 9, 2007.
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE MEETING 2 – TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT 12/12/2013.
Next Steps.  To begin Planning Council discussion about the MPO’s Next Steps. Now that the 2035 Regional Transportation Plan has been updated and adopted,
DESTINATION 2030 Regional Local Personal Adopted May 24, 2001.
Planning Commission Ian Macek May 26, 2016 Freight Master Plan.
Southwest Parkway/Chisholm Trail Briefing to the Stakeholders Texas Department of Transportation North Texas Tollway Authority Regional Transportation.
Chelan County Transportation Element Update
City of New Braunfels Regional Transportation Planning Garry Ford, P.E., PTOE City Engineer June 13, 2017.
Regional Roads Committee
Draft Transportation Element September 6, 2017
San Mateo Countywide Transportation Plan update
TRANSPORTATION SUMMIT
Non-Single Occupancy Vehicle (Non-SOV) Travel Performance Measure and Regional Targets Daniel Snyder - NCTCOG.
Presentation transcript:

The Metropolitan Transportation Plan for North Central Texas Public Meetings January 2016

Presentation Agenda Mobility 2040 Draft Recommendations 2016 Transportation Conformity RTC Policy Bundle Concept Mobility 2040 Projects: TxDOT Congestion Relief Funding 2

Mobility 2040 Draft Recommendations 3

4 Represents a blueprint for the region’s multimodal transportation system Covers at least a 20-year timeframe Responds to Regional Transportation Council goals Identifies policies, programs, and projects for continued development Guides the expenditure of federal and state transportation funds What is the Metropolitan Transportation Plan?

Planning Horizon 2040 (24 years) Demographics Population by 2040: 10.7 million Employment by 2040: 6.7 million Financial Assumptions Legislative action and RTC direction 5 Planning Requirements Legislative action and/or pending official guidance on MAP-21 Policy Considerations Focus on balance and integrated system connectivity More transportation options and choice Recommendations Responsive to demographics, financial assumptions, planning requirements, and policy considerations What’s New for Mobility 2040?

Spring/Summer Survey (approximately 2,500 responses) Fall Survey (approximately 1,200 responses) 13 Formal Public Meetings 12 Community Outreach Events 15 Community, Industry, or Special Presentations 8 Surface Transportation Technical Committee Presentations 9 Regional Transportation Council Meeting Presentations 2 Regional Transportation Council Workshops 6 Mobility 2040 Public Involvement to Date

Conduct comprehensive corridor evaluations Reevaluate toll facility recommendations Review needed arterial improvements Reassess regional rail recommendations Update the Regional Veloweb Maintain and enhance existing infrastructure Consider the role of new technology 7 Mobility 2040 Guiding Principles

8 Mobility 2040 Prioritization and Expenditures Maximize Existing System Strategic Infrastructure Investment $37.4 $7.2 $3.6 $34.9 $43.4 Freeways/Tollways and Arterials Additional Vehicle Capacity HOV/Managed Lanes Increase Auto Occupancy Rail and Bus Induce Switch to Transit Growth, Development, and Land Use Strategies More Efficient Land Use & Transportation Balance Management and Operations Improve Efficiency & Remove Trips from System Traffic Signals and Bicycle & Pedestrian Improvements Infrastructure Maintenance Maintain & Operate Existing Facilities Bridge Replacements Mobility 2040 Expenditures $126.6 * *Actual dollars, in billions. Values may not sum due to independent rounding. DRAFT

Financial Considerations Reduces use of toll in proportion to new revenue made available from recent state legislative sessions Social Considerations Emphasizes transportation choice for a diverse and growing region Environmental Considerations Strengthens connection between environmental and transportation planning Operational Efficiency Continues programs aimed at reducing travel and creating an efficient transportation system 9 Mobility 2040 Summary

10 Mobility Options Supports on- and off-street bicycle and pedestrian facilities Recommends over 6,350 new lane miles on the region’s roadway network Calls for more than 380 miles of passenger rail by 2040 Introduces “high intensity bus” service to the region Accommodates high speed rail service to and within the region Recognizes the important roles freight and aviation play in our region’s economy Regional Performance Documents significant performance measures to track system performance over time Mobility 2040 Summary

11 DRAFT

12 DRAFT

Make improvements on US 67 to aid Southwest Center redevelopment Need for a 5-2Reversible-5 lane configuration north of US 67 Reconfigure and widen US 67 north of IH 20 to 3-1Reversible-3 Widen US 67 south of IH 20 to 3-3 No toll components Stage construct at $650 million Build pedestrian cap north of Dallas Zoo Importance of connectivity to Lowest Stemmons 13 Southern Gateway General Consensus (Near Term)

LBJ East General Consensus Build tolled managed lanes west of Royal/Miller Expedite committed noise wall construction (January 2016 RTC) Advance Skillman/Audelia construction (2016 ROW, 2017 construction) Need for a lane configuration The elevated managed lanes section should not be evaluated further The depressed section east of Royal/Miller Road should only be evaluated to save right-of-way (ROW) in small section Continue to investigate opportunities to reduce ROW impacts, particularly east of Royal/Miller The design will include continuous frontage roads and improved interchanges throughout the corridor Phase IH 30 interchange if Prop. 7 allocations are less than expected 14 Kelly Selman, P.E., TxDOT-Dallas and Michael Morris, P.E., NCTCOG – December 4, 2015

US 75 General Consensus Complete construction in Allen area Complete bottleneck improvement at PGBT/15 th Street and remove pylons to allow for general traffic to use the HOV lane as part of immediate construction project Phase 1 −Close current HOV lane and remove pylons to convert back to shoulder −Implement peak period shoulder use similar to SH 161 −Utilize shoulder for off-peak non-recurring congestion events managed through multi-agency task force including first responders Phase 2 Continue to review options for ultimate US 75 improvements 15 Kelly Selman, P.E., TxDOT-Dallas and Michael Morris, P.E., NCTCOG – December 4, 2015

16 DRAFT

17 DRAFT

18

DRAFT 19

High-Intensity Bus Service Premium bus service may include features such as: Travel time savings when operated in managed lanes Buses with commuter amenities Park-and-rides or other waiting areas with amenities Fare discounts if buses do not arrive on time 20 Image source: PrevostCar.com High-Intensity Bus ServiceWhere Lower-cost replacement for rail service Speedway Line and Chisholm Trail Parkway Precursor for rail serviceIn rail corridors, starting with US 75 Other opportunities In other high-demand corridors, including corridors with managed lanes or toll roads with excess capacity

21 Cotton Belt Corridor Proposed Recommendations Regional Rail line from DFW Airport to Plano with one-seat ride connectivity with TEX Rail Expedite project delivery to include in “Ten-Year Plan” If rail service cannot be expedited, review potential for High Intensity Bus service as an early implementation phase

Mar Apr May 2015 June 2015 July 2015 Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May 2016 June Public meetings held during highlighted months. Regional Transportation Council plan adoption scheduled for March Air Quality Conformity STTC & RTC Action Official Comment Period Draft Recommendations for Review Plan Development DRAFT Mobility 2040 Schedule

2016 Transportation Conformity 23

Purpose: Federal requirement in nonattainment areas to conduct air quality analysis on projects, programs, and policies identified in transportation plans, transportation improvement programs, federally funded projects, or projects required for federal approval Analysis Area: Ten-County Ozone Nonattainment Area Latest Planning Assumptions Motor Vehicle Emission Budgets * : −Nitrogen Oxides (NO X ) = tons/day −Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) = tons/day Analysis Years: 2017, 2027, 2037, and 2040 Preliminary Results for 2017: NO X : tons/day VOC: tons/day Results not including RTC initiatives 24 * Contained in the Dallas-Fort Worth Hour Ozone Reasonable Further Progress State Implementation Plan. Adequacy of the MVEBs for Transportation Conformity anticipated in coming months Transportation Conformity

RTC Policy Bundle Concept 25

RTC Policy Bundle Concept Summary Solutions beyond infrastructure improvements are needed to achieve regional transportation goals. Policies included in Mobility 2040 aim to encourage alternative solutions to reach these goals. The RTC Policy Bundle Concept: Works as a credit bank to help offset local funds on federal projects Participation is a Governmental Entity’s Decision − Voluntary − Decide Preference − 50 Percent Target 26

Policy Types Type 1: Joint Staff Coordination Meet with Major Employers to Promote Employer Trip Reduction Program Implement Strategies to Reduce Wrong-Way Driving Crashes Secure Transportation Infrastructure Integrate Traffic Operations Systems Develop Parking Management Strategies Coordinate Implementation of Safe Routes to School Improve Railroad Safety Share Best Practices to Prevent Copper Theft Type 2: Governing Body Approval Clean Fleet Support Traffic Incident Management Develop Sustainable Land Use Strategies to Support Urban, Rural and Suburban Communities Collaborate on ISD Growth Plans and City Plans Implement Complete Streets Policy Implement Urban Thoroughfare Revitalization Implement Sustainable Stormwater Practices Encourage Use of Lower- Emission Construction Equipment Allocate Local Funds to Support Public Transit Type 3: Ordinances Implement and Enforce Locally Enforced Motor Vehicle Idling Limitations Enhance Freight- Oriented Land-Use Sustainability Implement Operational Restrictions of Unmanned Aircraft Systems (UAS) Type 4: Elections Participate in Membership with a Transportation Authority 27

Mobility 2040 Projects: TxDOT Congestion Relief Funding 28

Background Expedite congestion relief projects Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT) to allocate $1.0 billion - $1.3 billion statewide Need early construction timeframes Only available in Houston, Austin, San Antonio, and Dallas-Fort Worth TxDOT Commission support anticipated on January 28, 2016

Funding Partnership Create a funding partnership with the TxDOT and Texas Transportation Commission (TTC) to implement priority projects in the West and East All projects move forward as a congestion relief package Provide performance measures along with proposed project list TxDOT commits funding (new Metro District Congestion Relief funding) RTC commits funding and creates supplemental project commitments –Surface Transportation Program – Metropolitan Mobility (STP-MM) –Congestion Mitigation Air Quality Improvement Program (CMAQ) –Regional Toll Revenue (RTR)

Proposed Funding Allocations Anticipated DFW Allocation at Upper and Lower End of Range ($ in Millions) TxDOT District At $1 Billion Statewide Allocation At $1.3 Billion Statewide Allocation Fort Worth Dallas Total Current discussions include a statewide allocation range of $1.0 billion – $1.3 billion

Proposed Projects – Eastern Subregion Project/LocationProposed Funding 1 IH 35E Southern Gateway (IH 35E and US 67) Lowest Stemmons (IH 35E) SUPPLEMENTAL PROJECTS: IH 635 East Noise Walls Skillman/Audelia US 75 (Peak Hour Shoulder Use) $625 million + $30 million for deck park $100 million $1,300 million $31 million $65 million $40 million 1 Includes additional funding sources beyond the Congestion Relief funding.

Proposed Projects – Western Subregion Project/LocationProposed Funding SH 121/SH 360 Interchange SH 199 IH 820 (from SH 121 to Randol Mill) $60.0 million $56.5 million $137.0 million

Contact Information 34 To find out more about Mobility 2040: questions or comments to: Kendall Wendling, AICP Senior Transportation Planner Chad McKeown, AICP Program Manager