Risk Management and Risk indicators working group 16th EPSO conference, Copenhagen, September 17th 2013.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

The EBI-II Benchmarking Project Approach, methods, outcomes Jeroen Huisman, University of Bath Benchmarking conference, London, July 2011.

Advertisements

European facility survey questionnaire (EFSQ) Treatment CUP.

Management Quality - Achieving Excellence in Allied Health Profession’s Services Management Quality Matrix Dr Robert Jones Head of Therapy Services Directorate.

Geographical investigation

Towards a new EPSO working group on the Risk Assessment topic Brussels –

Gibtson M. Pb nd year project management student.

A prospective euro area survey on household finances and consumption: Policy needs and preparatory work * Sébastien Pérez-Duarte – joint with Jirka Slacalek.

A NEW APPROACH TO ASSET THE VALUE OF “BUILDING CONTROL”…

TeamSTEPPS TM National Implementation Measurement The following slides are not part of the TeamSTEPPS Instructor Guide. Due to federal 508 compliance requirements.

Quality Improvement Prepeared By Dr: Manal Moussa.

5 Whys – Root Cause Analysis 1. 2 Client Satisfaction Surveys Web-based surveys- may reach a broader audience Targeted questions – allow you to focus.

Where it all starts - RESEARCH LXIV International Council Meeting Opatija, Croatia October 28 th - November 3 rd 2013.

Peer Evaluation of the Danish Health and Medicines Authority by the Peer Evaluation Team of the European Partnership for Supervisory Organisations.

“”Capacity and services to road users” Task descriptions Paul van der Kroon, Paris November 2005.

EPSO: Peer evaluation: EPSO: History(1),Scope(5), Aims & Functions(5) Activities(1),Topics(1). Peer evaluation: Peer evaluation(8), Norms(7), Follow up(1).

United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific Kitakyushu Initiative for a Clean Environment M. Aslam Khan Chief, Environment Section.

United Nations Statistics Division

QESTRAIN –project Personnel training model for integrated quality-environment-safety managements system in hospitals and public health services 1st Internal.

MAST: the organisational aspects Lise Kvistgaard Odense University Hospital Denmark Berlin, May 2010.

Art teachers in a comparative perspective Preliminary results from the Talis 2013 Database Dr. Henk Vinken Dr. Teunis IJdens

Incident Management Taking Task 05 Forward David Stones, Stockholm 12/

Framework for assessment of restraints and coercive methods in healthcare and social care Eve Pilt and Jooske Vos.

Item 8: Revised project plan: Encouraging Quality in ECEC Miho Taguma Education and Training Policy Division Directorate for Education, OECD 7-8 December.

Y OUNG C YPRIOT I NTERNET USERS : A QUANTITATIVE SURVEY IN THE CONTEXT OF EU K IDS O NLINE (Co-authors: Tatjana Taraszow & Yiannis Laouris) May 2008.

1 1 Results from the AHRQ Hospital Survey on Patient Safety Culture Joann Sorra, Ph.D. Westat AHRQ Annual Conference 2008: Promoting Quality…Partnering.

______________________________________________ Loïc Bordais Head of industrial liaison office Partnership management : Using decision support tools

European Supervisory Bodies and Patient Safety Presented by Sandra Eismann (CQC)

Studying Quality and Safety in European Hospitals - QUASER 9 th June, 2010 Prof Naomi Fulop Dr. Janet Anderson NIHR King’s Patient Safety and Service Quality.

The Tri-Hospital Health Equity Data Collection Project Centre for Addiction and Mental Health Mount Sinai Hospital St. Michael’s Hospital Toronto Public.

The Health Metrics Network Assessment Tool. HMN Assessment Process & Tool Why use the HMN assessment tool? A step towards a comprehensive HIS vision;

Performance Data: From Both Sides Now Gail R. Bellamy, Ph.D. AHRQ 2007 Annual Conference “Improving Health Care, Improving Lives.

BEST 2011 Benchmarking in European Service of public Transport EMTA & BEST – towards a more complete and interactive benchmarking database Birmingham,

Gudrun Nachtschatt & Peter Oberbichler Indicators – general remarks How to calculate the indicators for the benchmarking procedure Vienna

TAIEX-REGIO PEER 2 PEER: A new tool bringing together cohesion policy experts EVALUATION NETWORK MEETING 18 June 2015 DG Regional and Urban Policy Unit.

Prepared by the (Institute of Industrial Engineers – Industry Advisory Board)

EPSO Conference, Brussels 18 – 19 April 2013 User Participation by Regulators Theresa Nixon Director Mental Health & Learning Disability and Social Work,

Knowledge Platform for Assessing the Costs and Benefits of Flood Prevention Measures (FLOOD CBA) FLOOD CBA Task B: Building the Stakeholders’ Capacity.

National/Regional Recommendations on Expanding Opportunities.

European Conference on Quality in Official Statistics Session 26: Quality Issues in Census « Rome, 10 July 2008 « Quality Assurance and Control Programme.

Bilateral cooperation between Italy and Turkey FRAMEWORK FOR A MONITORING SYSTEM OF PUBLIC INVESTMENTS.

Workshop 4 Monitoring by Statistical Indicators Goal setting & formulation of operational objectives as a key challenge of monitoring systems Case 1: The.

Britt Wendelboe Danish Society for Patient Safety Work Package 4 BMJ - Paris April 10, 2014.

Jenny Linnerud, 27/10/2011, Cologne1 ESSnet CORE Common Reference Environment ESSnet workshop in Cologne 27th and 28th of October 2011.

NAME Evaluation Report Name of author(s) Name of institution Year.

Are clinical leaders and staff prepared for accreditation? Survey on knowledge, expectations and areas for improvement in the County of Copenhagen Gut.

Frankfurt (Germany), 6-9 June 2011 SmartLife Guillaume & SmartLife Core Group – France – S1 – Paper SmartLife initiative in Focus.

Q Rome Italy, July Towards Producing and Using Response Burden Data for Establishment Surveys at Statistics Sweden Johan Erikson, Dan Hedlin,

Health Quality Ontario: Health System Performance New Zealand Master Class March 25, 2014.

4th Quality Conference (4QC) Impact Assessment Study Rui Sousa, PhD Catholic University of Portugal Lisbon, 16 July 2007.

Copyright 2010 Delmar, a part of Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. H O S P I T A L I T Y & T R A V E L M A R K E T I N G & T R A V E L M A R K E T.

Peer Evaluation of the Norwegian Board of Health Supervision (Statens helsetilsyn) First of its kind. Performed by EPSO Peer Evaluation Team Norway (July.

Copyright  2003 McGraw-Hill Australia Pty Ltd PPT t/a Communication for Business by Access Series Slides prepared by TAFE NSW—Access Division 10–1 This.

Marketing Research Process

Chapter 14: Affective Assessment

VERTROUWELIJK EPSO working group on Restraints and Coercive Methods in health care M.E.W.(Thijs) Melchior, RN, PhD coordinating/specialized senior inspector.

E-Health Working Group: Questionnaire Helsinki, 30 September, 2015 E-Health Working Group: Preparing for the Kosovo conference Questionnaire Helsinki,

EUROPEAN ACTUARIAL CONSULTATIVE GROUP INVESTMENT AND FINANCIAL RISK COMMITTEE YIELD CURVE SURVEY: FIRST RESULTS Paolo De Angelis BRUXELLES, 9 th APRIL.

VAWA Forensic Compliance Project Forensic Evidence Collection: Policies and Systems Survey Results.

SERSCIDA WP2 and WP3 Marijana Glavica SEEDS kick-off meeting, 4th May 2015.

ICE Collaboration with EU Anne Mette T. Johansen & Birthe Frimodt-Møller Denmark International Collaborative Effort on Injury Statistics May.

Reading Discussion – s519 by Peter Hall – 1/21/09 Ryan, J., McClure, C. R., & Bertot, J. C. (2001). Choosing measures to evaluate networked information.

EUNetPaS European Union Network for Patient Safety

Stephen Fennell The Role of the Regulatory Body

REPORTING SDG INDICATORS USING NATIONAL REPORTING PLATFORMS

The New EPSO Management Board Estonia, July 2017

BenchCan Core Group Meeting

Minimal Information Model for Patient Safety on Incident Reporting and Learning by WHO and experts from various countries Introduction of this.

How is qualitative research different from quantitative research?

EPSO Risk profile working group

The mandate to develop crime statistics

Presentation transcript:

Risk Management and Risk indicators working group 16th EPSO conference, Copenhagen, September 17th 2013

Pilot survey (may-june 2013) A pilot survey designed with Jooske Vos, tested with 7 member states : - understanding of items, - description of practices, - allowing benchmarking

10 items

With participation of EPSO members from: Denmark Sweden Netherlands England Portugal Turkey France  7 answers

First results 1. Risk is used as a topic to find out : –Where to inspect (5/7) –What to inspect (7/7) –How to inspect (3/7) 2. What kind of risks –Safety risks for patient (7/7) –Quality risks for medical procedures (4/7) –Financial risks (2/7) –Other risks (4/7) : –organisationnal (absenteism,…) –Patient rights –Social services –Human ressources

First results 3. Risks are used as an indicator: –Before selection of inspection locations (6/7) –After having gathered informations about hospital / institution (4/7) –In analyses of findings (5/7) 4. What type of data : –External source (7/7) –Internal source (5/7) –Public data (6/7) –Inspection data (5/7) –Hard data (e.g. financial figures) (4/7) –Quality figures (indicators) (6/7) –Soft data (interview, …) (2/7) –Feeling (3/7)

First results 5. methods : –Formal method (3/7) –Informal method (4/7) –Statistic (3/7) –Multicriterion analysis (2/7) –Other (1/7) 6. specific tools ? : –Yes (4/7)  webbased survey, decision cloud, dashboard system, combination of information sources –No (3/7) 7.Implementation of method or tool aim at : - improve the capacity to detect risks (5/7) - improve the preparation inspection by focusing on risky areas (6/7) - just a supplementary tool (2/7)

Next steps 1.Refinement of the questionnaire –Addition of an item to inventory the key data 2.Survey among all the EPSO network  Expecting results for Porto meeting in may Bibliography collection and analysis 4.Toward a common definition of risk 5.Analysis of tools and methods 6.Exchange mechanisms